Re: svn error during 'make buildkernel'?

On 06.08.13 21:11, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: Sure, right _now_ devel/subversion and base svnlite get along, but what happens when ports moves to 1.9 which changes the WT format? This is just one of the quirks that subversion has, in that it's database can't be easily parsed with other tools.

Re: GCC withdraw

On 23.08.13 14:16, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build on platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely don't want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these for

Re: What happened to nslookup?

On 16.10.13 08:42, Kevin Oberman wrote: nslookup(1) was deprecated about a decade ago because it often provides misleading results when used for DNS troubleshooting. It generally works fine for simply turning a name to an address or vice-versa. People should really use host(1) for simple

Re: RFC: Project geom-events

On 06.10.11 14:07, Ivan Voras wrote: Um, you do realize this is a physical problem with metadata location and cannot be solved in any meaningful way? Geom_label stores its label in the last sector of the device, and GPT stores the secondary / backup table also at the end of the device. The

Re: RFC: Project geom-events

On 06.10.11 15:36, Ivan Voras wrote: On 06/10/2011 13:29, Daniel Kalchev wrote: On 06.10.11 14:07, Ivan Voras wrote: Um, you do realize this is a physical problem with metadata location and cannot be solved in any meaningful way? Geom_label stores its label in the last sector of the device

Re: RFC: Project geom-events

On 06.10.11 17:04, Pieter de Goeje wrote: The layering *is* correct and you *can* create a GPT inside a glabel label, but then 1) you get device names like /dev/label/somethingp1, /dev/label/somethingp2, etc. .. and, you overwrite the last sector of the device, not of the provider. This is

Re: RFC: Project geom-events

On 07.10.11 22:44, Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Perryh. You wrote 7 октября 2011 г., 18:06:38: GPT (and MBR) metadata placement is dictated from outside world, where is no GEOM and geom_label. They INTENDED to be used on DISKS. BIOSes should be able to find it :) Certainly GPT and MBR

Re: RFC: Project geom-events

On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:05 , Lev Serebryakov wrote: Hello, Ivan. You wrote 8 октября 2011 г., 0:23:14: If you think this should be explicitely handled, please file a PR which requests the modification of gpart so that it detects that a GPT is being created in anything other than a raw

Re: gptzfsboot error using HP Smart Array P410i Controller

Has this issue been resolved somehow? Sane method to build gptzfsboot that will run on HP's P410i? Daniel ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: gptzfsboot error using HP Smart Array P410i Controller

On 13.10.11 00:33, Christoph Hoffmann wrote: I am inclined to think that this is related to the way how we compile this code, especially when run on the following particular processor: 1 Processor(s) detected, 4 total cores enabled, Hyperthreading is enabled Proc 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5630

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: - have two machines connected by a 10G link - on one run nuttcp -S - on the other one run nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v the.other.ip Any particular tuning of FreeBSD? Daniel ___

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

Here is what I get, with an existing install, no tuning other than kern.ipc.nmbclusters=512000 Pair of Supermicro blades: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 28 11:23:59 EEST 2011 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (2403.58-MHz K8-class CPU) real memory = 51539607552 (49152 MB)

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

On 06.12.11 13:18, Daniel Kalchev wrote: [...] second blade: # nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v 10.2.101.13 nuttcp-t: v6.1.2: socket nuttcp-t: buflen=65536, nstream=1, port=5001 tcp - 10.2.101.13 nuttcp-t: time limit = 5.00 seconds nuttcp-t: connect to 10.2.101.13 with mss=1448, RTT=0.164 ms nuttcp-t

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

Some tests with updated FreeBSD to 8-stable as of today, compared with the previous run On 06.12.11 13:18, Daniel Kalchev wrote: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 28 11:23:59 EEST 2011 CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz (2403.58-MHz K8-class CPU) real memory = 51539607552

Re: USB system: FreeBSD 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT do not recognize 64GB USB drive while Linux and Windows do

