Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com writes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/patches/20140304-libbsdstatfoo.diff
Why did you rename it? The whole point of PRIVATELIB is to avoid having
to rename libraries.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
On Friday, March 07, 2014 5:51:27 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com writes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/patches/20140304-libbsdstatfoo.diff
Why did you rename it? The whole point of PRIVATELIB is to avoid having
to rename libraries.
Because 'statfoo'
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to administrator
policy.
Yes, but if you are moving to a different algorithm to improve security, not
coupling it with an eventual expiration of non-migrated accounts
On Mar 7, 2014, at 12:30 AM, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
When I am using mercurial to initialize a freebsd repository, it prints
warning: filename ends with '.', which is not allowed on Windows:
'tools/test/sort/bigtest/q-1.024.003.'
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal
On 2014-03-07 09:13, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to administrator
policy.
Yes, but if you are moving to a different algorithm to improve security, not
coupling it with an eventual
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to administrator
policy.
Yes, but if you are moving to a different algorithm to improve security,
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength of the
hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature request).
Updating my bcrypt hashes from $2a$04$ to $2b$12$ or something. Same
applies for the default sha512, maybe I want to update to
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
Is this something we want to support? NetBSD made some invasive changes on
their source
On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
Is this something we want to
On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out freebsd source
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:19 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal
On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 10:19 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014 11:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu
what he said.
-a
On 7 March 2014 05:37, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, March 07, 2014 5:51:27 am Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Adrian Chadd adrian.ch...@gmail.com writes:
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/patches/20140304-libbsdstatfoo.diff
Why did you rename it? The whole
hi all:
i am trying to compile webkit-gtk2 and stuck on error:
===
ar: warning: can't mmap file: libWebCore_la-SVGFEDisplacementMapElement.o:
Cannot allocate memory
ar: warning: can't mmap file: libWebCore_la-SVGFEDropShadowElement.o:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out freebsd source code on Windows, it will be a problem.
Is this something we want
On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 09:13:30 -0500
John Baldwin wrote:
I am assuming that an
administrator wants the transparent upgrade (which I think is useful)
because they are assuming that the hash algorithm is compromised or
inferior.
I'd expect it to be done well in advance of that to give plenty of
On Friday, March 07, 2014 10:34:40 am Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:09:30 pm Matthew Rezny wrote:
Password expiry is an orthogonal issue and should be up to
administrator
policy.
Yes, but
Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for convenience
I used the
workstation predefinition of FreeBSD. But with that change, all access of
ports via
fetch located at ftp-sites stopped passing the filter.
Even switching to open doesn't help and this is confusing me.
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is illegal on Windows, if someone
wants to check out freebsd
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength of the
hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature request).
Updating my bcrypt hashes from $2a$04$ to $2b$12$ or something. Same
applies
On 2014-03-07 13:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for
convenience I used the
workstation predefinition of FreeBSD. But with that change, all access of
ports via
fetch located at ftp-sites stopped passing the filter.
Even switching to
Hello,
I've written a bsnmp module to export the lm75 sensor's temperature
(and some other data) over SNMP.
With this module it is simple and easy to monitor the temperature of
rooms and other devices over the network with help of a RPi, a BBB or
others.
This is my first module for bsnmp, so i
On Mar 7, 2014, at 11:50 AM, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:33:39 -0500
Allan Jude free...@allanjude.com wrote:
On 2014-03-07 13:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for
convenience I used
the workstation predefinition of FreeBSD. But with that change, all
access of
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength of the
hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature request).
Updating my bcrypt hashes from $2a$04$ to $2b$12$ or something.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength
of the hashing algorithm
On 2014-03-07 16:55, O. Hartmann wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:33:39 -0500
Allan Jude free...@allanjude.com wrote:
On 2014-03-07 13:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
Recently I swaitched from pf to ipfw on some CURRENT boxes and for
convenience I used
the workstation predefinition of FreeBSD. But
On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength
of the hashing algorithm (when combined
Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is
On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it seems filename ended with a dot is
On 2014-03-07 18:12, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu davi...@freebsd.org wrote:
it
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo rpa...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 6 Mar 2014, at 23:30, David Xu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 14:50, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 15:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13,
On 7 March 2014 15:25, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 16:41, Rui Paulo
Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 16:43 -0800:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 15:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52,
On Mar 7, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 March 2014 15:25, Warner Losh i...@bsdimp.com wrote:
On Mar 7, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
On 7 March 2014 13:50, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
On 7 Mar 2014, at 10:38, David
Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 16:36 -0800:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 14:50, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe
Xin Li wrote:
Hi,
On 03/07/14 13:52, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
On 2014-03-07 11:13, A.J. Kehoe IV (Nanoman) wrote:
Allan Jude wrote:
[...]
Honestly, my use case is just silently upgrading the strength
of the hashing algorithm (when combined with my other feature
On 2014-03-07 21:15, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Xin Li wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 16:43 -0800:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/07/14 15:07, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Allan Jude wrote this message on Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 17:53 -0500:
On 2014-03-07 17:06, Xin
On Mar 7, 2014, at 10:22 PM, Allan Jude free...@allanjude.com wrote:
Performance for default, sha512 w/ 5k rounds:
AMD A10-5700 3.4GHz 3.8ms
AMD Opteron 4228 HE 2.8Ghz 5.4ms
Intel(R) Xeon(R) X5650 2.67GHz 4.0ms
these times are aprox as the timing varies quite a bit,
41 matches
Mail list logo
