Re: JFS2 on freebsd
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? thanks -kamal On 9/9/05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday, 8 September 2005 at 20:41:49 +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: Hello, Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd? A little, but it never got finished. Hiten Pandya did the work a while back. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JFS2 on freebsd
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? thanks -kamal There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only because you think others desire your work, you'll probably give up when you have to start dealing with all the realities of the project. However, if you're motivated because *you* want to port JFS2, then you'll probably do a good job of it. So, of course support for new filesystem support is good, but my personal opinion is that JFS2 isn't worth your time, for two reasons: a) Even if it's BSD licensed, it's unlikely to displace UFS as our default filesystem. b) It's not a widely used filesystem, so it doesn't really increase our interoperability with other OSes. OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would be something of use to many people, I suspect. Mike Silby Silbersack ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JFS2 on freebsd
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:31:15PM +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? To add to Mike's comments, if you're really keen on playing with journalling, adding journalling support to UFS2 is something that probably would be widely appreciated. AFAIK, there's work underway on this and suggest you try freebsd-fs. -- Peter Jeremy ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: fok() execve() - No child processes
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:40:20PM -0700, erkan kolemen wrote: Following code fails. I debugged it and saw that: it produces No child processes error while wait(). is it possible, parent still is not start to wait but child finished. After that CPU schedules parents. It try to start wait but child has finished. is it possible... What can i do for that? If you want to use vfork(), then you should know that a child will borrow parent's memory and a parent is suspended while a child is using its resources (at least in BSD). A child is allowed to call only execve() or _exit() and it is not allowed to return from the function in which vfork() was called. A child can modify some data in the parent's memory (really shared memory by both processes), but this memory should be volatile (try to modify non-volatile variable in a child and check result in a parent and compile this test program with optimization). Read description and application usage of vfork() in SUSv3, it gives very hard limits on vfork() usage (if you are interesting in creating portable software). Also find discussions about vfork() in this mailing list and read another limitations on its usage in found letters. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 panics when when configuring pfsync0
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq.
When I attempt to configure the pfsync0 interface the systems panic. The
systems currently have HTT enabled, I've googled but I didn't find
anything to suggest pfsync was not SMP/HTT friendly. Could this be a
configuration problem?
interface:
# ifconfig em2
em2: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU
inet 172.16.254.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.16.254.255
ether 00:04:23:bd:7a:ef
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
command:
# ifconfig pfsync0 syncdev em2 syncpeer 172.16.254.1
panic message:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc067bfdc
stack pointer = 0x28:0xcca18aa0
frame pointer = 0x28:0xcca18ab4
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 84 (swi4: clock sio)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
Uptime: 17m1s
Dumping 255 MB (2 chunks)
backtrace:
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc065b55d in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:397
#2 0xc065b881 in panic (fmt=0xc0854645 %s)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:553
#3 0xc080cdfc in trap_fatal (frame=0xcca18a60, eva=36)
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:841
#4 0xc080c5b6 in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = 8, tf_es = 40, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = -1043696512, tf_esi =
-106424 5856, tf_ebp = -861828428, tf_isp =
-861828468, tf_ebx = -1051017216, tf_edx = -
1043696512, tf_ecx = -1051126400, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12,
tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1066942500, tf_cs =
32, tf_eflags = 65670, tf_esp = 52, tf_ss = 0})
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:272
#5 0xc07fa5ca in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
#6 0x0008 in ?? ()
#7 0x0028 in ?? ()
#8 0x0028 in ?? ()
#9 0xc1ca7480 in ?? ()
#10 0xc090e5a0 in pfi_buffer_max ()
#11 0xcca18ab4 in ?? ()
#12 0xcca18a8c in ?? ()
#13 0xc15ac000 in ?? ()
#14 0xc1ca7480 in ?? ()
#15 0xc1591580 in ?? ()
#16 0x in ?? ()
#17 0x000c in ?? ()
#18 0x in ?? ()
#19 0xc067bfdc in propagate_priority (td=0xc1ca7480)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:234
#20 0xc067c8f1 in turnstile_wait (lock=0xc090e5a0, owner=0xc1ca7480)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:629
#21 0xc0652cb0 in _mtx_lock_sleep (m=0xc090e5a0, tid=3243950080, opts=0,
file=0x0, line=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:549
#22 0xc04768ed in pf_test (dir=2, ifp=0xc16ae000, m0=0xcca18c18, eh=0x0,
inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:6284
#23 0xc047f74b in pf_check_out (arg=0x0, m=0xcca18c18, ifp=0xc16ae000, dir=2,
inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c:3386
#24 0xc06d1837 in pfil_run_hooks (ph=0xc0934740, mp=0xcca18c8c,
ifp=0xc16ae000, dir=2, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/net/pfil.c:139
#25 0xc06f7172 in ip_output (m=0xc177e900, opt=0xc177e988, ro=0xcca18c58,
flags=2, imo=0xc16e3e08, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:666
#26 0xc0469dc2 in pfsync_senddef (arg=0xc16e3e00)
at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/if_pfsync.c:1829
#27 0xc0667bea in softclock (dummy=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:295
#28 0xc0646d11 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc15bc480)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:545
