Hello
It looks like I fucked my -current box up during the sig_t changes.
I tried made a new kernel before make world but after ifconfig'ing
the network interfaces it panics with:
panic: malloc type lacks magic
Making a new world is of course not possible because of the sig_t
changes.
Any
.
majordomo is crap it seems, the freebsd mailing lists should switch
over to ezmlm-idx/qmail... *THAT* works 100% reliable.
--
Andre Oppermann
CEO / Geschaeftsfuehrer
Internet Business Solutions Ltd. (AG)
Hardstrasse 235, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland
Fon +41 1 277 75 75 / Fax +41 1 277 75 77
http
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 11:01 AM +0200 1999/10/11, Andre Oppermann wrote:
majordomo is crap it seems, the freebsd mailing lists should switch
over to ezmlm-idx/qmail... *THAT* works 100% reliable.
I think we can separate MLA issues from MTA issues. Myself, I've
had
)
plus
http://www.ezmlm.org/faq-0.32/FAQ4.html#ss4.33 (how bounces are
handled)
--
Andre Oppermann
CEO / Geschaeftsfuehrer
Internet Business Solutions Ltd. (AG)
Hardstrasse 235, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland
Fon +41 1 277 75 75 / Fax +41 1 277 75 77
http://www.pipeline.ch[EMAIL PROTECTED
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:23 PM +0200 1999/10/12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
I know some guys with list's in the three digit k to one digit M range
which don't have to deal with bounces at any time. I know it's hard
to believe but it's true and I can provide you with names where one
can
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 10:11 PM +0200 1999/10/12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
They must be crazy to run a several million recipients
mailing list with sendmail...
You don't know all the hacks that they made to sendmail to make
it perform at previously unheard of levels
truck down for constitutional
reasons, but until it is... it's a very risky thing to do.
Not every country has the same stupid "copyright" laws as the US.
Who cares anyway that they think they can rule the world?
--
Andre Oppermann
CEO / Geschaeftsfuehrer
Internet Busines
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get high numbers too:
FreeBSD mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch 3.2-STABLE FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE #3: Sun
Jun 13 20:31:43 CEST 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys
/compile/mailtoaster1 i386
Read the original message. It says:
I would appreciate it if people
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
[Bcc to -net because it is relevant there. This email has been
triggered by a private discussion i was having with other committers
(who will easily recognise themselves :) which suggested the
possibility of adding more fields to mbuf headers]
Just recently came up to
I always get bitten by these bugs while trying to upgrade a 4.0-RELEASE
box to 5.0-CURRENT via make world:
Problem #1:
=== libcrypto
perl
/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypto/../../../crypto/openssl/crypto/objects/obj_dat.
pl
Andrew Reilly wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2000 at 05:01:46PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Andrew Reilly" writes:
: That sounds way too hard. Why not restrict suspend activity to
: user-level processes and bring the kernel/drivers back up through
: a regular boot
Is there any supporting Access Point functionality, eg. using the
freebsd server as AP?
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" writes:
: Is there a list of wireless pc cards that work (and how well they work)
: with FreeBSD??
There's
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 01:17:03 -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
I'm planning on checking in the zero copy sockets code Tuesday evening,
MDT. If there are any
On 05.08.2013 16:59, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
- Original Message -
i am slightly unclear of what mechanisms we use to prevent races
between interface being reconfigured (up/down/multicast setting, etc,
all causing reinitialization of the rx and tx rings) and
i) packets from the host
On 05.08.2013 19:36, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I'm travelling back to San Jose today; poke me tomorrow and I'll brain
dump what I did in ath(4) and the lessons learnt.
The TL;DR version - you don't want to grab an extra lock in
On 05.08.2013 23:53, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:04:44PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 05.08.2013 19:36, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
[picking a post at random to reply in this thread]
tell whether or not we should bail out).
Ideally we don't want to have any locks
On 07.08.2013 09:18, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Mike Karels m...@karels.net
mailto:m...@karels.net wrote:
Jumping to (near) the end of the thread, I like most of Andre's proposal.
Running with minimal locks at this layer is an admirable goal, and I agree
with
I want to put these mbuf changes/updates/adjustments up for objections, if any,
before committing them.
This is a moderate overhaul of the mbuf headers and fields to take us into the
next 5 years and two releases. The mbuf headers, in particular the pkthdr, have
seen a number of new uses and
On 26.08.2013 13:02, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
r254804 and r254807 changed the types of some of the members of the
mbuf struct, and introduced some compile time errors in netback
debug messages that prevented compiling a XENHVM kernel.
