Re: RSA library problems

2000-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Paul Richards wrote: I stuck a dlerror() in there and the problem is usr/lib/librsaINTL.so: Undefined symbol "BN_mod_exp_mont" This symbol is defined in bn_ext.c and should be compiled into libcrypto - can you verify yours has it? Kris In God we Trust -- all

Re: -current, ep and fragment problems.

2000-03-24 Thread Dan Moschuk
| Is anyone else seeing odd behaviour with a fairly recent -current, an ep | driver nic card and fragmented packets? | | If I understand things correctly, Matt Dillon and a cast of thousands | just committed a fix to this problem. Try cvsup'ing and make'ing world | and see if that

Re: -current, ep and fragment problems.

2000-03-24 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
[cc:'d shin] :-) I have only fxp and fe for 4.0/5.0 machines at my work place, but I have a 4.0 machine with ep at my home. I think I'can test it tonight if it also happens in my environment. As far as I confirmed it here, many pinging with -s 1600 won't make any problems between my

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Bruce Evans wrote: Yes. make.conf shouldn't even hint that globally changing CFLAGS is supported or good. Note that the suggested "most common use" has been bogus since -pipe was added to the default settings in rev.1.31

Re: -current, ep and fragment problems.

2000-03-24 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
Also I tried to set mtu 1200 to my fxp, and login other machines with mtu 1500, and did `ls -lR /`, and also there seems to be no problem. Woops, this latter check was meaningless for checking fragments. No fragments were happening due to tcp mss negotiation and path mtu discovery.

Anyone know why the syscall interface is using the doreti mechanism?

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
I understand why interrupts use the doreti mechanism. I don't understand why the syscall interface traps have to use it. As far as I can tell, the cpl stuff does not have to be checked at all, the spl does not have to be set to 0 (it damn well better already be 0!), pending

Re: /boot/loader is making my VAIO reboot

2000-03-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-Mar-00 Ollivier Robert wrote: According to Daniel C. Sobral: Or just pressing space when the countdown message first appears... No time for that. My guess is that it is dying trying to load the kernel, since those are where the recent changes were. Try putting something simple in

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread Jim Bloom
Upgrade sys/vm/swap_pager.c to the current version. There was a bug there which has been fixed. Jim Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD mailing list wrote: /var/log/messages indicates: Mar 23 23:32:47 mrynet /kernel: Debugger("d_iocmd botch") called. Mar 23 23:32:49 mrynet /kernel: fd0c:

Re: /boot/loader is making my VAIO reboot

2000-03-24 Thread Ollivier Robert
My guess is that it is dying trying to load the kernel, since those are It is rebooting before /boot/loader.rc because none of the "key" commands I've put there are executed. where th e recent changes were. Try putting something simple in loader.rc, like just 'lsde v'. Basically, we need a

Dynamic sysctls - patches for review

2000-03-24 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Hi, Inspired by PR kern/16928 I implemented completely dynamic creation/deletion of sysctl trees at runtime. The patches (relative to -current) can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/~abial/dyn_sysctl.tgz Included is an example of KLD that creates some subtrees when loaded, and

sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread John Baldwin
Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current: cc -O -pipe -Wall -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../gnu/lib/libdialog -I/usr/obj/usr/src/release/sysinstall -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../sys -c /usr/src/release/sysinstall/kget.c

NOUUCP knob and /etc/uucp

2000-03-24 Thread Ray Kohler
I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped around the NOUUCP knob? -- Ray Kohler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Commitment, n.: Commitment can be

Re: ppp oddity

2000-03-24 Thread Brian Somers
Check out http://www.FreeBSD.org/FAQ/userppp.html. The remote end is reflecting your data back at you. usually ppp from laptop (3.4+pao) to home (4.0-stable) works fine. and then sometimes it will get stuck in the following mode three N in a row. ppp[547]: tun0: Chat: Send: AT^M

Re: INVARIANTS doesn't work?

