Hi,
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It
needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test.
I've not implemented the -d flag
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It
needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test.
I've not implemented the -d flag since it sort of became unneeded, and
it's not really the way things are done in the rest of pkg_*. I've also
not
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It
needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more people to test.
I've
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
+++ version/perform.c 14 May 2002 12:41:41 -
[...]
+ strlcpy(tmp, PORTS_DIR, PATH_MAX);
+ strlcat(tmp, /INDEX, PATH_MAX);
I'd suggest snprintf(3)
Yeah. Like I said, it needs a bit of polishing. I
Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 04:19:29PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
+++ version/perform.c 14 May 2002 12:41:41 -
[...]
+ strlcpy(tmp, PORTS_DIR, PATH_MAX);
+ strlcat(tmp, /INDEX, PATH_MAX);
I'd suggest snprintf(3)
Yeah. Like I said, it
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 02:50:39PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It
needs some spit and polish,
If memory serves me right, Jeremy Lea wrote:
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 08:33:22PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
/usr/sbin/pkg_version Jeremy Lea [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
OK, the first revision is attached. It appears to work for me... It
needs some spit and polish, and probably a few more
Hi,
On Thu, 09 May 2002 20:33:22 +0100
Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mark /usr/sbin/scriptdump
This script is from KAME. It seems that NetBSD doesn't install it.
Is someone actually using it? If okay, I'll change to don't install
it.
That sounds good to me! Go right ahead!
Hi,
On Thu, 09 May 2002 20:33:22 +0100
Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
mark /usr/sbin/scriptdump
This script is from KAME. It seems that NetBSD doesn't install it.
Is someone actually using it? If okay, I'll change to don't install
it.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual
Hi
The response to the perl-script rewriting project has been
very hearteningly _fantastic_!
Here is the list as it stands. The gaps are fairly obvious (and
probably mostly not critical in the short term):
/usr/bin/afmtodit
/usr/bin/catman John Rochester [EMAIL PROTECTED] - re
10 matches
Mail list logo