On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:41:44AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
Hi Ruslan,
During make release I see a lot of these messages:
#
make: no target to make.
/usr/src/Makefile.inc1, line 140: warning: make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar
e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE returned non-zero
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrey A. Chernov writes:
I found at least one case:
Try this patch:
Index: malloc.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -r1.70 malloc.c
---
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 07:41:44AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
Hi Ruslan,
During make release I see a lot of these messages:
#
make: no target to make.
/usr/src/Makefile.inc1, line 140: warning: make -f /dev/null -m /usr/src/shar
e/mk CPUTYPE=i386 -V CPUTYPE returned
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:11:02 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrey A. Chernov writes:
I found at least one case:
Try this patch:
I doubt about choosed EPERM code. According to intro(2) it refers to some
priviledges required for operation, but recursive
Building of x11-fonts/webfonts gives this message:
/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 2580: warning: duplicate script for
target patch-message ignored
Which breaks portupgrade
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazachek
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
I've switched one of my desktops to using kdm and I've noticed that
w(1) creates suprious warnings because it can't find the tty entry.
$ w
w: /dev/:0: No such file or directory
w: /dev/:0: No such file or directory
2:41AM up 49 mins, 0 users, load averages: 0.05, 0.04, 0.04
USER
Hi,
I think MSDOS installs are pretty rare and NFS ones even rarer (FTP is
easier to setup)
Survey time! :)
I use NFS installs a lot, both with floppies and with pxeboot'd sysinstall.
I've never had much luck with FTP installs from a remote server.
--
Bob Bishop +44
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:13:55AM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
Because chances are good that the bugs still aren't fixed. I reported a
bug related to optimization with -march=athlon recently and the reply
If you've got a newer Athlon (XP) then you could compile it with -march=athlon-xp.
I've
In the last episode (Aug 08), David O'Brien said:
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 08:01:10PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our
printf() in libc. I haven't find any assembler code in
/usr/src/lib/libc/stdio/vfprintf.c,
...
If someone
On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 12:58:03AM -0400, Alp ATICI wrote:
I guess that is never going to be the case. Since ATI does not produce
drivers for linux (or any other UNIX) and has no such plans (AFAIK).
I don't know why you think that. I sent a week in Germany with ATI's
FireGL Linux driver
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
David O'Brien wrote:
If someone could find the small segment of code where the optimizer
screws up, and write a small program to demonstrate the problem, we
would have a good chance of it getting fixed.
Er, someone (Dan Lukes) has already done this. See PR 40209.
It looks like this PR is
David O'Brien wrote:
I've got suggests that it's still present in all branches. I get the
impression that not too many people really use gcc3 with heavy
optimization on big stuff like XFree86 yet ... Of course, updating the
XFree86 works like a charm built with -march=athlon-xp .
I do
-current build error:
mkdep -f .depend -a /usr/src/sbin/quotacheck/quotacheck.c
/usr/src/sbin/quotacheck/preen.c
/usr/src/sbin/quotacheck/../fsck_ffs/utilities.c
/usr/src/sbin/quotacheck/preen.c:54:18: fsck.h: No such file or directory
mkdep: compile failed
*** Error code 1
Beech
--
=== sbin/quotacheck
/local0/scratch/des/src/sbin/quotacheck/preen.c:54:18: fsck.h: No such file or
directory
Already fixed.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never
Hackers,
Can anyone shed some light on the following problem:
OS: FreeBSD-current DP1 (dmesg attached)
Laptop: Toshiba Tecra 8100 (docked)
Hardware: 3Com Bluetooth USB dongle, 3Com Bluetooth PC-CARD
Xircom CBT PC-CARD (with 16550A UART)
First of all, irq 11 gets shared between
system compiler would make bug reports from -CURRENT users even more useful.
Indeed. IMHO going to 3.2 is the best we could do.
IMO going to 3.3 would be much better -- we can actually get our needs
better addressed as the compiler is still in development, but about to
head into code
You might want to try the attached code-snippet I grabbed from the gcc
GNATS. It manages to ICE 3.1 and 3.2 with a lot of optimizations,
including pentium2/3/4 and athlon-* and is believed to trigger the same
bug that borks XFree86 here.
XFree works fine (for me) with -O -march=athlon-xp
500 - 700 interrupts a second is a lot, depending on how long you stay in the
interrupt handler before returning.
1 cent of info
Johan
-Original Message-
From: ext Maksim Yevmenkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Brooks Davis wrote:
I recently updated my laptop's kernel to an August 5th version from an
July 23rd one and mozilla started getting connection refused from
everything. Lynx worked fine as did other network services like cvsup
and ssh. Upgrading mozilla from 1.0_rc? to the latest version
Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
I recently updated my laptop's kernel to an August 5th version from an
July 23rd one and mozilla started getting connection refused from
everything. Lynx worked fine as did other network services like cvsup
and ssh. Upgrading mozilla from
I have a machine I've been trying to get
freebsd-current installed. Everytime I run the
installation, it warns me that the freebsd slice does
not start on cylinder (sorry, I don't remeber the
exact wording) boundary. How can I create the slice
that starts with cylinder boundary? I have a 20M
[replying to an old message]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Leidi
nger writes:
On 7 Mai, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
| DUMP: slave couldn't reopen disk: Interrupted system call
Try the attached patch. I also have a similar patch for restore. I don't
like the patch, I think I should
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
IMO going to 3.3 would be much better -- we can actually get our needs
better addressed as the compiler is still in development, but about to
head into code slush. We cannot affect GCC 3.2.1 too much due to it
being on a release
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary==_NextPart_000_00B1_52B18C7B.A2703E37
25 matches
Mail list logo
