Re: binutils symbol hiding and versioning (was Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING)

2002-11-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Loren James Rittle wrote: FYI, the libstdc++-v3 maintainers on the FSF side are only guaranteeing forward ABI compatibility of any sort if libstdc++.so is built with symbol versioning and symbol hiding. FWIW: symbol versioning is incredibly broken. It attempts to do in UNIX what interface

Re: building -STABLE from within -CURRENT

2002-11-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Wilkinson,Alex wrote: In a dual boot situation, is it possible to be logged into -CURRENT and build -STABLE ( ie -STABLE filesystems live on separate fdisk partitions and are exported ) ? Only if you unpack the contents of CDROM #2 from a -STABLE system into a chroot environment.

seeking help to rewrite the msdos filesystem

2002-11-12 Thread Tomas Pluskal
Hello, I believe that everybody here knows about the slow msdosfs problem, that is AFAIK caused by implementation without clustering. For me this is very annoying, because I use digital camera, and ZIP drive, and FAT on both of them. Speed is about 10 times lower than it could be.. I would like

Re: Loader-Problem with current kernel

2002-11-12 Thread Florian George
David Wolfskill wrote: Did you remember to create /boot/device.hints? Cheers, david Hi, the file didn't exist so i just copied the /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints to /boot/device.hints. I think it is ok because i compiled the GENERIC-kernel. Unfortunately it doesn't help. The machine

dnet causes panic ( was Hard Lock )

2002-11-12 Thread Joel M. Baldwin
Well I'm not getting Hard Locks when I try running dnet on a SMP kernel. Instead I've gotten the following panics. It turns out I can run a single non threaded dnet process when I invoke it thus: 'dnet -cpunum 0' - lock order

Compaq Evo n115

2002-11-12 Thread John Angelmo
This was posted earlier in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello I have a Compaq evo n115, everything seems to be found by FreeBSD-Current but the sound dosn't work This seems to be the important part: pcm0: VIA VT82C686A port 0x1850-0x1853,0x1854-0x1857,0x1000-0x10ff irq 5 at device 7.5 on pci0 So

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Old bugfix for double Last login: was spammed in 3rd time, causing following printout: I can't reproduce this here. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Mark Murray
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:58:44AM +, Mark Murray wrote: IMVHO, the perl wrapper should be removed altogether, and the perl port's use.port symlink-creating feature should be used instead. Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out for all the cases I

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:37:13 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Old bugfix for double Last login: was spammed in 3rd time, causing following printout: I can't reproduce this here. Look at session.c, one Last login comes from

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:37:13 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Old bugfix for double Last login: was spammed in 3rd time, causing following printout: I can't reproduce this here. Look at

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 11:13 PM + 11/8/02, Mark Murray wrote: I mean *all* the cruft -- old modules and config files, deprecated binaries and man pages, even old shlibs if it's safe. I agree with you, and I was giving an example that a lesser form of this is already required during the upgrade.

Re: Samba on -current

2002-11-12 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/11/12 08:55), Jason Vervlied wrote: I am having problems with a Samba share on my -current box, I just installed from 20021103-SNAP. I did recompile my kernel with the following options. I'll bet your problem as nothing to do with Samba. What you have is a problem with smbfs. Here

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have standard /etc/pam.d from latest -current. pam.d is not relevant, sshd_config is. Before I'll send you my /etc/ssh config, I think there is more simple way to find it out. I have a question: which one prompt _you_ have? des@des ~% ssh

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 14:26:58 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: pam.d is not relevant, sshd_config is. I sent it to you privately. des@des ~% ssh localhost Last login: Tue Nov 12 14:25:39 2002 from :0.0 It is Last login with right time comes from sshd itself (second in my case). It means

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, double-testes options.print_lastlog looks suspiciuos. For what print_pam_messages() used here? It is unclear to me. I think the idea is that we should define NO_SSH_LASTLOG in config.h. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 14:47:51 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW, double-testes options.print_lastlog looks suspiciuos. For what print_pam_messages() used here? It is unclear to me. I think the idea is that we should define NO_SSH_LASTLOG

