Current in Production

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Knight
Howdy, I'd just like to thank the FreeBSD team for an outstanding job. I've got a FreeBSD-current system in production running an Intranet that has just exceeded one year's uptime. Admittedly, the snapshot I built was 30/10/2000, but it does go to show that current can indeed be used

Re: Current in Production

2002-04-10 Thread Jim Bryant
Knight wrote: Howdy, I'd just like to thank the FreeBSD team for an outstanding job. I've got a FreeBSD-current system in production running an Intranet that has just exceeded one year's uptime. Admittedly, the snapshot I built was 30/10/2000, but it does go to show that current can indeed

RE: Current in Production

2002-04-10 Thread Chris Knight
-Original Message- From: Jim Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 11 April 2002 14:35 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Current in Production Do you own a Harley? Do the Mosh Pit? You definitely like riding the edge of insanity... -current

Current for production?

2001-03-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Mar-01 Gabriel Ambuehl wrote: While I'm writing this: what is the general opinion about having CURRENT on production servers (I'd really love to deploy the ACLs ASAP)? I don't plan to use SMP and can wait for snapshots til the RELEASE comes... Don't. ACL's are still not production

Re: Current for production?

2001-03-27 Thread Michael Lucas
be for a technically sound reason, I know, but that still makes it a pain. I would run unionfs on a 3-stable production box before running -current in production right now. ==ml PS: You could also make a management decision to hire a kernel hacker to work on the part of -current that you need

current for production?

1999-12-20 Thread Fritz Heinrichmeyer
as there now is almost only talk about sound and ata drivers in this list, would it be adviseable to use a current-snap on a server machine (apache,samba,ftp) without need for sound and ata drivers (box with aic-scsi-only drives)? The integrated gcc-2.95.2 is so handy and current does all i

Re: current for production?

1999-12-20 Thread Ben Rosengart
gcc-2.95.2 is so handy and current does all i want on my private box anyway. I think you'd have better luck asking people what their experiences with the software have been, rather than asking for a recommendation. No one is likely to want to take the responsibility of recommending -current

Re: current for production?

1999-12-20 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
I'm inclined to agree. I have had great luck in production boxes with FreeBSD-CURRENT, but it's not reccomended to use -CURRENT for production just because sometimes things break. :-) = | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD