Oh, right. I swear, i read UPDATING, just missed that particular note.
Adding device ath_pci fixed my problem.
Thanks all.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any
On 26 September 2011 16:09, arrowdodger 6year...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, right. I swear, i read UPDATING, just missed that particular note.
Adding device ath_pci fixed my problem.
Thanks all.
Please let me / freebsd-wireless@ know if things work :) I'd like some
assurances that the wireless in
.. and as a side note, PCBSD 9.0-BETA2 USB install booted fine on the
same machine (Although I needed a larger flash disk, as it's 100
megabytes larger than what my 4 gigabyte USB flash drives
advertise.)
I'll try dumping FreeBSD on the same USB flash disk once PCBSD is
installed, just to
.. because PCBSD 9.0 uses a FreeBSD partition inside an MBR/DOS
partition scheme, rather than GPT inside MBR/DOS.
Something tells me this is going to cause problems..
Adrian
On 26 September 2011 16:38, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. and as a side note, PCBSD 9.0-BETA2 USB install
On 23/09/2011 04:49, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:26:47AM + I heard the voice of
Thomas Mueller, and lo! it spake thus:
I don't think there is any particular advantage in aligning GPT
partitions on 1 MB boundaries.
No, but it's bg, and rund!
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:32:55PM +0300, Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:22:02PM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
We should kille the load avarage as a measure for system activity,
it only has any relevance if you run heavy CPU bound processes.
It may be true, but in current
Hello.
Does anyone knows whether there is a port of the Point Cloud Library
(PCL), which seems to be a subproject of OpenCV?
Any hints or tips are welcome.
Regards,
Oliver
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
This is for 9 BETA2 or 10-CURRENT.
Please fix it on either side. Apparently minor types mismatch within
sasl_callback_t type.
cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src
-I/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/include -I. -DNEWDB
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:48:31 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
Nope, it has the opposite effect:
* Increased latency may make aggregation better (for TX) but it limits
throughput because TCP senses a latency increase;
I suspect this matters more. Have you tried comparing UDP throughput in the
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 4:16:51 am Thomas Mueller wrote:
Other issue is the 64 KB boot partition, which does not boot for me.
There ought to be an option, or is there already, to omit the boot
partition.
Sysinstall had such an option, to not install the boot loader, since user
could
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:52:37 pm Brett Glass wrote:
First thing I noticed, when running the new FreeBSD installer from
a memory stick image, is that disk partitioning was odd. It
abandoned standard UNIX parlance, calling what are traditionally
called slices partitions. It also
On Friday, September 23, 2011 11:21:06 am Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 20:07 +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Thursday 22 September 2011 19:55:23 David Somayajulu wrote:
It appears that the pause() function cannot be used in driver functions
which are invoked early in
On 26 September 2011 21:17, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:48:31 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
Nope, it has the opposite effect:
* Increased latency may make aggregation better (for TX) but it limits
throughput because TCP senses a latency increase;
I suspect
Hi, Ryan, I came across the similar problem on 8-stable when I run
# dtrace -lv
the panic message says:
page fault just happened at fbt.c
if (*lc.ctfoffp == NULL) { // page fault
/*
* Initialise the
On Monday, September 26, 2011 10:10:27 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 26 September 2011 21:17, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:48:31 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
Nope, it has the opposite effect:
* Increased latency may make aggregation better (for TX) but it
On 26 September 2011 22:53, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I meant do the timer settings affect UDP performance? I.e. does idletick=1
change UDP performance at all?
I'll check that and get back to you.
But please keep in mind that the first time I tried this and saw
immediate results
Hi,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:58:03 +0400
Andrey Chernov a...@freebsd.org said:
ache This is for 9 BETA2 or 10-CURRENT.
ache Please fix it on either side. Apparently minor types mismatch within
ache sasl_callback_t type.
ache cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4
ache
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 26 September 2011 16:09, arrowdodger 6year...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, right. I swear, i read UPDATING, just missed that particular note.
