On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Werner Griessl wrote:
<>
<>current's new ppp discards the "#0001"-part from my
<>german telekom account and makes it impossible to
<>connect to my provider.
<>
While we are on the subject, ppp no longer runs an external chat
script. This used to work:
set login "\"!chat \\
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>Well, I don't know about anyone else out there having the problems I'm
>having, but I might as well ask. I'm using the ATA driver with the
>following bugfix applied, otherwise the same.
>
At the risk of sounding like an AOLer, me too. Prio
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>I'm sure everyone's seen my e-mail and others' e-mail about ATAPI in the
>ATA driver, at least, being broken (WRT CD-Rs). The question is, does
>anyone have any idea at all why? I tried reverting to just before the
>CDRIOC* changes, and tha
On Sun, 16 Jan 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>Can you try this patch to src/usr.sbin/burncd, and see if things work
>after that? Thanks! (BTW, there's also an extra feature in there, hope
>you don't mind :)
>
Yes, I burned a full 650MB onto a CD-R disk. No problems at all. And
I see j
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>There really wasn't any functional changes to the driver, but there was
>to the util :)
>It is sad though that there still are so many crappy drives be made :(
>
>However I've committed the fix...
>
>
>-Søren
>
Now if we can only get my crappy tape driv
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
>Hi ...
>
>I checked out a -current of about midnight 8 Feb ...
>
>After doing a "make buildworld" (which finished ok) ... did
>a "make installworld" which failed because my /usr/bin/install
>was not updated and thus dit not support the -fschg opti
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Philipp Mergenthaler wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:39:42AM -0500, Bryan Liesner wrote:
>> Jose, the problem seems to be resolved by rebuilding the boot
>> loader. Or bypass the loader altogether.
>>
>> cd /usr/src/sys/boot
>> make o
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>Have you rebuild your modules lately ??
>
>-Søren
>
Yes. My world is current as of a few hours ago. I did a make world
right after finding out about the loader problem to rule that
possibility out. The disk probes still fail when loading today's
mo
The latest ata commits left my system completely unbootable. No disks
were probed.
I have on the motherboard's Alladin controller:
HP 4x4x24 CD burner as master primary channel
40x CD as slave primary channel
HP Colorado 8 Gig ATAPI tape as master secondary channel
On a Promise Ultra66:
WDC AC
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>It seems Bryan Liesner wrote:
>>
>> The latest ata commits left my system completely unbootable. No disks
>> were probed.
>
>He, you always seem to be lucky when I change something :)
I always hold my breath when I c
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jose Gabriel Marcelino wrote:
>
>hi Soren,
>
>The latest ata commits left me unbootable too, the patch you provided
>below didn't help this too. I have a very different configuration from
>Bryan's (much simpler too):
>
Jose, the problem seems to be resolved by rebuilding the
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
>I cvsupped this morning and I just had a chance to build a new kernel, and
>now I get a "cannot mount root" and it drops into some kind of commandline
>where I can enter a root for it to mount. This is the error it gives me
>now:
>
>ata0-slave: WA
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Alex Le Heux wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Am I the only one who's experiencing an amzing amount of crashes on
>Netscape?
>
>It's been going on for quite some time now (months), upgrading Netscape or
>switching from the Linux to the FreeBSD to the BSDI version doesn't help.
>The most stable
I recently set up a network at home to share an internet
connection with a win98 box. Currently it's ppp/nat with a modem, in
a few days ADSL. It works just fine for a while, but I'm experiencing
unexplained outages where I have to do an ifconfig dc1 down/up to wake
it up again. No error messag
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Michael L. Imamura wrote:
>
>I've had this occur also; usually I get the message twice at startup, then
>at seemingly random times while online. So far, my connection has only
>been dropped once -- I got a flurry of "dc0: TX underrun --
>resetting" messages, then my connecti
I have a win98 box connected to a 4.0-current box via an ethernet
connection. The connection will go dead after about 20 minutes. I'm
unable to ping the win98 box and cannot ping the FreeBSD box from the
win98 box. No error/console messages. I can bring it back to life by
doing an ifconfig dc1
Is the Promise Ultra66 IDE adapter supported? I cannot get 3.3 or 4.0
kernels to see the card at all. The mailing list archive details are
sketchy at best. The pci_ide source seems to only do support for the
Ultra33.
