Re: cd writer recommendation?

1999-08-16 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sun, 15 Aug 1999, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Any one care to recommend a CD writer for FreeBSD-current since thats > typically what I run over here. I use Sony CDU948S-RP more than year. works like a charm If cd-recorder is not MMC-compatible check that cdrdao supports it directly (So

Re: Bug with malloc_options

1999-08-19 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -current from ~3 days ago. > > from malloc(3): > ---snip--- > To specify in the source that a program does no return value checking on > calls to these functions: > >extern char *malloc_options; >malloc

Re: HEADS UP: grep 2.4a is now in the tree

2000-01-18 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > The equivalent to the old -a option is --binary-files=without-match. > If you want this by default, you can hardcode it in GREP_OPTIONS > environment variable. I think there should be one-letter shorthand for this. /fjoe To Unsubscribe

collect2 and cplus-dem.c in binutils

2000-01-21 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! will collect2 be built in base system? btw binutils have in their libiberty cplus-dem.c which is incompatible with that which is used in gcc 2.9x.x. the result is broken -frepo in egcs and gcc-devel ports in -current. I filed one PR about it but I was rather tired yesterday and did no

rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! applet_viewer bombs out with a lot of stuff in the output like this (until killed -9): ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-21 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > Really?! Augh. Naturally this comes just hours after I have merged > the latest changes into -stable *sigh*. > > Could you please make sure your src/libexec/rtld-elf is > up-to-date? rtld.c should be at revision 1.41. yes. my src/libexec

Re: rtld-elf, java + tya

2000-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote: > > ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 > > If any of you can reproduce this problem fairly reliably, please try > the appended patch for "src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c" and let me > know if it solves the prob

Re: grep --binary-files=without-match (fwd)

2000-01-25 Thread Max Khon
ep --binary-files=without-match Bonjour >Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 10:18:30 +0600 (NS) >From: Max Khon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sometimes I need to find all files that >contain something. Sometimes I need only text files >(e.g: vi `grep -rl xxx .` -- no bin

UPDATING

2000-01-31 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! --- cut here --- 2129: {set,get}flags have been added to the tree for rather dubious reasons. An unintended side effect of this is that you must rebuild install before the rest of the world. cd src/usr.bin/xinstall make depe

Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d

2000-02-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Jeremy Lea wrote: > > It was a local FreeBSD feature; now it is part of the official GNU grep. > > Any chance of -R coming back too? it is already there (-r) /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

Re: HEADS UP: GNU grep 2.4d

2000-02-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Alexander Langer wrote: > > > > It was a local FreeBSD feature; now it is part of the official GNU grep. > > > Any chance of -R coming back too? > > it is already there (-r) > > Hmm. Somehow I dislike name-changes of params. :-( GREP guys decided to use -r (which

Re: UPDATING

2000-02-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > Just one problem, when I follow the instructions, in usr.bin/xinstall, > > make depend all install clean ... > > Then make installworld with my configuration dies in > > install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 install.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 >

Re: UPDATING

2000-02-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Max Khon writes: > : actually xinstall cannot be built before make world or make buildworld > : because of undefined symbols `setflags'. > > What's the right thing then? make

Re: extern variables in shared libraries broken (ld.so or mmap bug)

2000-02-24 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:31:01PM +0100, Martin Cracauer wrote: > > Where's the bug, anyway? Do we need to fix the compiler or would it be > > better to get a newer assembler? > > A new assembler (whole binutils) is on the way, probably ar

Re: XFree 3.3.6 authentication failed?

2000-02-22 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am running monday's current, Mesa-glx for Riva, XFree 3.3.6 and > KDE 1.1.2. All from monday's ports tree. > Well, I think I can't say I am running this system, for I am getting > the following message whenever I try startx

grep -a (-stable)

1999-12-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! it is not possible to make short equivalent for old grep -a option (as in grep 2.3 -a is used for other purposes). it is possible to make a long option (--skip-binary) but long options are quite unusable. GREP_OPTIONS cannot help much (I want an equiv. for old 'grep -aRl pattern .') an

Re: grep -a (-stable)

1999-12-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > it is not possible to make short equivalent for old grep -a option > > (as in grep 2.3 -a is used for other purposes). > > Que? I've used grep -a since the update to grep 2.3 and haven't > noticed any strange behaviour from the -a option.

Re: grep -a (-stable)

1999-12-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, James Howard wrote: > > it is not possible to make short equivalent for old grep -a option > > (as in grep 2.3 -a is used for other purposes). > > it is possible to make a long option (--skip-binary) but long options > > are quite unusable. GREP_OPTIONS cannot help

Re: ATA driver as the default

1999-12-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Alex wrote: > > The other one is my laptop, and that one seems to be a lot faster and > > the system load is down (PIIX4 chipset). Except that it always gives me > > a timeout at boot. > > > > acd0: CDROM drive at ata1 as master > > acd0: read 2416KB/s (2416KB/s),

Re: grep -a (-stable)

1999-12-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, James Howard wrote: > > I know about this beast. It would be nice if our out-of-box grep had > > this option. > > Hah, it used to. -stable grep used -a to skip binary files. -current does not. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubs

Re: ATA driver problem?? (lost disk contact)

1999-12-16 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Dave J. Boers wrote: > Could you tell met the exact time on which these messages occurred? > Anywhere near 10:15 or 9:15 ? nope. the time is unpredictable. sometimes it can work more than a day without spilling out those messages /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send m

Re: ATA driver problem?? (lost disk contact)

1999-12-16 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Dave J. Boers wrote: > I am still having "disc contact lost messages" regularly too. [...] > There are two important aspects of the problem: > > 1. The problem does not always occur: it's unpredictable > 2. When it occurs, I can actually hear the disk spinnin

ARP issues (Arcnet)

2000-03-21 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Once again I'm trying to port Arcnet driver from NetBSD/amiga to FreeBSD/i386 (like I did more than a year ago for 3.x). The problem is in ARP stuff -- should I port if_arp.c from NetBSD or should I make changes in if_ether.c for arcnet stuff like Token Ring support did? Any suggestion

Re: ftp client bug

2000-06-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Dmitry Valdov wrote: > There is a problem in ftp client in all FreeBSD versions. It isn't dangerous > but probably should be fixed. > > > uname -a > FreeBSD work.dv.ru 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Thu Jun 22 19:41:50 > MSD 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/s

Re: HEADS UP: Updating our CVSweb

2000-08-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > I have been hacking on CVSweb for a while and now I think it is the > time we update our CVSweb to the full-featured version, which is based > on Henner Zeller and other people's work. The ready-to-commit demo is > available at this pa

Re: HEADS UP: Updating our CVSweb

2000-08-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > > maybe it is worth moving form that allows request diffs between any two > > revision to the top? > > Well, following the hyperlink "Request diff between arbitrary > revisions" will take you to the form. > > It's as easy as a single

Re: crypt(3) problems

2000-08-08 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > We should switch to using just libdescrypt and being allowed to switch > crypt formats easily between md5 and des. My proposed solution using > login.conf is at http://people.FreeBSD.org/~green/crypt_switching.patch, > and it's g

Re: gdb bug w/ dlopen()ed images

2000-08-24 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, John DeBoskey wrote: >There appears to be a problem with gdb when debugging > dynamically loaded images. On 5.0-current with > sources current and built as of this evenning and a > 4.1-STABLE system, the following incorrect result is seen: PR/20373 Solution:

Re: arp: is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-18 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:11:45PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I've seen this when DHCP fails to allocate an address. > > > > But I am not using DHCP. Maybe there are other machines in the LAN (it is > a *big*

Re: arp: is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-19 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! > Same here. My -CURRENT system is replying to those ARP request which carry > 0.0.0.0 as sender IP address: > > 14:43:33.706099 arp who-has 158.227.48.193 (ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff) tell 0.0.0.0 > 14:43:33.706152 arp reply 0.0.0.0 is-at 0:d0:b7:3e:a0:fb > > > I think this is because I have

initgroups

2001-11-13 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Any objections if I will commit the following patch (see PR/15421)? Index: initgroups.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/gen/initgroups.c,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 initgroups.c --- initgroups.c2

Re: misc/15421 (was: Re: initgroups)

2001-11-19 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 06:19:50PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Can setgroups return a positive number? If so, you've just changed > > the semantics of the funtion; before, it used to return 0 on 0 or a > > positive number. > > > No. setgroups() is a syscall, and as such return

Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:30:54PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > | I'm trying to compile smbfs. I've added SMBFS and NETSMB options to my kernel > | config, but I'm not sure is it enough. The output of make buildkernel is as > | follows: > > I don't think anyone's updated smbfs for

Re: smbfs support

2001-11-28 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 02:55:24PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this > | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and > | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs > | i

Re: smbfs support

2001-12-28 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:33:08PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > What is the state of smbfs for current at present? Boris Popov has updated kernel-side smbfs for KSE. Sheldon Hearn imported smbfs 1.4.3 userland (to both HEAD and RELENG_4). smbfs should work out of box. we still do no

Re: How about gcj? (Re: Not committing WARNS settings...)

2002-02-06 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:52:40PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > But alright, let's say -- ports. gcj and gcjh themselves are > installed by the several lang/gcc* ports, but they are not functional > (libgcj/libjava are not ported). As a ports committer I might try to

Re: gcc3.x issues

2002-02-06 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote: > So what? Just because it wasn't part of 4.2 BSD, does that mean that we > should never support it? > > > 2. What is so hard with installing the port. No one has answered *THAT* > > question yet. > > Ports are ins

Re: Support for atapi cdrw as scsi in -current?

2002-02-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:14:22PM +0100, Thomas Quinot wrote: > > Is there a place where I can find this updated patch which will work for > > me in the current -current? Thanks. > > I put up updated patches at > http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ > > For -CURRENT, y

Re: Support for atapi cdrw as scsi in -current?

2002-02-07 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 12:38:08PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > > > I put up updated patches at > > > http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/ > > > > > > For -CURRENT, you should be using the latest one (of today) > > > which fixes a silly line inversion. > > > > > > I'd be

Re: gcc3.x issues

2002-02-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 05:47:07PM -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote: > So what? Just because it wasn't part of 4.2 BSD, does that mean that we > should never support it? > > > 2. What is so hard with installing the port. No one has answered *THAT* > > question yet. > > Ports are ins

Re: FW: Re: windbindd

2002-02-13 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 03:55:28AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Is there any way to impliment dl_open in our nsswitch for -current so > > > that samba's winbindd can work on FreeBSD? > > > > no. > > It's actually not that hard to write a "libdlopen" that > mmap's exectuable the

Re: Why isn't PAM_smb available for FreeBSD?

2002-02-16 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 01:14:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > According to the pam_smb webpage, it states that it works cleanly > > with FreeBSD 3.x onwards, so I will have to try it out anyway. BTW, > > what is NSS? > > Network Security Services; supposedly it's required, accor

Re: sysinstall and wrong /etc/ttys types

2001-05-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 11 May 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > Look through the cvs history for sysinstall - you'll see that it > > already had much of that already, back around 2.0.5 I think. It > > was eventually removed again due to disuse. > > Could you please be more specific on what you me

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-18 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency > >in the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of > >functional code duplication. > > I may be misunderstanding what you mean here, but I don't think > we

/usr/games/wtf

2001-08-20 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! I would like to add /usr/games/wtf from NetBSD to base system. Any opinions/objections? /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: /usr/games/wtf

2001-08-20 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! > > I would like to add /usr/games/wtf from NetBSD to base system. > > Any opinions/objections? > > wtf is it? NAME wtf - translates acronyms for you SYNOPSIS wtf [is] acronym ... husky:~$wtf is pola POLA: principle of least astonishment husky:~$ /fjoe To Unsubscribe: s

Re: Permissions for /var/mail

2000-09-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Leif Neland wrote: > Pine 4.21 complains that /var/mail is vulnerable, that the perms should be > 1777 > > Would this be less vulnerable than 775 which make world restores it to? this happens because ports/mail/pine4/patches/patch-aw was not merged when libc-cli

Re: pw_class in _pw_passwd is null if __hashpw() is not called inprior

2000-09-28 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > Here is another possible trouble. While libc.so.4 with nsswitch no > > > longer requires the magic '+' entry, libc.so.3 and earlier still > > > require '+'. > > > > IMHO, This Is A Bug. > > Depends on what Seigo meant. If he meant that l

Re: ABI is broken??

2000-11-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, John Polstra wrote: > Here are all the random facts which, when put together, explain what > is going on. > > Your old application was (like all -pthread programs) linked > with "/usr/lib/libgcc_r.a". That library contains a function > "__register_frame_info" whi

Re: Problem building -current kernel with read-only /usr/src.

2000-12-24 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Chris wrote: > Actually, last time I checked, I think stable did not install with a RO > /usr/src either. Anyone know if this is still the case? I have no problems with 'make installworld' with RO obj and src on latest -stable /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: New threads way questions

2001-01-31 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > I have some questions about new threads way. Daniel says that new way is: > > > gcc -Wall -o foo foo.c -lc_r > 1) What about libgcc_r.a? Is it picked automatically in this case or > not? Is it ever needed now? we do not have libgcc_r.

