On Mon, 27 May 2002, kai ouyang wrote:
Hi,everybody
I found many v_operations, such as VOP_UNLOCK, VOP_OPEN., there
all have a parameter(struct proc) in FreeBSD4.x, but, there all be
changed to thread in FreeBSD5.0. why? And what relation of the proc
and thread ?
Thank you!
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:04:29AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2002 at 16:22:54 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:28:26PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
Finally I have decided to give post gcc-3.1 perless world a
try, but found that world doesn't
On Wed, 15 May 2002 08:21:46 -0400 (EDT),
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
jhb On 15-May-2002 Seigo Tanimura wrote:
Currently, a new runnable thread cannot preempt the thread on any
processor other than the thread that called mi_switch(). For
instance, we do something like the
Hello !
If you're like me, you've tried EVERYTHING to lose
weight. I know how you feel - the special diets,
miracle pills, and fancy exercise equipment never helped
me lose a pound either. It seemed like the harder I tried,
the bigger I got, until I heard about a product called
Extreme Power
I'm using a derivative of the .gdbinit.vinum files that is available in
the modules/vinum directory. For them to work the following patch is
needed in gdb52.
As you can see, the patch is trivial, so I have no clue why this wasn't
left alone when they modified symfile.c. If I can be bothered
comments please
new changes i made to libstand/bootp.c:
now, apart from placing all the dhcp stuff in the kenv, if the tag rc-conf
is set i.e:
option FBSD.rc-conf 132.65.16.100:/c/conf/rc.conf.foo;
it will read the file and place the name=value in the kenv as
rc.conf.name=value
No problem up to yesterday's -CURRENT (well, other than the 'could
sleep with ___ lock locked from ___' messages), and built today's
OK, but here's what I got on the serial console on reboot:
...
Uptime: 1h47m56s
Terminate ACPI
Rebooting...
cpu_reset called on cpu#0
cpu_reset: Stopping other
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:48:05PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Monday, 27 May 2002 at 16:22:54 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
: On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:28:26PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
:
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 03:54:21PM +0200, Nick Hibma wrote:
I'm using a derivative of the .gdbinit.vinum files that is available in
the modules/vinum directory. For them to work the following patch is
needed in gdb52.
As you can see, the patch is trivial, so I have no clue why this wasn't
Doh! me bad, I didn't include an example:
The attached .gdbinit loads the symbols from a module, but needs the
start address of the .text section.
add-symbol-file filename address
address cannot be an expression in gdb5.2, just a simple address
('0x[0-9a-f]+' or '[0-9]+').
Nick
On
Hello
I wonder if there's any planned support for Alcatel Speed Touch PC (a
ADSL PCI card) I think there are some linuxdrivers but what could be
needed for FreeBSD support?
thanks
/John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:58:39AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
No problem up to yesterday's -CURRENT (well, other than the 'could
sleep with ___ lock locked from ___' messages), and built today's
OK, but here's what I got on the serial console on reboot:
[...]
Entropy harvesting:
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 18:38:10 +0200
From: Jose M. Alcaide [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The panic is triggered by a sysctl -a invoked from /etc/rc while
harvesting entropy data. The cause is a bug introduced in sys/kern/tty.c.
Try the following patch (suggested by [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Index:
The prototype patch is at:
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/ippreempt.diff.gz
And the p4 depot
//depot/user/tanimura/ippreempt/...
The patch is for only i386 at the moment.
The following is the brief description of the patch:
I would prefer that this was hung off the
Hello
Did you know it's possible to make $50,000 or more in 90 days sending
e-mail. Seem impossible? Is there a catch? NO, there is no catch,
just send your e-mails and be on your way to financial freedom.
Basically, I send out as many of these e-mails as I can, then people
send me cash
In todays -current build
snip about 20 other sections
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/config/elfos.h:594:1: warning: STRING_ASM_OP redefined
In file included from
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/tconfig.h:16,
from
John Angelmo wrote:
I wonder if there's any planned support for Alcatel Speed Touch PC (a
ADSL PCI card) I think there are some linuxdrivers but what could be
needed for FreeBSD support?
1) Knowing that there were Linux drivers, rather than just
thinking it,
OR
On 27-May-2002 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020526 19:09] wrote:
At Sun, 26 May 2002 22:19:58 + (UTC),
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Uh, why don't you guys enable 'debug.witness_ddb' and get us some
tracebacks? :)
Could this help you?
Yes.