On 22.06.12 09:22, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is difficult to autodetect these issues, because once you trigger the non- supported SCSI command, then

Re: ZFS/RAIDZ and SAMBA: abyssimal performance

On Jan 4, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gd wrote: And network cards: # Up a bit our intel cards parameters hw.em.txd=4096 hw.em.rxd=4096 hw.em.tx_int_delay=512 hw.em.rx_int_delay=512 hw.em.tx_abs_int_delay=1024 hw.em.rx_abs_int_delay=1024 I am curious why we need to

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

I see significant difference between number of interrupts on the Intel and the AMD blades. When performing a test between the Intel and AMD blades, the Intel blade generates 20,000-35,000 interrupts, while the AMD blade generates under 1,000 interrupts. There is no longer throttling, but the

Re: quick summary results with ixgbe (was Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

On Dec 7, 2011, at 8:08 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Summary: - with default interrupt mitigation, the fastest configuration is with checksums enabled on both sender and receiver, lro enabled on the receiver. This gets about 8.0 Gbit/s I do not observe this. With defaults: # nuttcp -t -T 5

Re: quick summary results with ixgbe (was Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

On 07.12.11 22:23, Luigi Rizzo wrote: Sorry, forgot to mention that the above is with TSO DISABLED (which is not the default). TSO seems to have a very bad interaction with HWCSUM and non-zero mitigation. I have this on both sender and receiver # ifconfig ix1 ix1:

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: […] That said: thrown out, data ignored, done. Now what? Where are we? We're right back where we were a day or two ago; meaning no closer to solving the dilemma reported by users and SCHED_ULE. Heck, we're not even sure if there is an

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel: No, the same hardware was used for each OS. In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was used. Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

I have already canceled few replies to this thread, but... On 19.12.11 15:16, Alexander Yerenkow wrote: IMHO, no offence, as always. I feel obliged to include the same disclaimer :-) As were told, Phoronix used default setup, not tuned. Not really. They created some weird test

Re: Uneven load on drives in ZFS RAIDZ1

I have observed similar behavior, even more extreme on a spool with dedup enabled. Is dedup enabled on this spool? Might be that the DDT tables somehow end up unevenly distributed to disks. My observation was on a 6 disk raidz2. Daniel___

Re: Uneven load on drives in ZFS RAIDZ1

On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:00 PM, Stefan Esser wrote: Am 19.12.2011 19:03, schrieb Daniel Kalchev: I have observed similar behavior, even more extreme on a spool with dedup enabled. Is dedup enabled on this spool? Thank you for the report! Well, I had dedup enabled for a few short tests

Re: Uneven load on drives in ZFS RAIDZ1

On Dec 19, 2011, at 11:53 PM, Dan Nelson wrote: Since it looks like the algorithm ends up creating two half-cold parity disks instead of one cold disk, I bet a 3-disk RAIDZ would exhibit even worse balancing, and a 5-disk set would be more even. There were some experiments a year or two

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 20.12.11 11:42, Garrett Cooper wrote: As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images from. Relying on checksums that are published on the same web site where you download the files

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 21.12.11 23:49, Johan Hendriks wrote: I my opinion, you benchmark the latest release of Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris, Windows and whatever OS you want to compare! There is no 'general benchmark' as there is not one single tasks that all computers are used for. If you want to benchmark

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 22.12.11 00:33, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: Using the same argument one can say that Ferrari F430 vs Toyota Prius is a meaningless comparison because the under-the-hood equipment is different. Of course, it is meaningless, the Ferrari will lose big time in the fuel consumption comparison! I

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 22.12.11 11:02, Johan Hendriks wrote: Stefan Esser schreef: Am 21.12.2011 22:49, schrieb Johan Hendriks: If you tune up FreeBSD to use the GCC 4.7 compiler, or downgrade linux to 4.2.1, then that will tell me nothing about FreeBSD vs Linux. The gcc version distributed with FreeBSD was