Re: WARNING: Today's current breaks passwords

1999-01-22 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > This may or may not affect you. > > Today's installworld broke passwords for me. By that, I mean that login, > xdm, su and friends gave authentication failures on all passwords for > all users that I tried. I suspect this has to do with a ha

Re: nVidia opengl works as root but not as user

2003-01-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:31:56PM -0500, Jonah Sherman wrote: > Im not sure why this would cause it but it's the only thing I can think > of that differentiates between root and non-root for gl stuff: > > In your XF86Config-4, do you have a section which resembles the > following? :

Re: background fsck did not create lost+found

2003-01-22 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 07:18:44PM +0100, Jan Srzednicki wrote: > > > Would that be a big problem to allow some fsck option not to erase all > > > these softupdates-pending inodes, but to put them in lost+found as usual? > > > > It certainly couldn't be done with the background fsck, b

Re: background fsck did not create lost+found

2003-01-22 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:43:37PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > > > Would that be a big problem to allow some fsck option not > > > > > to erase all these softupdates-pending inodes, but to put > > > > > them in lost+found as usual? > > > > > > > > It certainly couldn't b

Re: stand/sysinstall changes?

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:04:30AM -0800, Elden Fenison wrote: > According to the handbook's instructions, back on 4.7 I used to always > do the following as part of my installworld: > > cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall > make all install > > This apparently updates the sysinstall stuf

Re: only root can startx

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 12:37:55PM -0600, Charlie ROOT wrote: > > See /usr/ports/x11/wrapper. > > I have wrapper installed > > lorax# pkg_info | grep wrapper > fampp-1.1 A C++ wrapper for fam from SGI > gtkmm-1.2.8_1 C++ wrapper for gtk, a x11 graphics library > javav

pw

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw? The patch is attached. Other variant is to enable using '$' only at end of user name. /fjoe Index: pw_user.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.sbin/pw/pw_user.c,v retrieving rev

Re: pw

2003-01-23 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:54:18PM -0500, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > Can we enable using '$' in usernames in pw? > > The patch is attached. > > The same patch was submitted here by David Chapman: > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1059329+1062195+/usr/local/www/db/text/20

incremental cross-builds

2003-01-27 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Is it possible to build a part of (for example) 5.x tree on 4.x machine? Suppose I have run make buildworld once, have bootstrap toolchain in /usr/obj and want to rebuild only libc. /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of

Re: add ext2fs to the module list in modules/Makefile

2003-01-27 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:40:12AM +0200, Enache Adrian wrote: > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:36:35PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Portions of the ext2fs source are covered by the GPL. You > > need to rebuild the kernel with "option EXT2FS". The > > FreeBSD cannot create a ext2fs.ko a

Re: add ext2fs to the module list in modules/Makefile

2003-01-27 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:05:45PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > > > > > Portions of the ext2fs source are covered by the GPL. You > > > > > need to rebuild the kernel with "option EXT2FS". The > > > > > FreeBSD cannot create a ext2fs.ko and comply with the GPL. > > > > > > > > This

Re: error in nsdispatch.c

2003-02-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:37:31PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote: > There is a potential bug in src/lib/libc/net/nsdispatch.c > > in the function > const ns_dbt * _nsdbtget(const char * name). > > The static variable > > static time_t confmod; > > is not initialized to anything. > >

Re: netncp/nwfs is rotting...

2003-02-25 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:20:28PM -0800, Tim J. Robbins wrote: j > A few months ago there was a thread on this list discussing the state > of NWFS/netncp/libncp/etc. on 5.0. Terry Lambert produced a patch [1] > that made netncp compile. The patch still applies cleanly to -current > and

make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foobar seems to be broken

2003-02-26 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! Seems that for some reason gengenrtl is not built when doing 'make build-tools' in gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools. As a result 'make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=foobar' is broken. Below is the output of 'make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=alpha' of recent HEAD on 4.7-STABLE/i386 ===> gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_t

Re: More if_ath churn coming your way!

2011-01-20 Thread Max Khon
Adrian, On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: I'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the > if_ath code into -HEAD. > > I'd appreciate some testing just to ensure I haven't broken anything > terribly obvious. > Any chances for proper support for Atheros 802.

