On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:18:29AM +, b.f. wrote:
> ># cat /etc/make.conf|grep FFLAGS
> >FFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -march=native -mtune=native
>
> Please do _not_ assign flags unconditionally in make.conf.
FFLAGS is for compiling Fortran. I'm one of the people who
has spent years working/patching g
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 01:29:12PM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2013, at 10:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
>
> > It's unfortunate that the builworld time roughly trippled since
> > 2010 but I guess that's progress and a more powerful system
> > should fix it. I certainly welcome clang in gene
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:24:03PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> From s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Sun Feb 10 19:06:10 2013
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:51:23PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:44:24 -0800
> >
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:51:23PM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:44:24 -0800
> From: Steve Kargl
> To: Boris Samorodov
> Subject: Re: 7+ days of dogfood
>
> > > FFLAGS = -O2 -pipe -march=native -mtune=nativ
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 09:05:22AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 10 February 2013 08:44, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> > Without it, the build infrastructure was selecting -march=i486,
> > which produced even worse results. Several ports would not
> > compile because
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 05:39:37PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> 10.02.2013 04:07, Steve Kargl ??:
>
> As for me I use CURRENT at my JOB for many years now.
> I used to i386 but switched to amd64 at the end of 2012.
> The system (both world and kernel) are updated ever
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 08:33:25AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Firefox segfaults after ~10 seconds. Chrome gets stuck in a uwait
> > state and never becomes responsive. Libreoffice displays its splash
> > screen and immediately segfaults. Xorg does
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 04:07:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> Libreoffice currently does not build, but that's not totally
> unexpected as compiling libreoffice seems to be a hit-or-miss
> proposition.
>
laptop:root[201] cd
/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libr
In a long thread started by Peter Wemm on developers@, he described
the move/upgrade of the FreeBSD.org cluster to using FreeBSD-10. A
part of his description included the need to test top-of-tree under
actual real-world conditions. In his words, FreeBSD should "eat its
own dogfood." The new ins
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:20:16PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:14:41 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > What's the preferred method for compiling libc
> > and libthr with debugging enable?
>
> I just do:
>
> cd /path/to/src/lib/libc
&g
What's the preferred method for compiling libc
and libthr with debugging enable?
--
Steve
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr..
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:54:03PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Recently "make buildworld" started failing for me:
>
> 8<
> ===> include/xlocale (installincludes)
> sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 _ctype.h _inttypes.h
> _langinfo.h _locale.h _monetary.h _st
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 06:44:39PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:35:25PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > It seems that buildworld depends on the existence of
> > /usr/bin/compile_et if one wants to build WITH_KERBEROS
> > on a system that has never had
It seems that buildworld depends on the existence of
/usr/bin/compile_et if one wants to build WITH_KERBEROS
on a system that has never had Kerberos support. I
discovered this issue when des@ removed the NOFOO and
NO_FOO options, and the NO_KERBEROS="YES" in my
/etc/make.conf was neutered. The sy
It seems that a parallel buildworld is broken by clang.
% cd /usr/src
% svn update
% svn info
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src
URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head
Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base
Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
Revision: 245280
% make -j
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:52:41PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 01/04/13 15:52, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
> > Answering just the trivial question...
> > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:13 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> server-1: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r244957: Wed Jan 2 12:06:13 CET 2013
> >>
> >> By the w
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 10:41:41PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I replaced lang/gcc46 by lang/gcc47, since gcc46 doesn't build anymore
> on the FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT in question.
>
> I have a small f77 program, which built well with the autotools I used
> and ran for ages now. But I receive this err
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 01:33:40AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-11-10 00:25, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> ...