Thanks,
Bryan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
I've been having trouble mounting my ATAPI CDROM using the new ATA drivers
When I do a:
%mount /cdrom, the system complains:
cd9660: Block device required
This is my fstab entry:
/dev/acd0a /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0
0
And here is the relevan
I've had an ATAPI CDROM as master and an HP Colorado tape as slave set up
on my system for quite some time now. I recently migrated to 4.0 and
I'm using the new ATA drivers. Below is a snip from my kernel config:
controller ata0
device atadisk0
device atapicd0
device
I've had an ATAPI CDROM as master and an HP Colorado tape as slave set up
on my system for quite some time now. I recently migrated to 4.0 and
I'm using the new ATA drivers. Below is a snip from my kernel config:
controller ata0
device atadisk0
device atapicd0
device
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote:
<>It seems F. Heinrichmeyer wrote:
<>> more observations to the zip-drive problem:
<>> First the relevant dmesg-line:
I'm also still having a small problem with the ata driver and my HP
Colorado 8G. I have it hanging off an ATAPI CDROM as a slave.
The d
In a kernel built from sources current as of 21:00 EST, I no longer
have sound.
dmesg from yesterday:
pcm0: at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
unknown0: at port 0x388-0x38f on isa0
joy0: at port 0x200-0x207 on isa0
unknown1: at port 0x330-0x331 irq 9 on isa0
The above worked without
A few days back my Avance Asound stopped working. The probe would
fail (sorry, this is from memory):
sbc0: probe_and_attach returned 6
I found a slight error in sbc.c and here's a working patch:
--- /sys/dev/sound/isa/sbc.cSat Dec 11 21:30:19 1999
+++ sbc.c Thu Dec 16 23:42:43 1999
@
On Fri, 24 Dec 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<>unknown0: at port 0x220-0x22f irq 5 drq 1,0 on isa0
<>sbc0: at port 0x388-0x38f on isa0
<>sbc0: alloc_resource
<>device_probe_and_attach: sbc0 attach returned 6
<>unknown1: at port 0x208-0x20f on isa0
<>unknown2: at port 0x330-0x331 irq 9 on isa0
I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related
problem.
When booting, the kernel loads, detects the devices, then hangs right
here:
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
pid 84 (fsck_ufs), uid 0: exited
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
> > went smoothly, and I was up and running quickly, but with an acpi related
> > problem.
> >
> > When b
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > > > I just upgraded my 4.7 system to 5.0-current via sources. Everything
>
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > Thanks, Nate. When you suggested that I remove the apm stuff fron the
> > kernel, you meant ALL of the apm stuff, didn't you :) . I took a
> > second look and found I still had
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> It seems that with -O2 on ia32 (-march=k6-2 in my case), gcc will in
> some cases generate short jumps to targets too far away for the offset
> to fit in a single byte. A surefire way to reproduce this is to build
> Mesa (or XFree86-4-libraries, w
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 05:31:20PM -0500, Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > I have seen this as well, using -O2 -march=athlon-xp.
> > The generated assembler tried to stuff -129 into a single byte.
>
> What about just trying -march=at
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Juli Mallett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to upgrade my workstation to current recently, and I have to
> use a lot of USB, and while using some USB mass storage device, with
> a UFS filesystem on it, and doing a large operation to it (tar c|tar x)
> everything deadlocked on ufs, t
I get the following panic while shutting down the system or simply
issuing a kill to inetd.
This happens each and every time, but locks the system, so a dump
isn't available.
The kernel is compiled without WITNESS and without INVARIANTS.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtu
A couple of days ago I posted a message about panicing whenever
shutting down inetd. The panic persists, but now it seems to happen
at any time, always stopping at in_pcbremlists().
The kernel is up-to-date, a kernel built on July 30th runs stable as a
rock.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in k
The last known good state of my system was a world and kernel from
Sunday, Aug 24 at approx 12:00 EDT.
This problem is from a kernel built from sources current as of
Aug 26th at approx 22:00 EDT
Here's the sequence - I booted the system, had a panic while running
sysctl from etc/rc.d/devd. It c
Just a follow up to this - cannot get it to panic with DDB compiled
in. hmmm...
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
>
> The last known good state of my system was a world and kernel from
> Sunday, Aug 24 at approx 12:00 EDT.
>
> This problem is from a kernel built from
Over the past few weeks, I have posted messages about panics
that I've been having. No answers at all.
Yesterday, I posted about a repeatable problem where dumps just
destroy my IDE drive. No answers. Pretty serious problem. No, my
swap partition doesn't start at sector 0.
