Okay, so I finally decided to take the plunge and check out ipfilter. ipf
seemed to load my ruleset with no problems, but ipfstat dies with:
ioctl(SIOCGETFS): Invalid argument
I have remade the 'ipl' target in MAKEDEV, and my kernel and userland are
in sync. I have options IPFILTER and options I
It seems Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Since the most recent round of ATA updates, my CDROM is no longer even
> probed at boot time.
>
> deviceata0
> deviceatadisk0
> deviceatapicd0
> options ATA_STATIC_ID
>
I know of this, it should be fixed in my
Is there a way to initialized a vga card after the system is booted?
What I am looking for is to initialize a second vga in my
system so that I can run X in a dual headed configuration
with XFree86 or to be able to chose which vga card
to run X with on my system.
Tnks
--
Amancio Ha
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 10:26:48AM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
>>
>> Saving 10% or 20% on disk space is not worth wasting >= 10 times more
>> CPU time than gzip. Disk space is cheap nowadays, but upgrading to a
>> CPU that is
Hi,
It seems that recent kernels have problems initialising syscons in VESA pixel
modes. Particularly "vidcontrol VESA_800x600" (actually "vidcontrol
VESA_800x600 < /dev/ttyv1" to see what's going on ttyv0) command make my kernel
panicing with the following output:
Fatal trap 18: integer divide
Hi,
I've build gimp-1.1.15 (some minutes ago) on -current (cvsuped
yesterday) and I'm getting sigsegv's after the parsing of the plug-in's.
Anyone seeing this too?
---snip---
(150) netchild@ttyp0 > gimp
gimp: fatal error: sigsegv caught
gimp (pid:90581): [E]xit, [H]alt, show [S]tack trace or [P]r
>It seems that recent kernels have problems initialising syscons in VESA pixel
>modes. Particularly "vidcontrol VESA_800x600" (actually "vidcontrol
>VESA_800x600 < /dev/ttyv1" to see what's going on ttyv0) command make my kerne
>l
>panicing with the following output:
[...]
>Looking into nm /kernel
I wrote a patch for the psm driver to add support for several PS/2 mice.
It is in http://www.freebsd.org/~yokota/ps2mice-24Jan2000.tar.gz.
I am attaching README included in the patch.
Thank you.
Kazu
--
PS/2 mouse driver patch
Hi,there
I install FreeBSD-current-2122.
I tried to write CD-R with burncd, but writing of CD-R is failed
at the 'fixate' sequence. At the same time, I got the next error
message.
The message is "burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCCLOSEDISK) : Device busy".
Then, I add "sleep(10);" in 'fixate' code of burnc
The following patch fixes two things: First, DEVICE_SUSPEND errors are
no longer ignored. Since we have defaults for methods we should no
longer ignore these errors. Also, DEVICE_RESUME wasn't done when the
apm_suspend_system event failed.
Second, in the ordering of DEVICE_* and apm_hook_* is no
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> >It seems that recent kernels have problems initialising syscons in VESA pixel
> >modes. Particularly "vidcontrol VESA_800x600" (actually "vidcontrol
> >VESA_800x600 < /dev/ttyv1" to see what's going on ttyv0) command make my kerne
> >l
> >panicing with the following outp
It seems Yosuke Koshino wrote:
> Hi,there
>
> I install FreeBSD-current-2122.
> I tried to write CD-R with burncd, but writing of CD-R is failed
> at the 'fixate' sequence. At the same time, I got the next error
> message.
> The message is "burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCCLOSEDISK) : Device busy".
> The
Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> What type of mouse is it, PS/2, serial, or USB? Is the power supply
> in your system big enough? Is the mouse's cable and connector look
> OK?
Well, it's an ISA bus mouse. I bought this thing back in 1994. It's
an IMSI mouse. I'll bet this stupid thing could last f
"Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote:
> > The message is "burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCCLOSEDISK) : Device busy".
> > Then, I add "sleep(10);" in 'fixate' code of burncd.c.
>
> You didn't get any other error messages ??
I didn't get no other error message.
