Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:49:14AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: I have a host controller with the same chipset. I was having frequent data corruption problems, so I asked about it on current@ a few days ago. so@ offered a patch (which has now been comitted), but it didn't help. Bottom

Re: MAJOR number

2003-11-30 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Sorry for the late reply. Roman Kurakin wrote this message on Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 21:09 +0300: I need a new MAJOR number for our new device. How can I get it? Are you sure you need one? Are you doing a -stable release of the driver? or just a -current? You only need a major number if you

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Derek Ragona
I have a server that uses the same chipset with a maxtor drive, no RAID just a single drive. My hardware exact hardware is: Adaptec SATA 1210SA (SiI 3112 SATA150 controller in non RAID mode with a single drive) and a Maxtor 6Y120M0 120 GB drive It is probed correctly with the ISO mini 5.2

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:07:30AM -0600, Derek Ragona wrote: I have a server that uses the same chipset with a maxtor drive, no RAID just a single drive. My hardware exact hardware is: Adaptec SATA 1210SA (SiI 3112 SATA150 controller in non RAID mode with a single drive) and a Maxtor

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 02:00, Will Andrews wrote: On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 01:49:14AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: I have a host controller with the same chipset. I was having frequent data corruption problems, so I asked about it on current@ a few days ago. so@ offered a patch (which

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 02:07, Derek Ragona wrote: I have a server that uses the same chipset with a maxtor drive, no RAID just a single drive. My hardware exact hardware is: Adaptec SATA 1210SA (SiI 3112 SATA150 controller in non RAID mode with a single drive) and a Maxtor 6Y120M0 120 GB

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Will Andrews
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 02:11:59AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: Well, you're not using the same card or drive that I am, but thanks for your feedback. I am fully aware that there are many people who have (semi-)working SATA configs in recent -CURRENT. :) I should say, mine is completely

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:41:33AM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing startup scripts to

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Will Andrews wrote: Yeah, that's what I figured. When I looked at the change, the fix only appears to affect rev 0x00, but my SiI3112A is 0x02. :( The errata should be fixed in rev 2 silicon. Well, I can tell you that people aren't gonna be happy when their brand new motherboard

Re: Western Digital WD360GD SATA disk on -CURRENT

2003-11-30 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: I agree. I really needed to be up and running ASAP, so I opted for the new controller. Søren, if you're listening, and need an SiI controller for testing, you're free to have mine. Else, I can keep it and test it as needed (I can put a test drive on it). I

Re: panic on 5.2 BETA: blockable sleep lock

2003-11-30 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote: On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote: The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can cause a context switch if the mutex is already locked by another thread. This is contrary to

amd64/SMP(/ata-raid ?) not happy...

2003-11-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xff00eebfaca0 ad0: 35772MB IBM-DPTA-353750 [72680/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xff00eebfa4a0 ad4: 35304MB WDC WD360GD-00FNA0 [71730/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA133 GEOM: create disk ad6

Re: amd64/SMP(/ata-raid ?) not happy...

2003-11-30 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xff00eebfaca0 ad0: 35772MB IBM-DPTA-353750 [72680/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xff00eebfa4a0 ad4: 35304MB WDC WD360GD-00FNA0 [71730/16/63] at

5.2-BETA panic: page fault

2003-11-30 Thread Stefan Ehmann
This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is different though (but always seems to be file system related in some way) Here's one from today: GNU gdb 5.2.1 (FreeBSD) Copyright 2002 Free Software

Re: panic on 5.2 BETA: blockable sleep lock

2003-11-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote: On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote: On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote: The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can cause a context switch if the mutex is already locked by

Re: Need to trim the disc1 packages

2003-11-30 Thread Doug Barton
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Scott Long wrote: All, We are badly overflowing the disc1 release ISO with packages, and need to trim it down. One package that could easily get axed is the linux-netscape-communicator package. I concur with that. For those of us who use linux netscape for whatever

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Oliver Eikemeier
Andreas Klemm wrote: On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 03:41:33AM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:33:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:43:06PM +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: I don't care whether slapd or slurpd starts first, I even don't care when slurpd starts. I want to start ldapd early in the boot process to supports services like nss_ldap and mail. I did things differently e.g. in net/rsync,

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Andreas Klemm
I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d and starts it very early. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Need a

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

2003-11-30 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:13, Stefan Ehmann wrote: This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is different though (but always seems to be file system related in some way) Here's one from today: As