2000-03-24 Thread Greg Lehey
On Thursday, 23 March 2000 at 9:45:31 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: (Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Folks, It looks to me like setting INVARIANTS in your kernel doesn't work in 4.0-STABLE. ... reference to `zerror' /usr/src/sys/compile/AUDREY/../../vm/vm_zone.h:91: undefined

Re: current panics

2000-03-24 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 12:29:28PM +0100, Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen wrote: Hi, I know it isn't much (no debugger compiled in (yet)), but is anybody else seeing panics like this: mode = 0100644, inum = 214354, fs = /data0 panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc syncing disks... 23 13 4 3 3

Preliminary SMP/BGL patch

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
A preliminary BGL patch is now on my site, relative to RELENG_4. http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ It is the smp-patch-03.diff item at the end of the first section. My test box successfully built the world. I know I'm probably missing something, but so far I can't

Experts only please! (was Re: Preliminary SMP/BGL patch)

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
Umm... ok, some people seem to be enthusiastic but I really recommend that ONLY experts mess around with this patch until they sign off on its properness (or suggest fixes for improperness). This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to just work, but

Re: INVARIANTS doesn't work?

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Is there any good reason why we have two different options if they can :only be used together? : :Greg I think it's so you can compile a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT in in order to support dynamic load modules which may have been compiled with INVARIANTS.

Re: NOUUCP knob and /etc/uucp

2000-03-24 Thread Doug Barton
Ray Kohler wrote: I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped around the NOUUCP knob? I replied to Dan Moschuk's commit message for

Re: NOUUCP knob and /etc/uucp

2000-03-24 Thread Dan Moschuk
| I was just noticing that the files in /etc/uucp are installed anyway | if you set NOUUCP, whereas those in /etc/ssh and /etc/ssl are | affected by their respective knobs. Could /etc/uucp be wrapped | around the NOUUCP knob? | | I replied to Dan Moschuk's commit message for this with

Re: sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current: I don't know what version of sysinstall you're using, but it builds just fine for me under -current. I saw some other kvetching about kget being broken and just tried building it last night. Observe: root@zippy- make

Re: sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 24-Mar-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current: I don't know what version of sysinstall you're using, but it builds just fine for me under -current. I saw some other kvetching about kget being broken and just tried building it

Re: AMI MegaRAID lockup? not accepting commands.

2000-03-24 Thread Mike Smith
Can you try instead the changes that I just committed to -current? I think that the problem shows up when the controller is heavily loaded; your patch will keep the load on the controller down, which may mask the 'real' bug. Just recently (this evening), I was able to get our

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread FreeBSD mailing list
Jim Bloom wrote: Upgrade sys/vm/swap_pager.c to the current version. There was a bug there which has been fixed. Jim Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD mailing list wrote: /var/log/messages indicates: Mar 23 23:32:47 mrynet /kernel: Debugger("d_iocmd botch") called. Mar 23

Proper location for certs (Now that openssl is in the base system)

2000-03-24 Thread Barry Lustig
User added certificates used to go in /usr/local/openssl/certs when openssl was a port. What is the correct location for certs now? barry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Experts only please! (was Re: Preliminary SMP/BGL patch)

2000-03-24 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote: This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a designation before 'early alpha' this patch would get it. "Rough-draft proposal for early alpha

Re: sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread Ted Sikora
John Baldwin wrote: Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current: cc -O -pipe -Wall -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../gnu/lib/libdialog -I/usr/obj/usr/src/release/sysinstall -I/usr/src/release/sysinstall/../../sys -c bail: Comments? It's broken for

Re: NOUUCP knob and /etc/uucp

2000-03-24 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Dan Moschuk wrote: Oops! I've just committed the fix. No sweat! We're all busy. I'm just glad to see it done. It's something I've wanted for a long time. It probably should be NO_UUCP, but no one seems to want to make a final decision on the NOFOO vs. NO_FOO

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread Jim Bloom
I reproduced the problem and have attached a patch. It was the exact same problem as in swap_pager.c (assuming B_WRITE was 0). Hopefully phk will commit this fix shortly. Jim Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ FreeBSD mailing list wrote: I cvsup'd once more this morning... Nothing significant has

Re: Proper location for certs (Now that openssl is in the basesystem)

2000-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Barry Lustig wrote: User added certificates used to go in /usr/local/openssl/certs when openssl was a port. What is the correct location for certs now? /etc/ssl/certs - I think I forgot to add the directory. Kris In God we Trust -- all others must submit an

Re: sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Urk, sorry guys, I've been cvsupping the repo faithfully but evidently not cvs updating my tree as faithfully. :-) I'll find and fix it. - Jordan On 24-Mar-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current: I don't know what version of

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I belive Joerg Wunsh is already on this case ? Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Bloom writes: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --7D0E1521E15DD9B4A3213A24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I reproduced the problem

Re: AMI MegaRAID lockup? not accepting commands.

