Re: upgrade from 4.5 to current fails

2002-04-28 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 01:29:49PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: On 24-Apr-2002 Christian Flügel wrote: [snip] make buildworld: works ok. make buildkernel: works ok. copy GENERIC.hints to /boot/device.hints: works ok. make installkernel: stops with error: kldxref not found This is a

Re: upgrade from 4.5 to current fails

2002-04-28 Thread Makoto Matsushita
cjc However, I have (and think I posted somewhere?) some kludgey cjc patches that build kldxref(8) as a cross-tool so that it works cjc for 4.5 to 5.0 upgrades. But it's not really the right fix cjc (since it is not a true cross-tool), so I haven't committed it. Can we add kldxref(8) to

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Lamont Granquist wrote: I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime is showing 8909 days. Motherboard is an ASUS A7M266D with the (possibly buggy) 1004 BIOS. I'm really surprised... I didn't realize ASUS made PDP-11 compatibles. 1977... I also didn't realize

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:45:49PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote: I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime is showing 8909 days. Motherboard is an ASUS A7M266D with the (possibly buggy) 1004 BIOS. I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by out of sync kernel and world. I haven't yet been able to test this hypothesis. Just wondering, could this be because of the recent changes made to the time code by phk? (uh oh, hiten.. you are

Re: Locking down a socket, milestone 1

2002-04-28 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:08:56 +0900, Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Seigo I am now working on locking down a socket. (I have heard that Jeffrey Seigo Hsu is also doing that, but I have never seen his patch. Has anyone Seigo seen that?) My first milestone patch is now available at:

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-04-28 Thread Hiten Pandya
%%% : iedowse 2002/04/28 03:24:38 PDT : : Modified files: :usr.sbin/pstat pstat.8 pstat.c : Log: : Oops, remove references to NLOCKED and NWANTED, now that they no : longer exist. %%% I beleive this unbreaks pstat. :-) -- Hiten

Re: Locking down a socket, milestone 1

2002-04-28 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Seigo Tanimura wrote: On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 20:08:56 +0900, Seigo Tanimura [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Seigo I am now working on locking down a socket. (I have heard that Jeffrey Seigo Hsu is also doing that, but I have never seen his patch. Has anyone Seigo seen that?)

subscribe

2002-04-28 Thread Gerald Knight

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:45:49PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote: I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime is showing 8909 days. Motherboard is an ASUS A7M266D with the (possibly buggy) 1004 BIOS. I'm

Page fault in swp_pager_meta_build()

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
(Matt gets CC'd because he's just unlucky :-) This system is (as always) a pxeboot'd nfsroot'd dual processor box. This time, however, it's running straight GENERIC from the main tree instead of the MAC branch. The box network boots, does a buildkernel -j 8, and then reboots. It currently

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Ole Guldberg Jensen
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:31:32AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:45:49PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote: I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime is showing 8909 days. Motherboard

page fault in _mtx_lock_flags

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
As usual, GENERIC -CURRENT head from last night, from the main tree. Dual-proc SMP box netbooted using PXE. System usually boots, does a buildkernel -j 8 over NFS, then reboots and repeats. This time it didn't. I actually have two boxes doing this, which does seem to double the rate of

vm_map_lookup_entry: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
It could be this was fixed by Alan's commit last night to fix locking in VM. In any case, here's the panic anyway. This is from box2, again, -current from last night, nfs root via pxeboot, GENERIC, spinning {boot, buildkernel}. I'll update the two boxes when I get back from the hospital later

strange file

2002-04-28 Thread Richard Arends
Hello, Yesterday installed current from a snapshot and instantly updated it via CVS. Today i noticed a strange file in /usr with the name @LongLink. # cat /usr/@LongLink ports/java/jdk13/files/patch-..::src::solaris::native::com::sun::media::sound::engine::HAE_API_BSDOS_Capture.c I containes a

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Robert Watson wrote: Heh. I'm seeing this during the uptime announcement from the kernel after kernel shutdown, which means userland isn't involved: Uptime: 8909d8h59m52s Given that the uptime of the box was well less than a minute, that seems a little extreme. This

Re: Page fault in swp_pager_meta_build()

