It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
requires multiple packages to work.
People shouldn't have to compile Motif up just to get a non-source
version of the JDK to work. Versioning problems that can be caused by
folks using different include files and/or
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:08:23 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include langinfo.h, which FreeBSD
doesn't have.
I've integrated NetBSD's
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
I've integrated NetBSD's langinfo and nl_types support into FreeBSD. I
can send you patches if you haven't managed to work around this yet?
Great. Please send me the patches. BTW, by "integrated", do you mean
that you've integrated them into the
I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK.
Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e.,
a port or a package.
Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the
package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would be to distribute
I think that you no longer have to include Motif with the JDK.
Just let the distribution of Motif come from freebsd.org , i.e.,
a port or a package.
Too much hassle IMO. I'd *much* rather distribute it as part of the
package, and I'm looking into how feasible it would be to
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:08:23 -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include langinfo.h, which
At 9:35 AM -0600 5/16/00, Nate Williams wrote:
If this Open Motif can be distributed as a port or package for FreeBSD
itself (and it seems to me that it can), then what hassle is that for
JDK on FreeBSD?
It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
requires multiple
If this Open Motif can be distributed as a port or package for FreeBSD
itself (and it seems to me that it can), then what hassle is that for
JDK on FreeBSD?
It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
requires multiple packages to work.
As long as
No, I'm saying that OpenSource Motif *will* be going through lots of
gyrations in the future, and these gyrations may cause instabilities in
the JDK.
But, if the JDK uses the Motif version it was compiled against, it will
work 'consistently.
Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Nate Williams wrote:
Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect the Motif stuff to change
alot.
I'm unclear on what gyrations you are expecting from a mature API
codified in an IEEE standard. As long as you're using the Motif
standard interface in your code you should have
Unlike X (which rarely changes), I suspect the Motif stuff to change
alot.
I'm unclear on what gyrations you are expecting from a mature API
codified in an IEEE standard. As long as you're using the Motif
standard interface in your code you should have nothing to worry about.
Ahh, but
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
"We want to support the momentum of Open Source operating systems such as
Linux® and FreeBSD by developing an Open Motif® licence for use with
Open Source operating systems."
Also the OpenGroup is looking for sites to mirror their Motif
Amancio Hasty wrote:
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
Yes, that is great news! I tried compiling it, but I had trouble with
lib/Xm/Scale.c. It wanted to include langinfo.h, which FreeBSD
doesn't have. So, I copied langinfo.h from
/usr/compat/linux/usr/include, but even
Check it out at:
http://www.opengroup.org/openmotif/
"We want to support the momentum of Open Source operating systems such as
Linux® and FreeBSD by developing an Open Motif® licence for use with
Open Source operating systems."
Also the OpenGroup is looking for sites to mirror their
I have a copy. However, the license is 'interesting' enough to read
that I'm not sure it can be used inside the JDK distribution, so if
someone can give me an explanation that I can understand that I'm legal
to distribute the library as part of an application, please show me in
terms a
I have a copy. However, the license is 'interesting' enough to read
that I'm not sure it can be used inside the JDK distribution, so if
someone can give me an explanation that I can understand that I'm legal
to distribute the library as part of an application, please show me in
16 matches
Mail list logo
