On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
:inet_addr()
:__inet_aton()
:inet_addr()
:__inet_aton()
:
I've had similar issues. I just sent in a pr yesterday where the
recursive call was to sigprocmask() -- this happened when I managed to
core sysinstall and when I managed to core cvs remotely.
Joerg,
> > first of all i want to apoligize. i sent the wrong output. yes, it
> > does the right thing if you use "-g" switch, however it does not
> > work for me if i use "-ggdb" switch.
>
> Indeed, the output generated with -ggdb looks weird. But then, it
> never occurred to me to use -ggdb a
As Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> first of all i want to apoligize. i sent the wrong output. yes, it
> does the right thing if you use "-g" switch, however it does not
> work for me if i use "-ggdb" switch.
Indeed, the output generated with -ggdb looks weird. But then, it
never occurred to me to use
Joerg,
> > i have some weird problem.
>
> Well, it would have been nice if you had told what you deemed to
> be the problem. ;-) I can't find any problem at all...
>
> > Breakpoint 1, main () at prog1.c:8
> > 8 return (foo(1, 2, '3', "test"));
> > (gdb) s
> > foo (i=1, s=10244, c=-
Maksim Yevmenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have some weird problem.
Well, it would have been nice if you had told what you deemed to
be the problem. ;-) I can't find any problem at all...
> Breakpoint 1, main () at prog1.c:8
> 8 return (foo(1, 2, '3', "test"));
> (gdb) s
> foo
"Alexander N. Kabaev" wrote:
>
> What is the problem exactly? It is hard to guess that from the
> information you posted.
>
> > foo (i=1, s=10244, c=-54 'J', str=0x804855b "test") at prog1.c:13
> Is that what bothers you? It happens because
> your code is compiled with no optimization, and t
Hackers,
first of all i want to apologize for posting this in -current.
this should probably go into -questions.
i have some weird problem. i have cvsup'ed and installed -current
yesterday. i have attached script(1) output. quick search came up
with nothing.
did i miss anything?
thanks
max
S