Thanks, I fixed the printf's with r254910 in a slightly
On 26.08.2013 15:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 26/08/13 15:22, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 26.08.2013 13:02, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
r254804 and r254807 changed the types of some of the members of the
mbuf struct, and introduced some compile time errors in netback
debug messages that prevented
On a newly installed development machine I installed subversion-freebsd
from ports and ended up with a huge dependency chain. Eventually I got
the usual gnu-hell (auto-*, lib*), but also python27, tcl-8.5, perl-5.12
and m4. This is a bit too much. The last four should not be required to
check
On 03.10.2012 22:03, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
somaxconn is the connection queue depth. If it's sitting at a couple
hundred thousand then something else is going crazily wrong.
I understand your frustration, but there's a lot of instances where
the application just isn't doing things right and
What's keeping kernel modules from building in parallel with
make -j8?
--
Andre
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 20.10.2012 15:11, Vladislav Prodan wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Jul 25 01:40:56 EEST 2012
I have the server: 8 cores AMD, 16GB RAM, 4x3TB HDD in RAID10 for ZFS.
Sometime wheels fall off the server and the network.
Can this clean-up memory for ZFS cache?
I enclose a picture with
The ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS kernel option has been removed from HEAD
today. Please see the explanation in the attached commit message.
--
Andre
---BeginMessage---
Author: andre
Date: Tue Oct 23 16:33:43 2012
New Revision: 241955
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241955
Log:
Note the
On 24.10.2012 16:26, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi,
We have 'maxusers' tunable which affects many other tunables, e.g. number of
network mbuf/clusters which is often too low on current machines.
The mbuf/cluster limit can be rethought as well. Since it all comes
out of UMA and is not
On 04.11.2012 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote:
At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local network since last sunday.
the last kernel that works:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Oct 28
On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote:
On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote:
At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 3 November 2012 10:40, Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
i have problem connecting to freebsd box on local
On 22.10.2012 15:28, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, October 21, 2012 7:11:10 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
What's keeping kernel modules from building in parallel with
make -j8?
They don't for you? They do for me either via 'make buildkernel'
or the old method.
They do, but only partially
On 04.11.2012 21:15, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 04.11.12 14:57, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote:
On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar wrote:
At 03:29 PM 11/3/2012, Adrian Chadd wrote:
After the commit
On 05.11.2012 02:39, Manfred Antar wrote:
At 01:57 PM 11/4/2012, you wrote:
On 04.11.2012 21:15, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 04.11.12 14:57, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 04.11.2012 13:11, Kim Culhan wrote:
On Sun, November 4, 2012 6:21 am, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-04 02:13, Manfred Antar
On 05.11.2012 17:57, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:25:36PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Joe Holden li...@rewt.org.uk wrote:
doh, running kernel wasn't as GENERIC as I
On 06.11.2012 11:27, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 5098e526.6070...@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann writes:
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
Can I just point out
On 06.11.2012 12:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 11:23:34AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
yes, we should let it rest in peace
On 06.11.2012 12:02, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Hi Luigi,
do you agree on polling having outlived its usefulness in the light
of interrupt moderating NIC's and SMP complications/disadvantages?
If you have only one interface yes polling is not really necessary.
If you have 10 interfaces the
On 14.11.2012 03:10, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Andre, do you think the variable realmem could be exported as something like
kmemsize or something?
Or maybe a function call to subr_param.c?
The reason I ask is that I would like to scale things like number of default
sysv semaphores to
something
Hello
I currently working on a number of drivers for popular network
cards and extend them with automatic hybrid interrupt/polling
ithread processing with life-lock prevention (so that the driver
can't consume all CPU when under heavy load or attack).
To properly test this I need the proper
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012
a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64
#0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h:229
#1 0x8033e2d2 in db_fncall (dummy1=value optimized out,
dummy2=value optimized out,
On 27.11.2012 16:05, Attilio Rao wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012
a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64
#0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336
On 27.11.2012 16:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012
a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64
#0 doadump (textdump=-2014022336) at pcpu.h
On 27.11.2012 16:40, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 27/11/2012 17:38 Andre Oppermann said the following:
Clang doing a manual kernel build of my work tree with make -j8 kernel.
This sounds like a process that may have triggered the problem.
