On 25 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:43:30PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
I upgraded my 11.0-CURRENT machine to r258504 to get past the uma panic
that I stumbled across earlier. Now I got this when I started upgrading
ports:
Unread portion of the kernel message
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
It took a while, but I just got another double fault, though this one is
somewhat different. This time it trapped in cpu_switch(), which
resulted in calls to
trap()-printf()-...-putchar()-msgbuf_addstr()-_mtx_lock_spin_flags()
where
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
It took a while, but I just got another double fault, though this one is
somewhat different. This time it trapped in cpu_switch(), which
resulted in calls to
When building ports on head I sometimes see messages like the following during a
patch phase:
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for firefox-25.0_1,1
No such line 262 in input file, ignoring
=== Applying NSS patches
No such line 194 in input file, ignoring
No such line 658 in input file, ignoring
No
FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 snapshots are now available. These images are
generated from r258657 of stable/10, and are intended as pre -BETA4
snapshots for public testing, until 10.0-BETA4 is rolled (which should
be within the next few days).
Please note, freebsd-update(8) upgrades are not available for
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:13:41AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
It took a while, but I just got another double fault, though this one is
somewhat different. This time it trapped in cpu_switch(),
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:13:41AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
It took a while, but I just got another double fault, though this one is
somewhat different.
On 27 Nov, I wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:13:41AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:22:27AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
It took a while, but I just got another double fault, though this one is
Hello,
ever since I took a FreeBSD machine into production, acting as any kind
of file server, I have to work arround the problem, that write access to
a directory implies unlinking (deleting) directory contents. Never heard
any sensible explanation why anybody would ever want that behaviour,
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 11:21:58 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
When building ports on head I sometimes see messages like the
following
during a patch phase:
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for firefox-25.0_1,1
No such line 262 in input file, ignoring
=== Applying NSS patches
No such line
TB --- 2013-11-27 07:20:17 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-11-27 07:20:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2013-11-27 07:20:17 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-11-27 07:20:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.orgwrote:
stage 3.2: building everything
[...]
^
/src/sys/sys/sdt.h:153:19: note: expanded from macro 'SDT_PROBE_DEFINE'
struct sdt_probe sdt_##prov##_##mod##_##func##_##name[1] = {
\
On 27 November 2013 17:59, Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 8:07 AM, FreeBSD Tinderbox
tinder...@freebsd.orgwrote:
stage 3.2: building everything
[...]
^
/src/sys/sys/sdt.h:153:19: note: expanded from macro 'SDT_PROBE_DEFINE'
struct sdt_probe
On 11/27/13, 8:03 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
ever since I took a FreeBSD machine into production, acting as any kind
of file server, I have to work arround the problem, that write access to
a directory implies unlinking (deleting) directory contents.
not sure I fully understand
Hi,
is it possible to include in base system of the upcoming 10.0 the new
version of ntp (4.2.7 instead of 4.2.4)?
There is a bug in older versions ( 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an ntp
server to DDoS. This has been corrected in new version:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Cristiano Deana
cristiano.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to include in base system of the upcoming 10.0 the new
version of ntp (4.2.7 instead of 4.2.4)?
There is a bug in older versions ( 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an ntp
server to DDoS. This
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
There is a bug in older versions ( 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an ntp
server to DDoS. This has been corrected in new version:
https://cert.litnet.lt/en/docs/ntp-distributed-reflection-dos-attacks
This attack
Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 27.11.2013 16:20 (localtime):
On 11/27/13, 8:03 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
ever since I took a FreeBSD machine into production, acting as any kind
of file server, I have to work arround the problem, that write access to
a directory
on 26/11/2013 11:57 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Author: avg
Date: Tue Nov 26 09:57:14 2013
New Revision: 258632
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/258632
Log:
MFV r255255: 4045 zfs write throttle i/o scheduler performance work
OS: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #0 r257580: Sun Nov 3 19:43:01 UTC 2013
r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
When I boot a computer I got one warning:
/etc/rc: WARNING: $tcsd_enable is not set properly
I don't now on which setting is this warning related.
My rc.conf looks
OS: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #0 r257580: Sun Nov 3 19:43:01 UTC 2013
r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
I have all the time python related warnings:
WARNING pid 1615 (python2.7): ioctl sign-extension ioctl 80087467
WARNING pid 1617 (python2.7): ioctl
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/doublefault2.JPG
What is the instruction at cpu_switch+0x9b ?
pgpkUYYh0Npao.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Cristiano Deana
cristiano.de...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
There is a bug in older versions ( 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an
ntp
server to DDoS. This has been corrected in new version:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/doublefault2.JPG
What is the instruction at cpu_switch+0x9b ?
movl 0x8(%edx),%eax
This machine is running in i386 mode.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/doublefault2.JPG
What is the instruction at cpu_switch+0x9b ?
movl 0x8(%edx),%eax
So it is
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
http://people.freebsd.org/~truckman/doublefault2.JPG
What is the instruction at
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 11/14/2013 15:45, Steve Kargl wrote:
And in practice, it is broken.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-November/046565.html
QED
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave.
On 11/14/2013 15:45, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 09:54:52AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
On 13 Nov 2013, at 19:40, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On the other hand, different C++ standard libraries simply cannot be
mixed. The internal implementations are usually
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:30AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:30AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 02:49:12AM -0800, Don Lewis
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 12:59:10 Ajtim wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 17:07:40 you wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Ajtim lum...@gmail.com wrote:
OS: FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 #0 r257580: Sun Nov 3 19:43:01 UTC 2013
r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:30AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov
Hi,
Here's part #2 in my sendfile refactoring. This is a little more
intrusive than the first patch.
http://people.freebsd.org/~adrian/netflix/20131126-sendfile-sync-refactor-2.diff
My aim here is to move the sendfile_sync stuff out of uipc_syscalls.c
and out of sendfile-only code and into
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Trying to migrate to 10, I would like to keep octave. Have you found
anything new? Having build the port and all dependencies with standard
options, octave is segfaulting for me, too. Anyhow, I can run octave with:
env
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:30AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Cristiano Deana
cristiano.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to include in base system of the upcoming 10.0 the new
version of ntp (4.2.7 instead of 4.2.4)?
There is a bug in older versions ( 4.2.7) who allows attacker use an ntp
server to DDoS. This
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:30AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:41:36AM -0800, Don Lewis
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:33:30AM -0800, Don Lewis
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does it have a CVE? The article is low on content
I don't think so. I think there were lot of ideas about the DDoS, that's
the only article suggesting a right solution (in my experience).
I think they are still
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labbé
oliv...@cochard.mewrote:
Hi
Thanks for this URL, I've meet this problem on my FreeBSD 9.2 few
weeks ago (public NTP registered in the pool.ntp.org).
Same for me.
There is a thread on the ntp.org ML about this too:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
And, as the last resort, I do understand that this sounds as giving up,
do you monitor the temperature of the CPUs ? BTW, which CPUs are that,
please show the cpu identification lines from the boot dmesg.
Idle temps:
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature:
On 11/28/13, 12:17 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 27.11.2013 16:20 (localtime):
On 11/27/13, 8:03 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
ever since I took a FreeBSD machine into production, acting as any kind
of file server, I have to work arround
Hmm thanks for discussion.
I'll install and test FBSD 10 in this weekend.
thanks
Nakata Maho
From: Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Subject: Re: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:43:02 -0800
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Jan
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:11:35PM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote:
On 27 Nov, Konstantin Belousov
45 matches
Mail list logo