Adding device ath_pci fixed my problem.
Thanks all.
Please let me /
On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:30:27 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 26 September 2011 22:53, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I meant do the timer settings affect UDP performance? I.e. does
idletick=1
change UDP performance at all?
I'll check that and get back to you.
But please
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:52:37 pm Brett Glass wrote:
First thing I noticed, when running the new FreeBSD installer from
a memory stick image, is that disk partitioning was odd. It
abandoned standard UNIX parlance, calling what are traditionally
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I agree, the lack of a virtual/emergency terminal seems a bit silly.
I'm not sure about the cons25 versus xterm stuff - you're not the
first person to report this. Guys/girls/other (Hi SF!) - why is this?
:)
It shouldn't be that hard to submit a patch
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, September 25, 2011 8:52:37 pm Brett Glass wrote:
First thing I noticed, when running the new FreeBSD installer from
a memory stick image, is that disk partitioning
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
The question of how to layout and split filesystems was discussed at the
filesystems working group of the devsummit at BSDCan this may.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:23:32AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
It seems 2.1.25 requires to cast to sasl_callback_ft. How about the
attached patch?
Thanx, it works now. IMHO it should be MFCed to stable-9 ASAP (and to
sendmail trunk too).
--
http://ache.vniz.net/
Hello.
I upgrade my FreeBSD 8.2-Release to FreeBSD 9-Beta and pkg_delete -f -a
and add new (that same) pkgs with pkg_add.
And system, xorgs, wine, opera, java, flash works ok, but...
I find two things that dont works ;/
1. Suspend.
On FreeBSD 8.2 when i make ifconfig wlan0 down, and use zzz
Hello.
I upgrade my FreeBSD 8.2-Release to FreeBSD 9-Beta and pkg_delete -f -a
and add new (that same) pkgs with pkg_add.
And system, xorgs, wine, opera, java, flash works ok, but...
I find two things that dont works ;/
1. Suspend.
On FreeBSD 8.2 when i make ifconfig wlan0 down, and use zzz
At 12:03 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
I can't speak to the one-big-fs bit (there was another thread
long ago about
that). However, as to the partitioning bit, bsdinstall is
defaulting to using
The question of how to layout and split
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
At 12:03 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
I can't speak to the one-big-fs bit (there was another thread long ago
about
that). However, as to the partitioning bit,
Hi,
I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
I found this behavior:
% camcontrol devlist
ST380815AS 4.ADA at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
TEAC DVD-ROM DV28SV R.0A at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (pass1,cd0)
%
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
2) I saw many warnings of lock order reversals under the GENERIC kernel, in
particular in the file system code. These obviously should be fixed before
release.
Where did you report them ? [btw, they might
Hi,
I have created a web page for the BSD Hypervisor (BHyVe) project:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/BHyVe
This page contains pointers to how to get the BHyVe code, build it, etc.
It will be updated with more documentation over time.
Please send followup questions to
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Brett Glass wrote:
At 12:03 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
I can't speak to the one-big-fs bit (there was another thread long ago
about
that). However, as to the partitioning bit, bsdinstall is defaulting to
using
The
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
I found this behavior:
% camcontrol devlist
ST380815AS 4.ADA at scbus2 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0)
TEAC
On 09/26/2011 15:38, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
This perception that ZFS is most of the future probably contributed to
the lack of strong opinions regarding the default UFS partition scheme.
Can we please stop saying that there were no contrary opinions stated? I
personally expressed a preference
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/
I run portmaster -y --no-confirm --packages-if-newer -m
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/26/2011 15:38, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
This perception that ZFS is most of the future probably contributed to
the lack of strong opinions regarding the default UFS partition scheme.
Can we please stop saying that there were no contrary opinions
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
Surely the device ID in bus/target/LUN format should be 2:0:0 for the
Seagate hard disk?
