On 25/04/2016 08:39, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Gerrit Kühn wrote on 04/25/2016 07:48:
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 18:52:32 +0100 Matthew Seaman
wrote about Re: why 100 packages are evil:
MS> > Is freebsd-update going away as result of the new packaging ?
Yes. It will be replaced by 'pkg upgrade' -- a
On 02/03/2016 19:45, Lundberg, Johannes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Jakob Alvermark mailto:ja...@alvermark.net>> wrote:
On Wed, March 2, 2016 20:00, Lundberg, Johannes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Joe Holden mailto:m...@m.jwh.me.uk>> wrote:
&g
) but didn't
manage to make it boot anything
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 5:20 PM, John Baldwin mailto:j...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
On Sunday, February 28, 2016 07:00:06 AM Joe Holden wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Apologies if this is the wrong list...
>
> Is th
Hi all,
Apologies if this is the wrong list...
Is there any plan to support booting FreeBSD on 32bit UEFI systems (with
or without 64bit kernel/userland)? Obviously there is no i386 efi loader
currently so neither is possible...
TIA,
J
___
freebsd-
On 22/02/2016 00:04, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 08:39:32 -0600 (CST) Dan Mack wrote
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Joe Holden wrote:
On 17/02/2016 14:07, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 17.02.2016 ?., at 15:40, Shawn Webb
wrote: >>>
TL;DR: FreeBSD is not affected by CVE-2015-7547.
Unles
On 17/02/2016 14:07, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
On 17.02.2016 г., at 15:40, Shawn Webb wrote:
TL;DR: FreeBSD is not affected by CVE-2015-7547.
Unless you use Linux applications under emulation.
Daniel
Which is supported by ports so at most it should be a ports advisory and
not a FreeBSD (bas
On 24/02/2014 15:40, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b666a.1000...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
Please check how NTP is authenticated before giving bad advice,
it's all in the RFC.
v3 or v4? It is an optional part of the spec in both cases and again
isn't req
On 24/02/2014 13:52, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b2dee.3030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
The other point I should make here is that if you care that much about
time security you shouldn't be contacting ntp servers over 3rd party
networks anyway, at least not with
On 24/02/2014 11:26, Joe Holden wrote:
On 24/02/2014 11:18, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Joe Holden on Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13:23AM +:
hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've
used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper?
Non-s
On 24/02/2014 11:18, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Joe Holden on Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13:23AM +:
hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've
used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper?
Non-support for auth is a concern, lac
On 24/02/2014 11:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:04:48AM +, Joe Holden wrote:
On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b2500.5030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base eit
On 24/02/2014 10:56, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b2500.5030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
Can I also suggest that ntp.org shouldn't be in the base either? :P
I absolutely agree, but the replacement is less clear in that case.
I'd suggest openntpd as a
On 24/02/2014 10:00, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 09:56:05AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b13ca.6000...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
On 24/02/2014 04:26, Julio Merino wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
As some
On 24/02/2014 04:26, Julio Merino wrote:
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
As some of you may have noticed, I have imorted a couple of days ago dma
(DragonFly Mail Agent) in base. I have been asked to explain my motivation
so
here they are.
DragonFly Mail Agent is
Doh should have checked the thread before sending - is there any news on
this?
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-m...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> m...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Joe Holden
> Sent: 15 September 2013 23:28
> To: 'Adrian Chadd'; &#x
Are you still playing with this? Reason I ask is that I tried to build
world with clang for the crack and it bails with:
/usr/obj/mips.mips64/pseudosrc/tmp/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/obj/mips.mips64/pseudosrc/tmp/usr/lib/crtn.o: warning: linking PIC
files with non-PIC files
exect.So: In function `exect':
(
On 24/08/2013 13:30, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Pawel Pekala wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I get this:
[corn:~]> route get
route: writing to routing socket: Invalid argument
Is this just my build or anyone can confirm this?
--
pozdrawiam / with regards
Paweł Pękal
Install Windows, OSS is not suitable for audio production, except maybe
at a push, OS X.
Super Bisquit wrote:
I can't use the SoundBlaster PCI card on the laptop. Also, I need to be
able to switch between the FreeBSD sound drivers and OSS drivers. What do I
need to do to the kernel configuratio
wishmaster wrote:
--- Original message ---
From: "Gary Palmer"
Date: 14 April 2013, 19:06:59
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 09:48:33AM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
Is it possible to move ipfilter into a port?
That may work short term, but the ENOMAINTAINER problem will quickly creep
up again as k
Joe Holden wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:25:36PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
doh, running kernel wasn't as GENERIC as I thought i
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:25:36PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
doh, running kernel wasn't as GENERIC as I thought it was, looks like
d
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 04:25:36PM +, Joe Holden wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
doh, running kernel wasn't as GENERIC as I thought it was, looks like
d
Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
Full interrupt rate on some CPU means that your system is not idle, but
running some process. Another possibility is that you have DUMMYNET
compiled into your kernel, which tends to schedule callout for every HZ
tick, effectively blocking skipping interrupts for one
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:11:41AM -0500, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
doh, running kernel wasn't as GENERIC as I thought it was, looks like
device polling not only breaks dynamic ticks but also reduces rx ability
signific
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Nov 4, 2012 10:40 PM, "Joe Holden" wrote:
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD?
On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday
(GENE
Davide Italiano wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Joe Holden wrote:
Hi guys,
Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD?
On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday
(GENERIC) I see the following in systat -v:
9.1:
65 cpu0:timer
10 cpu1:timer
HEAD
Hi guys,
Has some default changed between 9.1-RC2 and HEAD?
On identical machines, one with 9.1-RC2 and one with HEAD from yesterday
(GENERIC) I see the following in systat -v:
9.1:
65 cpu0:timer
10 cpu1:timer
HEAD:
1127 cpu0:timer
22 cpu1:timer
These are Supermicro i3 boxes and as far as
Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
wrote:
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
using a kernel + compiler a
28 matches
Mail list logo