2000-03-24 Thread Brian Dean
Mike Smith wrote: Just recently (this evening), I was able to get our controller to lock up with the latest patch. Previously, with that patch installed, I must not have been able to tickle the bug just right, and I believe that Mike based his decision to make that mod based on my lack

Re: sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread John Baldwin
On 24-Mar-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Urk, sorry guys, I've been cvsupping the repo faithfully but evidently not cvs updating my tree as faithfully. :-) I'll find and fix it. Well, my patch fixes it as far as I can tell, it's quite simple. Right now I'm still running it through a test

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread FreeBSD mailing list
Jim Bloom wrote: I reproduced the problem and have attached a patch. It was the exact same problem as in swap_pager.c (assuming B_WRITE was 0). Hopefully phk will commit this fix shortly. Index: sys/isa/fd.c === RCS file:

breakage still in sys/systm.h

2000-03-24 Thread Steve Kiernan
The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the header. Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which compute the major and minor numbers, this creates an order dependency on sys/systm.h and sys/types.h. Is this not a bad thing? -- Stephen Kiernan

test

2000-03-24 Thread Christian DeKonink
-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

perl not working

2000-03-24 Thread Christian DeKonink
Hi, I just installed 4.0 and when I try to run perl I get perl: warning Setting locale failed perl: warning: Please check that you locale settings: LC_ALL = C LC_CTYPE = en_US LANG = C are supported and installed on your system perl: warning: Falling back to

breakage still in sys/systm.h

2000-03-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:12:32 -0500 (EST), Steve Kiernan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the header. Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which compute the major and minor numbers, this creates an order dependency

Re: breakage still in sys/systm.h

2000-03-24 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Steve Kiernan wrote: The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the header. Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which compute the major and minor numbers, this creates an order dependency on sys/systm.h and sys/types.h. Is

Re: perl not working

2000-03-24 Thread Thimble Smith
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000 at 02:18:09PM -0800, Christian DeKonink wrote: Hi, I just installed 4.0 and when I try to run perl I get Just so you know, I think 4.0 is being discussed on -stable now. perl: warning Setting locale failed perl: warning: Please check that you locale settings:

Re: breakage still in sys/systm.h

2000-03-24 Thread Steve Kiernan
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:12:32 -0500 (EST), Steve Kiernan [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The definitions of major() and minor() in sys/systm.h break usage of the header. Since sys/types.h defines major() and minor() as macros which compute the major

Re: Dynamic sysctls - patches for review

2000-03-24 Thread Brian Fundakowski Feldman
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Andrzej Bialecki wrote: I'd appreciate some feedback. Thanks! Note this is not an actual peer review (yet), but... Good job! This is another big step in the right direction, and the code looks good to me :) The only problems I can see right now are just all style bugs

Re: Preliminary SMP/BGL patch

2000-03-24 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000324 10:23] wrote: A preliminary BGL patch is now on my site, relative to RELENG_4. http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ It is the smp-patch-03.diff item at the end of the first section. My test box successfully built the world. I

Re: Experts only please! (was Re: Preliminary SMP/BGL patch)

2000-03-24 Thread Brad Knowles
At 2:57 PM -0500 2000/3/24, Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 10:01 AM -0800 3/24/00, Matthew Dillon wrote: This is not a 'normal Matt patch' that 'just works'. Ok, it seems to just work, but it's not a normal Matt patch. If there were a designation before 'early alpha' this patch

Re: KDE kdm problem with packaged version (make release issue?)

2000-03-24 Thread Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
* From: "R. Imura" [EMAIL PROTECTED] * It's because, there are no /usr/X11R6/bin/X in Asami-san's chroot * environment, I bet. Hmm. So kdm looks at the X symlink to decide whether to build with X support or not? I can add that to my X package, but what exactly do I need? Just the symlink

Re: Preliminary SMP/BGL patch

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
:This sort of concerns me, but if I remeber correctly, unmasking :spl will cause a soft intr if there are pending interupts, the only :problem is that completely software initiated interupts wouldn't :get processed, or would they? Can you explain how they are being :scheduled/run if you remove

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Bruce Evans wrote: Hmm. What is the correct way of compiling world with optimisation or other compiler settings? `make world'. Optimization is in the default settings (-O). Fair enough - but how about platform-specific code generation settings, e.g. -march=pentium?

