[no subject]

2013-12-13 Thread Markiyan Kushnir
I started some ports to compile inside a bhyve instance: root@vm:~ # uname -a FreeBSD vm.mkushnir.mooo.com 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r259250: Thu Dec 12 14:17:32 EET 2013 r...@vm.mkushnir.zapto.org:/ usr/obj/usr/src.svnup/sys/MAREK amd64 and left it running unattended. Approx. 2 hours

11.0-CURRENT panic while running a bhyve instance

2013-12-13 Thread Markiyan Kushnir
Forgot to fill the Subject: header, re-posting it fixed. -- Markiyan -- Forwarded message -- From: Markiyan Kushnir Date: 2013/12/13 Subject: To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualizat...@freebsd.org I started some ports to compile inside a bhyve instance: root@vm:~

Re: vt-enabled 11.0-CURRENT + radeonkms boot load = direct rendering disabled in X

2013-12-13 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
On 10.12.2013 12:21, Markiyan Kushnir wrote: > Hello, Hi! First, a quick note: freebsd-current@ and current@ are the same list. > There seems to be a difference in how Xorg server can use direct > rendering depending when radeonkms.ko was loaded: at boot time vs. at > a later time (but not neces

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
Please commit (Approved by: portmgr(bapt)) if needed regards, Bapt On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 20:45:56 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 19:31:44 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > >> Trying to migrate to 10, I would li

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Nakata Maho
Hi all Does anybody please commit the patch? My FreeBSD machine is down due to power outage for next week. Also I'll be very busy in the next week. Best, Nakata Maho From: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 > On Sun, De

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > I see the octave port is still broken. > > After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, > reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports, > I'm see the original problem. > > % octave > Segmentation faul

[SOLVED]Re: vt-enabled 11.0-CURRENT + radeonkms boot load = direct rendering disabled in X

2013-12-13 Thread Markiyan Kushnir
2013/12/13 Jean-Sébastien Pédron : > On 10.12.2013 12:21, Markiyan Kushnir wrote: >> Hello, > > Hi! > > First, a quick note: freebsd-current@ and current@ are the same list. > thanks, I will know now. >> There seems to be a difference in how Xorg server can use direct >> rendering depending when

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >> I see the octave port is still broken. >> >> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, >> reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports, >> I'm see the or

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:19 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >>> I see the octave port is still broken. >>> >>> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, >>> reverting my l

Re: vt-enabled 11.0-CURRENT + radeonkms boot load = direct rendering disabled in X

2013-12-13 Thread Adrian Chadd
Are you able to make it do delayed firmware loading? Adrian On Dec 13, 2013 3:23 AM, "Jean-Sébastien Pédron" wrote: > On 10.12.2013 12:21, Markiyan Kushnir wrote: > > Hello, > > Hi! > > First, a quick note: freebsd-current@ and current@ are the same list. > > > There seems to be a difference in

Re: vt-enabled 11.0-CURRENT + radeonkms boot load = direct rendering disabled in X

2013-12-13 Thread Jean-Sébastien Pédron
Le 13/12/2013 19:24, Adrian Chadd a écrit : Are you able to make it do delayed firmware loading? Delayed until / is mounted? In this case, doesn't loading radeonkms from rc.conf achieve the same result? Firmwares are loaded early during card initialization. -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 02:47:23PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > > I see the octave port is still broken. > > > > After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, > > reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding al

Re: r259072 is not a happy camper...

2013-12-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <201312091216.04052@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes: >On Saturday, December 07, 2013 2:32:56 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frampanic: bad stray interrupt >> cpuid = 2 >> KDB: stack backtrace: >> db_trace_self_wrapper() at db_trace_self_wra

Re: 11.0-CURRENT panic while running a bhyve instance

2013-12-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:46:20 am Markiyan Kushnir wrote: > Forgot to fill the Subject: header, re-posting it fixed. The mailing lists strips attachments, can you post it at a URL? > -- > Markiyan > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Markiyan Kushnir > Date: 2013/12/13 >

kasserts behind invariants

2013-12-13 Thread Sean Bruno
I guess this may have been argued before, but I don't see why we would want to hide specific things like: sys/kern/subr_lock.c /* Check for double-init and zero object. */ KASSERT(!lock_initalized(lock), ("lock \"%s\" %p already initialized", name, lock)); If I hadn't completely missed t

Re: r259072 is not a happy camper...

2013-12-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, December 13, 2013 3:36:37 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <201312091216.04052@freebsd.org>, John Baldwin writes: > >On Saturday, December 07, 2013 2:32:56 pm Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> > >> kdb_backtrace() at kdb_backtrace+0x39/frampanic: bad stray interrupt > >> cpuid =

Re: 11.0-CURRENT panic while running a bhyve instance

2013-12-13 Thread Markiyan Kushnir
2013/12/13 John Baldwin : > On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:46:20 am Markiyan Kushnir wrote: >> Forgot to fill the Subject: header, re-posting it fixed. > > The mailing lists strips attachments, can you post it at a URL? > Shared here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9Q-zpUXxqCnem5iYTVqLUxrcWo4c

Re: kasserts behind invariants

2013-12-13 Thread Alfred Perlstein
On 12/13/13 1:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: I guess this may have been argued before, but I don't see why we would want to hide specific things like: sys/kern/subr_lock.c /* Check for double-init and zero object. */ KASSERT(!lock_initalized(lock), ("lock \"%s\" %p already initialized", name

Re: kasserts behind invariants

2013-12-13 Thread Sean Bruno
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:43 -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 12/13/13 1:50 PM, Sean Bruno wrote: > > I guess this may have been argued before, but I don't see why we would > > want to hide specific things like: sys/kern/subr_lock.c > > > > /* Check for double-init and zero object. */ > > KASSER

Re: 11.0-CURRENT panic while running a bhyve instance

2013-12-13 Thread Neel Natu
Hi Markiyan, On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Markiyan Kushnir wrote: > 2013/12/13 John Baldwin : >> On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:46:20 am Markiyan Kushnir wrote: >>> Forgot to fill the Subject: header, re-posting it fixed. >> >> The mailing lists strips attachments, can you post it at a URL? >

Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

2013-12-13 Thread Nakata Maho
Many thanks! From: Tijl Coosemans Subject: Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:47:23 +0100 > On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: >> I see the octave port is still broken. >> >> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed port

Re: kasserts behind invariants

2013-12-13 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 14/12/2013 01:05 Sean Bruno said the following: > In this specific instance, it would have been much better to simply > panic if(condition) than silently allowing the vendor driver to do > something stupid like initialize a mutex twice. I like Solaris/illumos approach of having ASSERT and VERIF

Re: boot failure after upgrade to HEAD from svn: zfs i/o error - all block copies unavailable invalid format

2013-12-13 Thread 乔楚
Now , I'm recovery my OS. I installed freebsd11 on a new disk ,and copy every thing to it. 2013/12/12 乔楚 > >Have you updated bootcode then? > After make installkernel && make installworld && reboot, boot error. > > > Yes ,I can import in -currentr258961( > http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/sna

Re: 11.0-CURRENT panic while running a bhyve instance

2013-12-13 Thread Markiyan Kushnir
2013/12/14 Neel Natu : > Hi Markiyan, > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Markiyan Kushnir > wrote: >> 2013/12/13 John Baldwin : >>> On Friday, December 13, 2013 5:46:20 am Markiyan Kushnir wrote: Forgot to fill the Subject: header, re-posting it fixed. >>> >>> The mailing lists strips attac