cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -
Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I.
-I../../.. -I../.
./../dev -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/ipfilter
-I../../../../include
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 11:02:26AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
As a datapoint, this does work when starting from a 4.5-RELEASE
I just did a build yesterday on the AS500
Wilko
Anyone have any ideas? I'm trying to build the latest -current
(from cvs) on an alpha running
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 08:50:19PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hello,
After this commit 'device ether' is mandatory if ever there is no any
ethernet or token-ring devices.
The same problem in STABLE...
from revision 1.85.2.15 of net/if.c:
#ifdef INET
/*
*
Do you have a suggestion for an #ifdef /#endif to
remove the problem you mention ?
cheers
luigi
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 08:50:19PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
Hello,
After this commit 'device ether' is mandatory if ever there is no any
ethernet or token-ring devices.
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied.
: If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not useful (by being removed from the
: DP), it sounds like we
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe
rt Watson writes:
With new userland code coming into -CURRENT at a rapid rate, it may be
useful in -CURRENT for developers. For DPs, probably not.
I don't have to tell you what the 'D' in 'DP' means, right ? :-)
Robert, I can only say that I disagree 100%
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 11:28:27AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Not clear from your suggestion if you mean the branch or the dp's. My
feeling is that a useful strategy is:
- -CURRENT has AJ from inception of branch until final DP before release.
- DP's don't have AJ
The DP's should have
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 11:02:26AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Anyone have any ideas? I'm trying to build the latest -current
(from cvs) on an alpha running 4.3-RELEASE, using 'make buildworld'.
I have thought about what could be the problem several times and cannot
come up with
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe
rt Watson writes:
With new userland code coming into -CURRENT at a rapid rate, it may be
useful in -CURRENT for developers. For DPs, probably not.
I don't have to tell you what the 'D' in 'DP' means,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe
rt Watson writes:
A few weeks ago, I would have believed you. Except that using -J was a
workaround recommended in a recent security advisory--prior to
recommending it, I ran it on a server of mine for a few days. You'd be
surprised how many random
David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I also mention the DP's GENERIC kernel has no INVARIANTS and no
WITNESS? I have not gotten a response back from the RE's about that one
yet. This is also wrong. INVARIANTS is low-impact. I can kind of
accept WITNESS -- maybe we should turn it
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe
rt Watson writes:
A few weeks ago, I would have believed you. Except that using -J was a
workaround recommended in a recent security advisory--prior to
recommending it, I ran it on a server of mine for a
:On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 11:02:26AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Anyone have any ideas? I'm trying to build the latest -current
: (from cvs) on an alpha running 4.3-RELEASE, using 'make buildworld'.
:
:I have thought about what could be the problem several times and cannot
:come up
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:34:08PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Hmm. The argument for A is, I think, is a lot stronger than for J, since
it comes without the performance impact, and you can actually generate
useful diagnostics. I would be fine with leaving A in the developer
snapshot.
Lets
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:34:08PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Hmm. The argument for A is, I think, is a lot stronger than for J, since
it comes without the performance impact, and you can actually generate
useful diagnostics. I would be fine
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robe
rt Watson writes:
Something that phk and I have discussed out-of-band is the idea of keying
phkmalloc behavior to kernel selection. I.e., exposing a policy sysctl
from the kernel, keyed to the kernel identity/option, causing phkmalloc to
behave different
I belive GEOM will now correctly identify the following label formats
on all platforms:
MSDOS MBR
MSDOS MBR extended partitions
FreeBSD/i386 disklabel
FreeBSD/alpha disklabel
Solaris/disklabel
This in practice means that one can move a disk from one
This seems like a reasonable strategy. If we do this, we'll need to
expand the discussion of performance tuning and usability in the release
notes for the DP. We'll also need to formalize the notion of DP3: right
now we have only DP1 and DP2 formally scheduled, and DP2 is expected to
have some
Hi,
Attached are patches that makes scanning work with sane, using an Agfa
Snapscan 1212U USB scanner for me. They are merely reworked from PRs
32652 and 32653 by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NB: Only tested in 4.5-stable, not in -current (sorry). Patches should
apply cleanly in -stable.
It would be nice
David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 12:34:08PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Hmm. The argument for A is, I think, is a lot stronger than for J, since
it comes without the performance impact, and you can actually generate
useful diagnostics. I would be fine with leaving A in the
The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight:
Mar 24 07:31:44 user.crit gohan17 kernel: lock order reversal
Mar 24 07:31:44 user.crit gohan17 kernel:
On Sunday 24 March 2002 05:26 pm, you wrote:
The bento cluster is now running with WITNESS enabled to try and track
down some odd UMA lock corruption panics. Instead, it found the
following lock order reversal in sys_pipe.c overnight:
Mar 24 07:31:44 user.crit gohan17 kernel: lock order
...for example, the w3m port. As part of the configure script, it
executes the following shell command:
expr --prefix=/usr/local : -*prefix=\(.*\)
expr: syntax error
Is expr to blame, or w3m?
Kris
msg36527/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:59:36 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
expr --prefix=/usr/local : -*prefix=\(.*\)
expr: syntax error
Is expr to blame, or w3m?
w3m is to blame. See expr(1) for more details and a workaround which
is portable to both historic and POSIX expr
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 08:05:26PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 16:59:36 -0800, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
expr --prefix=/usr/local : -*prefix=\(.*\)
expr: syntax error
Is expr to blame, or w3m?
w3m is to blame. See expr(1) for more details and a
The changes to the definitions of stdout/stdin/stderr from a while
back caused a number of ports to break (somewhere around 84, according
to bento). For example, the cap port fails like this:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/cap-6.0.198.log
cc -DBYTESWAPPED -DPHASE2 -O
..include the following:
bftpd-1.0.22.log
pam-pgsql-0.5.2_2.log
pam_ldap-1.4.0.log
pam_mysql-0.4.7.log
pam_ssh-1.5.log
samba-3.0a15.log
vlock-1.3.log
Logs available on bento:
http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/
Kris
msg36531/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: The changes to the definitions of stdout/stdin/stderr from a while
: back caused a number of ports to break (somewhere around 84, according
: to bento). For example, the cap port fails like this:
:
:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 06:43:13PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: David O'Brien committed a workaround to the clog port yesterday to
: move the initializer to main() instead of trying to do it statically.
:
: Is this something which is supposed to work?
No. This isn't something that is
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 01:59:56PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
The goal of DP's is to increase exposure of the development branch in some
key audiences, including the developer community, and community of early
adopters. Part of the discussion that lead up to deciding to follow
through on
Hi, everybody...
Because I have to test 100Mbps network performance w/ notebook pc,
I've installed FreeBSD 5.0 Current (3/22). But, there's some curious things.
I have
- Xircom RealPort CardBus Ethernet 10/100+Modem 56 (RBEM56G-100) w/ 'dc'
driver
- 3Com Megahertz 10/100 LAN CardBus
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 09:38:42AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 11:02:26AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: Anyone have any ideas? I'm trying to build the latest -current
: (from cvs) on an alpha running 4.3-RELEASE, using 'make buildworld'.
I just verified one
I believe the recent changes to the bktr(4) module Makefile broke it,
=== bktr
=== bktr/bktr
make: don't know how to make smbus.h. Stop
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/bktr.
*** Error code 1
.
.
.
A fresh checkout on freefall still seems to have this problem.
--
Crist J. Clark
33 matches
Mail list logo
