On Sunday, 25 July 1999 at 1:21:03 -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
On Saturday, 24 July 1999 at 20:51:37 -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Kevin Day wrote:
For one, do another 'ps' with the 'l' option, so you can see what it's stuck
on.
UID PID PPID CPU PRI NI VSZ RSS WCHAN
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 18:47:37 +0200, Nick Hibma wrote:
PR 12634 mentions the increase of MAXSYMLINKS (src/sys/sys/param.h) to
64.
There has to be a limit. Like so many limits, it has to increase as more
and more people bump up against it, provided:
1) They're not bumping up against
[Hijacked from the freebsd-current mailing list]
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999 19:46:52 -0400, Bill Pechter wrote:
Are there any tricks to getting Java in Netscape running with
FreeBSD --current.
Just because CURRENT is the platform you use when you encounter a
problem, doesn't mean that the
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
The tcsh listed below that is a zombie of the running kvt.
There aren't any zombies here.
Right, they'd show up as 'Z' in the state field, I'd guess.
This seems to be more of a kvt bug than a freebsd bug. :)
I don't see that either. The fact
while you are at it try to compile a kernel with symbols ...
--
Amancio Hasty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
while you are at it try to compile a kernel with symbols ...
I already have (this is my standard practice). What should I do with it
here?
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote:
while you are at it try to compile a kernel with symbols ...
I already have (this is my standard practice). What should I do with it
here?
Kris
Well, if the process is not in a zombie state and you can't kill it . We may
need
to examine
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Nope. I did attach to it with gdb at one point to try and figure out what
it was running, but because it was compiled w/o debugging symbols I didn't
get anything out of a backtrace except for something similar to:
You *can* compile it again, just adding the -g and
whereis anything yields..
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Warning: couldn't
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 14:12:53 -0400, Dan Moschuk wrote:
whereis anything yields..
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Staleness. Unfortunately, the whereis(1) manpage doesn't tell you to
look at the manpath(1) manpage. Do so now and you'll see that you should
Otherwise,
the generic code is missing mainly update of the interrupt masks when
an interrupt is unregistered.
For the low level side, we could consider something like the following code.
But this shall be called by the nexus layer and then needs generic newbus
support (as you said above, didn't
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 20:12:46 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Staleness.
It's been pointed out to me in private mail that current's
manpath.config is broken. If nobody's looked at it by tomorrow, I'll do
so then.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
* Sheldon Hearn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990725 20:29]:
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 14:12:53 -0400, Dan Moschuk wrote:
whereis anything yields..
Warning: couldn't stat file /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.00502/man!
Staleness. Unfortunately, the whereis(1) manpage doesn't tell you to
look at the
It's been pointed out to me in private mail that current's
manpath.config is broken. If nobody's looked at it by tomorrow, I'll do
so then.
Fixed.
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Sun, 25 Jul 1999 21:33:55 +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
It's been pointed out to me in private mail that current's
manpath.config is broken.
Fixed.
Hi Dan,
You'll need rev 1.11 of src/gnu/usr.bin/man/manpath/manpath.config, but
you should be able to get away with commenting out those
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 10:02:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
This aside, I think there are more bits required for the patches :*1
rc.conf.5 needs to be updated - that's the easy bit.
Done - see attached.
I think we also need a src/etc/ppp/ppp.conf that installs with 0600
permissions
I was just wondering how the drivers on the aureal vortex are coming
along... I know that Cameron Grant was working on them, but I have not
heard anything on that subject fora while, so I was kinda hoping to hear
about it soon. Thanks.
Kenneth Culver
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
17 matches
Mail list logo