> Hmm, acd_close_track waits uptil 5 mins f
At 4:43 PM -0500 2000/1/21, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>>And to my best knowledge, BIND does not support anything
>>like that.
>
> Not directly, but I think there are ways you can have it call
> some external procedure to do "load-balancing" for an IP
> rotary. We talked about doing this to add
At 5:07 PM -0500 2000/1/21, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> As John mentioned earlier, what your probably most interested in is
> patch quality (e.g., minimum packet loss) first and latency second as
> far as network characteristics are concerned. Simply measure them if
> you choose rather than tr
At 5:23 PM -0800 2000/1/21, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> You don't even need to modify the protocol. Just write a small
> tcp program that times the 3 way handshake on open to all the
> servers, take the one with the sortest time and spit that out
> for the user to stuff in his cvsupfile.
At 10:00 PM -0700 2000/1/21, Warner Losh wrote:
> Hmmm. A thought just occurred to me. There's no need to measure
> these things. Lookup all the IP addresses. Do a non blocking
> connection to each of these machines. First one to come back with the
> REL16_1 response wins, and all the ot
At 11:34 PM +1300 2000/1/22, Joe Abley wrote:
> This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
> you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
> cancelled out by the fact that all tests are run around the same time.
This is a really cool ide
At 12:16 PM +0100 2000/1/24, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Using bzip2 for the FreeBSD distribution sets would increase
> the minimum memory requirement by 4 Mbyte (or about 2.5 Mbyte
> using the -s option of bunzip2, but which doubles decompression
> time).
I really don't see what everyone
* From: Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* The correct answer seems to be "you can't do that" :-). Even checking
Err. Now why am I not surprised that you said that? ;)
Anyway, I have committed the following patch submitted by Alexander
Langer. It has a nice feature of working for both -curr
On 23/01 22:36, David O'Brien wrote:
> BUT, if we bzip2'ed the base system distribution, we'd be able to fit
> more Packages on the 1st CDROM, and that is a BIG win. With it in the
This would indeed be good. Let's also remember that 'tar' has built-in
support for bzip2 so it's not as if it wou
It seems Yosuke Koshino wrote:
> "Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote:
> > > The message is "burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCCLOSEDISK) : Device busy".
> > > Then, I add "sleep(10);" in 'fixate' code of burncd.c.
> >
> > You didn't get any other error messages ??
> I didn't get no other error message.
> I'm hatching in my head a scheme as follows:
you may want to take a look at keith moore's work on what he called sonar.
there was code, but the internet draft seems to have expired. keith is
usually available at Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
randy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
{\rtf1\ansi\deff0\deftab720{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss MS Sans Serif;}{\f1\froman\fcharset2 Symbol;}{\f2\fswiss\fprq2 Arial;}}
{\colortbl\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;}
\deflang1033\pard\plain\f2\fs20 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
\par
\par
\par CONTACT:
\par Jeannette Guillermo
\par Powerhousepress
Hi,
Since the 4.0 release is coming up soon, I'd like to remind people to
check the build logs and fix what they can. The latest one is in
http://bento.FreeBSD.org/errorlogs/errorlogs/e.4.2123/
There are over 200 broken ports. In particular, there are a few dozen
(78 at last count) brok
On 24 Jan 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> Anyway, I have committed the following patch submitted by Alexander
> Langer. It has a nice feature of working for both -current and
> -stable without any additional #ifdef's. I hope it's ok.
>
> Satoshi
> ===
> --- lib/libxview/notif
Why don't we use the download accelerator
(http://www.lidan.com/) methodology and make simultaneous connections to
the top 4 sites as discovered by ping? :)
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 5:23 PM -0800 2000/1/21, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> > You don't even need to modify the
>
> Is there a way to initialized a vga card after the system is booted?
>
> What I am looking for is to initialize a second vga in my
> system so that I can run X in a dual headed configuration
> with XFree86 or to be able to chose which vga card
> to run X with on my system.
The Linux folks c
Thus spake Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Langer. It has a nice feature of working for both -current and
> -stable without any additional #ifdef's. I hope it's ok.
I now saw Garret Wollman's function.
I like the use of the static-vars.
