RE: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-29 Thread Jason Young
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leif Neland Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 4:23 PM To: Kris Kennaway Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: libc.so.4 not found On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Leif Neland

libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread Derek Schene'
On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the following after installation: Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found I tried again from scratch with 5.0 20001124 Current and have the same problem. This affects ema

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:18:43AM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote: On a fresh hard drive I installed 5.0 20001123 Current and got the following after installation: Local package initialization:/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found we bumped the libc version to

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread David O'Brien
object "libc.so.4" not found we bumped the libc version to 5, but we didn't make compat4 libaries available for installation yet. In this case it doesn't matter -- "a fresh hard drive" and "local package" implies that the -current packages on ftp.freebsd.org hav

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread Leif Neland
Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps core on Fbsd current? It works on a Fbsd stable. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:44:34PM -0600, Bill Fumerola wrote: Huh? Why the worst of both worlds?? Incompatible changes AND no way to differentiate between the two. (plus we don't even know what changed it, so we have no way of telling people "your libc before X won't work with binarys

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread janb
I am not sure, if anybody care for this fix, but I just copied libc.so.5 to libc.so.4 when kde was complaining about not finding it. I am not sure if this should work, but it does work just fine... JAn On Sat, 25 Nov 2000, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 12:44:34PM -0600, Bill

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread Derek Schene'
Thanks for everyone's input, I feel I'm getting closer and see where my previous thinking had gone wrong. I tried this- I'd suggest just symlinking libc.so.4 to libc.so.5, nothing terrible should happen. and now when booting get- Local package initialization:fopen: No such file or

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 03:34:49PM -0800, Derek Schene' wrote: I tried this- I'd suggest just symlinking libc.so.4 to libc.so.5, nothing terrible should happen. Since nothing has changed in the -CURRENT libc yet, this will work. BTW, you'd want to do the same for libc_r.so.4.

Re: libc.so.4 not found

2000-11-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:28:53PM +0100, Leif Neland wrote: Could this be the reason why Avp (virusscanner) for FreeBSD 4X just dumps core on Fbsd current? It works on a Fbsd stable. Could be malloc.conf defaults. i.e. a bug in avp triggered by the debugging /etc/malloc.conf settings in