Ah, OK. Here is what I get now:
These are the devices, as shown in the dmesg.boot output:
ada0 at ahcich0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 21:27:22 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
Kenneth D. Merry k...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have attached a set of patches against head that implement SCSI
descriptor sense support for CAM.
Anyway, I'd appreciate any testing and feedback on these changes. As I
said, they
[majority of CC'd lists removed...]
On 9/26/11 7:02 PM, crsnet.pl wrote:
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Gary Palmer gpal...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I am running this version: 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #23 r225745:
Fri Sep 23 19:45:09 PDT 2011
I found this behavior:
% camcontrol devlist
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
My personal preference would be to place portions of the directory tree
which contain critical configuration information and are not written in
normal use -- e.g. /etc and
.. I do FreeBSD installs on 1GB flash disks. You know, so I don't have
to nuke the windows install. Just so I can test out things. :)
If people would like to see a more detailed partition editor, please
supply patches to bsdinstall to do so. :-)
I'd love to have multiple options - use all for one
Hi,
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
(And you haven't told us what your hardware is.)
Adrian
___
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. I do FreeBSD installs on 1GB flash disks. You know, so I don't have
to nuke the windows install. Just so I can test out things. :)
If people would like to see a more detailed partition editor, please
supply patches to
On 09/26/2011 16:02, crsnet.pl wrote:
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/
I run
I spoke with John last night. This little gem popped up in the KTR trace.
* the scheduler switches to the idle task
* The interrupt comes in for ath0
* it gets added to the run queue
* .. but then the idle task keeps running ..
* .. until an arge0 interrupt comes in.
There's also three statclock
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
My personal preference would be to place portions of the directory tree
which contain critical
ead...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0
State-Changed-From-To: open-analyzed
State-Changed-By: eadler
State-Changed-When: Mon Sep 26 23:24:00 UTC 2011
State-Changed-Why:
requires only a release notes entry; use cdrecord instead of burncd
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. I do FreeBSD installs on 1GB flash disks. You know, so I don't have
to nuke the windows install. Just so I can test out things. :)
If people would like to see a more detailed partition editor, please
supply
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Brett Glass br...@lariat.net wrote:
My personal preference
The alternative is to fix burncd or backout the acd0 to cd0 change from 9.0
which may be the most desired solution because its obvious that no one
researched the impact this change may have. This change may impact many
ports that access cd/dvd drives for read and write access. burncd may be a
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
The storage world is not limited to spinning hardware. Take a 512MB
CF, put it in a soekris box, and you got an embedded system capable of
doing a whole bunch of stuff.
Now, FreeBSD may no longer want to target such niche usage.
Sure we do!
On 9/26/11 8:59 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
ead...@freebsd.org wrote:
Synopsis: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0
State-Changed-Why: requires only a release notes entry; use cdrecord
instead of burncd
The alternative is to fix burncd or backout the acd0 to cd0 change from
9.0 which
I just filed a bunch of PRs to make sure these comments don't get (too)
lost: 16104{6,7,8,9} and 161050.
-Ben Kaduk
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
[...]
Then why don't you provide symbols for the whole system, including
binaries and libraries ? At least be consistent in your argument...
And, yes, I have patches for that.
On 09/26/2011 17:59, Fbsd8 wrote:
Your solution is very un-professional.
Good thing we're all volunteers. :)
What your solution purposes to do
is do nothing. I think your judgment is flawed and a larger group of
your peers need to review your judgment in this case.
Ok, done. Eitan is
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
burncd has been part of the system utilities included in the basic
release since release 4.0 and cdrecord is a port. The professional
solution is to remove burncd from the 9.0 system release and add the
cdrecord command to
At 04:38 PM 9/26/2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
There was also general sentiment that the rise of ZFS would allow
just this sort of fine-grained partitioning, which is a huge
advantage of its ability to create datasets on the fly. This
perception that ZFS is most of the future probably
On 09/26/2011 18:43, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
burncd has been part of the system utilities included in the basic
release since release 4.0 and cdrecord is a port. The professional
solution is to remove burncd from the 9.0
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have used burncd on many releases of FreeBSD, on many machines
without problem. I can see the fact that burncd suddenly failing to
work on ATAPI hardware could annoy and confused end-users.