2002-04-28 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No idea, but the last time someone had a weird swap issue it turned out that they had swapon'd the same swap partition twice. The system's checks are not sufficient if you swapon the same device from different mounts. So check that

truss

2002-04-28 Thread Richard Arends
Hello, On a fresh current i get this # truss /bin/echo hello truss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory Greetings, Richard. An OS is like swiss cheese, the bigger it is, the more holes you get! To

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Harti Brandt
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Richard Arends wrote: RAHello, RA RAOn a fresh current i get this RA RA# truss /bin/echo hello RAtruss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory RAtruss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory You need to mount procfs. harti RA

Re: Page fault in swp_pager_meta_build()

2002-04-28 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: Talking about doing something twice, it reminds me, that there is the same type of issue with the md devices, which when they are destroyed twice or thrice, they panic the kernel. Re.v.108 of kern_conf.c fixes similar bugs. Bruce To Unsubscribe:

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 28-Apr-2002 (17:56:47/GMT) Harti Brandt wrote: RAOn a fresh current i get this RA# truss /bin/echo hello RAtruss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory RAtruss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory You need to mount procfs. Mee too message. I

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Doug Barton
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote: I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime is showing 8909 days. cvsup again, this problem should be fixed now. -- We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great

Re: ipfilter not broken for me

2002-04-28 Thread Doug Barton
On Sat, 27 Apr 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: That was probably a local problem on one of the Brian's fast machines where I initially attempted to finally test my patch (unsynched cvsup update?). Sorry for the false alarm, I can't check it right now anyway. You probably caught things

Bochs panic on current

2002-04-28 Thread Riccardo Torrini
I asked for same problem some time ago to this list and to ports without answer, anyone out there running bochs on current? I have installed bochs from ports but I was unable to start any sample image from support site, all fails with same error: Event type: PANIC Device: [APIC0] Message:

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:05:47AM -0700, Hiten Pandya wrote: --- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by out of sync kernel and world. I haven't yet been able to test this hypothesis. Just wondering, could this be because of the

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Richard Arends
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Harti Brandt wrote: You need to mount procfs. Oops youre right... Why isn't it listed in /etc/fstab??? Greetings, Richard. An OS is like swiss cheese, the bigger it is, the more holes you get! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:46:27PM +0200, Richard Arends wrote: Hello, On a fresh current i get this # truss /bin/echo hello truss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory truss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No such file or directory procfs is not mounted by

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:11:58PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote: On 28-Apr-2002 (17:56:47/GMT) Harti Brandt wrote: RAOn a fresh current i get this RA# truss /bin/echo hello RAtruss: cannot open /proc/13245/mem: No such file or directory RAtruss: cannot open /proc/curproc/mem: No

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Richard Arends
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: procfs is not mounted by default. New to current (one day old baby :-), so didn't know that. sorry() Why isn't it mounted by default?? Greetings, Richard. An OS is like swiss cheese, the bigger it is, the more holes you get! To Unsubscribe:

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Richard Arends wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: procfs is not mounted by default. New to current (one day old baby :-), so didn't know that. sorry() Why isn't it mounted by default?? I believe DES has a largely rewritten version of truss that

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-04-28 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 08:49:55PM +0200, Richard Arends wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: procfs is not mounted by default. New to current (one day old baby :-), so didn't know that. sorry() Why isn't it mounted by default?? Numerous and horrendous security

Re: Page fault in swp_pager_meta_build()

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote: :(Matt gets CC'd because he's just unlucky :-) : :This system is (as always) a pxeboot'd nfsroot'd dual processor box. This :time, however, it's running straight GENERIC from the main tree instead of :the MAC branch. The box network boots, does

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Richard Arends
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Robert Watson wrote: The rationale for disabling procfs is that its functionality is largely redundant to existing sysctls and debugging mechanisms, and that it has been, and will likely continue to be, an important source of system security holes. Okay disable it :-)

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Richard Arends wrote: I think truss is one of the last stragglers that relies on it -- the other is 'ps -e', which gropes through the memory of each process to dig out the environmental variables. This requires that ps both have substantial privilege, and that

[no subject]

2002-04-28 Thread Radoslav Vasilev
unsuscribe freebsd-current

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Richard Arends
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Robert Watson wrote: BTW, 5.0 will also allow (once we commit the MAC framework from the TrustedBSD Project) kernel modules to tweak process visibility protections in the kernel at runtime. For example, you can kldload a mac_seeotheruids.ko policy module, which can