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Brad Knowles
At 4:29 PM -0800 2000/3/24, Kris Kennaway wrote: `make world'. Optimization is in the default settings (-O). Fair enough - but how about platform-specific code generation settings, e.g. -march=pentium? Whatever the official position is, it should be documented in

Re: sysinstall broken :(

2000-03-24 Thread Doug Barton
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, John Baldwin wrote: On 24-Mar-00 Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Hmph, it seems sysinstall (and thus make release) is broken in -current: I don't know what version of sysinstall you're using, but it builds just fine for me under -current. I saw some other kvetching

Re: Optimisation patch

2000-03-24 Thread Brad Knowles
At 5:14 PM -0800 2000/3/24, Kris Kennaway wrote: Err, this thread started with a patch to do that, which is what we're currently discussing. Understood. I just didn't want to lose sight of the real goal of the proposed patch, and what led up to the proposed patch. -- These are

reproducable system crash in 4.0-STABLE

2000-03-24 Thread Alan Clegg
I know this is not "current", but it was last week, so give me a break. On a dual PII system, access to /dev/smb0 (system management bus) by wmhm (/usr/ports/sysutils/wmhm) or gkrellm (/usr/ports/sysutils/gkrellm) causes an immediate system panic. I have the following in dmesg: smbus0:

Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from 4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-24 Thread Brad Knowles
Folks, I gotta be doing something stupid here. I haven't been able to access the existing 3.4-STABLE filesystems on this machine since I upgraded it to 4.0-STABLE on a second hard drive, and I likewise can't access the 4.0-STABLE filesystems from 3.4-STABLE. Anybody got any

Re: reproducable system crash in 4.0-STABLE

2000-03-24 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Alan Clegg wrote: I know this is not "current", but it was last week, so give me a break. On a dual PII system, access to /dev/smb0 (system management bus) by wmhm (/usr/ports/sysutils/wmhm) or gkrellm (/usr/ports/sysutils/gkrellm) causes an immediate system panic.

SMP/BGL patch 04

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
Patch 04 is ready. http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/smp-patch-04.diff Contains lots of cleanup of stale SMP code. There are still a few places where get_mplock is being called with interrupts disabled which I haven't found, so I put

Re: reproducable system crash in 4.0-STABLE

2000-03-24 Thread Alan Clegg
BTW, this is from sources cvsup'd at 3:00 this afternoon, Fri, March 24. Out of the ether, Chris D. Faulhaber spewed forth the following bitstream: On a dual PII system, access to /dev/smb0 (system management bus) by wmhm (/usr/ports/sysutils/wmhm) or gkrellm (/usr/ports/sysutils/gkrellm)

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread Jim Bloom
FreeBSD mailing list wrote: This patch does indeed fix the writing of floppies. However, fdformat(1) still fails as follows: That is very strange. My patch only applies to formatting floppies. It did not touch any routine used in writing a floppy. I have no idea at this time what is

Testers Wanted! (EtherExpress 16 3C507 owners/users)

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
I'm working on converting the 'ie' driver to newbus. I've rewritten the code that identifies the cards and am in need of wider testing since I've only got a lone Intel EtherExpress 16. I have a non-invasive test 'driver' that just looks for the cards and figures out the resources they are

Why are all accesses to the cpl surrounded by a lock?

2000-03-24 Thread Matthew Dillon
I've been doing more SMP cleanup and for the life of me I can't figure out why cpl operations are surrounded by its own [S]CPL_LOCK ?? As far as I can tell, the cpl is only accessed/modified: * by mainline code while the MP lock is held * by an interrupt while the

Re: -current, ep and fragment problems.

2000-03-24 Thread Andrew Sherrod
My 3.4 machine at work has periodic problems with the fxp. No performance issues (perhaps a little slow, but the network is congested enough that this is hard to measure). However it does periodically display an error message about "PHYS" and "unsupported". I am home right now, so I can't

Re: reproducable system crash in 4.0-STABLE

2000-03-24 Thread takawata
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alan Clegg さんいわく: On a dual PII system, access to /dev/smb0 (system management bus) by=20 In SMP Environment 'intpm' driver will not work correctly,because it drops intrrupt. I made a patch so that it uses polling at

Re: Anyone know why the syscall interface is using the doretimechanism?

2000-03-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote: I understand why interrupts use the doreti mechanism. I don't understand why the syscall interface traps have to use it. As far as I can tell, To handle AST's (for signals and forced context switches, etc), and to do the special stuff

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-24 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Jim Bloom wrote: FreeBSD mailing list wrote: This patch does indeed fix the writing of floppies. However, fdformat(1) still fails as follows: That is very strange. My patch only applies to formatting floppies. It did not touch any routine used in writing a