On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:44:02AM +, Sebastian Yepes [ESN] wrote:
Hi all you FreeBSD dell freack.. xD
I have just put in my webpaga the src of the dellmod to control the dell i8500
www.x123.info docs-i8500 - ACPI
Great work, but could you please state on your page also that this
Juli Mallett wrote this message on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 00:15 -0500:
* Juli Mallett [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Date: 2003-06-24 ]
[ w.r.t. Re: tcsh being dodgy, or pipe code ishoos? ]
* Tim Kientzle [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Date: 2003-06-24 ]
Hmmm... This looks like xargs isn't waiting for the
John-Mark Gurney wrote this message on Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 23:04 -0700:
Ok, I seem to have found out that we are reaping a child that we don't
know about. slightly modified xargs produces this:
ok, with some magic ktrace work, I have come up with an more complete
answer to the riddle. It's
Hello,
Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486
w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install.
avail memory = (245760) 0 MB
Is this expected behavior?
David
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi,
My laptop running -CURRENT (with source from yesterday morning), just
panic'ed - and I am able to reproduce the problem.
First of all, on boot I disable ACPI as it does not work on my system.
# dhclient ep0
on which the system crashes, here is console output:
snip
Fatal trap 12: page fault
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, M-Trade wrote:
Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486
w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install.
avail memory = (245760) 0 MB
Is this expected behavior?
Yes. I got pre 5.1 running on a 386dx33 with 16mb; it wouldn't work with
8.
--
| Matthew N. Dodd | '78
Mike Silbersack wrote:
I could probably grep for this, but what's the best way to get a hold of
the # of pages (or MB of ram) that max KVA is set to? I'm adding another
autosize option, and I want to base it on min (KVA, ram) so that it
doesn't balloon on boxes where ram KVA.
I posted a
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: : Speaking about ACPI,
Great. Do you also have working battery status now?
Does anyone have a 5000e? The fix for the 5000 doesn't fix my
suspend/resume problems on my 5000e. However, the battery status
works fine using standard /dev/apm from the acpi module.
Jason
___
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:41:51AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
[...]
So, now the question is, do we fix xargs to deal with unexpected
children? Or fix the shells in question? (tcsh and zsh seem to suffer
this problem)
To me, fixing xargs is correct since it prevents another possible
The silence is deafening.
Please commit this if it's the correct solution.
FreeBSD looks real bad when it cant be a NIS client of Solaris NIS+ (in YP compat)
servers.
-Original Message-
From: Thyer, Matthew
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:04 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
M-Trade wrote:
Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486
w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install.
avail memory = (245760) 0 MB
Is this expected behavior?
Until you build a skinnier kernel, you only have 240K of memory
in which to run processes.
Normally, the install process uses a
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
So, now the question is, do we fix xargs to deal with unexpected
children? Or fix the shells in question? (tcsh and zsh seem to suffer
this problem)
To me, fixing xargs is correct since it prevents another possible
future abusers of this feature.
Fixing the shells
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 11:44, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alternately, you could find a FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 distribution on the
net somewhere, and install that, instead; I have personally run
that version of FreeBSD on a 4M 386SX, to use it as an X Terminal.
8-).
FWIW, the last FreeBSD release I
Hi
how can I turn on support for protocol version1 in yp on freebsd 5.2 if this
machine ist the yp master server.
sincerley
gerald mixa
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send
On 2003.06.25 12:10:42 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 11:44, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alternately, you could find a FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 distribution on the
net somewhere, and install that, instead; I have personally run
that version of FreeBSD on a 4M 386SX, to use it
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:45:19PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2003.06.25 12:10:42 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 11:44, Terry Lambert wrote:
Alternately, you could find a FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 distribution on the
net somewhere, and install that, instead; I
Hi,
i have nearly ported the SapDB (www.sapdb.org), an oracle like open source
database from SAP AG,
to FreeBSD. It is running fine on FreeBSD5.0, but as i updated to
5.1-Release, most of the
binaries got stuck. (Also when i recompile with 5.1 libs).