But is it the process that made the syscall in the backtrace
On 27.11.2012 16:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:38:12PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 27.11.2012 16:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Fri Nov 23 17
On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Fri Nov 23 17:00:40 CET 2012
a...@bbb.ccc:/usr/obj/usr/src/head/sys/GENERIC amd64
#0
On 27.11.2012 19:27, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:08, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
FreeBSD bbb.ccc 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0:
Fri Nov
On 27.11.2012 20:16, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:43, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 27.11.2012 19:27, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:08, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 27.11.2012 17:42, Alan Cox wrote:
On 11/27/2012 09:06, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:26:44PM +0100
On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 07:40:21PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
I see significant difference between number of interrupts on the Intel and the
AMD blades. When performing a test between the Intel and AMD blades, the Intel
blade generates 20,000-35,000
On 08.12.2011 14:11, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Even in my experiments there is a lot of instability in the results.
I don't know exactly where
On 08.12.2011 16:34, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
I ran a bunch of tests on the ixgbe (82599) using RELENG_8 (which
seems slightly faster than HEAD) using MTU=1500 and various
combinations of
On 02.04.2012 18:21, Alexandre Martins wrote:
Dear,
I have currently having troubles with a basic socket stress.
The socket are setup to use non-blocking I/O.
During this stress-test, the kernel is running mbuf exhaustion, the goal is to
see system limits.
If the program make a write on a
On 11.04.2012 01:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:05:00PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
CPU cache?
Cx states?
powerd?
powerd is disabled, and i am going down to C1 at most
sysctl -a | grep cx
hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1
dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1 C2/80
On 11.04.2012 13:00, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:35:10PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 11.04.2012 01:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 07:05:00PM -0400, Barney Wolff wrote:
CPU cache?
Cx states?
powerd?
powerd is disabled, and i am going down to C1 at most
On 19.04.2012 15:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have been running some performance tests on UDP sockets,
using the netsend program in tools/tools/netrate/netsend
and instrumenting the source code and the kernel do return in
various points of the path. Here are some results which
I hope you find
On 19.04.2012 22:34, K. Macy wrote:
This is indeed a big problem. I'm working (rough edges remain) on
changing the routing table locking to an rmlock (read-mostly) which
This only helps if your flows aren't hitting the same rtentry.
Otherwise you still convoy on the lock for the rtentry
On 19.04.2012 22:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:05:37PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.04.2012 15:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have been running some performance tests on UDP sockets,
using the netsend program in tools/tools/netrate/netsend
and instrumenting the source code
On 19.04.2012 23:17, K. Macy wrote:
This only helps if your flows aren't hitting the same rtentry.
Otherwise you still convoy on the lock for the rtentry itself to
increment and decrement the rtentry's reference count.
The rtentry lock isn't obtained anymore. While the rmlock read
lock is
On 20.04.2012 00:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:20:00PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.04.2012 22:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The allocation happens while the code has already an exclusive
lock on so-snd_buf so a pool of fresh buffers could be attached
there.
Ah
On 20.04.2012 10:26, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
On 20.04.2012 01:12, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.04.2012 22:34, K. Macy wrote:
If the number of peers is bounded then you can use the flowtable. Max
PPS is much higher bypassing routing lookup. However, it doesn't scale
From my experience
On 20.04.2012 08:35, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:37:21AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 20.04.2012 00:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:20:00PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.04.2012 22:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
The allocation happens while the code has
On 19.04.2012 22:46, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:05:37PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.04.2012 15:30, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
I have been running some performance tests on UDP sockets,
using the netsend program in tools/tools/netrate/netsend
and instrumenting the source code
The autotuning work is reaching into many places of the kernel and
while trying to tie up all lose ends I've got stuck in the kmem_map
and how it works or what its limitations are.
During startup the VM is initialized and an initial kernel virtual
memory map is setup in kmem_init() covering the
On 23.01.2013 00:22, Artem Belevich wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek p...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:26:04AM -0800, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Should it be set to a larger initial value based on min(physical,KVM) space
available?
It needs to be
On 31.01.2013 12:27, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 30, 2013, at 22:43, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@crodrigues.org wrote:
What you need to do is, before the FreeBSD kernel boots, your
loader needs to export some environment variables. This will trigger
the various behaviors in the FreeBSD mount
On 28.01.2013 20:20, Alan Cox wrote:
On 01/28/2013 08:22, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 00:09 -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
I ran into a panic while attempting to un-tar a large file on a
DreamPlug (arm-based system)
On 31.01.2013 23:25, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 18:13 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 28.01.2013 20:20, Alan Cox wrote:
On 01/28/2013 08:22, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 00:09 -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote
As an outcome of the recent problems with auto-sizing and auto-tuning of
the various kernel subsystems and related memory structures I've taken a
closer look at the whole KVM inner working and initialization process.