Have I offended so
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
> I've figured out that after some recent posix1e upgrades (mac stuff?),
> ifconfig -a will blow up if mac.conf isn't there:
>
> # mv /etc/mac.conf /etc/mac.conf.backup
> # ifconfig -a
> fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet 10.0.0.6 netmask 0x
If I remove "device pmtimer" from my config, I get a consistent panic,
or variation of:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x0
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0135b0a7
stack pointer = 0x1
I have a perl script that dd's each audio track from an audio cd. The
tracks are copied just fine until it gets about 75% into a 70 minute
cd. dd then gets slower and slower until it seems to grind to a halt.
eventually, I'll set TIMEOUT messages and won't be able to kill the
current dd process.
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Martin wrote:
> Am Di, 2003-09-02 um 18.56 schrieb Bryan Liesner:
> > dd then gets slower and slower until it seems to grind to a halt.
>
> I have this problems everywhere (not only ATAng), if I'm trying to
> read some of my really old CD-Rs. You sh
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > > No, we're talking about brand new, factory pressed, audio CDs.
> >
> > And on top of that, my Windows XP machine's DVD-ROM was able to raed my
> > *commercial audio CDs* perfectly while the CD-RW in the FreeBSD machine was
> > only able to read about
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Bryan Liesner wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Martin wrote:
> > > If you notice that your CD-R label looks strange and if you need
> > > the data, you should backup it fast.
> >
> > No, we're talking about br
The last change to ata-lowlevel (rev 1.11) causes a 10-15 second delay
probing for a drive that's not there:
atapci0: port 0xa000-0xa00f,0xa400-0xa403,
0xa800-0xa807,0xb000-0xb003,0xb400-0xb407 mem 0xed00-0xed003fff irq 5 at device
15.0 on pci0
atapci0: [MPSAFE]
ata2: at 0xb400 on atapci0
a
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-17, Guillaume écrivait :
>
> > > + if (atapi_dma && atp->channel->dma &&
> > > + (atp->param->config & ATA_DRQ_MASK) != ATA_DRQ_INTR)
> > > + atp->setmode(atadev, ATA_DMA_MAX);
> > > + else
> > > + atp->setmode(atadev, ATA_PIO_MAX)
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-18, Guillaume écrivait :
>
> > The patch does nothing for me. Same results... and cd0 is still slow.
>
> OK, then please try to apply the patch below in addition to the previous
> one:
>
Sorry, I hadn't really noticed or checked for speed iss
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 19:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote:
> > >
> > > Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's
> > > triggered by:
> > >
> > > cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's
> > triggered by:
> >
> > cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track
> >
>
> This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could you try the
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> >>It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>
> >>>On a kernel built just a few hours ago, it hangs on boot
> >>>right after:
> >>>
> >>>acd0: CDROM at ata0-master PIO4
> >>
> >>Get atapicam ou
On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-20, Daniel Eischen écrivait :
>
> > No, using latest sources, with or without atapicam, does
> > not solve the problem. It still hangs.
>
> Please try the patch below, it should at least work around the problem.
>
> > http://people.freebsd.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-21, Bryan Liesner écrivait :
>
> > The patch doesn't take care of the hang for me.
>
> Does it change anything, or do you still see the 'REQUEST_SENSE
> recovered from missing interrupt'? Is your source t
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait :
>
> > Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great.
> > Are you going to commit the patch?
>
> DMA is now enabled for ATAPI/CAM i/o, as of atapi-cam.c rev. 1.26.
> Thanks to all who tested and revie
Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and
that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing,
but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before
completing the shutdown. The motherboard beeps three times, the
screen goes blank, and will co
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and
> > that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing,
> > but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before
>
> sysctl hw.acpi should show you what the
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I also had problems dumping onto a UDMA66 disk on a promise PDC20267
> controller - it seemed to dump OK (dump was readable after I recovered
> the disk), but it (or maybe the crash itself) trashed the partition
> table.
>
> Kris
I mentioned the very sa
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 11 Oct, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Upgrade tonight (7pm PST) and received the following
> > on rebooting
> >
> > panic: pmap_zero_page: CMAP3 busy
> >
> > Unfortunately, this system does not have a serial
> > console and the panic locked it up tight. Only
>
oops, didn't cc this to the list
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 15:50:01 -0500 (EST)
From: Bryan Liesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Shizuka Kudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Still getting panic on boot.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Shizuka Kudo wro
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Brent Jones wrote:
> Wow. That's quite a trick. I've CVSup'ed, buildworld/kernel and
> freshly installed gpg, within the last two hours.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/brent $ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key
> BB6BC940
> and then it dies...
