On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 11:20:56 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is
it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 11:20:56 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is
it still
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:16:10AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 11:20:56 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 17:44:42 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:16:10AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 11:20:56 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 20:07:37 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I think we can greatly simplify things with one firm but relatively
bearable rule:
The directories /bin, /usr/bin, /sbin, /usr/sbin, insert others
here are for the
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:34:42AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
What would you do about install -C?
I think it confuses the issue rather than solving it. We're talking
about removing binaries which are no longer needed, not replacing
binaries that are needed.
install -C will not
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 20:07:37 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I think we can greatly simplify things with one firm but relatively
bearable rule:
The directories /bin, /usr/bin,
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 21:18:10 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 20:07:37 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I think we can greatly simplify things with one firm but
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:34:42AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 17:44:42 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:16:10AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 11:20:56 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 18:46:35 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:34:42AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 17:44:42 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:16:10AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October
At 11:31 AM +0930 10/8/02, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
install -C doesn't change the timestamp, so you'll have tons of
files that are older than some file in the build tree.
What does the last access timestamp look like after install -C?
What does the last-access timestamp look like on an
I wrote:
I understand what the topic is. I don't understand your comment, I'd
be inclined just to remove all files in those directories which are older
than some file in the build tree--*after* a successful
installation.
Ah, sorry, that might bear more explanation.
install -C doesn't
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:35:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Monday, 7 October 2002 at 20:07:37 -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I'd prefer this as a job for mergemaster, asking you confirmation
for each binary.
I'd much rather
13 matches
Mail list logo