> > The more difficult way out is to not define any duplicate functions in
> > libc.a and libm.a. For the shared libraries, this should not be a
> > problem, since the dynamic linker
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 07:02:48PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-11-09 00:13, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Upgraded my amd64 system, yesterday. Needed to rebuild one
> > of my projects, and hit
> >
> > /usr/local/openmpi-1.6.3/bin/mpif90 -static -O2 -pipe -marc
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 05:45:41PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 08:43:04AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >
> > > There is some magic switch to reduce amount of clang bugs,
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:00:12PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:49:32PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > This appears to fix the problem. Don't know if this is
> > th right way to handle it.
>
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Upgraded my amd64 system, yesterday. Needed to rebuild one
> of my projects, and hit
>
> /usr/local/openmpi-1.6.3/bin/mpif90 -static -O2 -pipe -march=native
> -mtune=native -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize -Wall -rpat
Upgraded my amd64 system, yesterday. Needed to rebuild one
of my projects, and hit
/usr/local/openmpi-1.6.3/bin/mpif90 -static -O2 -pipe -march=native
-mtune=native -funroll-loops -ftree-vectorize -Wall -rpath /usr/local/lib/gcc46
-I/home/kargl/modules -o sasmp sasmp.f90 -L/home/kargl/lib -L. -
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 07:27:44AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> caNyO usti llputw hitespa cewhere ever you like in for TraN?
>
Sigh. You can get copies of the final committee drafts of
the Fortran 95, 2003, and 2008 standards. There you will
learn that Fortran since Fortran 90 al
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 2 Nov 2012, at 08:18, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> > Very many years ago , when 2010 was a very distant future , I do not
> > remember the name of the writer , who wrote approximately :
> >
> > "In 2010 , there will be Fortr
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 12:21:03PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter e
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 10:29:45PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> - Not all libm tests pass. More work by subject matter experts is
>required to create tests cases for LLVM developers. Most problems are
>not expected to be major in practice given that LLVM is being used for
>scientific
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:09:47AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
>
> "* Scheduler rewrite"
>
> They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's
> too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in
> FreeBSD after all this time.
>
'loathe' appears to be an interesting choice of word.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:42:23PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> If someone overrides the default system compiler which is in my case
> CLANG 3.2 (on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r240885M: Mon Sep 24 12:30:44
> CEST 2012 amd64), the if-statement does always take place and prevents
> lang/icon to be build
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 02:20:14PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As a followup to my previous post about the performance of FreeBSD 10.0
> > kernels compiled with different compilers (clang and gcc), I did an
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 07:18:28PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-15 16:30, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> >On 15-09-2012 16:09, Roman Divacky wrote:
> >>Is this correct?
> >>
> >>lev ~$ ./cos 1.23456789e20
> >>6.031937e-01
> >>-9.629173e-02
> >>2.814722e-01
> >
> >Yes, that's what the libm cal
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:18:08PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> A third class of failure appears to be that clang emits
> i387 fpu instructions for at least sinf and cosf instead
> of calls to the library routines. AFAIK, the library
> routines are faster and more accurate.
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > ok 1 - cexp zero
> > Abort trap (core dumped)
> > *** [tests] Error code 134
> >
> > Stop in /usr/src/tools/regression/lib/msun.
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 06:25:37PM +0200, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > clang -O2 -pipe -march=opteron -O0 -lm test-cexp.c -o test-cexp
> > test-cexp.c:49:14: warning: pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON is not supported,
>
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:32:12AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 19:08 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > In regards to my initial post in this thread, I was just trying
> > to assess whether any benchmarks have been performed on FreeBSD
> > for floating poi
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:42:27PM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 09/11/12 09:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >On 2012-09-11 16:27, Tijl Coosemans wrote:> On 11-09-2012 16:10,
> >Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >...
> >>>Yes, maths support, specifically precision, is admittedly still one of
> >>>clang's
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 07:19:48PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 08:12:30AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure if anyone has done any extensive testing.
> > I've started to run some of my test codes to compare
> > certain fu
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:14:09PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> "Clang produces incorrect code" vs "Clang's floating point has
> issues" are two different arguments.
Wow. clang produces incorrect floating point code, and
that's somehow just an issue with floating point.