#29 0xc0645dd5 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0646bc4 ithread_loop,
arg=0xc15bc480, frame=0xcca18d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:789
#30 0xc07fa62c in fork_trampoline () at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:208
dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 #1: Tue Sep 6 15:44:57 BST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FIREWALL
ACPI APIC Table: DELL PESC1425
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3200.12-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACP
I,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
Features2=0x641dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14
AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs
real memory = 268173312 (255 MB)
avail memory = 252772352 (241 MB)
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0
cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1
Re: JFS2 on freebsd
On Friday 09 September 2005 16:31, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? Core doesn't decide what stuff gets committed into FreeBSD. Core doesn't control who writes things, or what they write, for FreeBSD. If you write it, and it works well enough and you are prepared to maintain it, it will almost certainly be committed. FreeBSD works from the ground up, not the other way around. If you want it, write it :) PS I am not a core member :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from. -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C pgpR4z0oIzuUP.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: fok() execve() - No child processes
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 12:40:20PM -0700, erkan kolemen wrote:
Following code fails. I debugged it and saw that: it
produces No child processes error while wait().
is it possible, parent still is not start to wait but
child finished. After that CPU schedules parents. It
try to start wait but child has finished.
is it possible... What can i do for that?
[snip]
default:
if (wait(stat) == -1) {
slog(1, LOG_ERR);
return -14;
}
Just an idea: what happens if you try waitpid(pid, stat, 0) instead
of wait(stat)?
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
I've heard that this sentence is a rumor.
pgpgY22C3LxXB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: JFS2 on freebsd
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd? There has been recent work to port several of the newer Linux file systems to FreeBSD, including: - Pretty old work to get the basic JFS userland tools working (status unknown, likely very stale due to the passage of time). - Pretty recent work to get read-only reiserfs working (committed and in the CVS repository). - Pretty recent work to get read-only XFS working (external repository, but publicly available). Also potentially of interesting: - Increasingly dated work to port the pre-journalled version of HFS+ to FreeBSD, which works well subject to the datedness and pre-journalledness of the work. There's also on-going work on a journalled version of UFS. I'm sure the authors of any of these would be interested in someone lending a hand -- I know there have been specific appeals for interest from the XFS crowd in the last month, along with test patches, etc, for example. You might want to post to freebsd-fs looking for details on the various projects. Robert N M Watson ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: NFS hanging
From: Steve Suhre [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know I've dealt with this before...but can't remember what the deal was... I mount a remote server to /mnt and the mount command seems to work, no errors or logged errors on either machine. But when I try to cd to the /mnt folder on the client the server hangs. I can't do an ls without it hanging either. I can't even kill the ls process, the client needs to be rebooted to clear any hung commands. The client is running an older version of bsd (BSDI), the nfs server FreeBSD 5.4. Any help would be appreciated. Looks like the mountd daemon on the server is working fine but nfsd is not. Check if it's running, if the versions are matching, and such. -SB ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status of ufsj and gjournal
Hi list, I wonder whats the status of those summer of code projects. From gjournal we heard that it has been completed but then nothing happens, any further information about this? Is somebody working on ufsj? Was the summer of code project successful? best regards, -Dennis This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: status of ufsj and gjournal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I wonder whats the status of those summer of code projects. From gjournal we heard that it has been completed but then nothing happens, any further information about this? Is somebody working on ufsj? Was the summer of code project successful? Scott Long is the core person working on ufsj, and I have seen some stuff worked on in his perforce tree, but I think it's a ways away from being beta. I'm sure he would welcome help. gjournal is 'complete', but still beta, mostly (I think) due to lack of bug reports/testing. I know I have been playing with it, and have had no real problems with the current beta. It's a very cool tool, however it won't help with fsck's - it's aimed at solving other problems. Eric -- Eric AndersonSr. Systems AdministratorCentaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: JFS2 on freebsd
From: Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote: would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core? thanks -kamal There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only because you think others desire your work, you'll probably give up when you have to start dealing with all the realities of the project. However, if you're motivated because *you* want to port JFS2, then you'll probably do a good job of it. So, of course support for new filesystem support is good, but my personal opinion is that JFS2 isn't worth your time, for two reasons: a) Even if it's BSD licensed, it's unlikely to displace UFS as our default filesystem. b) It's not a widely used filesystem, so it doesn't really increase our interoperability with other OSes. OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would be something of use to many people, I suspect. Why not go for ext3 instead of JFS then? It has journaling in it. -SB ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 panics when when configuring pfsync0
Dominic Marks wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq.