Re: Fix for WINE on -CURRENT

2003-11-04 Thread Max Khon
Hello! On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 11:14:03PM -0600, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > Below is a patch to fix WINE for the new ATA driver. > > I created this patch based on the ideals from a previous user > who had patched 3 other ports to work with -CURRENT's new ATA > driver. > > Could someone familar wit

Re: Fix for WINE on -CURRENT

2003-11-05 Thread Max Khon
Hello! On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 05:50:35AM +0100, Simon Barner wrote: > > can you make a patch for cdparanoia as well? > > cdparanoia is also broken on recent -CURRENT and testing will be easy. > > There is already a PR. I will rewise my patch to use __FreeBSD__ in the > patch file instead of usi

Re: PRs for dagrab and cdparanoia reworked (was: Re: Fix for WINE on -CURRENT)

2003-11-05 Thread Max Khon
Hello! On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:10:02PM +0100, Simon Barner wrote: > > please revise the patch and submit follow-up. > > Done. Tested on both -STABLE and -CURRENT. > > I am progress of doing the same for dagrab (expect a follow-up to PR > 57227 soon). There is no need for extra-patches. #ifd

Re: VMWare build failure

2003-11-20 Thread Max Khon
Hello! On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 04:53:57PM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote: > >Guessing you're running -CURRENT you have the kernel source installed, > >so my suggestion is to run vmware3. > > > >Unless you have a specific reason to run 2? > > > Maybe he doesn't run 3 because it also doesn't build: >

Re: lnc0: broke for us between 3.1 and 4.0?

1999-04-16 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > We upgraded a crash machine from 3.1-RELEASE to 4.0-CURRENT from just > before the EGCS switch was pulled. The machine is a Pentium 166 MMX > overdrive. Prior to the upgrade, it correctly probed the Kensington KNE > 2100 (something like th

Re: Incorrect memory sizes reported

1999-05-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 11 May 1999, Kevin Day wrote: > I'm not sure if this is related to the bug I found in 3.1, regarding mmaping > devices, then forking, but with my -current NFS server: > > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATETIME WCPUCPU COMMAND > 139 root 2 0 257M

Re: FBSDBOOT.EXE

1999-05-11 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, 11 May 1999, Carlos C. Tapang wrote: > Because I need it, I have upgraded fbsdboot.exe so now it can recognize ELF. > If anybody else needs it, please let me know and I'll see what I can do for > you. > ps. I had to use my old Microsoft Visual C++ (ver 1.5) to do this > modific

Re: openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-12 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 01:30:47AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > Make sure you use the ports gcc31 for compiling. The c++ from > CURRENT has broken exception handling. In the next few days a > patch will be committed to address this. btw does it still use -fsjlj method for exception h

Re: pkg-comment

2002-08-12 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:36:51PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile > > > to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think > > > it would speed up updates. > > > > http://people.F

building -CURRENT on RELENG_4

2002-10-22 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! cross-building -CURRENT on RELENG_4 is broken in src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: --- cut here --- ... sh /usr/fbsd/HEAD/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/makeman /usr/libexec/lint1 -m >lint.7 lint1: illegal option -- m usage: lint1 [-abcdeghprstuvyzF] src dest gzip -cn lint.7 > lint.7.gz --- cut here -

Re: [PATCH: libc]Re: gnome on current

2002-10-31 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:39:10AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > Considering that I built the same applications and ran the same applications > > fine a while ago, and we've had a binutils upgrade, and things don't break > > on other systems, I'm inclined to assume there are linker b

Re: libc size

2002-11-04 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 01:57:35PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > another 2.4M for /rescue. That makes it less > > impressive. I don't find the duplication appealing, either. > > (Why not just put the /rescue versions directly > > into /bin and /sbin? That would be smaller still, >

Re: libc size

2002-11-04 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:18:23AM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > > Before someone says you can dlopen() from static binaries in order to > > > implement nsswitch, please provide the patch proving it. Our best > > > FreeBSD minds don't think it can be done properly and sanely. > >

Re: libc size

2002-11-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:12:45AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Ok, I put the patch and test program to > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fjoe/libdl.tar.bz2. > > > > Patches are made against RELENG_4 (and all tests were done on RELENG_4) > > but it will not be that hard to port everyt

Re: libc size

2002-11-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:08:33PM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > The plan is to add this stuff (rtld sources with -DLIBDL) to libc.a > > so statically linked programe will have dlopen/dlsym etc. > > > > Problems with current patches are: > > - I do not know what to do on alpha wit

