would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
thanks
-kamal
On 9/9/05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 8 September 2005 at 20:41:49 +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Hello,
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
A little, but it never got
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
thanks
-kamal
There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but
that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only
because you think others desire your
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:31:15PM +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
To add to Mike's comments, if you're really keen on playing with
journalling, adding journalling support to UFS2 is something that
probably would be widely appreciated. AFAIK,
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:40:20PM -0700, erkan kolemen wrote:
Following code fails. I debugged it and saw that: it
produces No child processes error while wait().
is it possible, parent still is not start to wait but
child finished. After that CPU schedules parents. It
try to start wait
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq.
When I attempt to configure the pfsync0 interface the systems panic. The
systems currently have HTT
On Friday 09 September 2005 16:31, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
Core doesn't decide what stuff gets committed into FreeBSD.
Core doesn't control who writes things, or what they write, for FreeBSD.
If you write it, and it works well enough and you
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:40:20PM -0700, erkan kolemen wrote:
Following code fails. I debugged it and saw that: it
produces No child processes error while wait().
is it possible, parent still is not start to wait but
child finished. After that CPU schedules parents. It
try to start wait
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
There has been recent work to port several of the newer Linux file systems
to FreeBSD, including:
- Pretty old work to get the basic JFS userland tools working (status
unknown, likely very
From: Steve Suhre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know I've dealt with this before...but can't remember what the deal
was... I mount a remote server to /mnt and the mount command seems to
work, no errors or logged errors on either machine. But when I try to cd
to the /mnt folder on the client the server
Hi list,
I wonder whats the status of those summer of code projects.
From gjournal we heard that it has been completed but then nothing happens, any
further information about this?
Is somebody working on ufsj? Was the summer of code project successful?
best regards,
-Dennis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi list,
I wonder whats the status of those summer of code projects.
From gjournal we heard that it has been completed but then nothing happens, any
further information about this?
Is somebody working on ufsj? Was the summer of code project successful?
Scott Long is
From: Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
thanks
-kamal
There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but
that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only
Dominic Marks wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq.
When I attempt to configure the pfsync0 interface the systems panic. The
I came over a discussion on slashdot about an effort to implement
solaris dtrace for FreeBSD (sorry if this is not the news), the article
discussed:
http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Developer_aims_for_Dtrace_on_FreeBSD/0,261733,39210618,00.htm
On a somewhat related note (solaris):
Hello,
Does FreeBSD have 'software suspend' like linux ? or
maybe something similar...
Regards,
Pranav.J.Peshwe
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:28:39PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Robert Watson, and lo! it spake thus:
- Pretty recent work to get read-only reiserfs working (committed and in
the CVS repository).
Which, by the way, I just used earlier this week to pull data and
configs and such off an old and
I'm attempting to setup a few systems such that I can sniff traffic to and
from one computer. One requirment is this has to be as portable as
possible. I obtained a hub and setup the target and the sniffing system.
However, the sniffing system was not able to see all traffic to/from the
target.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:52:46PM +0530, Pranav Peshwe wrote:
Hello,
Does FreeBSD have 'software suspend' like linux ? or
maybe something similar...
No.
--
Bruno Ducrot
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2.
PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall
good 'ol hub, let me know.
Linksys is sort of well known for playing this trick: they call entry
level switches hub
Quite a few packages fail to install from CD due to the package
split across CD1 and CD2, and example of this is apache 1.3
The way this is dealt with needs some work as even installing
a small package can sometimes require 4 CD switches. Would
be much better if all the dependencies where
I have a ftpd server running in a jail and i want to
redirect the ftp traffic from my real host to jail.
I have already configured my traffic from 22 and 25 to
jail with natd and ipfw, but isn't working for ftp.
And i set all security.jail.* to 1 , (except
security.jail.jailed)
How can it be
On Friday 09 September 2005 15:05, Dominic Marks wrote:
Dominic Marks wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq.
When I
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:01:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Quite a few packages fail to install from CD due to the package
split across CD1 and CD2, and example of this is apache 1.3
You're sure this is the reason and not that amd64 packages were put on
the i386 disc 1 by mistake? ;-)
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2.
PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall
good 'ol hub, let me know.
Linksys is sort of
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2.
PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall
I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find
a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always
go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports.
I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if
you couldn't find it on some other
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
Google will tell you more about this, as well as suggesting real hubs.
I'd recommend to go with Netgear.
Ya, this was
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote:
I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find
a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always
go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports.
I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be
On Sep 09, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote:
I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find
a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always
go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports.
I know the
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:28:49PM -0700, Mike Hunter wrote:
On Sep 09, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote:
I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find
a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always
go for a
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:44:56PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2.
PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall
Hello fellow hackers,
I'm porting the NetBSD IrDA frame level driver irframe[1] to FreeBSD.
The port also, for now, includes a driver for one of the USB-IrDA
bridges supported by NetBSD - ustir[2] and a modified version of the
comms/birda suite. The initial work is done and both drivers compile
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:44:56PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote:
Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2.
PS If anyone knows of a hub
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: php extensions compile error
Date: Friday 09 September 2005 12:21
From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Compile error
/usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions
*
dns1# make
On Friday 09 September 2005 19:19, Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 09 September 2005 15:05, Dominic Marks wrote:
Dominic Marks wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
I also posted the following to freebsd-questions which has some relevance to
this thread - but I was uncertain about posting my earlier full report t that
list.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: libmagic files missing??
Date: Friday 09 September 2005 15:46
From: Vizion [EMAIL
Earlier in the linear time track, on approximately Fri, Sep 09,
2005 at 23:01 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] divulged this
public information:
From: Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Software suspend on FBSD.
To: Pranav Peshwe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Sergey Babkin wrote:
OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would
be something of use to many people, I suspect.
Why not go for ext3 instead of JFS then? It has
journaling in it.
-SB
I was thinking that as I wrote it as well, I'm not sure
38 matches
Mail list logo