The use of sigemptyset makes it mo
Brad Knowles wrote:
>At 4:43 PM -0500 2000/1/21, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>
>>>And to my best knowledge, BIND does not support anything
>>>like that.
>>
>> Not directly, but I think there are ways you can have it call
>> some external procedure to do "load-balancing" for an IP
>> rotary. We t
At 10:23 AM -0500 2000/1/24, Mr. K. wrote:
> Why don't we use the download accelerator
> (http://www.lidan.com/) methodology and make simultaneous connections to
> the top 4 sites as discovered by ping? :)
As mentioned before, not all sites allow ICMP packets through
their networks.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seems that this patch fixed the problem for me.
> I can not reproduce it anymore.
That's good news. Thanks for testing it! I'll commit it later
today.
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 09:48:33AM -0600, damieon wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I administer several machines running freebsd. Most of
> them are running FreeBSD-CURRENT, and all of them have DPT SmartRAID IV
> raid controlers. I was looking though LINT and found that it made
> re
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > And just how do I increase the space on a CDROM???
>
> Include another CD-ROM.
You are missing the point. The installation CDROM only shows you the
packages on that CDROM, this gives newbies the impression we don't have
very ma
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 02:13:17PM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> Hi, I've noticed a strange problem with vidcontrol and moused recently
> with current. I also had the same problem about 3 weeks back, and it
> doesn't seem to be occurring all that regularly.
>
>
> Here's what I was doing: I had j
Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On 24-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > > running Winloose, so I actually *CAN* run this in the background. I
> > > certainly was not idle while Bzip2 was compressing.
> > Its pretty annoying waiting for som
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> And the only cost is the slight expansion of the amount of disk
> space required to store the source code in /usr/src and the binaries
> in /usr/bin [...]
And the time and disk space required to make world. No thank you.
Remember that the only
In message Brad Knowles writes:
: Doesn't work. There might be a very low latency but
: low-bandwidth connection between you and one of the servers, when you
: (and everyone else) would be better off if you instead connected to a
: server that show
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 11:34 PM +1300 2000/1/22, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> > This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
> > you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
> > cancelled out by the fact that al
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > At 11:34 PM +1300 2000/1/22, Joe Abley wrote:
> >
> > > This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
> > > you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
> > > cancelled out by the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 06:36:44AM -0800, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
> There are over 200 broken ports. In particular, there are a few dozen
> (78 at last count) broken by the gcc upgrade (those marked by "new
These are due to bogus i386 ASM:
cooledit-3.11.3.log ja-kon2-14dot-0.3
In message Nick Hibma writes:
: The following patch fixes two things: First, DEVICE_SUSPEND errors are
: no longer ignored. Since we have defaults for methods we should no
: longer ignore these errors. Also, DEVICE_RESUME wasn't done when the
: a
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> Agreed. The making lots of connections was a bad idea. However, I've
> rarely seen low latency and low bandwidth go together. I've also
> problems connecting accross high loss links more often. Sure, it is a
> statistical argument.
>
> I still think
On 23-Jan-00 Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, you wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2000, Rod Taylor wrote:
>>
>> > Personally, I'd like to see less stuff in the system source for
>> > smaller installs and lower compile time leaving it up to me to
>> > customize the individual stuff thats install
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey writes:
: That's the precise reason I suggested a system that used no probing, had
: feedback, and forced shared load in spite of user misconfiguration. Got
: shouted down.
One reason I think that you've been shouted down (and me too, since I
had simila
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> On the 29th of January, I'll be freezing the -current branch (well,
> OK, the trunk). That means NO commits without my review first and I
Hmm. What does this mean for the ATA driver? I know Soren has some more
updates in the wings, and I'm gratefu
Thus spake David O'Brien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I would be happy to look review fixes or consult the maintainers.
Hello David, compiler-maintainer ;-)
I noticed that many ports are broken because the compiler handles
ANSI-C++ violations too strict.
That means, if you do, as an example:
const
On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 08:50:21PM +0100, Alexander Langer wrote:
> I noticed that many ports are broken because the compiler handles
> ANSI-C++ violations too strict.
Not too strict -- to the ratified ISO-C++ specification.