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 22.12.11 11:56, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: On 22 December 2011 05:54, Daniel Kalchevdan...@digsys.bg wrote: Of course, it is meaningless, the Ferrari will lose big time in the fuel consumption comparison! I believe it will also lose the price comparison as well. Not to speak the

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 22.12.11 12:50, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: On 22 December 2011 10:12, Daniel Kalchevdan...@digsys.bg wrote: As for how fast to get from point A to point B. If you observe speed limits, that will depend only on the pilot, no? :) Both cars are sufficiently faster than the imposed speed limits.

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 23.12.11 03:17, O. Hartmann wrote: Or even look at the thread regarding to SCHED_ULE. Why has a user, experiencing really worse performance with SCHED_ULE, in a nearly scientific manner some engineer the fault? I'd expect the developer or care-taking engineer taking care in a more user

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 23.12.11 08:47, Martin Sugioarto wrote: A further thing is that I cannot understand the people here sometimes. I would like that the -RELEASE versions of FreeBSD perform well without any further optimizations. The -RELEASE things is just a freeze (or, let's say tested freeze) of the

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 23.12.11 12:48, O. Hartmann wrote: Look at Steve Kargls problem. He investigated a SCHED_ULE problem in a way that is far beyond enough! He gave tests, insights of his setup, bad performance compared to SCHED_4BSD and what happend? We are still stuck with this problem and more and more

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On 23.12.11 16:47, Martin Sugioarto wrote: I thought that the D in FreeBSD stands for distribution. Yes, it's ok that it compiles with LLVM. Does it also run faster in benchmarks? It does. From a language perspective. It is a distribution, because at the times BSD was developed, it was not

Re: lang/lua: /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC

On 29.12.11 14:19, O. Hartmann wrote: Am 12/29/11 12:59, schrieb Kostik Belousov: On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:19:40PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: [...] /usr/bin/ld: lapi.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `luaO_nilobject_' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC lapi.o:

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

I had few troubles compiling OpenOffice, until closer inspection, that revealed I had forgotten to remove the redirection of libs to gcc4.6 in /etc/libmap.conf -- left from my experiments to like it for compiling ports… (with the pipe dream software will run faster) After cleaning my system of

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 03.06.12 23:55, O. Hartmann wrote: On 06/03/12 15:29, Erich wrote: yes, you miss a very simple thing. Updated this morning your ports tree. Your client asks for something for Monday morning for which you need now a program which needs some kind of PNG but you did not install it. ... I

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 06.06.12 05:31, Erich wrote: On 05 June 2012 10:55:57 Chris Rees wrote: It is absolutely a bad idea for beginners to be using tagged/dated ports trees-- they are not supported and will lead to many complaints about problems that were solved since the tag. How do they fall back when things

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 06.06.12 05:35, Erich wrote: Warning: Be very careful to specify any tag= fields correctly. Some tags are valid only for certain collections of files. If you specify an incorrect or misspelled tag, CVSup will delete files which you probably do not want deleted. In particular, use only

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 07.06.12 02:09, Erich wrote: Those minor issues are, having the recent mess in front of my eyes, a simple negative exaggeration. What is that price worth, if the system is faulting and rendered useless or partially useless? just do what was recommended in this thread: wait. Tell this

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 07.06.12 12:30, Erich wrote: On 07 June 2012 12:17:14 Daniel Kalchev wrote: just do what was recommended in this thread: wait. Tell this ones to a commercial client. They will use words on you for which use you get a life ban on this list. If you are not qualified enough to handle

Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

On 07.06.12 13:58, Hartmann, O. wrote: ... in some cases this needs the deep knowledge of all ports/software provided and used and this is simply impossible, or at least null convergent probability. Only God is required to know and be able to do everything. We humans can be imperfect. In

