At 7:53 PM -0600 7/17/02, Eric Anholt wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 18:40, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
> > XDM generally did still seem to come up okay, although occasionally
> > the system would panic right at that initial XDM startup. While
> > I tried a few things to fix this (including vari
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 20:59, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > This looks like the classic error of the agp module having been loaded
> > by the drm because it's required, but agp doesn't probe/attach because
> > a generic bridge driver has already claimed the agp device.
>
> I doubt
Eric Anholt wrote:
> This looks like the classic error of the agp module having been loaded
> by the drm because it's required, but agp doesn't probe/attach because
> a generic bridge driver has already claimed the agp device.
I doubt that would be a problem as long as it came with a patch to th
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 18:40, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> I have a Matrox G400 Dual Head 32mb AGP card running on a dual
> Pentium III system, and I have been using XFree86-4 on my system for
> testing -current. This worked fine for months, and I still have a
> snapshot of -current from about Apri
I just thought I'd mention a little problem I ran into, because I had
not seen anyone else mention it. It might be specific to my PC
hardware, and actually it was pretty simple to solve once I took
the time to look into it. I don't know that anything needs to be
done about any of this, but perha