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-11-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-30 10:50:47 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-30 10:50:47 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-11-30 10:50:47 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread HaggeL
Hi Guys :) Sorry if i waste your time. I´m a freeBSD noob and need some help. I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I want to buy me a new harddrive, a serial ATA one, because i got the Silicon ImageR Sil 3112A-Controller onboard (Asus A7N8X Motherboard). I didn´t find a

user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Colin Percival
I've got a system running 5.2-BETA from 27/11/03, with the malloc_abort, malloc_junk, DEBUG=-g, DDB, INVARIANT*, and WITNESS* debugging options changed (as was done in 5.1-RELEASE). When running `make buildworld`, I see large amounts of sys time; eg, 27 minutes user 14 minutes sys for

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Percival writes: I've got a system running 5.2-BETA from 27/11/03, with the malloc_abort, malloc_junk, DEBUG=-g, DDB, INVARIANT*, and WITNESS* debugging options changed (as was done in 5.1-RELEASE). When running `make buildworld`, I see large amounts of

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Colin Percival
At 15:30 30/11/2003 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Percival writes: When running `make buildworld`, I see large amounts of sys time; eg, 27 minutes user 14 minutes sys for building 5.2, or 14 minutes user 10 minutes sys for building 4.9. I expected the

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Percival writes: At 15:30 30/11/2003 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Colin Percival writes: When running `make buildworld`, I see large amounts of sys time; eg, 27 minutes user 14 minutes sys for building 5.2, or 14

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Oliver Eikemeier wrote: The reason I did this was to support services like mail and nss_ldap. I really like to be prefix safe, PR conf/56736 relates to this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/56736 I agree that there should be a better solution, and already asked Mike Makonnen

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Andreas Klemm wrote: What about simply putting a number in front of the script, I didn't check but am really certain that we start scripts something like this: cd $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d for i in *.sh --- here you get an alphabetically

Re: Xircom pccard couldn't load/attach (with uname -a info)

2003-11-30 Thread Ronald Klop
Hello, Here is the output. And the dmesg is attached. NEWCARD/OLDCARD??? I think NEWCARD. Nov 30 16:51:11 laptop kernel: xe0: Xircom CreditCard Ethernet 10/100 + Modem 56 at port 0x2e8-0x2ef irq 11 function 0 config 39 on pccard0 Nov 30 16:51:12 laptop kernel: xe0: vendor = 0x0105 Nov 30

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote: I've got a system running 5.2-BETA from 27/11/03, with the malloc_abort, malloc_junk, DEBUG=-g, DDB, INVARIANT*, and WITNESS* debugging options changed (as was done in 5.1-RELEASE). When running `make buildworld`, I see large amounts of sys

Re: MAJOR number

2003-11-30 Thread Frank Mayhar
Piggybacking on that request... I also need a major number. I had requested one some time ago, but it apparently got lost in the shuffle. The device is a Specialix I/O8+ multiport serial card. I've been using it for some weeks now without problems. For now the driver is -stable only; I'll

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote: I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d and starts it very early. Hmm. I talked with Gordon

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:45:40AM -0500, Richard Coleman wrote: Oliver Eikemeier wrote: The reason I did this was to support services like mail and nss_ldap. I really like to be prefix safe, PR conf/56736 relates to this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/56736 I agree

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:31:34AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote: I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that checks for the start script under

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Sunday 30 November 2003 16:54, Richard Coleman wrote: But it doesn't help if you need a port to start earlier than something in the base. This could happen if you've replaced sendmail with postfix, and use maps from a remote database (openldap, postgresql, etc). I'm sure there are other

MALLOC_OPTIONS behaviour

2003-11-30 Thread rihad
Under 5.2-BETA, if I run a program with env MALLOC_OPTIONS=j then all the malloc()'ed memory will be zeroed even though I did not ask for it (by specifying Z). Also, J (memset to 0xd0) even appears to run a somewhat *faster* than j. Why doesn't jz return uninitialized memory and isn't the

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Melvyn Sopacua [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then you can just as easily nuke the entire mailer.conf principle and symlink bin/postfix to etc/rc.d/050.postfix.sh. This is actually one of the two recommended ways of starting postfix (and the one I prefer). The main reason for mailer.conf to exist

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote: Hi Guys :) Sorry if i waste your time. Im a freeBSD noob and need some help. I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I want to buy me a new harddrive, a serial ATA one, because i got the Silicon ImageR Sil 3112A-Controller