>
> Brent
>
> On Wednesday, Ma
David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:32:02PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:14:25PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
I need to install current on a new box that just arrived.
What's the latest working snapshot?
20030312-JPSNAP get about 40% of the way through t
Todays sources as of about 22:00 est
I built a kernel, rebooted, and built another, which failed with:
NM=nm sh /usr/src/sys/kern/genassym.sh genassym.o > assym.s
/usr/src/sys/kern/genassym.sh: cannot create /dev/stdout: Operation not supported
*** Error code 2
Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GRAVY
I made posts here recently describing some panics which are somehow
related to disappearing/never created device nodes. I am unable to
produce a core dump at all, as it panics before / is mounted.
The documented kern.dumpdev (unknown oid) doesn't exist and
setting dumpdev=ad0s1b in loader.conf d
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bryan Liesner writes:
> >
> >
> >I made posts here recently describing some panics which are somehow
> >related to disappearing/never created device nodes. I am unable to
> >p
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Conrad Sabatier wrote:
> > Now, really, am I the only one experiencing this?
>
> No, you're not. I've been unable to get a bootable kernel running for the last
> few days also.
>
> Booting in verbose mode, I see the last thing that occurs just before the panic
> is mounting r
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Shizuka Kudo wrote:
>
> --- Bryan Liesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I was able to get a kernel up and running (strangely) on 3/12, but
> > commits after that cause an immediate panic as soon as init starts.
> >
> > If I b
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >I think Poul-Henning will have enough information to go with now...
>
> You guys _way_ overestimate my abilities here.
>
> Right now I have a hard time imagining what geom's eventhandling
> for "withering" geoms can possibly have to do with any non-
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> One thing I'd like you to try is to remove any trace of USB from your
> systems. USB does some ugly VOP_REVOKES which I am not happy about, and
> I would like to exclude them from the list of suspects.
>
You can remove USB from your list, I tried
walt wrote:
Bryan Liesner wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
One thing I'd like you to try is to remove any trace of USB from your
systems. USB does some ugly VOP_REVOKES which I am not happy about, and
I would like to exclude them from the list of suspects.
You can r
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> As I said: I still think there is a lost serialization here
> that's at the root of the problem. I can't really dedicate
> the equipment I have here to reproducing the issue at this
> time, or I'd track down the race I think may be happening.
>
> -- Terr
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I hesistate to suggest this because everyone always gives me
> crap about me not disclosing the bug, but unless you are ready
> to grovel around in locore, and figure out what the root cause
> is for the difference in behaviour, I'm going to say that
> th
Is anyone going to look at this before the next release?
Of course, if more info is needed, I'll send it along. No dump is
available - it panics during boot.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52718
Thanks
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
ht
el that the subject was pretty
clear. If it wasn't clear enough, then I stand corrected.
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 12:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bryan Liesner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: panic since changes to kern_umtx.c
The change from kern_umtx.c rev 1.2 to 1.3 brou
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Nick H. wrote:
> Just out of curosity... I had this same error a while back on one of my
> boxes. I ended up booting to a recovery cd and running an fsck_ffs on it
> and it fixed the problem. Mine would get to a login and *WHAM* it's dead.
> Worth a shot to see if that fixe
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> If you have had issues with libthr on SMP or umtx panics, the following
> patch may solve these issues.
>
> http://www.chesapeake.net/~jroberson/umtxlocks.diff
>
> This patch fixes several race conditions and other issues with umtx.
Actually, no it does
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> > Actually, I think it's cam in general that's causing the panic with
> > these changes.
> >
> > Please see kern/52718
>
> I didn't see a backtrace in the PR. Is there one that you can share
> with us?
>
It panics during boot and, unfortunately, no dump is
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Scott Long wrote:
> It's very hard to imagine Jeff's patches causing a problem at the point
> that the PR mentions. Have you confirmed the problem in a kernel that
> was build in a totally clean environment?
>
> Scott
If you mean a kernel build with standard optimizations, ye
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Bryan Liesner wrote:
>
> > Actually, no it doesn't. I was able to use kern_umtx v 1.3 only if I
> > removed atapicam from my kernel config. These patches (now committed?)
> > panic the system whet
75 matches
Mail list logo