> Just FYI, maybe you can do something against this strict handling.
N
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
>writes:
> : That's the precise reason I suggested a system that used no probing, had
> : feedback, and forced shared load in spite of user misconfiguration. Got
> : shouted down.
>
> One reason I think that y
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey
>writes:
> : Oh. If that's a problem, it would be a fatal problem (would be for me,
> : sometimes).
>
> It used to be a big problem. When cvsup was first getting mirrors,
> some seemed to update every 15 minu
At 11:20 AM -0700 2000/1/24, Warner Losh wrote:
> Agreed. The making lots of connections was a bad idea. However, I've
> rarely seen low latency and low bandwidth go together.
I have. Until recently, we had only a 512KB line between our
operations facilities here in Brussels and th
At 9:54 AM -0800 1/24/00, David O'Brien wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > And just how do I increase the space on a CDROM???
> >
> > Include another CD-ROM.
>
>You are missing the point. The installation CDROM only shows
>you the packages on that CDROM,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Brad Knowles wrote:
> Can't we do both? Use gzip on the install floppy, but include
> bzip2 in /usr/src, and make sure that all the various programs that
> deal with tarballs and gzip'ed tarballs can also deal with bzip2
> tarballs (including in the ports system)?
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chuck Robey writes:
: Oh. If that's a problem, it would be a fatal problem (would be for me,
: sometimes).
It used to be a big problem. When cvsup was first getting mirrors,
some seemed to update every 15 minutes, while others updated what
seemed like every two da
At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote:
> The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2.
I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate?
--
These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy
__
At 1:17 PM -0500 2000/1/24, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> And the time and disk space required to make world. No thank you.
What is the time & disk space requirements without bzip2? I
recall multiple hours to do this, and hundreds of MB, but then maybe
I'm mis-remembering things.
The management of next_writeable has been move from the
kernel to userspace. This means that the burncd command
must be in sync with the kernel. So make world is your
friend.
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Not to disrupt the facinating discussion about bzip2, but,
1. I've had some people tell me that support for the 3com 574-tx PCMCIA
card was definitly in -current, and other people who weren't so sure. Is
it, and if so, under what driver?
2. If it's included, is that driver in the GENERIC kernel
> At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2.
>
> I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate?
Zip was selected because it's one of the few compressed bundle formats
that allows
On 24-Jan-00 Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 2:01 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> The new install system is probably going to use zip rather than bzip2.
>
> I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you
> elaborate?
I did not make the choice personally, I believe
It seems Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > On the 29th of January, I'll be freezing the -current branch (well,
> > OK, the trunk). That means NO commits without my review first and I
>
> Hmm. What does this mean for the ATA driver? I know Soren has some
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed
> with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ??
My WDC drive falling back to PIO mode..see the dmesg in the previous
message.
Kris
"How many roads must a man w
In message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> VINSON
WAYNE HOWARD writes:
: 1. I've had some people tell me that support for the 3com 574-tx PCMCIA
: card was definitly in -current, and other people who weren't so sure. Is
: it, and if so, under what driver?
The ep driver claims to support this card. the pcca
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Ben Rosengart wrote:
> And the time and disk space required to make world. No thank you.
> Remember that the only win here is if bzip is used in an infrastructural
> capacity (e.g. for packages and other install stuff), and it has been
> pointed out that the savings on disk
Looking at my CTM logs, I seem to be missing some pieces in the last 3
cvs-cur postings (cvs-cur 6021, 6022, 6023). I get two pieces
simultaneously and then nothing until the next part. Is anyone else
seeing this? Chuck isn't sure if it's anything he's done.
Looking back, the `first two pieces
On Tue, 25 Jan 2000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Looking at my CTM logs, I seem to be missing some pieces in the last 3
> cvs-cur postings (cvs-cur 6021, 6022, 6023). I get two pieces
> simultaneously and then nothing until the next part. Is anyone else
> seeing this? Chuck isn't sure if it's anythi
At 4:16 PM -0500 2000/1/24, John Baldwin wrote:
> Since zip integrates the
> compression and archiving in one file format, you can look in the zip header,
> find the file you want, and then extract and uncompress just its data. This
> func
>On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > On the 29th of January, I'll be freezing the -current branch (well,
> > OK, the trunk). That means NO commits without my review first ...
