On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> Which mailing list would be appropriate for discussing kernel modules,
> etc.?
freebsd-arch.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PR
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
> > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
> > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at
> > boot when loading a stale linux.ko.
> >
> If making world _and_ kernel doesn't build modules, what _then
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Donn Miller wrote:
> I'd like to discuss further the possibility of creating some sort of
> mechanism where the modules can be built with the kernel. Also, we
> can have some sort of option in LINT or GENERIC where a keyword, such
> as module, can be put somewhere in the ke
Leif Neland wrote:
> > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
> > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at
> > boot when loading a stale linux.ko.
> >
> If making world _and_ kernel doesn't build modules, what _then_?
Making world build
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> > I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
> > there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
>
> make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a
< said:
> Looks like *really* nice idea. This would allow to solve "stale
> modules" problem at minimal cost.
Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away... (well, OK, seven years ago, in
FreeBSD 1.0) I was working on developing a loadable-module system for
FreeBSD (which I eventually threw out when Ter
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Then, we could add an option
> > "make modules" and "make install_modules" so that they could be
> > built/installed with the kernel.
> >
> > After all, modules ARE a part of the kernel...
>
> Looks like *really* nice idea. This would allow to solve "s
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> \begin{newbie question}
> So why aren't the modules built with the kernel instead of with the world?
> \end{newbie question}
I bitched about this on committers the other day and marcel told me it was being
worked on.
--
Bill Fumerol
Donn Miller wrote:
> Stijn Hoop wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
> > > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at
> > > boot when loading a stale l
Stijn Hoop wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
> > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at
> > boot when loading a stale linux.ko.
>
> \begin{newbie ques
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:56:08AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
> > that rapid developer folks can disable it.
>
> ITYM "rabid". And I kinda resent that.. ;-)
I really did mean rapid, as in those that are installing kernels every
10 mins to test changes.
Though, these da
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:56:08AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
> that rapid developer folks can disable it.
ITYM "rabid". And I kinda resent that.. ;-)
--
Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alex Zepeda writes:
> : Perhaps it's time to implement some sort of versioning in the modules to
> : prevent them from being loaded into the incorrect kernel.
>
> In theory that sounds nice, but in -current the kernel ABI changes too
> quickl
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> > I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
> > there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
>
> make world doesn't build a
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alex Zepeda writes:
: Perhaps it's time to implement some sort of versioning in the modules to
: prevent them from being loaded into the incorrect kernel.
In theory that sounds nice, but in -current the kernel ABI changes too
quickly for that to be effecitve. The
On Thursday, April 20 2000, 01:15:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
>On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
>> I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
>> there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
>
>make world doesn't build a ker
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
> there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
modules. This bit me again the other
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 10:18:38AM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> > The panic is gone. I disabled the loading of the linuxulator in /etc/rc.local
> > and re-brandelf'ed it. Unfortunately I have no longer any proof that
Yikes!
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:49:28PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> The panic is gone. I disabled the loading of the linuxulator in /etc/rc.local
> and re-brandelf'ed it. Unfortunately I have no longer any proof that
> it really *was* the linux emulator (should have made a copy). So what.
Modu
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> >
> > With a kernel built Apr 18th (and also today, Apr 19th) I'm getting
> > panics when starting up in multiuser mode but also strange things
> > happen wh
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 12:44:22PM +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> With a kernel built Apr 18th (and also today, Apr 19th) I'm getting
> panics when starting up in multiuser mode but also strange things
> happen when trying to boot /kernel -s
>
> In the latter case I was dropped into ddb af
With a kernel built Apr 18th (and also today, Apr 19th) I'm getting
panics when starting up in multiuser mode but also strange things
happen when trying to boot /kernel -s
In the latter case I was dropped into ddb after being prompted with
something like mountroot>
I'm running i4b (isdnd) and
22 matches
Mail list logo