When I attempt to configure the pfsync0 interface the systems panic. The
systems currently have HTT enabled, I've googled but I didn't find
anything to suggest pfsync was not SMP/HTT friendly. Could this be a
configuration problem?
interface:
# ifconfig em2
em2: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU
inet 172.16.254.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.16.254.255
ether 00:04:23:bd:7a:ef
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
command:
# ifconfig pfsync0 syncdev em2 syncpeer 172.16.254.1
Following a little more testing:
If I don't specify a syncpeer I don't get the panic.
panic message:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x24
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc067bfdc
stack pointer = 0x28:0xcca18aa0
frame pointer = 0x28:0xcca18ab4
code segment= base 0x0, limit 0xf, type 0x1b
= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags= resume, IOPL = 0
current process = 84 (swi4: clock sio)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
cpuid = 0
Uptime: 17m1s
Dumping 255 MB (2 chunks)
backtrace:
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory.
in pcpu.h
(kgdb) bt
#0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165
#1 0xc065b55d in boot (howto=260) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:397
#2 0xc065b881 in panic (fmt=0xc0854645 %s)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:553
#3 0xc080cdfc in trap_fatal (frame=0xcca18a60, eva=36)
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:841
#4 0xc080c5b6 in trap (frame=
{tf_fs = 8, tf_es = 40, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = -1043696512, tf_esi =
-106424 5856, tf_ebp = -861828428, tf_isp =
-861828468, tf_ebx = -1051017216, tf_edx = -
1043696512, tf_ecx = -1051126400, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12,
tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1066942500, tf_cs =
32, tf_eflags = 65670, tf_esp = 52, tf_ss = 0})
at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:272
#5 0xc07fa5ca in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
#6 0x0008 in ?? ()
#7 0x0028 in ?? ()
#8 0x0028 in ?? ()
#9 0xc1ca7480 in ?? ()
#10 0xc090e5a0 in pfi_buffer_max ()
#11 0xcca18ab4 in ?? ()
#12 0xcca18a8c in ?? ()
#13 0xc15ac000 in ?? ()
#14 0xc1ca7480 in ?? ()
#15 0xc1591580 in ?? ()
#16 0x in ?? ()
#17 0x000c in ?? ()
#18 0x in ?? ()
#19 0xc067bfdc in propagate_priority (td=0xc1ca7480)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:234
#20 0xc067c8f1 in turnstile_wait (lock=0xc090e5a0, owner=0xc1ca7480)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:629
#21 0xc0652cb0 in _mtx_lock_sleep (m=0xc090e5a0, tid=3243950080, opts=0,
file=0x0, line=0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_mutex.c:549
#22 0xc04768ed in pf_test (dir=2, ifp=0xc16ae000, m0=0xcca18c18, eh=0x0,
inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c:6284
#23 0xc047f74b in pf_check_out (arg=0x0, m=0xcca18c18, ifp=0xc16ae000,
dir=2,
inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf_ioctl.c:3386
#24 0xc06d1837 in pfil_run_hooks (ph=0xc0934740, mp=0xcca18c8c,
ifp=0xc16ae000, dir=2, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/net/pfil.c:139
#25 0xc06f7172 in ip_output (m=0xc177e900, opt=0xc177e988, ro=0xcca18c58,
flags=2, imo=0xc16e3e08, inp=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:666
#26 0xc0469dc2 in pfsync_senddef (arg=0xc16e3e00)
at /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/if_pfsync.c:1829
#27 0xc0667bea in softclock (dummy=0x0) at
/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:295
#28 0xc0646d11 in ithread_loop (arg=0xc15bc480)
at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:545
#29 0xc0645dd5 in fork_exit (callout=0xc0646bc4 ithread_loop,
arg=0xc15bc480, frame=0xcca18d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:789
#30 0xc07fa62c in fork_trampoline () at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:208
dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 #1: Tue Sep 6 15:44:57 BST 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FIREWALL
ACPI APIC Table: DELL PESC1425
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (3200.12-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACP
I,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
Features2=0x641dSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,CNTX-ID,CX16,b14
AMD Features=0x2010NX,LM
dtrace
I came over a discussion on slashdot about an effort to implement solaris dtrace for FreeBSD (sorry if this is not the news), the article discussed: http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Developer_aims_for_Dtrace_on_FreeBSD/0,261733,39210618,00.htm On a somewhat related note (solaris): I also saw a posting in threads-related newsgroup about something called cyclic subsystem in solaris for high-precision timimg: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/eschrock?anchor=inside_the_cyclic_subsystem Looks quite interesting, although probably not a junior hacker's level. -- Andriy Gapon ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software suspend on FBSD.