I've found the VM and KVM initialization to be somewhat obscure and stuck
On 01.02.2013 18:09, Alan Cox wrote:
On 02/01/2013 07:25, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Rebase auto-sizing of limits on the available KVM/kmem_map instead of
physical
memory. Depending on the kernel and architecture configuration these
two can
be very different.
Comments and reviews
On 08.03.2013 10:16, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 06:03:51PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
pager_map: is used for pager IO to a storage media (disk). Not
pageable. Calculation: MAXPHYS * min(max(nbuf/4, 16), 256).
It is more versatile. The space is used for pbufs
Hi Rick, all,
is there a plan to decide for one NFS implementation for FreeBSD 10.0,
or to keep both around indefinately?
I'm talking about:
oldNFS in sys/{nfs, nfsclient, nfsserver} NFSv2+NFSv3
newNFS in sys/fs/{nfs, nfsclient, nfsserver} NFSv2+NFSv3+NFSv4
NewNFS supports newer NFS
On 15.03.2013 15:01, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
this reminds me that I ran into an issue lately with the new NFS and locking
for NFSv3 mounts on a client that ran -CURRENT and a server that ran
-STABLE.
When I ran portmaster -a on the client, which mounted /usr/ports and
/usr/local, as well as
On 15.03.2013 14:46, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2013 9:40:56 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi Rick, all,
is there a plan to decide for one NFS implementation for FreeBSD 10.0,
or to keep both around indefinately?
I'm talking about:
oldNFS in sys/{nfs, nfsclient, nfsserver
On 16.03.2013 01:44, Peter Wemm wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:03 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2013 11:24:32 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 15.03.2013 14:46, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, March 15, 2013 9:40:56 am Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hi Rick, all
On 15.03.2013 15:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
Hi,
this reminds me that I ran into an issue lately with the new NFS and
locking for NFSv3 mounts on a client that ran -CURRENT and a server
that ran -STABLE.
When I ran portmaster -a on the client, which mounted /usr/ports and
Excuse me for being slightly spammy but I've received feedback that we
haven't spread this information widely enough outside the inner circles
and interested people missed the announcement.
EuroBSDcon 2013: September 28-29 in Malta
=
EuroBSDcon is the
On 15.04.2013 19:48, Cy Schubert wrote:
I did consider a port but given it would has to touch bits and pieces of
the source tree (/usr/src), a port would be messy and the decision was made
to work on importing it into base.
Actually it shouldn't touch many if any pieces of src/sys. Everything
On 15.04.2013 05:32, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/11/13 5:18 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Excuse me for being slightly spammy but I've received feedback that we
haven't spread this information widely enough outside the inner circles
and interested people missed the announcement.
EuroBSDcon 2013
On 24.04.2013 12:45, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
Hi all,
here is the result of my simple-and-dummy bench script regarding
forwarding/ipfw/pf performance evolution on -current on a single-core
server with one flow only.
It's the result of more than 810 bench tests (including reboot between
On 25.04.2013 07:40, Olivier Cochard-Labbé wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Sami Halabi sodyn...@gmail.com wrote:
3. there some point of improved performance (without fw) that went down
again somewhere before Clang got prod.
Found it !
It's commit 242402: Rework the known mutexes...
On 08.05.2013 07:57, Andrey Smagin wrote:
I tried by analogy your patch add _padalign in all places where was before
r250300, and in stcp. Uptime now 15hours, before - 5min - 3hour max. I waiting
for more statistic.
my changes:
The padalign commit has been backed out in r250300 and we are
Any ideas how to fix this?
# make -j8 buildworld
--- buildworld ---
make: illegal option -- J
usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable]
[-d flags] [-E variable] [-f makefile] [-I directory]
[-j max_jobs] [-m directory] [-V variable]
[variable=value]
On 31.05.2013 12:17, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
Le 31/05/2013 12:13, Andre Oppermann a écrit :
Any ideas how to fix this?
# make -j8 buildworld
--- buildworld ---
make: illegal option -- J
usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable]
[-d flags] [-E variable] [-f
On 19.06.2013 11:10, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
I'm seeing this panic quite regularly now. Most recent sighting on r251858.
This panic message is not very informative and very hard to extract any
meaningful hints. Do you have a core dump and matching debug kernel?
--
Andre
cpuid = 15
KDB:
On 19.06.2013 11:34, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 19.06.2013 11:10, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
Hi
I'm seeing this panic quite regularly now. Most recent sighting on r251858.
