On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:40 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, lacom...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com
Hi folks,
There is many case recently when I really wished timestamp were present in
the
post-mortem msgbuf. Such situation
On Oct 25, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Jason Edwards wrote:
Hello list,
I'm working on ZFSguru, a FreeNAS-like distribution based on FreeBSD
that focuses on NAS or Network Attached Storage functionality,
sporting a web-interface et al.
I've been building FreeBSD 9.0-RC1, and put together a LiveCD
On Nov 14, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 10:24:06PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01.11.2011 19:50, Dennis K?gel wrote:
Not sure if replying on-list or off-list makes more sense...
Replying on-list could share experience to other users.
Anyway, some
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active probably only makes sense
if you are accessing single LUN.
In my tests where I have 24 LUNS that form 4 vdevs in a single zpool
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote:
Another thing I've observed is that active/active probably only makes
sense if you
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 14:13, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On 20.01.2012, at 12:51, Alexander Motinm...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 01/20/12 10:09, Nikolay Denev wrote
On Jan 20, 2012, at 3:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 15:27, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 14:13, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Jan 20, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 01/20/12 13:08, Nikolay Denev wrote
On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
I created a kernel config for i386/amd64 (should work on -current and 9.x)
and a suitable loader.conf which:
- tries to provide as much features as GENERIC (I lost one or two disk
controllers, they are not available as a
On Apr 6, 2012, at 2:48 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm looking for a way to force FreeBSD 10 to maintain/watch ECC errors
reported by UEFI (or BIOS).
Since ECC is said to be essential for server systems both in buisness
and science and I do not question this, I was wondering if I can not
report
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:51:59PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:31:45AM +0100, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov s...@zxy.spb.ru wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Dec, 2010, at 21:20 , Barbara wrote:
As my old PATA hard disk was failing, I had to replace it with a new SATA
drive where I moved my FreeBSDs installations, as PATA drives are not easy to
find these days.
So I had to move one of my
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
Beware that they (DO) do not at all grok ipv6. They hand out /124s, or
something equally silly.
My DO instance has /64 and I have no problems with using ipv6 to login.
--Nikolay
in Python and they use it to get a proper
IPv4 addresses. This configuration gets sucked into rc.
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015, Nikolay Denev wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca
wrote:
Beware that they (DO) do not at all grok ipv6. They hand out /124s
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
Do we have any support for process checkpoint and migration on FreeBSD? I
have found some code from 2010 at code.google.com/p/processmigration which
works by forcing a core dump. I wonder how difficult it would be to extend
I've noticed hostapd getting stuck in pcap_next() which led me to
check some net.bpf sysctls, as I was running with
net.bpf.zerocopy_enable=1.
When disabled hostapd works again for multiple clients.
--Nikolay
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Nikolay Denev <nde...@gmail.com> wrote:
reproducable. :)
>
>
> -a
>
>
> On 16 October 2015 at 11:25, Nikolay Denev <nde...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've noticed hostapd getting stuck in pcap_next() which led me to
>> check some net.bpf sysctls, as I was running with
>> net.bpf.zerocopy_enable=1.
>> When disabled
I'm not sure yet if this is related but I've just upgraded to latest
10-stable from svn and I'm also seeing issues.
Running hostapd in foreground like this : /usr/sbin/hostapd -P
/var/run/hostapd.pid -d /etc/hostapd.conf
I see one client connect and then attempts from other clients time out.
When
18 matches
Mail list logo
