> Yes. But our 5.0-RELEASE is will non-polished; so I think having the
> compiler in the same shape is OK if it means we can get bugs fixed and
> our needs taken care of.
But it's still a relase. :-)
> Many IA-64, and AMD x86-64 bug fixes and improvements aren't merged back
> to the 3.{1,2} bran
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 09:26:32PM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
> > IMO going to 3.3 would be much better -- we can actually get our needs
> > better addressed as the compiler is still in development, but about to
> > head into code slush. We cannot affect GCC 3.2.1 too much due to it
> > being on a
> You might want to try the attached code-snippet I grabbed from the gcc
> GNATS. It manages to ICE 3.1 and 3.2 with a lot of optimizations,
> including pentium2/3/4 and athlon-* and is believed to trigger the same
> bug that borks XFree86 here.
XFree works fine (for me) with -O -march=athlon-x
> > > system compiler would make bug reports from -CURRENT users even more useful.
> > Indeed. IMHO going to 3.2 is the best we could do.
>
> IMO going to 3.3 would be much better -- we can actually get our needs
> better addressed as the compiler is still in development, but about to
> head into
David O'Brien wrote:
>>>I've got suggests that it's still present in all branches. I get the
>>>impression that not too many people really use gcc3 with heavy
>>>optimization on big stuff like XFree86 yet ... Of course, updating the
>>
>>XFree86 works like a charm built with -march=athlon-xp .
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:13:55AM +0200, Marc Recht wrote:
> > Because chances are good that the bugs still aren't fixed. I reported a
> > bug related to optimization with -march=athlon recently and the reply
> If you've got a newer Athlon (XP) then you could compile it with -march=athlon-xp.
>
> Because chances are good that the bugs still aren't fixed. I reported a
> bug related to optimization with -march=athlon recently and the reply
If you've got a newer Athlon (XP) then you could compile it with -march=athlon-xp.
I've filed a PR with a patch against bsd.cpu.mk (misc/41425) recent
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
>
>>>Please submit a full bug report,
>>>with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>>>See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
>>>*** Error code 1
>>>
>>>Stop in
>>>/usr/ports/x11-se
On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 03:59:47PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >Please submit a full bug report,
> >with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> >See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
> >*** Error code 1
> >
> >Stop in
>
>>/usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-Server/w
