Jamie Heckford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In all honesty, I am just looking for something to play
with and see how fast FreeBSD can go.
I'd say about 2.8 m/s/s, given sufficient height.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jamie Heckford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In all honesty, I am just looking for something to play
with and see how fast FreeBSD can go.
I'd say about 2.8 m/s/s, given sufficient height.
Doh! I mean 9.8 m/s/s, of course.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
ll notice"
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
; nor does it chroot as far as I recall.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
'm
tempted to reply "not much more than it already is". Eivind and I
rewrote it for our previous employer, but the mod is part of a large
chunk of proprietary code, unfortunately.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
the scripts so we're reasonably confident that they can't do
much harm except to themselves.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Chris Stenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fatal server error:
xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
This is your clue.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fr
"Crist J. Clark" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 01:51:43AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Chris Stenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fatal server error:
xf86OpenConsole: Server must be suid root
This is your
happens ?
If the value you return is non-zero, see above. If it's zero, the
userland syscall code returns p-p_retval[0] to the caller.
* Does this logic also apply to the Linux syscall stuff in the kernel?
I think so. Marcel would be better placed to answer that.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
ed setting some option in the kernel and compiling a new
one.
Congratulations, you just invented capabilities! :)
http://www.trustedbsd.org/
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
and pointers are
the same size), but that's no reason not to do things right.
Also, I don't see the point in munging the Makefile like you do - I
think we can live with having a Makefile that's slightly (and
trivially) different from NetBSD's.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
looked at the libutil Makefile. Thanks!
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Arun Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another advantage of truss is that the output is online and interactive.
ktrace requires you to use kdump to view the trace.
I certainly wouldn't call truss interactive. As for online, see
the -l command-line option to kdump.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav
one int
at a time from process memory whereas with /proc/pid/mem you can read
as much as you want in one go.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Huh? Int on alpha is 32, and pointer is 64.
I thought we were ILP64 on 64-bit archs, but you're right. And I
ought to know better...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your rcorder patch is incorrect.
Here's a correct patch. Does anybody mind if I commit this and
connect rcorder(8) to the build?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: Makefile
Eugene L. Vorokov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Uhmz ?
Your shell is broken.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Nov 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
I've set up a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Any reason this can't/shouldn't be a freebsd.org mailing list?
Mostly because setting up a freebsd.org mailing list takes time and I
wasn't willing to wait
for PR handling in the context
of the FreeBSD Project.
To subscribe, send the usual magic incantations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Gary Jennejohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This seems like a fatal name for the list considering what
buggers means.
I know perfectly well what it means. I did say the list was informal,
didn't I? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
getting converted to heat by their
equipment, but they generally have good cooling, so if you don't
overdo it you should be OK.
I hope this answers your question.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
Guido van Rooij [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I aks which shell you are using?
Zsh.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In short: The data is tranfered into the kernel and dropped there.
The data is never transferred into the kernel. There is no copyin()
or uiomove() there.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
to the
outside box and let PPP take care of the default route. The outside
box should run natd or ipnat unless you have a spare IP address you
can use for the PPP link.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
Seth Kingsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not remove it after using it to restore the mixer state? It would
only exist to survive a reboot.
You'd have to reset everything manually after a crash.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The recently added cvsweb.FreeBSD.org vhost makes me think we could also
have one pointing to the PR database (/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi), for
example, bugs.FreeBSD.org as the subject of this mail suggests.
Yes, please.
DES (Bugmeister)
--
Dag-Erling
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There exists a patch for adding a mode to our floppy driver to
add DEC RX50 media handling.
Clearly a job for Jessem, don't you think? :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Rafter Man [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2. I hope that in the furture the FreeBSD developers will rewrite
the system in C++.
You need to have your head examined.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
-traditional?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
May I remind you that KR-style declarations have been deprecated for
the last 14 years?
Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were
still supported.
6.11.5
Valentin Nechayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read
as unsupported.
