Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>GBDE is for when the user is in danger. In danger of what? Please elaborate. >From the handbook, it is not clear at all that the two encryption methods are designed to defend against different threats. Maybe I'm using the wrong one... Thank you Anton

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread NGie Cooper
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 00:29, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message <201510200645.t9k6jaam004...@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton > Shterenlikht writes: >>> GBDE is for when the user is in danger. >> >> In danger of what? >> Please elaborate. > > Read the

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <5625d422.4040...@fizk.net>, Yonas Yanfa writes: >> Think human rights activists for instance. > >Couldn't they use a fake email address and Tor to communicate >anonymously? I'd be surprised if they aren't already. If you think being a human rights activist is that simple,

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <201510200841.t9k8fngy005...@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton Shterenlikht writes: >Am I correct that the papers are from 2003 and 2004 >respectively. Has much changed in gbde since then? Nope. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>From p...@phk.freebsd.dk Tue Oct 20 10:08:55 2015 > >>Am I correct that the papers are from 2003 and 2004 >>respectively. Has much changed in gbde since then? > >Nope. One thing that puzzled me about the way gbde is integrated with the FreeBSD boot sequence is that it's not possible to boot

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
>> In message <201510200645.t9k6jaam004...@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton >> Shterenlikht writes: GBDE is for when the user is in danger. >>> >>> In danger of what? >>> Please elaborate. >> >> Read the paper: >> >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/pubs/bsdcon-03.gbde.paper.pdf >> >> Or use

Re: Make installworld fails on file not found (Error code 71)

2015-10-20 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 20 October 2015 at 11:07, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I was trying to test the new i915 graphics driver but got stuck in building > and installing the userland: > > /usr/share/man/man2/mknodat.2 -> /usr/share/man/man2/mknod.2 > /usr/share/man/man2/munlock.2 ->

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Yonas Yanfa
On 10/20/2015 01:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message , NGie Cooper writes: 1. Why are there 2 competing technologies? They are not competing, they support two very different threat models. We need to make

Make installworld fails on file not found (Error code 71)

2015-10-20 Thread Thomas Mueller
I was trying to test the new i915 graphics driver but got stuck in building and installing the userland: /usr/share/man/man2/mknodat.2 -> /usr/share/man/man2/mknod.2 /usr/share/man/man2/munlock.2 -> /usr/share/man/man2/mlock.2 /usr/share/man/man2/munlockall.2 -> /usr/share/man/man2/mlockall.2

Re: Depreciate and remove gbde

2015-10-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <201510200645.t9k6jaam004...@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk>, Anton Shterenlikht writes: >>GBDE is for when the user is in danger. > >In danger of what? >Please elaborate. Read the paper: http://phk.freebsd.dk/pubs/bsdcon-03.gbde.paper.pdf Or use the TL;DR version in the

Re: [CFT] Buildworld ccache support

2015-10-20 Thread Freddie Cash
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: > Hi! > > I’m certainly doing it wrong, because CCACHE does not kick in after > applying the patch and modifying make.conf. CCACHE stats ('ccache -z' > followed by 'ccache -s') remain at zero during buildworld while

Re: [CFT] Buildworld ccache support

2015-10-20 Thread Juan Ramón Molina Menor
Le 20/10/2015 17:50, Freddie Cash a écrit : On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Juan Ramón Molina Menor >wrote: Hi! I’m certainly doing it wrong, because CCACHE does not kick in after applying the patch and modifying make.conf. CCACHE stats

is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated in 11 ?

2015-10-20 Thread John
Hi, as subject - is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated? I can get a modified kernel to build and install in /usr/src but not in /sys/amd64/conf. I always used to be able to do this in there, then again I either used -RELEASE or -STABLE. I used to do it like this: 1. cd

Re: Make installworld fails on file not found (Error code 71)

2015-10-20 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Jeffrey Bouquet: > I'd installworld in single user mode... sorry for no backstory. Worked here. Sure, I used single user mode, as advised in UPDATING file. from Sergey Kandauro: > This looks like if you would try to installworld on newer sources and older > objs without doing buildworld

Re: is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated in 11 ?

2015-10-20 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, John wrote: > Hi, > > as subject - is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated? > > I can get a modified kernel to build and install in /usr/src but not > in /sys/amd64/conf. I always used to be able to do this in there, then > again I either used -RELEASE or -STABLE. I

Re: is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated in 11 ?

2015-10-20 Thread Manfred Antar
> On Oct 20, 2015, at 8:55 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, John wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> as subject - is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated? >> >> I can get a modified kernel to build and install in /usr/src but not >> in /sys/amd64/conf. I always

[CFT] Buildworld ccache support

2015-10-20 Thread Juan Ramón Molina Menor
Hi! I’m certainly doing it wrong, because CCACHE does not kick in after applying the patch and modifying make.conf. CCACHE stats ('ccache -z' followed by 'ccache -s') remain at zero during buildworld while they used to reflect the cache miss/hits before. # cat /etc/make.conf