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Richard Arends wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Robert Watson wrote: BTW, 5.0 will also allow (once we commit the MAC framework from the TrustedBSD Project) kernel modules to tweak process visibility protections in the kernel at runtime. For example, you can kldload a

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:59:44PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: [snip] In FreeBSD 5.0, all this information is exported from the kernel using the sysctl() interface, which provides much more information gating, and flexibe policy controls. This exists in part in 4.x, but not completely. In

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 03:45:49PM -0700, Lamont Granquist wrote: I just did a cvsup today to -current on a GENERIC+SMP kernel and my uptime is showing 8909 days. Motherboard is an ASUS A7M266D with the (possibly buggy) 1004 BIOS. I'm

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote: On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:59:44PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: [snip] In FreeBSD 5.0, all this information is exported from the kernel using the sysctl() interface, which provides much more information gating, and flexibe policy controls.

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Hiten Pandya
--- Lamont Granquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by out of sync kernel and world. I haven't yet been able to test this hypothesis. I don't think so, I did: [...] Just cvsup again and rebuild your kernel, and that will fix the problem.

Re: Uptime of 8909 days on 5-CURRENT

2002-04-28 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: --- Lamont Granquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing this too, but I expect it's probably caused by out of sync kernel and world. I haven't yet been able to test this hypothesis. I don't think so, I did: [...] Just cvsup again and

can't make release - don't know how to make maninstall inusr.bin/strip

2002-04-28 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
# make release CHROOTDIR=/disk2/r BUILDNAME=jmb-citrus-snap-20020428 CVSROOT=/home/ncvs . . . snip . . . === usr.bin/size install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 size /disk2/r/usr/libexec/aout === usr.bin/smbutil install -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 smbutil /disk2/r/usr/bin === usr.bin/strings

Using laptop with lid closed

2002-04-28 Thread Krzysztof Parzyszek
Is there any way to prevent the system from reacting to the lid being closed? At this time when I close the lid I get the following messages: ed1: detached pccard: card disabled, slot 0 Then after re-opening, I have to press the power button for the system to wake up. I'm using Thinkpad A22m.

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 05:11:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote: On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 03:59:44PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: [snip] In FreeBSD 5.0, all this information is exported from the kernel using the sysctl() interface, which

Re: page fault in _mtx_lock_flags

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
I also get an almost identical fault on crash1 involving mdconfig as opposed to sh: ray irq 10 NFS ROOT: 192.168.50.1:/cboss/devel/nfsroot/crash1.cboss.tislabs.com 8.50.10 BroadcasP-Address 192.16 t 192.168.50.255 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100

Re: Page fault in swp_pager_meta_build()

2002-04-28 Thread Matthew Dillon
:It currently has no swap started at all, which is one reason I was rather :puzzled to see this panic: : :192.168.50.1:/cboss/devel/nfsroot/crash2.cboss.tislabs.com / nfs ro 0 : 0 :proc/proc procfs rw 0 0 :/dev/ad0s1e /mntufs rw 0

Re: truss

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote: Hmm. I'd forgotten that the setgid kmem was removed in 4.x; I was probably thinking of top, which still is setgid in -STABLE. You'll find however, that -e won't work without setgid kmem being turned on. '-e' for ps(1) seems to work fine on

elf_freebsd_fixup: panic freeing imgp-auxargs

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
The usual setup: dual process -CURRENT box (crash2) from an hour or two ago, network booted using pxeboot, with an NFS root. System boots, builds a kernel, and reboots, repeating until panic. Doesn't take long :-). This one is weird, as with many of them I suppose, and could mean possible

Re: page fault in _mtx_lock_flags

2002-04-28 Thread Robert Watson
If I apply the attached diff to the kern_malloc.c, backing out a portion of kern_malloc.c:1.99, the rate of panics plummets. Previously, I could have a box panic within five minutes of getting the crash boxes spinning. Now I've been going for about 40 minutes without any perceived failures

building -current on -stable broken?

2002-04-28 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
I'm trying to build -current from today (4/28/2002) on a -stable box with a kernel/world from April 25th. It blows up in xlint: == cc -O -pipe -I. -I/c/ken/perforce/FreeBSD-ken/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1