On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 10:23 -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> I am preparing to move the standalone kernel debug data out of
> /boot/kernel/ into /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/, mirroring the
> approach
> used for userland debug data. This significantly reduces the boot
> partition size requirement, and is a
On 29/10/2014 19:58, Mark Johnston wrote:
A while ago I wrote some code for libproc to handle .gnu_debuglink and
read stripped sections out of the standalone debug file.
Just in case, I have an ugly-ish local patch for that too:
Steven Hartland wrote this message on Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 16:49 +:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make
a copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to copy a kernel for debugging its a one liner,
splitting debug symbols off to /usr/lib would prevent
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of space on the
root partition really doesn't sound like a good idea; especially when
with the ZFS install, which I would
On 30/10/2014 09:47, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of space on the
root partition really doesn't
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Making things harder to manage vs saving a little bit of space on the
root partition really doesn't sound like a good idea; especially when
with the ZFS install, which I would suggest is becoming the norm, the
root
On 30 Oct 2014, at 09:47 , O'Connor, Daniel Daniel.O'con...@emc.com wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Making things harder to
On 29 October 2014 22:32, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a
copy /
On 30 October 2014 09:07, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 October 2014 22:32, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Hmm not sure I like
On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 09:47 , O'Connor, Daniel Daniel.O'con...@emc.com wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 19:44, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
On 30/10/2014 08:24, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 13:23, Steven Hartland
On 30 October 2014 09:21, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
(a) symbol files are for developers. Developers are clever people, often
with custom systems, they know how to deal with them as they already do
whatever they want anyway in 7
On 30/10/2014 14:15, Ed Maste wrote:
On 30 October 2014 09:21, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
On 30/10/2014 12:10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
(a) symbol files are for developers. Developers are clever people, often
with custom systems, they know how to deal with them as they
On 30 October 2014 10:26, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Yer that's the process that was in my head, if debug symbols aren't
available when savecore runs we're going to need a way to update / rerun
when they are available, or even better give it the ability to do the same
job
On 30/10/2014 14:40, Ed Maste wrote:
On 30 October 2014 10:26, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Yer that's the process that was in my head, if debug symbols aren't
available when savecore runs we're going to need a way to update / rerun
when they are available, or even better
On 30 October 2014 02:20, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Oh, make sure that make install (or installkernel) properly handles
moving the debug data too... i.e. kernel to kernel.old...
Yes, in the case that /boot/kernel is moved to /boot/kernel.old
/usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel is moved
On Oct 30, 2014, at 7:15, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
…
Whether that is /boot/kernel/symbols/*
or /usr/lib/***, I couldn’t care less
Note that if they go in /boot/kernel/symbols/ then we have to teach
GDB, LLDB, and other tools to look there; if they go in /usr/lib/debug
they're
On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:49, Ed Maste wrote:
On 30 October 2014 02:20, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Oh, make sure that make install (or installkernel) properly handles
moving the debug data too... i.e. kernel to kernel.old...
Yes, in the case that /boot/kernel is moved to
On 10/31/14, 1:41 AM, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
On 30 Oct 2014, at 12:49, Ed Maste wrote:
On 30 October 2014 02:20, John-Mark Gurney j...@funkthat.com wrote:
Oh, make sure that make install (or installkernel) properly handles
moving the debug data too... i.e. kernel to kernel.old...
Yes, in
On 29 Oct 2014, at 03:11, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
/usr/lib/debug is the standard location for standalone debug data
established by GDB, and seems like a decent enough location. I'll make
sure to update the man page.
Do gdb and lldb also look in /usr/local/lib/debug? If not, it
On 29 October 2014 05:05, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 Oct 2014, at 03:11, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
/usr/lib/debug is the standard location for standalone debug data
established by GDB, and seems like a decent enough location. I'll make
sure to update the man
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:17:33AM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 05:05, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 Oct 2014, at 03:11, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
/usr/lib/debug is the standard location for standalone debug data
established by GDB, and seems like
On 29/10/2014 10:17, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 05:05, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 Oct 2014, at 03:11, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
/usr/lib/debug is the standard location for standalone debug data
established by GDB, and seems like a decent enough location.
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make
a copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to copy a kernel for debugging its a one liner,
splitting debug symbols off to /usr/lib would prevent this.
Is there not a way to allow separate install of the debug files but
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 12:10:44PM -0400, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 29/10/2014 10:17, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 05:05, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 29 Oct 2014, at 03:11, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
/usr/lib/debug is the standard location for standalone debug
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a
copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to copy a kernel for debugging its a one liner, splitting
debug symbols off to /usr/lib would prevent
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a
copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to copy a kernel for debugging its a one
On 30/10/2014 02:32, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a
copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to
On 10/30/14, 10:32 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:15:50PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
On 29 October 2014 12:49, Steven Hartland kill...@multiplay.co.uk wrote:
Hmm not sure I like this idea as it would make it more difficult to make a
copy / backup a kernel.
ATM when I want to
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Ed Maste ema...@freebsd.org wrote:
I am preparing to move the standalone kernel debug data out of
/boot/kernel/ into /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/, mirroring the approach
used for userland debug data. This significantly reduces the boot
partition size
On 28 October 2014 23:04, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
Finally! This is great news.
/usr/lib seems like an odd place, though. Does not seem to match the
description in hier(7) (not that the man page can't be updated). Looks to me
like it fits /var a bit better, though I'm not
31 matches
Mail list logo