Re: libc size

2002-11-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 12:20:50AM +0600, Max Khon wrote: > The only way to save space in / and to be able to use nsswitch is > "make everyhting shared" exactly like NetBSD did a few weeks ago. > I saw a number of complaints about loosing an ability to repair sy

Re: libc size

2002-11-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Jake Burkholder wrote: > > Are you talking about STATICOBJS and SHOBJS? This is how libpam is built > > right now. You have different sets object files in shared and static > > versions of libpam. Please take a look at src/lib/libpam/libpam/Mak

Re: CVS broken? (buildworld fails when cleaning tar)

2002-12-05 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:43:38PM +0300, Denis N. Peplin wrote: > > > I'm trying this: > > > # cd /usr > > > # rm -rf src obj > > > # cvs -R co src > > > > use co -P (prune empty directories). > Thanks, i will use it. > But two weeks ago building world was succeseful w/o any additiona

Re: Updated ATAPI/CAM patches

2002-03-01 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:58:00PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote: > > > Hmm, why do we need to add new layers and loss of functionality > > > to the ATAPI devices ? > > > > Many many many people would like to be able to use cdrecord to burn data > > to cd's so that all the front-ends to

Re: Problem with ssh

2002-03-28 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 11:43:58AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Thursday 28 March 2002 10:28 am, Michael L. Hostbaek wrote: > > > Beech Rintoul (akbeech) writes: > > > > > > 'ChallengeResponseAuthentication no' > > > > Thanks, that fixed the problem. > > just stops my sshd f

Re: i386 ATA is very broken after sparc64 ATA mega-commit (April 5)

2002-04-18 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 01:51:19AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > It seems Doug Barton wrote: > > > Given the impending 4.6-release, might it make sense to back off ata in > > > > The busdma/sparc64 code is *not* in stable... > > Hmmm... I thought I saw some complaints on -stabl

WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-11-28 Thread Max Khon
Hello! Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by default? They are of no use for 100% users and 99,999% developers and just slow down world and universe builds. Here are the results of running buildworld on 1 core on AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+: m

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-11-28 Thread Max Khon
Doug, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Doug Barton wrote: >>> Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by > >>> default? > >> > >> Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new > >> system for at least a decade. > >> > >> Ideally we could do

removing libreadline from base system

2011-11-28 Thread Max Khon
Hello! It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit after r228114. The remaining question is what to do with libreadline: 1) just build & link gdb with libedit OR 2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and build INTERNALLIB version of it that is never installed an

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-11-29 Thread Max Khon
Baptiste, On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit > > after r228114. > > > > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline: > > > > 1) just build & link gdb with libedit > > > > OR > > > > 2) re-i

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Sevan, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: On 30/11/2011 16:03, Sevan / Venture37 wrote: > >> system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with >> profile support. >> > > sorry, I meant *without* profile support. Are you sure you mean profile support and

Re: Remove debug echo

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Garrett, On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > What I really want is this: > > > > $ cat Makefile > > all: foo bar baz yadda > > > > foo bar yadda: > > > > baz: > >false > > $ gmake > > false > > gmake: *** [baz] Error 1 > > > > $ make all > > false > >

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Brooks, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Brooks Davis wrote: > What is the value in doing either? > > > > libreadline isn't infecting any non-GPL code turning into GPLv2. > > > > Some of use have fancy .input files, and quite frankly the vi mode of > > libedit still doesn't work quite the same as

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM, David O'Brien wrote: > This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately. > > I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on > my system or I don't. > What I meant is that this problem is not related to the original quest

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > > I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions? > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote: > > Author: fj

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien wrote: If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a > libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up > with a libreadline on the system anyway. Then you need to define what base system is.

Re: WITHOUT_PROFILE=yes by default

2011-12-01 Thread Max Khon
Steve, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Steve Kargl < s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > > > I would like to disable building pro

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-02 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:17 PM, David O'Brien wrote: Agreed and known. If the application(s) using libreadline weren't > already GPL I wouldn't have spoken up. > > When I added the libreadline compatibility to libedit, I changed all the > non-GPL libreadline uses to libedit. Nope. You

Re: removing libreadline from base system

2011-12-02 Thread Max Khon
David, On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:43 PM, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:57:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien > wrote: > > If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a > &

  1   2   >