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It physically eliminates Last loging comes from sshd, but not fix wrong _time_ printed by print_pam_messages() in my case (first prompt), as I already write, there is JUST time, not LAST time. That is a separate bug, probably in pam_lastlog. I'll

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the idea is that we should define NO_SSH_LASTLOG in config.h. Actually, I think the problem is that DISABLE_LASTLOG should imply NO_SSH_LASTLOG but doesn't. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 15:11:04 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the idea is that we should define NO_SSH_LASTLOG in config.h. Actually, I think the problem is that DISABLE_LASTLOG should imply NO_SSH_LASTLOG but doesn't. There was

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There was USE_LASTLOG on the way, which is currently on and checked before DISABLE_LASTLOG, so DISABLE_LASTLOG does nothing. See loginrec.c No, USE_LASTLOG is not defined if DISABLE_LASTLOG is defined. See defines.h. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav -

Re: sshd: double Last login: bugfix spammed again

2002-11-12 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 15:28:41 +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There was USE_LASTLOG on the way, which is currently on and checked before DISABLE_LASTLOG, so DISABLE_LASTLOG does nothing. See loginrec.c No, USE_LASTLOG is not defined if

Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I have a problem with my ASUS P5A-B motherboard, where the timer runs too fast. This is with -CURRENT, cvsup'd from 1.5 weeks ago. I encountered this problem before, and found a fix which worke;:

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Tilman Linneweh
I have a problem with my ASUS P5A-B motherboard, where the timer runs too fast. This is with -CURRENT, cvsup'd from 1.5 weeks ago. I encountered this problem before, and found a fix which worke;:

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tilman Linneweh writes: I have a problem with my ASUS P5A-B motherboard, where the timer runs too fast. This is with -CURRENT, cvsup'd from 1.5 weeks ago. I encountered this problem before, and found a fix which worke;:

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:18:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Are you saying that the i8254 also runs twice as fast as it should ? It looks like it. Here is some additional output from dmesg. Does it give a clue? Calibrating clock(s) ... TSC clock: 400911902 Hz, i8254 clock: 1193190 Hz

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:34:23PM +, Mark Murray wrote: Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out for all the cases I hoped it would when I committed it. Yes, I think so. DES (The author?) doesn't mind. I'm for removal and so is Kris. Why does DES have

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:20:00AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: However, this fix (adding kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 to /etc/sysctl.conf) does not seem to work anymore. The clock still runs too fast. Could you try kern.timecounter.hardware=TSC - this worked for someone else sometime last

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Mark Murray
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:34:23PM +, Mark Murray wrote: Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out for all the cases I hoped it would when I committed it. Yes, I think so. DES (The author?) doesn't mind. I'm for removal and so is Kris. Why does

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:44:36PM +, David Malone wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:20:00AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: However, this fix (adding kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 to /etc/sysctl.conf) does not seem to work anymore. The clock still runs too fast. Could you try

Weird error during make installworld [executable becomes data]

2002-11-12 Thread David Wolfskill
OK; this is a bit strange, and I've come up with a circumvention (read really ugly bloody hack), but my real concern is that this may be a manifestation or symptom of something broken in some subtle way. The note is rather long- winded; sorry about that, but I didn't see a better way to do this.

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Craig Rodrigues writes: On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:44:36PM +, David Malone wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:20:00AM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: However, this fix (adding kern.timecounter.hardware=i8254 to /etc/sysctl.conf) does not seem to work anymore.

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Interesting

2002-11-12 Thread scottl
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA - This email was sent

Re: Clock runs too fast

2002-11-12 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 07:23:51PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: I just tried this, and it seems to work fine. So TSC seems to work, and i8254 does not seem to work. And ACPI doesn't work either, right ? That's right, doing: sysctl -w kern.timecounter.hardware=ACPI-safe does not work

Re: Samba on -current

2002-11-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Jason Vervlied wrote: I am having problems with a Samba share on my -current box, I just installed from 20021103-SNAP. I did recompile my kernel with the following options. [ ... ] I also added the SMP options to the kernel. I used the same options under -stable and experineced no issues.