It doesn't fail to work on
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:11:12PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. I do FreeBSD installs on 1GB flash disks. You know, so I don't have
to nuke the windows install. Just so I can test out things. :)
If people
.. I'm allowed to make mistakes you know. The point was, 7+1
partitions isn't a lot. :)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi
For me patch do not working
because tzsetup uses old tzsetup
I use this:
--- share/zoneinfo/Makefile (revision 224989)
+++ share/zoneinfo/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@
optC=-C ${DESTDIR}; \
fi; \
2011/9/26 Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru:
Hi
For me patch do not working
because tzsetup uses old tzsetup
I use this:
--- share/zoneinfo/Makefile (revision 224989)
+++ share/zoneinfo/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@
optC=-C
Hi John/Alex.
The AR71xx MIPS kernels didn't include PREEMPTION. This seems a bit
silly, as it's needed by sched_4bsd to actually compile in the code in
maybe_preempt().
So I added it, and it simply increased CPU use without fixing the
issue. But yes, maybe_preempt() is now setting td_owepreempt.
.. erm, sys/mips/mips/machdep.c:
/*
* call platform specific code to halt (until next interrupt) for the idle loop
*/
void
cpu_idle(int busy)
{
KASSERT((mips_rd_status() MIPS_SR_INT_IE) != 0,
(interrupts disabled in idle process.));
KASSERT((mips_rd_status()
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have used burncd on many releases of FreeBSD, on many machines
without problem. I can see the fact that burncd suddenly failing to
work on ATAPI hardware could annoy and
.. and as a follow up (and cc'ing attillo and freebsd-mips, in case
it's relevant to other platforms and there's a MIPS specific thing to
fix):
* 2128: mi_switch to idle
* 2129: kern_clocksource.c:762 - ie, cpu_idleclock() has been called
* 2130: the ath interrupt comes in
* 2134: it's skipped
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Please fix it and move on.
Thanks,
-Garrett
$ usr.sbin/burncd/burncd -f /dev/cd0 blank
burncd: device provided not an acd(4) device: /dev/cd0.
Please verify that your kernel is built with acd(4) and the
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Please fix it and move on.
Thanks,
-Garrett
$ usr.sbin/burncd/burncd -f /dev/cd0 blank
burncd: device provided not an acd(4) device: /dev/cd0.
Please verify that
.. and if someone would like to contribute patches to burncd to update
it, I think there'd be at least one committer here who would be happy
to help you get your changes into the tree.
:-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Gary Palmer wrote:
BSD disklabel is limited to a maximum of 8 slices per MBR partition.
Careful. disklabel/bsdlabel creates FreeBSD partitions, up to 8 per
MBR partition (FreeBSD slice).
Instead of three different things that share two names, GPT only has
partitions.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
.. I'm allowed to make mistakes you know. The point was, 7+1
partitions isn't a lot. :)
Just in case someone new is reading this and getting confused. I
believe those taking part
mostly understand this as well as or better
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completely
at random) assuming that FreeBSD would never jump to a double-digit
major version
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completely
at random)
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote:
With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to be
expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
The issue stems
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the FreeBSD dev's fault. Unfortunately the autotools folks
were microoptimizing and didn't consider that the future would come
sooner than it actually did.
Garrett,
First, I'm not complaining or criticizing
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the FreeBSD dev's fault. Unfortunately the autotools folks
were microoptimizing and didn't consider that the future would come
sooner
My computer recently paniced and broke into ddb after spamming my
console with swap zone exhausted, increase kern.maxswzone
Immediately prior to the panic X was killed and I was able to switch
to vty1 and log in as root (I planned on killing runaway programs)
I called doadump and have the saved
79 matches
Mail list logo
