This also looks fine, with the style nit noted in the patch.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:54:44PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> ---
> sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c | 50 ++
> sys/amd64/include/pc/bios.h |2 +
> sys/amd64/include/sysarch.h |1 +
> sy
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:54:47PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> This hook will only be implemented for bare metal, Xen doesn't require
> any bootstrap code since APs are started in long mode with paging
> enabled.
> ---
> sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c |6 +-
> sys/amd64/include/sysarch.h
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
configuration file
___
freebsd-current@fr
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
> portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
>
> pkg: PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf is deprecated. Please create a repository
> configuration
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> > I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
> > portupgrade procedure. I get the following message spammed a lot:
> >
> > pkg: PACKAGESITE
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
> > > I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a big
> > > portupgrade procedure.
On 12/21/2013 9:14 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:10:26PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 12:05:38PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 07:35:56PM +0100, d...@gmx.com wrote:
I've just installed a very recent -CURRENT, and now I'm performing a
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
> > stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
> > /var/log/messages provides NOTHING. Please turn
TB --- 2013-12-21 20:50:20 - tinderbox 2.20 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2013-12-21 20:50:20 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2013
On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
stupidity stopped by default. The spewing of this information in
/var/log/messages pr
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:24:55PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>
> >>> It did not ask how to stop this stupidity. I asked to have this
> >>>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:39:59PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 01:24:55PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > On 12/21/2013 1:05 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 02:54:39PM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 21 Dec 2013, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > >>
> > >
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>
> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
> secondly I receive tons of request to actiavte on by default while
> you are the first to request it off by
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
companies can turn it on it they want it.
And if you want to save the few extra kB, you can turn it off...
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
> > companies can turn it on it they wan
On 12/22/2013 12:25 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:16:00AM +0100, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 12/22/2013 12:04 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
co
On 22/12/13 00:04, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>
> Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
> that 'pkg info' doesn't! Please turn of this feature by default.
>
No please don't, it's a very useful feature, y
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> Steve Kargl writes:
>
> >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
> >that 'pkg info' doesn't!
>
> A record of when packages were installed
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> >
> > >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:47:01PM -0500, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > > Steve Kargl writes:
> > >
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:44:11PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 06:29:17PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
> > Steve Kargl writes:
> >
> > >Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 03:49:26PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> /var/log/message never gets corrupted?
>
If a machine is compromised, I can review log from remote syslog server.
It is impossible to trust the package information, relying on the local
database alone.
Glen
pgpklyEF3RMKl.pgp
Descr
In article <20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
Steve Kargl writes:
>Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide
>that 'pkg info' doesn't!
A record of when packages were installed and removed.
-GAWollman
___
free
I was surprised initially, but haven't thought about it much since.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/PACKAGESITE-spam-tp5870583p5870666.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
fre
On 22/12/2013 09:34, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>>
>> this has been done and activated for reason, first for lot of companies,
>
> companies can turn it on it they want it.
Generally the more secure option is default, you can turn off
26 matches
Mail list logo