Re: Samba on -current

2002-11-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Sheldon Hearn wrote: It's a known problem. Consider reading the -current mailing list to keep up to date with known problems. It was discussed last week. No solution is known at this time. Use dd(1) instead of cp(1) as an interim workaround. Actually, it's fixable 3 ways: o Full

buildkernel failure

2002-11-12 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
I have been trying to cvsup since yesterday to get this fixed, so it appears to still be broken, anyone else seeing this? anding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-p rototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -c /us

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 08:15:09AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: I would rather have some explicit list of filenames where we have good reason to delete them, and then adapt the above script to at least tell the user about the remaining files. Perhaps even delete them, but only *after*

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Mark Murray
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 08:15:09AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: I would rather have some explicit list of filenames where we have good reason to delete them, and then adapt the above script to at least tell the user about the remaining files. Perhaps even delete them, but only

Machine wedged on Nov 1 kernel (with DDB information)

2002-11-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
One of the gohan machines apparently wedged up (the kernel was running, but the network stack was not responding to connection requests). Breaking into DDB from the console shows that the following processes are running: pid proc addruid ppid pgrp flag stat wmesgwchan cmd

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:58:12PM +, Mark Murray wrote: On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 08:15:09AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: I would rather have some explicit list of filenames where we have good reason to delete them, and then adapt the above script to at least tell the user

Re: addition to cdefs

2002-11-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On 11 Nov 2002 17:56:08 +0100, Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm thinking more of it like an aggregation. IMHO it should be possible, if the user wants to, to get POSIX 199506 and BSD. That would be very difficult, since FreeBSD never supported that version (indeed, never even claimed

Re: addition to cdefs

2002-11-12 Thread Archie Cobbs
Marc Recht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've had the attached patch in my tree for a while. I'll try and get it and the unistd.h patch committed today. static __inline void __fd_zero(fd_set *p, __size_t n) { n = _howmany(n, _NFDBITS); while (n 0)

Re: addition to cdefs

2002-11-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002 09:54:58 -0500, Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: /* 1003.2-1992 */ -#if __POSIX_VISIBLE = 199209 +#if __POSIX_VISIBLE = 199209 || __XSI_VISIBLE size_tconfstr(int, char *, size_t); int getopt(int, char * const [], const char *); __XSI_VISIBLE should

Re: addition to cdefs

2002-11-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:49:05 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: But why not just this? static __inline void __fd_zero(fd_set *p, __size_t n) { memset(p-fds_bits, 0, _howmany(n, _NFDBITS)); } Because a declaration of memset() is not permitted in

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-11-12 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: building -STABLE from within -CURRENT

2002-11-12 Thread Wilkinson,Alex
Is there any documentation of how to cross-build different versions of FreeBSD ? - aW Only if you unpack the contents of CDROM #2 from a -STABLE system into a chroot environment. Specifically, the compiler and FFS changes have added a number of

sleep(1) behavior

2002-11-12 Thread Nate Lawson
I've found an interesting contradiction and was wondering what behavior sleep should have. It checks for a command line flag with getopt(3) and exits with usage() if it finds one. However, it then checks for a '-' or '+' sign. If negative, it behaves like sleep 0 and exits immediately. This

Re: sleep(1) behavior

2002-11-12 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-12 ] [ Subjecte: sleep(1) behavior ] I've found an interesting contradiction and was wondering what behavior sleep should have. It checks for a command line flag with getopt(3) and exits with usage() if it finds one. However, it then

Re: sleep(1) behavior

2002-11-12 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote: * De: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-12 ] [ Subjecte: sleep(1) behavior ] I've found an interesting contradiction and was wondering what behavior sleep should have. It checks for a command line flag with getopt(3) and exits

Mergemaster Bug (Though not a serious one)

2002-11-12 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello All, I just cvsup'd -current last night and ran make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel, reboot, make installworld, mergemaster (thus updating my system from a May -current). One thing that I found interesting during mergemaster was the grouping of changes. For instance

Handbook Section 21.4

2002-11-12 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, After looking in the mailling list archives for problems with mergemaster and reading the man page I noticed the -p option. I have been building the world with the sequence (as denoted in the handbook section 21.4): make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel, reboot, make

