Re: Another tweak to burncd msinfo

2002-01-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Stephen McKay wrote: Now that burncd msinfo returns the correct values I noticed another small problem: it displays the result on stderr instead of stdout. Hmm, that was intentional... Since very few people (nobody?) would be using this option yet because of the previous problem,

Re: Another tweak to burncd msinfo

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 5th January 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Stephen McKay wrote: Now that burncd msinfo returns the correct values I noticed another small problem: it displays the result on stderr instead of stdout. Hmm, that was intentional... Could you explain why? The most obvious

Re: Another tweak to burncd msinfo

2002-01-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Stephen McKay wrote: Are these changes intended for 4.5? I'm hoping the small change I proposed would be accepted into 4.5, before anybody starts using burncd msinfo in practice. I think this is sensible, even if a much improved burncd is scheduled for 4.6. You should ask

Re: Another tweak to burncd msinfo

2002-01-05 Thread Søren Schmidt
It seems Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Stephen McKay wrote: Are these changes intended for 4.5? I'm hoping the small change I proposed would be accepted into 4.5, before anybody starts using burncd msinfo in practice. I think this is sensible, even if a much improved burncd is

Re: Another tweak to burncd msinfo

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 5th January 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: It seems Stephen McKay wrote: Are these changes intended for 4.5? I'm hoping the small change I proposed would be accepted into 4.5, before anybody starts using burncd msinfo in practice. I think this is sensible, even if a much

Re: Another tweak to burncd msinfo

2002-01-05 Thread Stephen McKay
On Saturday, 5th January 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: I forgot to say that I already committed the change to current... :-) I try to keep up with -current, but that's too current for me! I'll hassle the REs tomorrow about permission to merge. Thanks, Stephen. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Five Dollar Reports

2002-01-05 Thread smr1tks
Dear Friend: AS SEEN ON NATIONAL TV: ''Making over half million dollars every 4 to 5 months from your home for an investment of only $25 U.S. Dollars expense one time'' THANKS TO THE COMPUTER AGE AND THE INTERNET! Before you say ''Bull'', please read the following. This is the letter you

RE: ftpd STOR and STOU work the same ?

2002-01-05 Thread Mike Heffner
On 04-Jan-2002 Riccardo Torrini wrote: | On 29-Dec-2001 (16:49:06/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote: | | I noticed a strange behaviour, sending a file twice create | version even if sunique is off, on all versions I can test. | | This includes: | - FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 9 08:37:55 CET

Re: Why does bus_alloc_resource fail for sound and PCIC?

2002-01-05 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Michael Reifenberger wrote: map[10]: type 4, range 32, base 2400, size 8, port disabled map[14]: type 4, range 32, base 2000, size 7, port disabled ... Which I interpret as: There are two ioports (type 4) which are disabled ( should get enabled

Re: Why does bus_alloc_resource fail for sound and PCIC?

2002-01-05 Thread M. Warner Losh
You might want to try and enable PCI_ENABLE_IO_MODES in your kernel. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Why does bus_alloc_resource fail for sound and PCIC?

2002-01-05 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: ... While the PCI bus code should enable these resources, only the driver really knows if a PCI map will be used. It should enable it. See pci_enable_io() Am I wrong or is: pci_enable_busmaster(dev); pci_enable_io(dev, SYS_RES_IOPORT);

Re: Why does bus_alloc_resource fail for sound and PCIC?

2002-01-05 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, thanks for the tip. options PCI_ENABLE_IO_MODES did the trick (for snd_ich). But why? Where is PCI_ENABLE_IO_MODES different from: pci_enable_busmaster(dev); pci_enable_io(dev, SYS_RES_IOPORT); pci_enable_io(dev, SYS_RES_MEMORY); or data = pci_read_config(dev, PCIR_COMMAND,

RE: ftpd STOR and STOU work the same ?

2002-01-05 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 05-Jan-2002 (19:47:53/GMT) Mike Heffner wrote: I noticed a strange behaviour, sending a file twice create version even if sunique is off, on all versions I can test. This is intentional... This is black magic. I hate it. I hope this would be (soon) documented _OR_ make configurable.

RE: ftpd STOR and STOU work the same ?

2002-01-05 Thread Mike Heffner
On 05-Jan-2002 Riccardo Torrini wrote: | On 05-Jan-2002 (19:47:53/GMT) Mike Heffner wrote: | | I noticed a strange behaviour, sending a file twice create | version even if sunique is off, on all versions I can test. | | This is intentional... | | This is black magic. I hate it. I hope this

Re: kernel compile fails...

2002-01-05 Thread Makoto Matsushita
coolvibe What header file defines SWI_NOSWITCH? http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/tour/current/cgi-bin/global.cgi?pattern=SWI_NOSWITCHid=type=symbol SWI_NOSWITCH are used and/or defined by these files. You can easily find that this list have only one *.h file -- sys/sys/interrupt.h. % grep