This panic message is not very informative and very hard to extract any
meaningful hints. Do you have
We have a SYN cookie implementation for quite some time now but it
has some limitations with current realities for window scaling and
SACK encoding the in the few available bits.
This patch updates and improves SYN cookies mainly by:
a) encoding of MSS, WSCALE (window scaling) and SACK into
On 05.07.2013 20:38, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message 20130705084649.gc67...@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff writes:
What I'd prefer to see is the following:
- commit new ipfilter untouched to vendor-sys/ipfilter
- nuke sys/contrib/ipfilter
- svn copy vendor-sys/ipfilter to sys/netpfil/ipfilter
On 10.07.2013 15:18, Fabian Keil wrote:
Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
We have a SYN cookie implementation for quite some time now but it
has some limitations with current realities for window scaling and
SACK encoding the in the few available bits.
This patch updates and improves
On 11.07.2013 18:09, Michael Butler wrote:
On 07/11/13 12:07, Michael Butler wrote:
Seems gcc is rather fussy about propagating 'const' and fails to compile
/usr/src/sys/crypto/siphash/siphash.c after SVN r253208.
I believe the attached patch is correct but please review ..
imb
grr
On 12.07.2013 12:56, Fabian Keil wrote:
Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10.07.2013 15:18, Fabian Keil wrote:
Andre Oppermann an...@freebsd.org wrote:
We have a SYN cookie implementation for quite some time now but it
has some limitations with current realities for window scaling
On 23.07.2013 09:28, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 21.07.2013 00:43, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote:
After r253088, systems with IPSEC and KSTACK_PAGES 4 crashes on
booting into multi-user mode.
The crash is due to sysctl -a in /etc/rc.d/initrandom ended up with
kernel stack overflow.
where type is
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andre Oppermann writes:
: Sat, 1 Jan 100 17:16:30 +0100 (MET)
: Oliver, how old is your PC?
It isn't a pc bug, but rather a bug in his mail transfer agent.
Hmm... His MTA looks fine:
Received: by frizzantino.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (SMI
Oliver Schonefeld wrote: [all snipped]
Here we go:
Sat, 1 Jan 100 17:16:30 +0100 (MET)
The first "millenium" bug on our mailing lists!
Oliver, how old is your PC?
--
Andre
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 10:43 AM -0800 1/21/00, John Polstra wrote:
This is another in my series of occasional nags to try to get people
to use some of the less heavily loaded CVSup mirrors. In the US
alone, we have 8 mirror sites now, named (duh) cvsup[1-8].FreeBSD.org.
The newest,
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 11:06 PM +0100 2000/1/21, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Thats not so easy. What about this:
cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup1.freebsd.org.
cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup2.freebsd.org.
cvsupIN CNAMEcvsup3.freebsd.org
Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup1.freebsd.org.
cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup2.freebsd.org.
cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup3.freebsd.org.
cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup4.freebsd.org.
cvsup IN CNAMEcvsup5.freebsd.org.
cvsup
Jesper Skriver wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:06:40PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
I don't see any appearant reson (short of network connectivity) that
one *needs* to get always the *same* server.
This has been discussed regulary ...
Must have been some time ago...
You will risk
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:39:24PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Does it matter? Who cvsup's regulary more than once or twice a day?
Committers AFAIK do cvs directly.
I "cvs co" from my local copy of the repository, which is kept
up-to-date using
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second, a domain name can at most a single CNAME record associated
with it, and other other record types. BIND will (should) barf on a
zone file containing the example you listed.
It does not. It will round-robin over the CNAME's.
See the documentation
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 11:56:11PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
OK, then you should hardwire your cvsup server to cvsup[1-8]. You can
master cvs so you can master this.
I do. Thanks for your vote of confidence in my abilities, though.
If you meant "commi
Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
Second, a domain name can at most a single CNAME record associated
with it, and other other record types. BIND will (should) barf on a
zone file containing the example you listed.
It does not. It will round-robin over the CNAME's.
If it does, than this
Brian Somers wrote:
So there are now 2 possibilities for this problem:
a) I was out of sync :(
b) Someone fixed ppp
Last nights commit was for RADIUS support in ppp. There was another
latency problem that I fixed about a week ago - maybe that was it :-)
Yuck! (jumping in the air
Matthew Jacob wrote:
For raw pattern testing Linux has a special challenge since you right
directly into the buffer cache. There *is* a BLKFLSBUF ioctl that can try
and force a flush but this probably ought to be written to use O_FSYNC- I
think that the ll_rw code might use it or an fsync
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
