Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-24 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Akinori MUSHA" writes: : Would you add an UPDATING entry for this? Many people have been : reporting problems with the local mailer not knowing these changes. It is on my queue of things to add to UPDATING as I find the time. I'll try to get to it quickly. Warner

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-23 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
knu> Would you add an UPDATING entry for this? Many people have been knu> reporting problems with the local mailer not knowing these changes. I gave the information to Warner, the maintainer of the UPDATING file. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-23 Thread Akinori MUSHA
Would you add an UPDATING entry for this? Many people have been reporting problems with the local mailer not knowing these changes. At Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT), Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > The following changes have been made in -CURRENT: > > 1. mail.local(8) is no longer install

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-15 Thread Andreas Klemm
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 11:19:43AM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > 5. The sendmail cf building tools (contrib/sendmail/cf) are installed in >/usr/share/sendmail/cf. Hurray ! -- Andreas Klemm Powered by FreeBSD SMP Songs from our band >>64Bits<<

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Peter Wemm
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > leifn> Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc? > > There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon. Yes, there has been one for ages. Add: "SENDMAIL_CF= myfile.cf" to /etc/make.conf, and the sendmail makefiles will build i

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >leifn> Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc? > >There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon. At one time there was a make.conf knob for it, is that not still around? -- Brandon D. Valentine <[EMAI

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
leifn> Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc? There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-14 Thread Leif Neland
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > The following changes have been made in -CURRENT: > > 1. mail.local(8) is no longer installed as a set-user-id binary. > >If you are using a /etc/mail/sendmail.cf from the default sendmail.cf >included with FreeBSD any time after 3.1.

HEADS UP: sendmail related changes

2000-10-10 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
The following changes have been made in -CURRENT: 1. mail.local(8) is no longer installed as a set-user-id binary. If you are using a /etc/mail/sendmail.cf from the default sendmail.cf included with FreeBSD any time after 3.1.0, you are fine. If you are using a hand-configured sendmail

Re: sendmail related changes

2000-10-01 Thread Archie Cobbs
Gregory Neil Shapiro writes: > sendmail's version of vacation is completely backwards compatible with the > existing version. It also contains new features and bug fixes that are not > in the current FreeBSD version. This will take care of PR bin/15227. > > 2. Copy cf config building tree into

Re: sendmail related changes

2000-09-30 Thread Brian F. Feldman
Gregory Neil Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are some sendmail related changes I would like to make in the next > few days. Some may be controversial so I am sending out this mail first. > I would appreciate feedback on any of these items. If I don't hear any >

sendmail related changes

2000-09-30 Thread Gregory Neil Shapiro
There are some sendmail related changes I would like to make in the next few days. Some may be controversial so I am sending out this mail first. I would appreciate feedback on any of these items. If I don't hear any major objections, I'll go ahead with the changes. 1. Use sendmail