Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-19 Thread Brian Somers
> I can see moving it out to where the rest of the linux emulation > code is but to remove it entirely seems the typical viking axe ^^ ^^ > bloody-minded behaviour that's getting too familiar. I agree with those sentiments. >From my re

Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Mike Smith
> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > > Fully agreement here, and that was also what the core decision said: > > only visible to processed run under the linuxolator. > > This sounds like a very poor decision to me.. > It doesn't help the security issue at all and it > makes it more difficult to fi

Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Fully agreement here, and that was also what the core decision said: > only visible to processed run under the linuxolator. This sounds like a very poor decision to me.. It doesn't help the security issue at all and it makes it more difficult to find out what is goi

Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Peter Wemm wrote: > > > The biggest problem is that it re-opens a security hole that > was explicitly patched in procfs. then look at the hole, don't remove it. That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater.. It's a godsend when trying to run Linux binaries. > > Also, the way I see it, the

Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Peter Wemm writes : >Julian Elischer wrote: >> I presume this means that it should remain part of the standard system >> but that the source should be moved to /sys/i386/linux? >> >> as long as it remains part of the system I don't care where it lives.. >> It's too

Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Peter Wemm
Julian Elischer wrote: > I presume this means that it should remain part of the standard system > but that the source should be moved to /sys/i386/linux? > > as long as it remains part of the system I don't care where it lives.. > It's too massively important to totally drop. Having it as a port

Re: HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Julian Elischer
I presume this means that it should remain part of the standard system but that the source should be moved to /sys/i386/linux? as long as it remains part of the system I don't care where it lives.. It's too massively important to totally drop. Having it as a port was a losing proposition. Julia

HEADSUP! linprocfs going away in 72 hours.

2000-04-18 Thread Soren Schmidt
Some time ago -core requested that linprocfs should move into the linuxulator. Nothing has happend on that account, so -core is now forced to take action. This is the announcement that linprocfs will be removed from the -current tree in 72 hours, giving the involved parties a final deadline fo