Re: Panic with ugen

2003-11-30 Thread Martin
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 14:43, Jay Cornwall wrote: Could you try the attached patch (rm -f sys/dev/usb/ugen.c, cvs up sys/dev/usb/ugen.c, patch ...) to see if it alleviates the panic? It should at least give a more specific panic, if it doesn't fix the problem. Sorry for the delay, I got a

kernel compile fails in uma_core.c

2003-11-30 Thread Paulius Bulotas
Hello, when building kernel: ../../../vm/uma_core.c: In function `zone_timeout': ../../../vm/uma_core.c:345: error: `mp_maxid' undeclared (first use in this function) and so on. Anything I missed? Paulius ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: kernel compile fails in uma_core.c

2003-11-30 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Paulius Bulotas wrote: Hello, when building kernel: ../../../vm/uma_core.c: In function `zone_timeout': ../../../vm/uma_core.c:345: error: `mp_maxid' undeclared (first use in this function) and so on. Anything I missed? No, this is the bad commit for UP but should

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote: Hi Guys :) Sorry if i waste your time. I®m a freeBSD noob and need some help. I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I want to buy me a new harddrive, a serial ATA one,

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 14:40, Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote: Hi Guys :) Sorry if i waste your time. I®m a freeBSD noob and need some help. I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Colin Percival
Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels: # /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 21' /dev/null Real UserSys UP kernel 38m33.29s 27m10.09s 10m59.15s (retest) 38m33.18s 27m04.40s 11m05.73s

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Scott Long
Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 09:43, HaggeL wrote: Hi Guys :) Sorry if i waste your time. I®m a freeBSD noob and need some help. I want to install freeBSD in januar and have some problems. I want to buy me a new harddrive, a serial ATA

Atheros Driver getting GOOD!!

2003-11-30 Thread Marcos Biscaysaqu
Hi there, a month ago we couldn't made work a Freebsd in hostap with the new Atheros card more than 4 min., Now with the looks so much better I have got one running with more than 33 client and even in mode 11b work faster than any Access Point or wireless card, but I still have some

more on non-executable mappings on NetBSD

2003-11-30 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Hi; I know everyone is busy with the upcoming release, but JIC someone is interested on this, I found this recent progress report post on NetBSD's lists: __ Subject: more on non-executable mappings To: None [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Chuck Silvers [EMAIL PROTECTED] List: tech-kern Date:

libradius - missing defines

2003-11-30 Thread Michael Bretterklieber
Hi, could someone please add these defines to radlib.h #define RAD_ACCT_INPUT_GIGAWORDS 52 #define RAD_ACCT_OUTPUT_GIGAWORDS 53 #define RAD_ACCT_INTERIM_INTERVAL 85 there is also a missing ACCT-Status-Type (RAD_ACCT_STATUS_TYPE) #define RAD_UPDATE 3 see also RFC 2869, thanx, bye, --

Re: Need to trim the disc1 packages

2003-11-30 Thread Julian St.
- IMO, Don't include netscape, mozilla or opera. KDE includes Konqueror and GNOME has Nautilus(1/2). That's enough to get someone up and running and let them get to www.freebsd.org to see how to install something else. I do use neither KDE nor GNOME. At least keep one mozilla (or Opera, it

Re: Atheros Driver getting GOOD!!

2003-11-30 Thread Marcos Biscaysaqu
I have lot of Ierrs and the pings to my clients go very high until I restart my ath0 interfaces and start to work all happy again. Im running the last dirver version from 29/11/03 I fogot my netstat Atheros# netstat -I ath0 NameMtu Network Address Ipkts IerrsOpkts

rpcbind not binding correctly with -h

2003-11-30 Thread Nuno Teixeira
Hello to all, I'm having some problems with NFS on a FreeBSD 5.1 p11 NFS server is a gateway with an adsl alcatel USB modem and has the following rc.conf: rpcbind_enable=YES rpcbind_flags=-h 192.168.0.1 nfs_server_enable=YES nfs_server_flags=-u -t -n 6 -h 192.168.0.1 mountd_flags=-r PROBLEM:

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Andreas Klemm wrote: I guess I don't see the problem. What is wrong with ports adding startup scripts to /etc/rc.d? For certain ports, that is the only way to get the startup dependencies right (like making sure openldap or postgresql starts before your mail system). This will become more

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Melvyn Sopacua [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then you can just as easily nuke the entire mailer.conf principle and symlink bin/postfix to etc/rc.d/050.postfix.sh. This is actually one of the two recommended ways of starting postfix (and the one I prefer). The main

[current tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2003-11-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-30 21:17:02 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-30 21:17:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2003-11-30 21:17:02 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

