Can you try with the patch I just committed ? It may be another
manifestation of that bug.
Poul-Henning
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes
:
>
>Actually- not alpha. Happened under i386, so it seems like it might be more
>related to the general console changes..
>
>--
d.ie on Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 07:48:13PM +0100
X-Echelon: BND CIA NSA Mossad KGB MI6 IRA detonator nuclear assault strike
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 07:48:13PM +0100, David Malone wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:16:12PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
> > Anybody has any idea how to properly fix?
>
>
> winbindd is a daemon that provides a service for the Name
> Service Switch capability that is present in most modern C
> libraries. The Name Service Switch allows user and system
> information to be obtained from different databases ser-
> vices such as NIS or DNS. The exact behaviour
Hello everybody,
While the flamage rages on on cvs-all, I would like to report the second
driver that does not pass the recently introduced warning-to-panic test
because of driver mistake. It is the Midi driver (device midi and device seq)
I have an SB 64 AWE ISA PnP card so I had these devices
Hi ;
I have installed application software from port collection . How do I
make un-install ? If I want to upgrade the existing application , how do I
upgrade them ? Please advise
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the mess
Type +ACI-pkg+AF8-info+ACI- will show u all those installed pkg
Type +ACI-pkg+AF8-delete +ADw-pkg name+AD4AIg- will remove the pkg
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questions+AEA-FreeBSD.ORG
+AFs-mailto:owner-freebsd-questions+A
On 29-Oct-2001 Kelvin Ng Chee Hoong wrote:
> I have installed application software from port collection . How do I
> make un-install ? If I want to upgrade the existing application , how do I
> upgrade them ? Please advise
You can do 'pkg_delete xyz-1.2' (look in /var/db/pkg)
Als
any one know if my 4.3 stable work with all AMD
processors, as well as with SMP enabled?
==
WWW.XGFORCE.COM
The Next Generation Load Balance and
Fail Safe Server Clustering Software
for the Internet.
==
- Original Message
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 10:29:00AM -0800, matt wrote:
> any one know if my 4.3 stable work with all AMD
> processors, as well as with SMP enabled?
Yes it will. I certifed 4.3 RELEASE (and thus 4.3-STABLE) on the SMP
Thunder for AMD.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>how about the following patch (untested) regarding the newer athlon xp
>processor type ? if needed, I could submit a PR.
AthlonXP is same as AthlonMP. It's better of the name "palomino",
isn't it? (But "morgan" Duron will have same featur
> What about new Durons based on the Palomino core? The problem is
> that as far as I know they have nothing in their name (like XP in
> Athlon's case) that distinguishes them from older Durons based on
> the Thunderbird core, while they do support SSE in addition to
> 3DNow and MMX. Perhaps it wo
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>AFAIK, not quite. The core name is Palomino and there are three
>processors based on it: Athlon XP, Athlon MP and Duron.
The AMD Athlon XP, MP, and mobile Athlon4 are based on the Palomino
core. The 1Ghz+ Durons are based on the Morgan core, a Palomino
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:49:05AM -0500, Chip Marshall wrote:
> Couldn't a test be done on the Features information of the processor
> to determine the best optimizations? Or would that break
> cross-compiliation of optimized code?
So I compile something on my AMD box which I expect to run
only
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>Athlon (alias k7) already has MMX. the objective of this patch
>was to add SSE to the set of XP (alias MP) processors.
I haven't seen the patch you're talking about, nor do I have any newer
Athlons here that support SSE, but it seems like it's pretty
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, mikea wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:49:05AM -0500, Chip Marshall wrote:
>
>> Couldn't a test be done on the Features information of the processor
>> to determine the best optimizations? Or would that break
>> cross-compiliation of optimized code?
>
>So I compile somethin
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:06:00PM -, cameron grant wrote:
> my system with dual 1.1ghz durons identifies as:
>
> CPU: AMD Duron(tm) MP Processor (1110.94-MHz 686-class CPU)
> Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x670 Stepping = 0
>
> Features=0x383fbff CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE>
> AMD Feat
On 28-Oct-01 cameron grant wrote:
>> What about new Durons based on the Palomino core? The problem is
>> that as far as I know they have nothing in their name (like XP in
>> Athlon's case) that distinguishes them from older Durons based on
>> the Thunderbird core, while they do support SSE in add
17 matches
Mail list logo