-current make jdk13 with native_threads error

2002-11-12 Thread suken woo
hi,all: errors occurred during make with native_threads. e -I../../../../src/share/hpi/export -D_REENTRANT -DNATIVE -DUSE_PTHREADS -DMOOT _PRIORITIES -DNO_INTERRUPTIBLE_IO-c -o ../../../../build/bsd-i386/tmp/java/h pi/native_threads/obj/threads_md.o

Re: Mergemaster Bug (Though not a serious one)

2002-11-12 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 05:53:03PM -0800, Galen Sampson wrote: IIRC the old mergemaster merged changes like this one line at a time. I don't recall it ever behaving this way, but I could be wrong. Kris msg46594/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: rmuser

2002-11-12 Thread Sean Kelly
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 04:27:12PM +0100, Eirik Nygaard wrote: I have rewritten the rmuser.perl script into C. But got no experiense with at, and I see the the perl port got a function that removes any at jobs for the user being removed. So I wonderd if anyone could make a patch that does that,

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Doug Barton
David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:58:44AM +, Mark Murray wrote: IMVHO, the perl wrapper should be removed altogether, and the perl port's use.port symlink-creating feature should be used instead. Do we have consensus on this? The perl wrapper really isn't working out

Re: Compaq Evo n115

2002-11-12 Thread Ilya Novoselov
John Angelmo wrote: This was posted earlier in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello I have a Compaq evo n115, everything seems to be found by FreeBSD-Current but the sound dosn't work This seems to be the important part: pcm0: VIA VT82C686A port 0x1850-0x1853,0x1854-0x1857,0x1000-0x10ff irq 5 at device

current SMP kernel crashes (different?)

2002-11-12 Thread Dave Cornejo
I've had a problem with a SuperMicro 2010H server crashing when attempting to run an SMP kernel. I've noticed a lot of this lately, but this seem to be crashing in the clock code. Below is the console output from power-up to crash. If I use an UP kernel of the same vintage there is no problem.

Re: binutils symbol hiding and versioning (was Re: [PATCH] note the __sF change in src/UPDATING)

2002-11-12 Thread Terry Lambert
Loren James Rittle wrote: FWIW: symbol versioning is incredibly broken. It attempts to do in UNIX what interface versioning does in Windows, through the use of class factories accessed via IUnknown. You might be absolutely correct in general. However, please read

Strange buildworld failure

2002-11-12 Thread Jos Backus
[ I don't want to hijack David Wolfskill's thread so I am starting a new one. I did see David's problem (see his message ``Weird error during make installworld'') but that one hasn't reappeared on my home system since I rebooted after first seeing it. ] === share/zoneinfo umask 022; cd

Re: -current make jdk13 with native_threads error

2002-11-12 Thread Terry Lambert
suken woo wrote: In file included from ../../../../src/solaris/hpi/native_threads/src/threads_md.c:27: /usr/include/sys/resource.h:61: field `ru_utime' has incomplete type /usr/include/sys/resource.h:62: field `ru_stime' has incomplete type struct timeval is not in scope. Modify the file:

Internal Compiler Error (not from ports)

2002-11-12 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, After updating to -current sources last night I found that I can reproduce an internal compiler error with my own source code. I'm not sure if it is related to the internal compiler error people are having with the ports are not. the command: g++ -Wall -c btree.cpp generates the

Re: Mergemaster Bug (Though not a serious one)

2002-11-12 Thread Doug Barton
Galen Sampson wrote: One thing that I found interesting during mergemaster was the grouping of changes. For instance mergemaster determined that my /etc/group file was lacking some groups. The 4 groups that needed changing were on adjacent lines. Mergemaster gave me the option of merging

Re: perl5.6.1 wrapper

2002-11-12 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/11/12 22:17), Doug Barton wrote: In case another vote is needed, I've always been opposed to the wrapper. tobez and I put some work into getting the use.perl script in the port to DTRT shortly after the demise of base perl, and I'm still willing to help fine tune it if needed. I