2003-11-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 30 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote: On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 11:13, Stefan Ehmann wrote: This happens to me several times a day (cvsup from yesterday didn't change anything). The panic message is always the same, the backtrace is different though (but always seems to be file system related in some

psmintr not attached w/ acpi

2003-11-30 Thread Slawa Olhovchenkov
If acpi enabled PS/2 mouse failed to work and irq12 cold't attach to psmintr. Is this problem reporting PS/2 mouse resource before atkbdc? psmcpnp0 irq 12 on acpi0 atkbdc0: Keyboard controller (i8042) port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: AT Keyboard flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 atkbd: the current

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Sunday 30 November 2003 23:00, Richard Coleman wrote: Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Melvyn Sopacua [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then you can just as easily nuke the entire mailer.conf principle and symlink bin/postfix to etc/rc.d/050.postfix.sh. This is actually one of the two recommended

[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2003-11-30 Thread Tinderbox
TB --- 2003-11-30 22:24:27 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2003-11-30 22:24:27 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2003-11-30 22:24:27 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Oliver Eikemeier
Robert Watson wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote: I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d and starts it very early. Hmm. I talked

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Melvyn Sopacua wrote: Isn't that *exactly why* ports should respect $PREFIX? At least than you know that startup scripts are in one place. Maybe all that is needed is a variable RCDIR?= etc/rc.d, for people who want to 'deviate' from this convention. I like that idea. That could work. But to

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote: Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels: # /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 21' /dev/null Real UserSys UP kernel 38m33.29s 27m10.09s 10m59.15s

Re: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-11-30 Thread Derek Ragona
I tried the 11/29 snapshot, it is indeed worse. I got a failure during the install's fsck. The errors I got were: ad4: Warning - WRITE_DMA recovered from missing interrupt ad4: Failure - WRITE_DMA status=ffI couldn't copy the codes here, sorry followed by lots of: ad4: timeout sending

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

2003-11-30 Thread Don Lewis
Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? #6 0xc06743d8 in calltrap () at {standard input}:94 #7 0xc0505b53 in _mtx_lock_flags (m=0x0, opts=0, file=0xc06bfc1d /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c, line=228) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:214 #8 0xc0502b54 in lockmgr

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Oliver Eikemeier
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I can't recommend doing it this way, since some ports I know are writing startup scripts to /etc/rc.d :-/ That is very, very bad. I wish we had some kind of ports QA team :( Can I assign PR 56748 to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread Michael Edenfield
* Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [031130 11:36]: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Andreas Klemm wrote: I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a wrapper script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d that checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d and

Re: kernel compile fails in uma_core.c

2003-11-30 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Paulius Bulotas wrote: Hello, when building kernel: ../../../vm/uma_core.c: In function `zone_timeout': ../../../vm/uma_core.c:345: error: `mp_maxid' undeclared (first use in this function) and so on. Anything I missed? I just fixed this, sorry. Paulius

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

2003-11-30 Thread Stefan Ehmann
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote: Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? snip You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount list entry each time. Maybe the mount list is getting

lock order reversal

2003-11-30 Thread genew
Is this a known issue on 5.2 beta 6 sup'ed nov 29/03? lock order reveral 1st 0xc2121b58 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1323 2nd 0xc0987b00 swap_pager swhash (swap_pager swhash) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/swap_pager.c:1838 3rd 0xc1036948 vm object (vm object) @

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Matthias Andree
Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But that kinda defeats the purpose of RCNG. One of the best features of RCNG is that it makes it easier to add/delete applications from the system. Not using it for this purpose reduces its utility. Let's not let the typical BSD traditionalism get

Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues

2003-11-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andreas Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I have a better idea, then we perhaps need something like a : wrapper script that is part of the FreeBSD basic system under /etc/rc.d : that checks for the start script under $LOCALBASE/etc/rc.d : and starts it

Re: Fatal double fault with 20031116-JPSNAP

2003-11-30 Thread Damian Gerow
(Re-sending, my original post was accepted by mx1.freebsd.org, but seems to have been lost somewhere.) Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [29/11/03 17:04]: But this is a little OT. I'll find some way to update my system, and respond back if the problem's fixed or not in a later

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Matthias Andree wrote: Richard Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But that kinda defeats the purpose of RCNG. One of the best features of RCNG is that it makes it easier to add/delete applications from the system. Not using it for this purpose reduces its utility. Let's not let the typical BSD

Re: user:sys time ratio

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Colin Percival wrote: Robert Watson suggested that I compare performance from UP and SMP kernels: # /usr/bin/time -hl sh -c 'make -s buildworld 21' /dev/null Real UserSys UP

Re: Nvidia problem fixed in current?