I soon updated to a kernel from 2003.06.23, to
I'm setting up a new machine, and none of the current *BSD's install on it.
Linux works. The *BSD's choke during the device identification. Perhaps
someone on this list knows why. Attaching a copy of dmesg output from one
of the Linux's I installed. The *BSD's appear to be missing an interrupt
I'm that guy who was running PAE on an 8GB machine...
BTW, it turns out the problem was _not_ the autotuning, it was simply an
overflow of a 32-bit variable in the kernel. It's been fixed in
-current, checked in 2 weeks ago.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Thyer, Matthew wrote:
The silence is deafening.
Please commit this if it's the correct solution.
I'll do it in a few days if no-one else has anything to say about
it. Speak up or forever hold your peace.
FreeBSD looks real bad when it cant be a NIS client of Solaris
I upgrade my world to latest current yesterday.
And it panic on my notebook during boot, around pci messages.
I use GENERIC config for this testing.
And I unset acpi_load, otherwise it will hang during boot.
Here is the panic message.
cut
Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
npx0: math processor on
It seems Thomas Dickey wrote:
I'm setting up a new machine, and none of the current *BSD's install on it.
Linux works. The *BSD's choke during the device identification. Perhaps
someone on this list knows why. Attaching a copy of dmesg output from one
of the Linux's I installed. The *BSD's
Hi,
After updating system on June, 23 floppy the disk drive does not work.
At loading messages are given out:
fdc0: cmd 3 failed at out byte 1 of 3
How to me to resolve this problem?
Full dmesg it is applied.
Eugene V. Boontseff
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979,
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:49:50 -0400, Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm setting up a new machine, and none of the current *BSD's install on it.
Linux works. The *BSD's choke during the device identification. Perhaps
someone on this list knows why. Attaching a copy of dmesg
It seems Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
From your attached dmesg,
PCI: Using IRQ router SIS [1039/0008] at 00:02.0
[...]
SIS5513: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 15
PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:02.5
SIS5513: chipset revision 0
SIS5513: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:44:24AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Terry Lambert, and lo! it spake thus:
Alternately, you could find a FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 distribution on the
net somewhere, and install that, instead; I have personally run
that version of FreeBSD on a 4M 386SX, to use it as an X
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 11:37:30PM +0900, Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 09:49:50 -0400, Thomas Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm setting up a new machine, and none of the current *BSD's install on it.
Linux works. The *BSD's choke during the device identification.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 04:56:56PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems Hideyuki KURASHINA wrote:
From your attached dmesg,
PCI: Using IRQ router SIS [1039/0008] at 00:02.0
[...]
SIS5513: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 15
PCI: Found IRQ 5 for device 00:02.5
SIS5513: chipset
--On Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:16:33 -0400 Thomas Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does FreeBSD still implement only one install per machine? (Is it
possible to install both 4.x and 5.x on the same box)
I have a dual-boot laptop with 4.x and 5.x. It's very easy.
there is an article on
On Wednesday 25 June 2003 17:18, Eugene V. Bontseff wrote:
Hi,
After updating system on June, 23 floppy the disk drive does not
work.
At loading messages are given out:
fdc0: cmd 3 failed at out byte 1 of 3
For what it's worth, I get the same with 5.1-RELEASE:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mp3]$
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M-Trade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Hello,
:
: Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486
: w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install.
:
: avail memory = (245760) 0 MB
:
: Is this expected behavior?
Yes. The generic kernel is a big fat pigdog.
Hi
About 4.5 minutes after rebooting with a SCHED_ULE kernel (I give
ULE a go every few months), top started looking really wierd (the
CPU % just kept on accumulating for each process). Before dnetc
started, httpd showed 17% CPU, but the system was supposedly 100%
idle at the time according to
Hi all,
I get e-mails from my current boxes saying: hostname: sethostname:
Operation not permitted (original message attached).