Hello, Does FreeBSD have 'software suspend' like linux ? or maybe something similar... Regards, Pranav.J.Peshwe ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: JFS2 on freebsd
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:28:39PM +0100 I heard the voice of Robert Watson, and lo! it spake thus: - Pretty recent work to get read-only reiserfs working (committed and in the CVS repository). Which, by the way, I just used earlier this week to pull data and configs and such off an old and unlamentedly dead Mandrake box onto its (6-BETA) FreeBSD replacement, and which worked well enough to have me quietly giggling while it copied8-} -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Smart Hubs
I'm attempting to setup a few systems such that I can sniff traffic to and from one computer. One requirment is this has to be as portable as possible. I obtained a hub and setup the target and the sniffing system. However, the sniffing system was not able to see all traffic to/from the target. The lights on the hub blinked over the uplink (internet) and the target, but not the sniffer. Next I tried my laptop as the sniffer (7-CURRENT, had tried both a Windows laptop and a laptop booted off a Linux live-filesystem). I was able to spoof the MAC address and IP on the sniffer (freebsd) and set monitor mode for the interface. However, I still was not able to see traffic to/from the target. The whole time though I have been able to, of course, see broadcast traffic. With the spoofed ip/mac though if I unplug the hub and then plug it back in, or periodically when leaving it plugged in, the sniffer will get a brief glimpse at a packet or two that was sent to the target system. This suggests to me the hub is learning, somehow. My question though is how? I took the sniffer out of monitor mode and generated a few ARP packets by pinging unused IPs. I also ran ethereal on the target. The target saw the ARPs generated by the sniffer system and the source address was correct, it was the mac address both systems were using. How is the hub able to tell these systems apart? Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2. All this was done at 100mbit full-duplex. Freebsd laptop nic won't drop to half and I'm not sure how to force linux (target's os) to use anything other than it's auto-config. PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall good 'ol hub, let me know. -- Ryan Sommers ryans a_t rpsommers.com (obsolete: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software suspend on FBSD.
