In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "kai ouyang" writes:
>If we add a partition 'da0s1h' to the box, when we excute the g_attach()
>function,
>it will call redo_rank(). My viewpoint is that the 'DEV'(da0s1h) should
>been added between 'Sda0' and 'Mda1'. Based my understanding on
>'redo_rank', this
Hi, Poul-Henning
This is my DP2 box's info about 'GEOM' when power on with 'boot -v'.
GEOM: new disk da0
GEOM: new disk da1
GEOM: new disk da2
MBR Slice 1 on da0:
80 01 01 00 a5 fe ff 7b 3f 00 00 00 3d a8 da 00 |...{?...=...|
[0] f:80 typ:165 s(CHS):0/1/1
On 5 Jul 2002, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote:
> May be same mechanism as hints, like:
> hint.sio.0.mode=0622
As long as we are throwing out ideas: Aside from the fact that
it's broken and at the moment wouldn't exactly DTRT, I always
figured a type of mount_unionfs() with the older filesyste
÷ Fri, 05.07.2002, × 06:39, Terry Lambert ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > Loader?
> > ie on shutdown write a list of permissions etc into a file which the
> > loader can slurp up next boot and shove into the kernel and be parsed.
>
> This really doesn't work very well. You end up with two sets of
> data. Having
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> I don't know enough about GEOM to embrace it whole-heartedly, but I
> think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who disagrees that devfs
> is a forward. It may need some improvement, but it's so much more
>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > > Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
> > > disklabels etc. when they're done and it works also with sysinstall
> > > it'll be standard.
> >
> > It shouldn'
don't want either of DEVFS or GEOM, I think
I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we
should stay stuck back there.
I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards.
I don't know enough about GEOM to embrace it whole-heartedly, but I
think yo
think
>> I know where you come from, I just happen to not agree that we
>> should stay stuck back there.
>
> I disagree that DEVFS and GEOM are forwards.
I don't know enough about GEOM to embrace it whole-heartedly, but I
think you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who di
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >This is mostly because resources have been diverted away from updating
> >working code to write a second system.
>
> Make that third system, the current slice/label code is our second
> system, a
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:59:47AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
> ian Elischer writes:
>
> >aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
>
> I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
Like reading Linux source code?
8-)
--
|
Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
> > >And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
> > >fine yet (toying around with it).
> >
> > Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls
Sick sick sick :-)
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
> ian Elischer writes:
>
> >aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
>
> I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>> >On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> >> Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
>> >> disklabels etc. when
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
> >> disklabels etc. when they're done and it works also with sysinstall
> >> it'll
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
>> >And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
>> >fine yet (toying around with it).
>>
>> Some bits are missing
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
> >And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
> >fine yet (toying around with it).
>
> Some bits are missing yet, for instance the ioctls to change
> disklabels etc.
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 10:59, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
> ian Elischer writes:
>
> >aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
>
> I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
Isn't it a bit worrying when the two overlap? :)
--
Simon
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jul
ian Elischer writes:
>aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
I am, I'm not working, only doing things I do for fun :-)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer
aren't you suppost to be honeymooning from yesterday?
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Goebbels writes:
>Hi!
>
>I have some questions about it.
>
>The first one is, when I compiled GEOM into the kernel, will physical
>disks be controlled by it already? Or does it apply to md mounted
>devices yet?
all disks should be GEOM'ized.
>And the secon
Hi!
I have some questions about it.
The first one is, when I compiled GEOM into the kernel, will physical
disks be controlled by it already? Or does it apply to md mounted
devices yet?
And the second is, when will it be officially activated? Seems to work
fine yet (toying around with it).
T
21 matches
Mail list logo