I know this is the random seed saving instance of crontab, but what
goes wrong here ? (why does it fail permission)
The box is updated today and mergemaster was run
Hi,
Since the big fixes in the pccard code (by Warner Losh), at a date that
I
can't remember of because I was busy at this time but
On 2003.06.25 18:38:59 +0200, Rob wrote:
I get e-mails from my current boxes saying: hostname: sethostname:
Operation not permitted (original message attached).
I know this is the random seed saving instance of crontab, but what
goes wrong here ? (why does it fail permission)
The box is
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
ok, with some magic ktrace work, I have come up with an more complete
answer to the riddle. It's how the shell exec's the processes. The
bare cause can be demo'd by:
( ( echo 2 ; echo 3 ) | ./xargs -I% echo + % )
Say the shell you run the above command is 10. It will
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2003.06.25 18:38:59 +0200, Rob wrote:
I get e-mails from my current boxes saying: hostname: sethostname:
Operation not permitted (original message attached).
I know this is the random seed saving instance of crontab, but what
goes wrong here ? (why does it fail
Hi all
I have just installed 5.1 Release on my laptop (6gb harddisk and 60 mb
ram). I only installed the base system + man pages and the port
collection. A little info:
/ 128M
Swap256M
/var128M
/var/tmp 256M (/tmp is symlinked to this)
/home 256M
/usrThe rest
I compiled a new
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 19:16:52 +0200
From: Socketd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all
I have just installed 5.1 Release on my laptop (6gb harddisk and 60 mb
ram). I only installed the base system + man pages and the port
collection. A little info:
/ 128M
Swap
Tim J. Robbins wrote this message on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 19:20 +1000:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 12:41:51AM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
[...]
So, now the question is, do we fix xargs to deal with unexpected
children? Or fix the shells in question? (tcsh and zsh seem to suffer
this
Tim Kientzle wrote this message on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:51 -0700:
[...]
Say the shell you run the above command is 10. It will fork to create
a shell to run the commands in the outter parens. Call this 11. 11's
job is to run: (echo 2; echo 3) | ./xargs -I% echo +%
11 will fork/exec and
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Ian Freislich wrote:
Hi
About 4.5 minutes after rebooting with a SCHED_ULE kernel (I give
ULE a go every few months), top started looking really wierd (the
CPU % just kept on accumulating for each process). Before dnetc
started, httpd showed 17% CPU, but the system was
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
I could probably grep for this, but what's the best way to get a hold of
the # of pages (or MB of ram) that max KVA is set to? I'm adding another
autosize option, and I want to base it on min (KVA, ram) so that it
doesn't
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:20:33PM +0200, Ian Freislich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About 4.5 minutes after rebooting with a SCHED_ULE kernel (I give
ULE a go every few months), top started looking really wierd (the
CPU % just kept on accumulating for each process). Before dnetc
started, httpd
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M-Trade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Hello,
:
: Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486
: w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install.
:
: avail memory = (245760) 0 MB
:
: Is this expected behavior?
TB --- 2003-06-25 17:27:03 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2003-06-25 17:27:03 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-06-25 17:28:46 - building world
TB --- cd
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 11:09:39AM -0700, Greg J. wrote:
Yuriy Tsibizov wrote:
Old driver (emu10k1.c) was too big for me to work on it and was
difficult to add MIDI support. I know that my driver will never go
into the tree - sound@ decided to use Orlando Bassotto's work. His
driver is
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 10:39:09AM +0400, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote:
My PCM-only driver is commitable. Diff to emu10k1.c in -current is small
and clear (at least to me). It's stable enought to be commited. But it
will not be commited because sound@ decided to use another driver that
is better than
TB --- 2003-06-25 18:16:25 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2003-06-25 18:16:25 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/pc98
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-06-25 18:18:43 - building world
TB --- cd
Hello
I have made a patch for -CURRENT and 5.1-RELEASE that hopefully
improves the support for Cardbus devices by changing the cardbus
driver to implement the pci devclass rather than the cardbus
devclass, and to make their unit numbers correspond with the
PCI secondary bus numbers that their
In this mail:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?