Re: FreeBSD Testing Facility

On 21.02.13 15:04, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: Dear All , During development of FreeBSD , testing is very vital . To my knowledge ( which may not be correct ) , at present , Tinderbox is used to only compilation correctness , means Syntax is tested . I have downloaded

Re: Response of *.freebsd.org websites are very slow

On 27.02.13 12:23, Daniel Nebdal wrote: I think you're supposed to be automatically sent to the mirror that is closest to you - for some value of closest. If the mirror you're getting has issues, that might show up like this. Could you post the output of traceroute ftp.freebsd.org ? It should

Re: Response of *.freebsd.org websites are very slow

On 27.02.13 15:13, Fbsd8 wrote: Mark Felder wrote: On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 06:52:29 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Well I am in cleveland ohio usa and I have noticed that http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/ is slow or in most cases just times out. So this is bigger problem that some mirror

Re: ipfilter(4) needs maintainer

On 14.04.13 21:55, Joe Holden wrote: For non-nat ipfw is still superior in every way, numbered rules (think: scripts), dummynet, much faster than pf, syntax is a lot nicer and predictable... And, best of all, it still is buggy. At lest, it's tables handling is unusable. I have been very

Re: Light humour

On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote: http://www.softpanorama.org/Copyright/License_classification/social_roots_of_GPL.shtml By any measure a very good one. Could use some editing of course to make it easier to comprehend for readers of different cultures though … and

Re: Light humour

On 29.04.13 12:40, Julian H. Stacey wrote: Daniel Kalchev wrote: On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:37 AM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote: http://www.softpanorama.org/Copyright/License_classification/social_roots_of_GPL.shtml By any measure a very good one. Could use some editing of course to make

Re: Import of DragonFly Mail Agent

On 24.02.14 13:47, Thomas Mueller wrote: I don't believe BSD users use base system of itself to send and receive email. They use ports (FreeBSD) or equivalent in other BSDs. One of the beauties of the BSD 'base system' is that upon installation you have an usable workstation/server

Re: Import of DragonFly Mail Agent

On 24.02.14 19:49, Mark Felder wrote: We can strip pieces of FreeBSD off and end up with an kernel. Or we could keep the system very much usable out of the box. Imagine a world where everything in FreeBSD is a package and we have a working PROVIDES framework. Upon installation you can choose

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

Hice April 1st piece, Let's see what I could contribute :) On 01.04.14 08:46, Eitan Adler wrote: Hi all, Some of you may have seen my posts entitled Story of a Laptop User and Story of a Desktop User. For those of you who did not, it can be a worthwhile read to see what life is like when

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

On 02.04.14 12:22, David Chisnall wrote: The use case that PulseAudio was [over]designed to fix was plugging in USB headphones (or connecting a Bluetooth headset) and having existing audio streams redirected there. Please don't ever make this behavior the default! Imagine, you have an audio

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

On 02.04.14 15:52, David Chisnall wrote: On 2 Apr 2014, at 13:40, Daniel Kalchev dan...@digsys.bg wrote: On 02.04.14 12:22, David Chisnall wrote: The use case that PulseAudio was [over]designed to fix was plugging in USB headphones (or connecting a Bluetooth headset) and having existing

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

On 02.04.14 04:26, Adrian Chadd wrote: It's no longer xorg just speaks to the graphics chip. This is a common trend in computing recently. What once required tightly integrated OS/applications is now distributed, in the widest sense. The so called Personal Computer is nowadays actually

Re: ZFS install from -CURRENT snapshot

On 29.05.11 16:10, Daniel Staal wrote: --As of May 29, 2011 12:06:30 PM +0300, George Kontostanos is alleged to have said: http://www.aisecure.net/?p=132; Thanks, that's about what I expected the install procedure to be at this point. Nice to have the reminder about the zpool.cache. (Do

Re: Weird issue with hastd(8)

On 03.06.11 11:26, Maxim Sobolev wrote: On 5/29/2011 4:11 AM, Mikolaj Golub wrote: This might be MSG_WAITALL issue I described on net@ (look for the thread recv() with MSG_WAITALL might stuck when receiving more than rcvbuf, and also kern/154504). Could you please try the patch?