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:52:46PM +0530, Pranav Peshwe wrote: Hello, Does FreeBSD have 'software suspend' like linux ? or maybe something similar... No. -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Smart Hubs
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote: Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2. PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall good 'ol hub, let me know. Linksys is sort of well known for playing this trick: they call entry level switches hub and reserve switch for higher-level equipment. Which is fine for people who just have to check email and play Quake, but screws you to no end when you actually need a hub :-/ Google will tell you more about this, as well as suggesting real hubs. I'd recommend to go with Netgear. Bye, Andrea -- Press every key to continue. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6.0-BETA4 package install failures
Quite a few packages fail to install from CD due to the package split across CD1 and CD2, and example of this is apache 1.3 The way this is dealt with needs some work as even installing a small package can sometimes require 4 CD switches. Would be much better if all the dependencies where analised and then all packages from one CD installed followed by those from the other. Steve This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ftpd in a jail
I have a ftpd server running in a jail and i want to redirect the ftp traffic from my real host to jail. I have already configured my traffic from 22 and 25 to jail with natd and ipfw, but isn't working for ftp. And i set all security.jail.* to 1 , (except security.jail.jailed) How can it be done? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 panics when when configuring pfsync0
On Friday 09 September 2005 15:05, Dominic Marks wrote: Dominic Marks wrote: Hello, I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4. Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq. When I attempt to configure the pfsync0 interface the systems panic. The systems currently have HTT enabled, I've googled but I didn't find anything to suggest pfsync was not SMP/HTT friendly. Could this be a configuration problem? interface: # ifconfig em2 em2: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500 options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU inet 172.16.254.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.16.254.255 ether 00:04:23:bd:7a:ef media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) status: active command: # ifconfig pfsync0 syncdev em2 syncpeer 172.16.254.1 Following a little more testing: If I don't specify a syncpeer I don't get the panic. Thanks for the dump. Seems like we were leaking a lock from pfsyncioctl(). Can you please try this patch and report back. Thanks in advance. -- /\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News pgpw6OUsYwVGQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: 6.0-BETA4 package install failures
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:01:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: Quite a few packages fail to install from CD due to the package split across CD1 and CD2, and example of this is apache 1.3 You're sure this is the reason and not that amd64 packages were put on the i386 disc 1 by mistake? ;-) Kris pgpiWrOoqgJfx.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Smart Hubs
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote: Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2. PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall good 'ol hub, let me know. Linksys is sort of well known for playing this trick: they call entry level switches hub and reserve switch for higher-level equipment. Which is fine for people who just have to check email and play Quake, but screws you to no end when you actually need a hub :-/ Google will tell you more about this, as well as suggesting real hubs. I'd recommend to go with Netgear. Alternativly, if you can get your hands on a second ethernet port for your sniffer box, make a passive tap: http://www.snort.org/docs/tap/ -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 pgp6iMw65AWJ3.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Smart Hubs
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote: Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2. PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall good 'ol hub, let me know. Linksys is sort of well known for playing this trick: they call entry level switches hub and reserve switch for higher-level equipment. Which is fine for people who just have to check email and play Quake, but screws you to no end when you actually need a hub :-/ Google will tell you more about this, as well as suggesting real hubs. I'd recommend to go with Netgear. Alternativly, if you can get your hands on a second ethernet port for your sniffer box, make a passive tap: I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. -- DE ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Smart Hubs
I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. Or if you have 3 nics, use if_bridge. Or buy a really expensive managed switch, which allows you to mirror ports, vlans etc. Arne ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 'Smart' Hubs
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:48:41PM +0200, Andrea Campi wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote: Google will tell you more about this, as well as suggesting real hubs. I'd recommend to go with Netgear. Ya, this was something of a last minute job we needed to do. We tried googling around, this hub was mentioned to work on the Ethereal wiki. Must have been misreported. Alternativly, if you can get your hands on a second ethernet port for your sniffer box, make a passive tap: This looks intrieging. Trouble is the 2nd port; as I mentioned we want this to be as portable as possible so we could deploy it in the field with minimal equiptment outside what we normally carry on jobs. I'd like it to work with a laptop, if possible. A USB 10/100 jobby might do the trick. I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. This is something I'm going to look into. I just didn't know off-hand what switches offered a monitor port, or what I'd be needing to spend. What I'm actually thinking of doing is getting a Soekris net4801 (3 Ethernet ports). I could set it up with FreeBSD or miniBSD and set it to do a layer-2 bridge between two of the ports. I'm not sure if the bridge device allows it, but I could set all three up for bridging and then let one port be the sniffer. Or, I thought it would be nice to just set it up with 2 ports bridged and then use the 3rd port as the managment port. I might be able to run a firewire card off the net4801 provided there is enough power and then attach an IDE-Firewire for a storage drive. Then just run tcpdump on the net4801 on the bridge device and store it to the storage drive. Or set it up with something like SMB, NFS or FTP to pull capture files down over the management nic port. Either way, this is a small piece of equiptment that could be portable and could allow us to use laptops for analyzing the traffic dumps. I've been looking for an excuse to get a net4801 to play with. :) Thanks for the replies by the way. -- Ryan Sommers ryans a_t rpsommers.com (obsolete: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Smart Hubs
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote: I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. Or if you have 3 nics, use if_bridge. Or buy a really expensive managed switch, which allows you to mirror ports, vlans etc. Well, is $175.00 US expensive? The Netgear FS726T can be had for about that price, and according to Netgear's web site, will support port monitoring. A 24-port switch may not be small enough for you, but if you look around enough, you might find something that is. -- DE ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Smart Hubs
On Sep 09, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote: I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. Or if you have 3 nics, use if_bridge. Or buy a really expensive managed switch, which allows you to mirror ports, vlans etc. Well, is $175.00 US expensive? The Netgear FS726T can be had for about that price, and according to Netgear's web site, will support port monitoring. A 24-port switch may not be small enough for you, but if you look around enough, you might find something that is. I think it violates specifications, but how about a physical copper tap, like a two-headed cable? Has anybody ever tried something like this? Ethernet was designed in the days of shared media Mike ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Smart Hubs
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 01:28:49PM -0700, Mike Hunter wrote: On Sep 09, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Arne Schwabe wrote: I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. Or if you have 3 nics, use if_bridge. Or buy a really expensive managed switch, which allows you to mirror ports, vlans etc. Well, is $175.00 US expensive? The Netgear FS726T can be had for about that price, and according to Netgear's web site, will support port monitoring. A 24-port switch may not be small enough for you, but if you look around enough, you might find something that is. I think it violates specifications, but how about a physical copper tap, like a two-headed cable? Has anybody ever tried something like this? Ethernet was designed in the days of shared media That would be what the link I posted earlier does. With full-duplex connections, you need two recieve lines to get traffic in both directions, but it does in fact work. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form X is the one, true Y is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 pgpxTz4CwrYha.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Smart Hubs
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:44:56PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote: Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2. PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall good 'ol hub, let me know. ... Alternativly, if you can get your hands on a second ethernet port for your sniffer box, make a passive tap: I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. I think most managed switches let you do this. The keyword being managed and a managed switch is always going to be far more expensive than a hub. This is mostly useful if you already have the infrastructure in place and just want to look at one of the systems attached to the switch. Note that both hubs and port cloning imply bandwidth limitations: All the traffic to and from the target system has to be transmited to your sniffer on a single link. This limits you to half-duplex speed. Depending on your requirements, this may or may not be a problem. If it is, you are going to be very careful about specifying and configuring your sniffer box to make sure it can actually handle the traffic load. Overall, I also recommend using dual NICs to create a passive tap. -- Peter Jeremy ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetBSD irframe and ustir port to FreeBSD
Hello fellow hackers, I'm porting the NetBSD IrDA frame level driver irframe[1] to FreeBSD. The port also, for now, includes a driver for one of the USB-IrDA bridges supported by NetBSD - ustir[2] and a modified version of the comms/birda suite. The initial work is done and both drivers compile and load without problems under FreeBSD 5.4. Due to lack of hardware I haven't been able to test it properly. The ustir driver works for dongles with the Sigmatel 4200 USB-IrDA chip. I have one with a Sigmatel 4210 chip (which has a GPL linux driver) and am trying to make it work. Sigmatel haven't been very cooperative in supplying datasheets, but I guess I'll keep trying/bugging them. So, if there is anyone interested in testing the driver and has the time and the hardware (the man page says, that a Mars II 740 USB IrDA Adapter should do the work), I'll be very pleased to hear from him. The next step will be to port the uirda[3] driver, which supports more devices, and also to get a piece of hardware that's supported and make it actually work :-) If you're still wondering what's this all about, the irframe and device drivers will make it, for example, possible to use your mobile phone and an USB-IrDA dongle for dial-up or synchronisation. At the moment this is only possible if you have an IrDA transceiver masked as a serial port in your laptop/desktop. Or if you use bluetooth. Instructions on patching the source are available here: http://0xdeadc0de.net/v/usb-irda/ Hats off to Lennart Augustsson, David Sainty, Tommy Bohlin and the other NetBSD hackers for writing the code. Cheers, Viktor [1] http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?irframe++NetBSD-current [2] http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?ustir+4+NetBSD-current [3] http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi?uirda+4+NetBSD-current -- I have great faith in fools; self-confidence, my friends call it. -- Edgar Allan Poe ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Smart Hubs
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 02:44:56PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Brooks Davis wrote: On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 08:39:30AM -0600, Ryan P. Sommers wrote: Hub in question is a linksys NH1005 v2. PS If anyone knows of a hub that's easy to find and still is an actuall good 'ol hub, let me know. ... Alternativly, if you can get your hands on a second ethernet port for your sniffer box, make a passive tap: I came in kinda late to this thread, but if you're trying to find a hub/switch in order to sniff network traffic, then you can always go for a switch that let's you monitor traffic on other ports. I know the Cisco's will let you do this, but I'd be suprised if you couldn't find it on some other cheaper switches. I think most managed switches let you do this. The keyword being managed and a managed switch is always going to be far more expensive than a hub. This is mostly useful if you already have the infrastructure in place and just want to look at one of the systems attached to the switch. Like I pointed out, though, it isn't as expensive as you think ($175 US for the Netgear). That's equivalent to about 2 hours of labor time at the rate my company charges. -- DE ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: php extensions compile error
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: php extensions compile error Date: Friday 09 September 2005 12:21 From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compile error /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions * dns1# make === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Found saved configuration for php5-extensions-1.0 === Extracting for php5-extensions-1.0 === Patching for php5-extensions-1.0 === Configuring for php5-extensions-1.0 dns1# make dns1# make install === Installing for php5-extensions-1.0 . /* much cut out */ . = Checksum OK for PECL/Fileinfo-1.0.tgz. === Patching for pecl-fileinfo-1.0 === Applying FreeBSD patches for pecl-fileinfo-1.0 === Ignoring patchfile /usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo/files/patch-config.m4,v === pecl-fileinfo-1.0 depends on executable: phpize - found === pecl-fileinfo-1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf259 - found === PHPizing for pecl-fileinfo-1.0 Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20031224 Zend Module Api No: 20041030 Zend Extension Api No: 220040412 === Configuring for pecl-fileinfo-1.0 configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking if compiler supports -R... yes checking for PHP prefix... /usr/local checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/local/lib/php/20041030 checking for re2c... exit 0; checking for gawk... gawk checking for fileinfo support... yes, shared checking for magic files in default path... not found configure: error: Please reinstall the libmagic distribution === Script configure failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [maintainer] and attach the /usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo/work/Fileinfo-1.0/config.log including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions. /*OUTPUT OF /usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo/work/Fileinfo-1.0/config.log */ *** dns1# locate libmagic /usr/lib/libmagic.a /usr/lib/libmagic.so /usr/lib/libmagic.so.1 /usr/lib/libmagic_p.a /usr/share/man/cat3/libmagic.3.gz /usr/share/man/man3/libmagic.3.gz /usr/src/contrib/file/libmagic.man /usr/src/contrib/file/libmagic.man,v /usr/src/lib/libmagic /usr/src/lib/libmagic/Makefile /usr/src/lib/libmagic/Makefile,v /usr/src/lib/libmagic/config.h /usr/src/lib/libmagic/config.h,v ** dns1# cat /usr/ports/sysutils/pecl-fileinfo/work/Fileinfo-1.0/config.log This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. It was created by configure, which was generated by GNU Autoconf 2.59. Invocation command line was $ ./configure --with-fileinfo=/usr --prefix=/usr/local i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 ## - ## ## Platform. ## ## - ## hostname = dns1.vizion2000.net uname -m = i386 uname -r = 5.3-RELEASE uname -s = FreeBSD uname -v = FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC /usr/bin/uname -p = i386 /bin/uname -X = unknown /bin/arch = unknown /usr/bin/arch -k = unknown /usr/convex/getsysinfo = unknown hostinfo = unknown /bin/machine = unknown /usr/bin/oslevel = unknown /bin/universe = unknown PATH: /usr/local/libexec/autoconf259 PATH: /sbin PATH: /bin PATH: /usr/sbin PATH: /usr/bin PATH: /usr/games PATH: /usr/local/sbin PATH: /usr/local/bin PATH: /usr/X11R6/bin PATH: /root/bin ## --- ## ## Core tests. ## ## --- ## configure:1499: checking build system type configure:1517: result: i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 configure:1525: checking host system type configure:1539: result: i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 configure:1601: checking for i386-portbld-freebsd5.3-gcc configure:1627: result: cc configure:1909: checking for C compiler version configure:1912: cc --version /dev/null 5 cc (GCC) 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728 Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
Re: FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4 panics when when configuring pfsync0
On Friday 09 September 2005 19:19, Max Laier wrote:
On Friday 09 September 2005 15:05, Dominic Marks wrote:
Dominic Marks wrote:
Hello,
I am setting up a redundant firewall setup for our company, the systems
are identically configured Dell servers running FreeBSD 6.0-BETA4.
