Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-26 Thread Andrea Campi
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote: > > and now performance is very good, event with: > > > > kern.random.sys.harvest_ethernet: 1 > > kern.random.sys.harvest_point_to_point: 0 > > kern.random.sys.harvest_interrupt: 1 > > You mean "even with"? If so, then I am very please

Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-24 Thread Mark Murray
> and now performance is very good, event with: > > kern.random.sys.harvest_ethernet: 1 > kern.random.sys.harvest_point_to_point: 0 > kern.random.sys.harvest_interrupt: 1 You mean "even with"? If so, then I am very pleased indeed! M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscr

[Solved] Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-23 Thread Andrea Campi
> > Do you have MUTEX_DEBUG in your kernel? > Sorry guys, my bad. As John and Kris reminded me, the slowdown was because of this - should have checked again the archive, I remember it had been mentioned before. Bye, Andrea -- It is easier to fix Unix than to live with NT

Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 01:50:23AM +0100, Andrea Campi wrote: > I am noticing a severe slowdown on my -CURRENT system. It actually started > after Feb [3-5] changes in intrupt handling, but I didn't really notice > until I run a make world (which I delayed doing because of, well you guess, > the l

Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-22 Thread Andrea Campi
> > Hmm, Feb 3-5 (looks). > > You mean the preemptive scheduling committed on Feb 1? Can you try updating > to early this week to see if it goes away? Hi John, every "recent" version I tried resulted in a slowdown so I didn't recompile very often; until tonight, I was still runninng a kernel

Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-22 Thread Andrea Campi
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:20:46PM +, Pierre Y. Dampure wrote: > Andrea Campi wrote: > > > I am noticing a severe slowdown on my -CURRENT system. It actually started > > after Feb [3-5] changes in intrupt handling, but I didn't really notice > > until I run a make world (which I delayed doing

Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-22 Thread Pierre Y. Dampure
Andrea Campi wrote: > Nope, UDMA33 (IBM-DARA-20600 on IBM Thinkpad). > > Question: you built a world yesterday, but what world did you have BEFORE? I > mean, what matters is the kernel/world which was running while you were > compiling, was that recent (< 15 days old)? Are you seeing any lock rev

RE: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-21 Thread John Baldwin
On 20-Feb-01 Andrea Campi wrote: > I am noticing a severe slowdown on my -CURRENT system. It actually started > after Feb [3-5] changes in intrupt handling, but I didn't really notice > until I run a make world (which I delayed doing because of, well you guess, > the libc breakage). When I say se

Re: -CURRENT slowdown in last 2 weeks

2001-02-21 Thread Pierre Y. Dampure
Andrea Campi wrote: > I am noticing a severe slowdown on my -CURRENT system. It actually started > after Feb [3-5] changes in intrupt handling, but I didn't really notice > until I run a make world (which I delayed doing because of, well you guess, > the libc breakage). When I say severe I mean m