Re: OpenSSH HPN

It is my understanding, that using the NONE cypher is not identical to using “the old tools” (rsh/rlogin/rcp). When ssh uses the NONE cypher, credentials and authorization are still encrypted and verified. Only the actual data payload is not encrypted. Perhaps similar level of security could

Re: "libssl.so.8" not found

> On 14.12.2015 г., at 17:35, Brad Davis wrote: > > > Or just use pkg-static. :) > I always wondered, why pkg is not static ONLY. That eliminates the chicken/egg dilemma. Yes, you eliminate the friendly reminder that your system is out of sync with the FreeBSD package

Re: CVE-2015-7547: critical bug in libc

> On 17.02.2016 г., at 15:40, Shawn Webb wrote: > > TL;DR: FreeBSD is not affected by CVE-2015-7547. Unless you use Linux applications under emulation. Daniel signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: Dropping some locales/encodings?

> On 1.03.2016 г., at 5:45, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > Excerpts from Andrey Chernov's message from Tue 01-Mar-16 05:47: >> On 01.03.2016 2:23, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> >>> I can properly generate almost any of the said locales/encodings but a few >>> that >>> I would

Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)

> On 19.04.2016 г., at 5:01, Roger Marquis wrote: > > Honestly, some of us are wondering what exactly is > behind some of these concerns regarding base packages. > Not taking a side on this discussion, yet… but the first thing that occurred to me is that such way of

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

> On 12.07.2016 г., at 12:12, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > I'm also curious as to how far these regulations are supposed to extend. > Presumably traffic which is merely transiting Russian territory isn't > covered, at least in a practical sense. How about people from Russia >

Re: GOST in OPENSSL_BASE

> On 12.07.2016 г., at 13:26, Franco Fichtner <fra...@lastsummer.de> wrote: > > >> On 12 Jul 2016, at 11:59 AM, Daniel Kalchev <dan...@digsys.bg> wrote: >> >> It is trivial to play MTIM with this protocol and in fact, there are >> commercia

Re: ISO image: where is the CLANG compiler?

I never use the pre-built ISO images for tasks like this. Here is a script I use to build my own USB boot drive. The drive contains the full OS to boot and also a copy used to create a new system. I make these boot drives from time to time, to stay current. Please note the script is few years

Re: IPFW on CURRENT: NAT forwarding exposes internal IP!

It looks like your httpd server is doing a redirect to your internal IP address, which it thinks is it’s ServerName. Don’t think NAT has anything to do with it. Daniel > On 29.09.2016 г., at 15:47, O. Hartmann wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

Re: Opteron 6100-series "Magny-Cours"

If you still have not found it, I have two Supermicro blades with these, one to be upgraded with 6127 these days… Daniel > On 27.03.2017 г., at 16:11, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > On 27/03/2017 15:06, Piotr Kubaj wrote: >> Does it have to be specifically 61xx series? I have a

Re: SMART: disk problems on RAIDZ1 pool: (ada6:ahcich6:0:0:0): CAM status: ATA Status Error

> On 13 Dec 2017, at 1:26, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Rodney W. Grimes < > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > >> Hum, just noticed this. 25k hours power on, 2M load cycles, this is >> very hard on a hard drive. Your drive is going

Re: SMART: disk problems on RAIDZ1 pool: (ada6:ahcich6:0:0:0): CAMstatus: ATA Status Error

> On 13 Dec 2017, at 21:39, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Am Wed, 13 Dec 2017 08:47:53 -0800 (PST) > "Rodney W. Grimes" schrieb: > >>> On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:58:28 -0800 >>> Cy Schubert wrote: >>> There