Could someone commit the 2-line bug fix in bin/15728 before yet
another system release goes out the door?
< said:
> Am I the only one that uses UNIX as a multitasking OS?
> nice the bzip2 process by 20 and background it. Geez.
Perhaps you're the only one who compresses files just for the hell of
it. Most people normally compress files to meet an immediate need,
and actually care how long it takes
< said:
>I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate?
Other people have answered with the why but not the how.
Choices (like this one about archive formats) get made when people sit
down and actually do the work to improve FreeBSD. People with commit
bits are gener
:Could someone commit the 2-line bug fix in bin/15728 before yet
:another system release goes out the door?
Done!
:Given that lpr/lpd seems to be very low priority in most committers
:queues, is there any way to expedite changes like these? I'm
:trying avoid any ranting or raving, but this
Could someone with a recent (ie < 1 week) -CURRENT confirm whether they
have problems booting their system when setting allscreens_flags to
"VESA_800x600"? I have now verified the problem with two different
systems -- Compaq Professional Workstation 5100 (UP, Matrox Millenium
II) and Intel Provi
>Could someone with a recent (ie < 1 week) -CURRENT confirm whether they
>have problems booting their system when setting allscreens_flags to
>"VESA_800x600"? I have now verified the problem with two different
>systems -- Compaq Professional Workstation 5100 (UP, Matrox Millenium
>II) and Intel P
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED],
generated with the help of perlbug 1.26 running under perl 5.00503.
-
[Please enter your report here]
Running the following test script causes perl to crash. You may need
to ru
Howdy, me again...
I wrote to some freebsd list some months/years back asking about
this, but now it's time to revisit things.
We have an old t^Hrusty 2.2-RELENG box from '97 that's been running
like a champ, kinda, after hacking around the problem. But it's
time to retire that underpowered box
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> The ep driver claims to support this card. the pccard.conf.sample
> file also claims to support this card. Matt Dodd claims to have fixed
> support for this card.
Claim nothing. It works for me and a number of other people who have
tested it for me.
>
Since the countdown is on to a new release, I'de like to take a second and
nag some committers to take a look at PR kern/15251. Greg was going to take
care of it for me before he got called away on business. In any event, it
would good to get into 4.0 release if for no other reason than to prev
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd"
writes:
: On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
: > The ep driver claims to support this card. the pccard.conf.sample
: > file also claims to support this card. Matt Dodd claims to have fixed
: > support for this card.
:
: Claim nothing. It w
Hi
At Sun, 23 Jan 2000 18:51:25 +0100 (CET),
Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I updated to today's -current from -stable.
> > My ATAPI CD-ROM drive doesn't probed,
> > and is seemed to be halted.
> > (The tray is locked, won't open, and the LED keeps being on.)
>
> This is fixed in
>Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed
>with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ??
On some older PCI systems, including my Pentium 66, the driver still detects
irq 0 for ata-pci0. Hardwiring it to irq 14 in the source as suggested recently is
t
Any reason that the IPFIREWALL and DUMMYNET code is present in
sys/net/bridge.c? It appears that it makes a number of bad assumptions
and in general violates the semantics of 'bridging' vs. 'routing'.
Should we even encourage people to use this functionality? Do we really
want bridge.c to have
Hmm. It sounds like the system is doing a huge amount of seeking to
flush the dirty buffers. Your history file may be badly fragmented on
the disk. The first thing I would do is take the system down and copy
the history file to reorder all of its block. i.e. 'cp fubar fubar.ba
* Matthew N. Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000124 18:11] wrote:
> Any reason that the IPFIREWALL and DUMMYNET code is present in
> sys/net/bridge.c? It appears that it makes a number of bad assumptions
> and in general violates the semantics of 'bridging' vs. 'routing'.
>
> Should we even encourage
On Monday, 24 January 2000 at 13:33:43 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
>> Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed
>> with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ??
