Re: ACPI says: "too many dependant configs"(?)

2000-12-26 Thread Mike Smith

> Since we are on the subject of ACPI, it is working great except for one
> thing, it can't attach my sound card to the pcm device (does that sound
> correct?). It definitely sees it:
> 
> unknown:  can't assign resources

This would suggest that something else is taking one or more of the 
resources that the device needs; on top of that, you may not have the 
driver necessary for this device in your kernel (you need 'isa' and 
'pcm').

> Looks like the yamaha chipset to me. If I could get sound working, I'd
> definitely be using acpica all the time.

The PnP BIOS code should pick this up as well, as long as your PnP BIOS 
works.

> I think the thermal management
> has been improved since the last time I tried it -- it kept the temp <
> 356K. Is there any way to set a temperature to be maintained? Or some way
> to actually query the current temperature? (lmmon doesnt work)

The ACPI thermal management code doesn't actually work yet (it's being 
worked on).  You don't set a temperature; the platform tells the OS what 
temperature(s) to maintain based on power profile, etc.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
   V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: ACPI says: "too many dependant configs"(?)

2000-12-24 Thread Wesley Morgan

Since we are on the subject of ACPI, it is working great except for one
thing, it can't attach my sound card to the pcm device (does that sound
correct?). It definitely sees it:

unknown:  can't assign resources

Looks like the yamaha chipset to me. If I could get sound working, I'd
definitely be using acpica all the time. I think the thermal management
has been improved since the last time I tried it -- it kept the temp <
356K. Is there any way to set a temperature to be maintained? Or some way
to actually query the current temperature? (lmmon doesnt work)



-- 
   _ __ ___   ___ ___ ___
  Wesley N Morgan   _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ __ | _ \._ \ |) |
  FreeBSD: The Power To Serve  _ |___/___/___/
  6bone: 3ffe:1ce3:7::b4ff:fe53:c297
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: ACPI says: "too many dependant configs"(?)

2000-12-24 Thread Mike Smith

> Ok, thanks for the info...  But this begs the question:  Why does the
> code limit maxdeps to 8?

I'd guess that it seemed like a good number at the time.  I mostly just 
duplicated the ISA code (which I'm not entirely a fan of, but it's a 
known evil).  I'm sure that it'd be possible to come up with a better 
algorithm, but for the most part, this code seems to work just fine.

> On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:50:13AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Last night I installed a kernel with 'device acpica' for the 1st
> > > time, and all seems fine, except that I see this at boot:
> > ...
> > > too many dependant configs
> > ...
> > > I traced this message to /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_isa.c, function
> > > acpi_isa_set_start_dependant().
> > > 
> > > Now, I have not had any indication of errors during ISA bus enumeration
> > > before, so why should I get this from the ACPI isa bus enumeration?
> > 
> > It just means that you have a device with more configuration options than 
> > our code can deal with; we just ignore the extra options. 
> > 
> > > Doesn't seem to hurt anything, but I'm curious (and ACPI-ignorant) :)
> > 
> > This part is just like BIOS PnP.  The warning indicates that we're losing 
> > possibly-useful information, but if things are still working, all is well.
> > 
> > -- 
> > ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
> > rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
> > to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
> > people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
> >V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
   V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: ACPI says: "too many dependant configs"(?)

2000-12-24 Thread Donald J . Maddox

Ok, thanks for the info...  But this begs the question:  Why does the
code limit maxdeps to 8?

On Sun, Dec 24, 2000 at 11:50:13AM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Last night I installed a kernel with 'device acpica' for the 1st
> > time, and all seems fine, except that I see this at boot:
> ...
> > too many dependant configs
> ...
> > I traced this message to /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_isa.c, function
> > acpi_isa_set_start_dependant().
> > 
> > Now, I have not had any indication of errors during ISA bus enumeration
> > before, so why should I get this from the ACPI isa bus enumeration?
> 
> It just means that you have a device with more configuration options than 
> our code can deal with; we just ignore the extra options. 
> 
> > Doesn't seem to hurt anything, but I'm curious (and ACPI-ignorant) :)
> 
> This part is just like BIOS PnP.  The warning indicates that we're losing 
> possibly-useful information, but if things are still working, all is well.
> 
> -- 
> ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
> rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
> to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
> people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
>V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Re: ACPI says: "too many dependant configs"(?)

2000-12-24 Thread Mike Smith

> Last night I installed a kernel with 'device acpica' for the 1st
> time, and all seems fine, except that I see this at boot:
...
> too many dependant configs
...
> I traced this message to /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_isa.c, function
> acpi_isa_set_start_dependant().
> 
> Now, I have not had any indication of errors during ISA bus enumeration
> before, so why should I get this from the ACPI isa bus enumeration?

It just means that you have a device with more configuration options than 
our code can deal with; we just ignore the extra options. 

> Doesn't seem to hurt anything, but I'm curious (and ACPI-ignorant) :)

This part is just like BIOS PnP.  The warning indicates that we're losing 
possibly-useful information, but if things are still working, all is well.

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
   V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



ACPI says: "too many dependant configs"(?)

2000-12-24 Thread Donald J . Maddox

Last night I installed a kernel with 'device acpica' for the 1st
time, and all seems fine, except that I see this at boot:

.
.
.
npx0:  on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
too many dependant configs
too many dependant configs
too many dependant configs
too many dependant configs
atkbdc0:  at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0:  flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
.
.
.

I traced this message to /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_isa.c, function
acpi_isa_set_start_dependant().

Now, I have not had any indication of errors during ISA bus enumeration
before, so why should I get this from the ACPI isa bus enumeration?

Doesn't seem to hurt anything, but I'm curious (and ACPI-ignorant) :)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message