> For a mathematical appl
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:42:53AM -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 09:10:24 -0500, Michael Butler
> wrote:
>
> >- From the link (http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/errata.html#WhatComp)
> >that Steve Kargl referenced (dated July 2012).
>
>
>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 11-09-2012 16:10, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2012-09-11 15:24, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >> What is important is whether software built with clang functions
> >> correctly. See for exa
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:10:13PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-11 15:24, Steve Kargl wrote:
> ...
> >How fast clang builds world in comparison to gcc is irrelevant.
>
> Not at all irrelevant: this proposal is about changing the default
> compiler for the FreeB
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:52:20PM +0200, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 11/09/2012 kl. 14.38 skrev Roman Divacky :
> > By the nature of "developing the OS" we are forced to use compilers and
> > toolchains. Recently I saw you submitting/committing patches with .byte
> > sequences because our defaul
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:06:49PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> > > tl;dr: Clang will become the default compiler for x86 architectures on
> > > 2012-11-04
>
> > Another issue with the switch, which seems to be not only not addressed,
> > but even not talked about, is the performance impact of t
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:57:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Hello.
> I tried to create a "port", see the Makefile attached I created already.
> For further informations and your convenience, look at this website:
>
Please stop cross posting to freebsd-current when you
have some issue that clea
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:43:12AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 03:13:11PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > Compiling libm on
> >
> > CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 (2192.01-MHz K8-class CPU)
> > Origin = "AuthenticA
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 11:31:26AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-05 01:40, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> ...
> > Steve does have a point. Posting the results of
> >CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS/LDFLAGS/etc for config.log (and maybe poking through
> >the code to figure out what *FLAGS were used elsewher
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 11:59:39PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-09-04 23:43, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >>I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD
> >>10.0-CURRENT, parti
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:39:40PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> I recently performed a series of compiler performance tests on FreeBSD
> 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing gcc 4.2.1 and gcc 4.7.1 against
> clang 3.1 and clang 3.2.
>
> The attached text file[1] contains more information abou
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 09:55:36PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:39:54 -0700
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > % file /usr/local/bin/ppdpo
> > /usr/local/bin/ppdpo: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, \
> > version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamical
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:36:35PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
> > On Aug 2, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > (gdb) print *ptr
> > > Attempt to dereference a generic pointer.
> > > (gdb) up 1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 04:21:20PM -0700, Jason Evans wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > (gdb) print *ptr
> > Attempt to dereference a generic pointer.
> > (gdb) up 1
> > #5 0x48164b7d in XFree (data=0x80f58e0) at XlibInt.c:1701
> > 1
Libc built today.
Start X with fvwm window manager.
Open xterm and su to root.
1. Use nedit to edit a file and close.
fvwm drops core. If fvwm does not drop core repeat 1 until
she does.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4841e294 in __jemalloc_arena_mapbits_get (chunk=0x800, pageind=245)
at
/usr/src/lib
% file /usr/local/bin/ppdpo
/usr/local/bin/ppdpo: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, \
version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), FreeBSD-style,\
for FreeBSD 10.0 (115), stripped
% ldd /usr/local/bin/ppdpo
/usr/local/bin/ppdpo:
/usr/local/bin/ppdpo: signal 11
% gdb741
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 09:36:26PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> I think this proves the point everybody has been saying: you
> are being needlessly contrary and confrontational.
>
Yep. In 18+ years of being subscribed to various freebsd
lists, Arnaud has the honor of being only the 2nd person
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> On 25.07.2012 19:00 (UTC+2), Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> >If you actually want to test expl() to see if it is producing
> >a decent result, you need a reference solution that contains
> >a higher precision.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:27:43PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/25/12 11:29, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> >Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
> >
> >I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following example
> >is correct and suit
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 06:29:18PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> Many thanks to you three for implementing expl() with r238722 and r238724.
>
> I am not a C programmer, but would like to ask if the following example
> is correct and suituable as a minimalistic test of this new C99 function?
>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:41:00PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jul-11 15:32:47 -0700, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> >I know an approach to implementing many of the missing
> >functions.
>
> Are you willing to share this insight so someone else could do the work?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:54:14PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 02:43:46PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
&g
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:20:09PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:02:33AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote:
> >
> > Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside. That's one of the
> > practical considerations that I w
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41:44PM -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> I have a patch from OpenBSD that adds -Wbounded to gcc:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pfg/patches/patch-gcc-bounded
>
> Unfortunately it breaks world, or at least binutils, at this time:
>
> _
> ...
> cc1: warnings bein
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:41:38PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:14:01PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Steve Kargl
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:52:10PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 01:11:38PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/10/2012 11:50 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:39:59AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >>On 07/09/2012 12:02 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >>>Yep
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:39:59AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 12:02 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >Yep. Another example is the use of upward recurion to compute
> >Bessel functions where the argument is larger than the order.
> >The algorithm
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:10:05AM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> Do you think your version from
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152415 for expl() ld80
> version could be the one getting into head? Would you be willing to
> commit it?
That's a fairly early version of the ld80 ex
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:52:10PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'm on amd64 r238259.
>
> I'm still not clear on the /usr/src/UPDATING
> entry from 20110424 on replacing the ATA
> drivers by CAM drivers.
>
> If I *do not* have device ata in the kernel,
> I have neither /dev/cd* or /dev/acd*
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 10:41:44PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/08/2012 09:01 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >Have you read Goldberg's paper?
>
> I must admit that I had not. I found it at:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/806-3568/ncg_goldberg
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 08:13:21PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 8:01 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Not to mention, I've seen way too many examples of 'x - y'
> > where cancellation of significant digits causes
> > problems. Throw in rather
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 07:29:30PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 07/08/2012 06:58 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:06:46PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
> >>So do people really work hard to get that last drop of ulp out of t
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 02:06:46PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Here is a technical question. I know that people always talk about
> ulp's in the context of how good a function implementation is. I think
> the ulp is the number of base 2 digits at the end of the mantissa that
> we
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 11:51:56AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 6:40 AM, David Schultz wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 29, 2012, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> On 2012-May-28 15:54:06 -0700, Steve Kargl
> >> wrote:
> >>> Given that
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:40:34PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I'm doing a binary search for another
> issue between r231193 and r233000.
>
> On r232100 I get:
>
> cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/src/libexec/mail.local/../../contrib/sendmail/include
> -I. -I/usr/local/include -DSASL=2 -std=gnu99 -Ws
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:04:58AM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 23:52, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > Of course. ??Sit down and write code.
>
> If I ever find the time, I just might. Do we have a wiki page listing
> the set of functions which we don't yet
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:16:03PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 1 June 2012 17:03, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2012-Jun-01 10:29:13 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>On Friday, June 01, 2012 1:55:10 am Eitan Adler wrote:
> >>> Also, are there BSD licensed naive implementations of these functions
>
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:56:13PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-May-28 15:54:06 -0700, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>
> There some test code in cephes. Can you point me to a suitable test
> suite for LD80 and LD128? The reason for calling it libm is to avoid
> having to hack
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:44:42PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 06:30 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >
> >>From clog.c in http://www.netlib.org/cephes/c9x-complex
> >
> >double complex
> >ccosh (z)
> > double complex z;
&
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 06:03:37PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 05:17 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:19:22PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >>On 05/28/2012 03:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>>On Mon, May 28, 201
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:05:07AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-May-28 11:01:24 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
> wrote:
> >One thing that could be done is to have a "math/cephes" port that adds
> >the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
> >port, using a rat
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:04:36AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-May-28 13:31:59 -0700, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
> >On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> One thing that could be done is to have a "math/cephes" port tha
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 04:19:22PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> On 05/28/2012 03:31 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >>One thing that could be done is to have a "math/cephes" port that
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:01:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> One thing that could be done is to have a "math/cephes" port that adds
> the extra C99 math functions. This is already done in the math/sage
> port, using a rather clever patch due to Peter Jeremy, that applies to
> the
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 01:18:53AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-04-20 02:40, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >laptop:root[227] uname -a
> >FreeBSD laptop 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r230975M: Sat Feb 4
> >09:03:27 PST 2012 root@laptop:/usr/obj/usr
laptop:root[227] uname -a
FreeBSD laptop 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r230975M: Sat Feb 4
09:03:27 PST 2012 root@laptop:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MOBILE i386
laptop:root[224] config MOBILE
Kernel build directory is ../compile/MOBILE
Don't forget to do ``make cleandepend && make depend''
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:21:11PM +0300, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
>
> I use one port from the Ports Collection, that works with FP. Having
> reinstalled it (its version was not changed) I noticed that it started
> to work incorrectly. After debugging and disassembling its code I found
> out that
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:56:06PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 30 March 2012 17:31, C. P. Ghost wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:18 PM, wrote:
> >>> > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage,
> >>> please do not. Some people expect /tmp to be persistent. This i
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 04:17:50PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 1:59:18 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:53:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 26, 2012 1:41:55 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Ma
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:53:25PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 1:41:55 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:18:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 26, 2012 12:21:29 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 01:18:37PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, March 26, 2012 12:21:29 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> You know your APIC ID is 0, so you should be able to find the IRQ for vector
> 51 from here in apic_idt_to_irq():
>
> irq = lapics[apic_id].la
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:43:59AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:59:35AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, March 23, 2012 6:23:13 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > Haven't seen one of these in a long time.
> > >
> > > %uname -a
&
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 10:59:35AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, March 23, 2012 6:23:13 pm Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Haven't seen one of these in a long time.
> >
> > %uname -a
> > FreeBSD troutmask.apl.washington.edu 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD
> > 10.0-C
Haven't seen one of these in a long time.
%uname -a
FreeBSD troutmask.apl.washington.edu 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD
10.0-CURRENT #0 r233282: Wed Mar 21 12:39:16 PDT 2012
ka...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPEW amd64
Hand transcribed
Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:39:36PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> >>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >>>On 20
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:22:50AM +0100, Mel Flynn wrote:
> On 2/21/2012 23:32, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >>> On 2012-
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:00:53PM -0500, Diane Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:37:15PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2012-02-21 20:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > ...
> > > Yes, /lib comes before /usr/local/lib/gcc46. I suppose
> > > that this is a
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:57:54PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:28:50AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >
> > troutmask:kargl[210] halfspace
> > /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by /home/kargl/bin/halfspace
> > n
Sorry about the cross post, but I can't tell if this
a -current issue of a -ports issue. Unfortunately,
I updated my freebsd 10.0 systems and the lang/gcc
port during the same timeframe.
I have compiled my math library and several programs
with gfortran, which is installed by lang/gcc (pkg_info
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 03:54:02PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:38:04PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2012-01-16 21:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >Is anyone else seeing svn getting stuck while
> > >updating /usr/src on an update-to-date free
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:38:04PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-01-16 21:42, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >Is anyone else seeing svn getting stuck while
> >updating /usr/src on an update-to-date freebsd-current?
>
> I saw this when I tried out serf instead of the defaul
Is anyone else seeing svn getting stuck while
updating /usr/src on an update-to-date freebsd-current?
laptop:kargl[211] svn update
Updating '.':
^Z
Suspended
laptop:kargl[212] fg
svn update
load: 0.07 cmd: svn 62029 [sbwait] 4717.28r 1.65u 1.09s 0% 9260k
load: 0.07 cmd: svn 62029 [sbwait] 4720
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 12:31:51AM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Audio from DVDs always played by software after reading if from the disk
> as usual data. Audio CDs instead could be played either by the CD drive
> itself via analog audio connection or by software using digital audio
> extracti
601 - 700 of 1223 matches
Mail list logo