>
> My WDC drive falling back to PIO mode..see
does it look like this ???
ad0: ATA-5 disk at ata0 as master
ad0: 9770MB (20010816 sectors), 19852 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, UDMA33
acd0: CDROM drive at ata0 as slave
acd0: read 6890KB/s (6890KB/s), 256KB buffer, PIO4
acd0: Reads: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA stream
> * Matthew N. Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000124 18:11] wrote:
> > Any reason that the IPFIREWALL and DUMMYNET code is present in
> > sys/net/bridge.c? It appears that it makes a number of bad assumptions
> > and in general violates the semantics of 'bridging' vs. 'routing'.
> >
> > Should we eve
This works on the i386 but fails on the Alpha:
===> sys/modules/if_tun
@ -> /c/src/sys
machine -> /c/src/sys/alpha/include
touch opt_devfs.h
echo "#define NETATALK 1" > opt_atalk.h
echo "#define ATM_CORE 1" > opt_atm.h
echo "#define INET 1" > opt_inet.h
echo "#define INET6 1" > opt_inet6.h
echo "
While I don't have much time to hack, I have tried to spend a little
time
going through the open PRs. When I find something I can reproduce,
I try
to fix it. How can I get the patches I have submitted into 4.0? Some
of
the problems were not very "obvious" patches, but all of them have been
very
What is the reason for putting a giant "Example!" in hosts.allow?
I note that it was committed at 3 o'clock in the morning... was someone
trying to make a point?
What other files have this type of gross bit-bloat in them?
Here is a patch: (please notice the spelling correction)
--- host
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> I'm not sure what your proposing, if it's removing BRIDGE support from
> the kernel, I'd have to object. BRIDGE enables me to run a transparent
> firewall without worrying about routing issues, just drop a machine
> with BRIDGE and IPFIREWALL in betw
On Tue, Jan 25, 2000 at 03:03:32PM +1100, Andy Farkas wrote:
>
>
> What is the reason for putting a giant "Example!" in hosts.allow?
>
> I note that it was committed at 3 o'clock in the morning... was someone
> trying to make a point?
>
> What other files have this type of gross bit-bloat in
I'd like a quick review of this patch. It looks like swapdev_vnode
changes broke diskless swapping too, not just swap-backed VN. I'm sure
glad someone filed a PR on this (kern/16165) or we would have gone into
release with this bug.
Now, normally I would take this opportuni
[I know this perhaps isn't the proper list, but -questions and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't replied this post, and the -current list
tends to be a bit more on the ball. Anyway, the problem is about getting a
-CURRENT snapshot :) ]
For the past several days (at least since 2118), I've been t
It seems TrouBle wrote:
> does it look like this ???
Could I have a complete dmesg, or at least all the lines that belongs
to the ata driver ??
I need to know what chips etc to be able to diagnose further...
> ad0: 9770MB (20010816 sectors), 19852 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> ad0: 16 secs/i
Later tonight I will make a change to our base C++ compiler that will
change the way virtual tables are handled. Currently we are using THUNKS
for virtual inheritance. Unfortunately there are bugs that The GCC
developers thought would be fixed in GCC 2.95. However it isn't.
After this change e
Hi,
> Any reason that the IPFIREWALL and DUMMYNET code is present in
> sys/net/bridge.c? It appears that it makes a number of bad assumptions
> and in general violates the semantics of 'bridging' vs. 'routing'.
the reason is that I needed that functionality, and according to
my experience most
The attached patch makes libc_r use the recently added hooks in the
dynamic linker to provide locking so that the dynamic linker is
thread-safe. I have tested it in a simple program and I believe it
works OK. If any of you have a -current system with a non-trivial
libc_r application, I would app
It seems Greg Childers wrote:
>
> >Huh, you have only told me about the missing CDROM (should be fixed
> >with the commit I just did), what else seems to be a problem ??
>
> On some older PCI systems, including my Pentium 66, the driver still detects
> irq 0 for ata-pci0. Hardwiring it to irq 1
This patch is designed to fix PR kern/15883. This PR is very easy
to reproduce.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=15883
Unfortunately the patch is not entirely trivial. NQNFS has a horrendous
bug in the code in question -- it's accessing a structure pointer fro
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo