Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:08:55PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
solution is really as easy as it seems:
Hmmm I had been
Doug Barton wrote:
Ok, sounds like you guys have it under control. If the fix was this
"easy," I really wish that someone had pushed for its inclusion in
4.0-Release. This is going to be a big problem for people, and there are
enough hurdles into 4.0 already. :-/
There was some
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
solution is really as easy as it seems:
Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the problem with
install-info was that the system couldn't use the new binary. Are you
saying
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 09:57:22AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
solution is really as easy as it seems:
Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the problem with
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
This is a bug. If install-info is installed, then it isn't a build tool.
Build tools are programs/scripts that are needed to build the sources
only. They are not installed. Since install-info is installed, it can't
be a build tool. this means that we either use the
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
solution is really as easy as it seems:
Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the problem with
install-info was that the system couldn't use the new
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 02:08:55PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
Hi,
I was looking into fixing the install-info problem, and wondered if the
solution is really as easy as it seems:
Hmmm I had been thinking all along that the
