arm64.aarch64: cross-compiling ports on AMD64 possible?

Hello, I've already successfully built a "world" and "kernel" on AMD64 (ath this place a thank-you for the developers!) using the port emulators/qemu_usr_static. /usr/src and /usr/ports are up to date on a daily basis. I use poudriere with a great success (and here again, thank-you towards those

Re: svn commit: r317659 - head/sys/dev/uart [head -r317729 for armv6/7: ns8250_drain : error: implicit declaration of function 'ns8250_drain' is invalid in C99]

On 2017-May-3, at 4:47 AM, Mark Millard wrote: >> Author: mav >> Date: Mon May 1 19:47:10 2017 >> New Revision: 317659 >> URL: >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317659 >> >> >> Log: >> Make some UART consoles to not spin wait for data to be sent. >> >> At

RE: Re: regression suspend/resume on Lenovo T420

> Von: Adrian Chadd > Gesendet: Mo. 01.05.2017 23:31 > An: Manuel Stühn , > Kopie: freebsd-current , > Betreff: Re: regression suspend/resume on Lenovo T420 > > There were lots of commits that could break things. :-) > > > Can you compile up some intermediary versions between 315141 and >

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On 3. mai 2017, at 21:53, Toomas Soome wrote: > > >> On 3. mai 2017, at 21:23, Michael W. Lucas > > wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:11:05PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: >>> On 3. mai 2017, at 21:06,

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On 3. mai 2017, at 21:23, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:11:05PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: >> >>> On 3. mai 2017, at 21:06, Michael W. Lucas >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:03:21PM +0300, Toomas

Re: old snapshot install images?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:11:05PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: > > > On 3. mai 2017, at 21:06, Michael W. Lucas > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:03:21PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: > >> There was many issues fixed step by step and some fixes for particular

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On 3. mai 2017, at 21:06, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:03:21PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: >> There was many issues fixed step by step and some fixes for particular >> problem did reveal next one (at least in some systems), and indeed, it

Re: old snapshot install images?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 08:03:21PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote: > There was many issues fixed step by step and some fixes for particular > problem did reveal next one (at least in some systems), and indeed, it can > cause some problems if you are caught in middle of updates. From my point of >

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On 3. mai 2017, at 19:52, Ngie Cooper wrote: > > >> On May 3, 2017, at 09:41, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:37:04AM -0700, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: >>> Ok. I was curious because there has been a period of

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On May 3, 2017, at 10:39, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:52:09AM -0700, Ngie Cooper wrote: >> Ok. How big is your freebsd-boot partition? > > The size created by the installer. ;) > > I've run another install, this one with the r317181

Re: old snapshot install images?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:52:09AM -0700, Ngie Cooper wrote: > Ok. How big is your freebsd-boot partition? The size created by the installer. ;) I've run another install, this one with the r317181 snapshot (20 April.) gpart show ada4 shows this (hand-copied) 40 125045344ada4 GPT

Re: regression suspend/resume on Lenovo T420

On 05/01/2017 14:31, Adrian Chadd wrote: There were lots of commits that could break things. :-) Can you compile up some intermediary versions between 315141 and r317559 to find which commit range broke things? That'll make chasing it down much quicker! Thanks! Hey Adrian - I was looking

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On May 3, 2017, at 09:41, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > >> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:37:04AM -0700, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: >> Ok. I was curious because there has been a period of time when 512b/sector >> disks have been broken and vice versa. >> >> I’m

Re: old snapshot install images?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:37:04AM -0700, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote: > Ok. I was curious because there has been a period of time when 512b/sector > disks have been broken and vice versa. > > I???m going to operate under the impression that one of tsoome???s recent > changes to zfsboot

Re: old snapshot install images?

> On May 3, 2017, at 09:34, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 01:01:10AM -0700, Ngie Cooper wrote: >> Hi Michael! >> - What sources are you using/revision are you at? > > Using r311461 amd64 install memstick at the moment. Uname says built > "Thu

Re: old snapshot install images?

On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 01:01:10AM -0700, Ngie Cooper wrote: > Hi Michael! > - What sources are you using/revision are you at? Using r311461 amd64 install memstick at the moment. Uname says built "Thu Jan 5 22:46:38 UTC 2017" > - Are your drives the 512 byte/sector or 4kB/sector variety? They

Re: svn commit: r317659 - head/sys/dev/uart [head -r317729 for armv6/7: ns8250_drain : error: implicit declaration of function 'ns8250_drain' is invalid in C99]

> Author: mav > Date: Mon May 1 19:47:10 2017 > New Revision: 317659 > URL: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/317659 > > > Log: > Make some UART consoles to not spin wait for data to be sent. > > At least with Tx FIFO enabled it shows me ~10% reduction of verbose boot > time

Re: old snapshot install images?

Hi Michael! > On May 2, 2017, at 12:15, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > Hi, > > About a year ago, I did a clean install on my desktop. No problems. > > I tried a clean install now, and it dies with: > > gtpzfsboot: error 1 lba 32 > error 1 > gptzfsboot: error 1 lba