On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 10:06:52PM -0800, Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But who will bell the cat? I vote for Snuffles.
Don't understand. Some inside joke or something based on US centric
TV? What are you trying to tell me? Remember I'm not native.
1930's/1940's cartoon
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:03:50AM -0800, David O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to see GCC 3.2.1 release be our 5.0-R compiler. However,
the GCC 3.2.1 release date kept slipping and in fact was nebulous for a
while. The same for our 5.0-R. So this has made it hard to decided
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 10:03:50AM -0800, David O'Brien
I would like to see GCC 3.2.1 release be our 5.0-R compiler. However,
the GCC 3.2.1 release date kept slipping and in fact was nebulous for a
while. The same for our 5.0-R. So this has made it hard to decided
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:52:27PM -0800, Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody with knowledge and time should generate patches, so it's
possible to at least test and report problems (or success). Given
that enough people give it a try and report, there's possibility for
import,
At 1:53 AM +0200 2002/11/24, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
But who will bell the cat? I vote for Snuffles.
Don't understand. Some inside joke or something based on US centric
TV? What are you trying to tell me? Remember I'm not native.
I am a native US citizen (well, caucasian ;-), and I don't
Belling the cat comes from a children's story, and is often referenced in
behavioral economics and game theory. The story goes, the mice decide that
life would be much safer if the cat were stuck with a bell around its neck.
This way the mice would hear the cat approaching. The problem is,
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 02:52:27PM -0800, Terry Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody with knowledge and time should generate patches, so it's
possible to at least test and report problems (or success). Given
that enough people give it a try and report, there's
Steve Kargl wrote:
Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
which is why I put the smiley's there.
Well, the 2-day old 3.2.1 fixes numerous problems
with our 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021009 (prerelease).
There is neither a gcc 3.2.1 nor a gcc 3.3 yet, so I would't use any of
them in a stable release.
In fact, there is a gcc 3.2.1 release. And it seems that 3.2.1 pre-release
will be the compiler for 5.0R.
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in
What does it do for all the other code in -ports, and in the
comp.source.* archives, and that anyone else has ever written,
such that you know it doesn't cause more problems than it
solves?
I don't think that the system cc is supposed to compile all code ever
written. IMHO It should compile the
It's a new import, and a complete regression test. Talk to the
maintainer: he's already made his statement, and you arguing with
I'm fine with it. In fact, I don't if I would be the gcc mainter if I would
import it. Probably not I guess..
me because I was willing to stand up and reiterate what
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 03:37:53AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Steve Kargl wrote:
Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
which is why I put the smiley's there.
Well, the 2-day old 3.2.1
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:04:40PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
I'm wondering if I should mention the new binutils.. :)
There will be a Binutils 2.13.2 import for 5.0-R w/in days.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 07:29:47AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
I respect David's judgement about bringing 3.2.1 into the
tree, but your statement above (totally blown out...)
suggests you don't follow GCC development. Several
significant bugs were fixed between our pre-release version
and
Thus spake David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
Don't worry about it; it's being totally blown out of proportion;
No problem.. :)
there's no way anyone will commit to importing a 2 day old 3.2.1,
which is why I put the smiley's
Steve Kargl wrote:
Supposedly, bringing in 3.2 was going to solve more problems
than it caused. It turns out the 4.x compiler, GCC 2.95.3,
also does not have an ICE as a result of compiling that code.
You know the reason why 3.2 pre-release was brought into
the tree, right? GCC has
David Schultz wrote:
It really comes down to a question of living with known bugs, or risking
gaining a new set of unknown bugs.
In theory, the set of bugs in an actual release should be smaller
than the set of bugs in a prerelease.
In theory, practice will be the same as theory. 8-)
Thus spake David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:57:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
Hi!
Will gcc 3.2.1/release be imported before 5.0R ? Just curious..
There will be no more GCC imports before 5.0-R. It is just too much code
churn with too little road testing
David Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will gcc 3.2.1/release be imported before 5.0R ? Just curious..
There will be no more GCC imports before 5.0-R. It is just too much code
churn with too little road testing before 5.0-R.
As I recall, the original plan was to import GCC 3.3 for
There is neither a gcc 3.2.1 nor a gcc 3.3 yet, so I would't use any of
them in a stable release.
gcc 3.2.1 has been uploaded on ftp.gnu.org at Nov. 19th.
Marc
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Marc Recht wrote:
There is neither a gcc 3.2.1 nor a gcc 3.3 yet, so I would't use any of
them in a stable release.
gcc 3.2.1 has been uploaded on ftp.gnu.org at Nov. 19th.
So it's been extensively tested by the full user base for the
last two days, and you should have known about it before
Marc Recht wrote:
So it's been extensively tested by the full user base for the
last two days, and you should have known about it before you
posted. 8-) 8-).
My original question was only if it will be imported before 5.0R. David
O'Brien already answered it with no. That's fine with me.
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 10:22:42PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
Marc Recht wrote:
So it's been extensively tested by the full user base for the
last two days, and you should have known about it before you
posted. 8-) 8-).
My original question was only if it will be imported before
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:57:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
Hi!
Will gcc 3.2.1/release be imported before 5.0R ? Just curious..
There will be no more GCC imports before 5.0-R. It is just too much code
churn with too little road testing before 5.0-R.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 08:14:49PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:57:41PM +0100, Marc Recht wrote:
Hi!
Will gcc 3.2.1/release be imported before 5.0R ? Just curious..
There will be no more GCC imports before 5.0-R. It is just too much code
churn with too little
25 matches
Mail list logo
