On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I need to review the gmp documents again, but I not sure
> the preference order is much of an issue. By default,
> CPU_TYPE="generic" would build the C code, which should work
> on all architectures supported by FreeBSD. If a user explicitly
> sets CPU_
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > I'm not fluent in FSF configure scripts, but it looks like
> > configure tests the compiler for specific features to determine
> > CPU type. The gross hack would be to add CPU_TYPE="generic"
> > to /etc/defaults/make.conf, and
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I'm not fluent in FSF configure scripts, but it looks like
> configure tests the compiler for specific features to determine
> CPU type. The gross hack would be to add CPU_TYPE="generic"
> to /etc/defaults/make.conf, and allow users to define CPU_TYPE
>
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > Before I jump in and attempt to do an upgrade of libgmp,
> > I thought I'd asked if anyone else has endured this joy?
> >
> > Note, src/contrib/libgmp is at version 2.0.x and it is
> > 3+ years old. The newest version is at 3
On Sat, 16 Sep 2000, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Before I jump in and attempt to do an upgrade of libgmp,
> I thought I'd asked if anyone else has endured this joy?
>
> Note, src/contrib/libgmp is at version 2.0.x and it is
> 3+ years old. The newest version is at 3.1. The Changelog
> indicates that
Before I jump in and attempt to do an upgrade of libgmp,
I thought I'd asked if anyone else has endured this joy?
Note, src/contrib/libgmp is at version 2.0.x and it is
3+ years old. The newest version is at 3.1. The Changelog
indicates that there are numerous fixes and enhancements
over 2.0.