I would prefer
Hi all,
gcc31 seems to do a s/i386/1/g with -D parameters :-((
# /usr/local/bin/g++31 -D_THREAD_SAFE -fexceptions
-DGXX_INCLUDE=/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/3.1/include/g++
-I../stlport -Wall -W -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized
-ftemplate-depth-32 -fPIC
On 2002-05-19 12:20, Mark Murray wrote:
What I've done so far (and only slightly tested) is available at
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~keramida/diff/periodic.diff
Untested, but seemingly complete, the patch is available for review at
the address mentioned above. I am thinking a nice way to test
KSE Milestone 3 has been running since BSDcon.
Since then things got mightily slowed down due to the birth of my
daughter, a burst in work and t round-the-world trip
(consequence if the birth had to show the grandparents on
2 continents you know..)
Now things are moving again.
Jonathon
Simon Dick wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:38:02PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
John Angelmo wrote:
I wonder if there's any planned support for Alcatel Speed Touch PC (a
ADSL PCI card) I think there are some linuxdrivers but what could be
needed for FreeBSD support?
[ ... ]
4)
Get this guy outta here!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2893 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Jos Backus wrote:
Every time I press ^C after su'ing to root which has zsh as its shell, zsh
exits. According to somebody on IRC this is related to the PAMification of su.
Strangely enough this does not occur when I replace zsh with bash (both from
ports).
Is anybody
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
This is a bogon specific to ref5 where I removed the old c++ stuff. I'll
fix this on ref5 in a moment. To build libstdc++ manually for folks that
have never had one before (or did the same sort of brutal cleanup I did)
can fairly easily build one like this:
cd src/gnu/lib/libstdc++
make obj
Thank you! I know a little more. From the kthread_create() function, I find Both 4.x and 5.0 are implemented by fork1(). I am puzzled about the structure thread and the structure proc only are different terms. How or what part source code can I find the difference thread realization between 4.x
Another problem: There are not the structure 'bio' in FreeBSD 4.x, but exist in 5.0. If I want to transfer some pseudo-device code from 4.x to 5.0, what rules about old 'buf' structure to the 'bio' structure? what relation of the 'bio' and 'buf' in FreeBSD5.0? Thank you! Best Regards Ouyang
This is my first attempt at running current.
Please forgive if this question is out of line.
After rebuilding everything, my console continually repeats this message:
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1324: could sleep with UMA lock locked from
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma-core.c:1157
Should I be concerned?
On Tuesday, 28 May 2002 at 15:54:21 +0200, Nick Hibma wrote:
I'm using a derivative of the .gdbinit.vinum files that is available in
the modules/vinum directory. For them to work the following patch is
needed in gdb52.
As you can see, the patch is trivial, so I have no clue why this wasn't
In the last episode (May 28), Jos Backus said:
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:55:54AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
Here is some old mail about this. Sorry I slowed down Alexander's
fixes.
Thanks Bruce. It sounds like we'll have to live with this problem for
now?
If you're not concerned about
Thanks Bruce. It sounds like we'll have to live with this problem for now?
For the lack of better ideas, I am just reposting the patch I sent to
Bruce about one year ago. I have been happily using it on all my systems
since then.
Index: su.c
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Bruce. It sounds like we'll have to live with this problem for now?
For the lack of better ideas, I am just reposting the patch I sent to
Bruce about one year ago. I have been happily using it on all my systems
since then.
[...]
Revision
Richard Wenninger wrote:
This is my first attempt at running current.
Please forgive if this question is out of line.
After rebuilding everything, my console continually repeats this message:
/usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1324: could sleep with UMA lock locked from
Is anyone else getting these? Is that a generic sort of error, or
does the error indicate (to someone) what might be wrong?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=38438
has all the info about my crashes...
-Seth
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Revision 1.51 of su.c fixes the bug.
No it doesn't. This is an obvious step and of course I tried to do the
same first. This is what I was getting then and what I am getting now
with your patch applied (my comments are in angle brackets):
Starting point: user is running zsh
[user]% sudo -s
OK, I will use Dan's or Alexander's patch until this has been sorted out.
Thanks guys.
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
_/ _/ _/
_/ _/_/_/
_/ _/ _/_/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Wemm wrote:
The bug is that things are calling things like malloc with M_WAITOK when
waiting is explicitly not allowed. There are other functions that can
tsleep as well that we have not added checks for yet, so this is likely
just the tip of the iceberg. :-(
Why is this a problem?
Hotels Etc. is giving away 10,000 of our $495 Travel Packages FREE, to help the USA in
the promotion of the travel business. The first 10,000 customers who sign up will
receive over $5000 worth of other free products.
This includes:
FREE 50% off card/vouchers
Terry Lambert wrote:
Peter Wemm wrote:
The bug is that things are calling things like malloc with M_WAITOK when
waiting is explicitly not allowed. There are other functions that can
tsleep as well that we have not added checks for yet, so this is likely
just the tip of the iceberg. :-(
40 matches
Mail list logo