2003-11-30 Thread Chris
Justin Smith wrote: The kernel nvidia driver worked fine in 5.1. It only STOPPED working when I upgraded to 5.2 beta (and rebuilt and reinstalled the kernel driver). This is a problem of 5.2 vs 5.1 something changed that stopped it from working. Perhaps some libraries in 5.2 are no

-CURRENT panic (Backtrace included. recent ip_input changes related?)

2003-11-30 Thread Xin LI/
Hi, On a recently compiled -CURRENT kernel, I have triggered a panic when turning fxp0 into promisc mode than turning it off and then turning it on. My boxes are connected through a hub and some of them (not the panic'ed one) have heavy network load. Hope this backtrace is useful. For more

Re: 5.2-BETA panic: page fault

2003-11-30 Thread Don Lewis
On 1 Dec, Stefan Ehmann wrote: On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 01:10, Don Lewis wrote: Can you reproduce this problem without bktr? snip You are getting a double panic, with the second happening during the file system sync. The code seems to be be tripping over the same mount list entry each time.

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Maxim M. Kazachek
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote: Andreas Klemm wrote: I guess I don't see the problem. What is wrong with ports adding startup scripts to /etc/rc.d? For certain ports, that is the only way to get the startup dependencies right (like making sure openldap or postgresql starts before

5.2-BETA boot failure

2003-11-30 Thread Jerry Keefe
I tried upgrading a Dell Optiplex GXa from Release 5.1p10 to the 5.2 Beta using the mini-install CD. The system hangs in the boot loader. This problem doesn't happen with the Release 5.1 CDs. I then tried upgrading from source after getting CURRENT as of 11/29/2003, and was able to build and

Re: Change install-order? (upgrade from static to dynamic root)

2003-11-30 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 9:39 PM -0500 11/26/03, Garance A Drosihn wrote: I just installed 5.1-release on a sparc64, and then cvsup'ed to the latest snapshot of -current. Since that update is such a large jump in time, I was going from a system which had no /rescue or /libexec to one which builds everything

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote: snip For 5.2-RELEASE, I think we should ignore the whole issue and let the couple of ports that insert things in /etc/rc.d just do it. We're not going to find any other solution in time to either close

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:47:24PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Maxim M. Kazachek wrote: On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Richard Coleman wrote: ..snip.. For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the following conclusions winning out, and the rest being

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
David O'Brien wrote: For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the following conclusions winning out, and the rest being discarded as flame-bait: (1) Combine / and /usr into a single file system by default, and add /usr/local/etc/rc.d to the search order, with

Re: MAJOR number

2003-11-30 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] John-Mark Gurney [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : There are still major numbers for a few devices that may are standard : (such as zero/null), but not common... I've already assigned him one. : I've read that FreeBSD doesn't use them any more. : But we may

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Richard Coleman
Robert Watson wrote: For 5.2-CURRENT, I think we should revisit this issue with one of the following conclusions winning out, and the rest being discarded as flame-bait: (1) Combine / and /usr into a single file system by default, and add /usr/local/etc/rc.d to the search order, with

bash2 linked dynamically

2003-11-30 Thread Sean McNeil
Hi all, I just sent email to obrien and I would like to encourage getting the ports collection changed to link bash dynamically. Hopefully before 5.2 release. It was the last frustrating problem I had with getting all the LDAP stuff working on FreeBSD-current. bash was displaying: I have no

Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)

2003-11-30 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Richard Coleman wrote: (2) Reevaluate the order at routine points in the boot where new scripts might now be available (due to file system mounts or whatever). Essentially insert the new cards into the deck, and shuffle. This requires rethinking of our

Re: bash2 linked dynamically

2003-11-30 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:03PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote: Also, I do not see any reason why bash should remain linked -static for -current. Lucky for me (who wants a static Bash), I don't have to make the decission -- ports are frozen and have been for a while.

problem with kerberos startup and LDAP

2003-11-30 Thread Sean McNeil
Hello All, I was having trouble with startup and kdc/kadmin5 failing. Turns out that they were trying to access a shared library in /usr/local/lib (libldap.so.2). Unfortunately, both were getting started before ldconfig. I added ldconfig to the REQUIRE: for kerberos and now all is well. What

Re: 5.2-BETA boot failure

2003-11-30 Thread pseudodyslexia
Quoting Jerry Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I tried upgrading a Dell Optiplex GXa from Release 5.1p10 to the 5.2 Beta using the mini-install CD. The system hangs in the boot loader. This problem doesn't happen with the Release 5.1 CDs. try disabling acpi when you boot from cd via boot menu.