Software being used is pf, carp, pfsync and altq.
When I attempt to configure the pfsync0 interface the systems panic.
The systems currently have HTT enabled, I've googled but I didn't find
anything to suggest pfsync was not SMP/HTT friendly. Could this be a
configuration problem?
interface:
# ifconfig em2
em2: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
options=bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU
inet 172.16.254.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.16.254.255
ether 00:04:23:bd:7a:ef
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
command:
# ifconfig pfsync0 syncdev em2 syncpeer 172.16.254.1
Following a little more testing:
If I don't specify a syncpeer I don't get the panic.
Thanks for the dump. Seems like we were leaking a lock from pfsyncioctl().
Can you please try this patch and report back. Thanks in advance.
And the patch ... sorry.
--
/\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661
X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
Index: if_pfsync.c
===
RCS file: /usr/store/mlaier/fcvs/src/sys/contrib/pf/net/if_pfsync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.19.2.2
diff -u -p -r1.19.2.2 if_pfsync.c
--- if_pfsync.c 25 Aug 2005 05:01:03 - 1.19.2.2
+++ if_pfsync.c 9 Sep 2005 17:16:39 -
@@ -1128,14 +1128,14 @@ pfsyncioctl(struct ifnet *ifp, u_long cm
imo-imo_multicast_ifp = sc-sc_sync_ifp;
imo-imo_multicast_ttl = PFSYNC_DFLTTL;
imo-imo_multicast_loop = 0;
+#ifdef __FreeBSD__
+ PF_LOCK();
+#endif
}
if (sc-sc_sync_ifp ||
sc-sc_sendaddr.s_addr != INADDR_PFSYNC_GROUP) {
/* Request a full state table update. */
-#ifdef __FreeBSD__
- PF_LOCK();
-#endif
sc-sc_ureq_sent = time_uptime;
#if NCARP 0
if (pfsync_sync_ok)
pgpPK4JskHogx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: Fwd: php extensions compile error
I also posted the following to freebsd-questions which has some relevance to this thread - but I was uncertain about posting my earlier full report t that list. -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: libmagic files missing?? Date: Friday 09 September 2005 15:46 From: Vizion [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Hi Here is the listing of: /usr/src/lib/libmagic dns1# ls -l total 1276 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1619 Dec 16 2004 Makefile -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3859 Apr 2 22:28 Makefile,v -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 5783 Aug 9 2004 config.h -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 6277 Apr 2 22:28 config.h,v -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1236221 Sep 9 15:34 magic -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel22879 Sep 9 15:34 mkmagic I am getting compile problems over libmagic and am wondering how I can be certain that all libmagic files are on the system. dns1# pwd /usr/share/misc dns1# ls -l | grep magic -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 360801 Nov 4 2004 magic -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 771456 Nov 4 2004 magic.mgc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel30231 Nov 4 2004 magic.mime -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel41728 Nov 4 2004 magic.mime.mgc /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions compile reporting it cannot find libmagic Can anyone please point a fingure in the right direction thanks david -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing bound for Europe via Panama Canal after completing engineroom refit. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- 40 yrs navigating and computing in blue waters. English Owner Captain of British Registered 60' bluewater Ketch S/V Taurus. Currently in San Diego, CA. Sailing bound for Europe via Panama Canal after completing engineroom refit. ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Software suspend on FreeBSD
Earlier in the linear time track, on approximately Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 23:01 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] divulged this public information: From: Bruno Ducrot [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Software suspend on FBSD. To: Pranav Peshwe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 07:52:46PM +0530, Pranav Peshwe wrote: Hello, Does FreeBSD have 'software suspend' like linux ? or maybe something similar... No. Yes. It depends upon which shell you are using. For shells that support it you just suspend it with control-Z. A restart is issued with 'fg' - foreground. Unless of course the OP means something entirely different. -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re: JFS2 on freebsd
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Sergey Babkin wrote: OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would be something of use to many people, I suspect. Why not go for ext3 instead of JFS then? It has journaling in it. -SB I was thinking that as I wrote it as well, I'm not sure why I didn't state it. But before ext3's journalling extensions could be implemented, ext2 would have to be brought up to date. Also, it would be nice if ext2 could be reimplemented in BSD licensed code before undergoing that ext3 conversion. :) Mike Silby Silbersack ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