fetch=29403+32287+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-scsi/20030615.freebsd-
scsi
It was suggested to do a backtrace on it. I didn't have the option in 5.1-
RELEASE, but I grabbed the 20030624 snapshot and was able to get the
following
In this mail:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?
fetch=29403+32287+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-scsi/20030615.freebsd-
scsi
It was suggested to do a backtrace on it. I didn't have the option in 5.1-
RELEASE, but I grabbed the 20030624 snapshot and was able to get the
following
TB --- 2003-06-25 19:08:44 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2003-06-25 19:08:44 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/ia64/ia64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-06-25 19:11:26 - building world
TB --- cd
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:24:43 -0700
Kevin Oberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Providing your complete configuration file and /var/run/dmesg.boot
might give a bit of a clue.
Ok. /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SOCKETD:
machine i386
cpu I586_CPU
ident SOCKETD
options
On 24-Jun-2003 Mark Murray wrote:
Hi
You (?) gave me these patches at least 6 months ago, and they've
been working for my Libretto ever since then. Is it OK if I commit
them?
No, not quite yet. Those are rather hackish and I didn't develop
them, one of the other ACPI guys did.
--
John
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Socketd wrote:
I have just installed 5.1 Release on my laptop (6gb harddisk and 60 mb
ram). I only installed the base system + man pages and the port
collection. A little info: / 128M Swap 256M /var 128M /var/tmp 256M
(/tmp is symlinked to this) /home 256M /usr The
Just FYI, there are actually some legitimate situations in which
processes will appear to hang when using MAC. For example, if you have
MLS or Biba turned on, and revocation support specifically enabled (not
the default), you can see interactive processes appear to hang when they
are interacting
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:44:56 -0400 (EDT)
Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a memory leak to me; it might also be a locking problem.
Are you actually running with any MAC policies, or just with the
framework?
Just the framework, no policies.
The code most likely to cause a
TB --- 2003-06-25 20:08:47 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2003-06-25 20:08:47 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-06-25 20:11:35 - building world
TB
John Baldwin writes:
On 24-Jun-2003 Mark Murray wrote:
Hi
You (?) gave me these patches at least 6 months ago, and they've
been working for my Libretto ever since then. Is it OK if I commit
them?
No, not quite yet. Those are rather hackish and I didn't develop
them, one of the
Untested in any other environment other than client of Solaris 8 NIS+ in YP compat.
However I am using the AMD automounter to mount users home directories from HP-UX
10.20, Solaris 8 and 9 systems succesfully.
Relevant parts of my /etc/rc.conf and /etc/amd.conf are:
ifconfig_xl0=DHCP
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
On 2003.06.25 12:10:42 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
FWIW, the last FreeBSD release I managed to install on an 8mb machine from
CD-ROM+bootfloppies was 4.1.1.
Can anybody else confirm this ? It seems like the documetation need to
be updated to state this.
Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote:
Terry Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Silbersack wrote:
I could probably grep for this, but what's the best way to get a hold
of the # of pages (or MB of ram) that max KVA is set to? I'm adding
another autosize option, and I want to base it on
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M-Trade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Has anyone had any success installing 5.1 release on a 486
: w/ 8MB RAM? I can't install.
:
: avail memory = (245760) 0 MB
:
: Is this expected behavior?
Yes. The generic kernel is a
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Tim Kientzle wrote this message on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:51 -0700:
Why do exec-ed processes inherit the children of the former
process, anyway? That doesn't entirely sound right to me.
Is that behavior mandated by some standard? If not, this
could arguably be
Mike Silbersack wrote:
I found the thread in question, but I didn't see a patch.
ARGH. There was a simultaneous off-list discussion; here is
the scrubbed part of what I sent; it's a patch, but it's not a
diff; sorry for the confusion.
-- Terry
67 matches
Mail list logo