I didn't use the word unsupported, I said deprecated.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL
Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello. I am trying to write a monitoring program
which makes use of the kvm interface.
procfs is significantly less evil, if you can get the information you
require from it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
) p *adp
Cannot access memory at address 0x68c040.
(kgdb) p *atadev
$4 = {channel = 0xc075b600, unit = 16, name = 0xc04503b0 ad1, param = 0x0,
driver = 0x0, flags = 0, mode = 0, cmd = 0, result = 0x0}
ad_attach() is trying to dereference atadev-param, which is NULL.
DES
--
Dag-Erling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm writing some graphics code (just for fun) and I need legal access to
the memory addresses below 1 mb.
You can't access the framebuffer directly in FreeBSD like you can in
DOS. Take a look at libvgl ('man vgl').
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How exactly would I go about increasing KVM?
Read the FAQ.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
it just fine, and attaches it as a
ulpt device, it fails to print (the process that tries to write to
/dev/ulpt0 just hangs). I'll see if I can figure out a way to force
the ulpt driver to bind to 7/1/2.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c,v
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -r1.50 ulpt.c
--- sys/dev/usb/ulpt.c 30 Oct 2002 01:18:58 - 1.50
+++ sys/dev/usb
the announcement again. FreeBSD 5.x will still have DoC support,
which means you have at least two years to grow tired of it before we
stop putting out 5.x releases. By that time you will hopefully have
realised it is a dead-end technology and switched to something that
works.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also the GNU grep has a lot more options, the most interesting
of them being -r.
Unfortunately, GNU grep's -r option is broken (it does not handle
symnlinks correctly). Try textproc/freegrep from ports instead.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL
in it.
This is an oft-requested feature, but I'm not sure how best to implement
it.
Look up the -I option in the diff(1) man page.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
reason why you don't use cmp instead of diff
on line 815?)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
additional information about memory maps etc. from procfs.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is OSVERSION num right after OpenPAM implemented?
What problem are you trying to solve?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
whether the system
runs Linux-PAM or OpenPAM, you've fixed it wrong.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
will be a right one?
I can't tell you unless you show me what you believe needs fixing.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Sergey Matveychuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What a right way escape from PAM_CONV_AGAIN/PAM_TRY_AGAIN and relate code
from LINUX_PAM?
Shoot the module author for using it, and Andrew Morgan (Linux-PAM
author) for inventing it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe
, then modifies its contents in the
setcred phase (which only occurs if authentication was successful).
The destructor would register success or failure in a database
depending on whether the object was modified before release. The
exact nature of that database is not important.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav
directly via getenv() etc, those would not be
too late.
It wouldn't be too late for loadable modules...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
in the list that has a lower address than c0174830.
How do you build your kernels - 'make buildkernel' or manually?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
?
Always make buildkernel. I have a debug kernel built as well
(makeoptions DEBUG=-g)
That's what I wanted to know.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you very much, I will do so as soon as I get the dump. BTW,
could the act of giving the wrong params to dumpon cause the crash ?
No, it wouldn't.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
of two.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In any case, doesn't the name imply that it's 31-bits...
Yes, it's a bad name.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
/kern_conf.c:207
These numbers look perfectly valid (cuaia0). The only explanation I
can think of is some kind of race, or some kind of corruption.
Hopefully somebody more clued than myself will be able to figure it
out.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
on periodic that it
dies and find is always the process running. Its only with SMP as well
on this 'oldish' machine
Hmm, it would be great to know what process was running when it
crashed. Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that post-KSE...
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
down to -STABLE yet.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
just a front-end to the ata system?
No, it's completely device independent.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
signal and core dumps. Can anyone give me a
clue how this is the case? Thanks!
The parent must either detach from the child, or wait for it to
terminate. See ptrace(2).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
of PT_TRACE_ME).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Zhihui Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 9 Feb 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
execve(2) in kern_exec.c posts SIGTRAP if the process has debugging
turned on (which it does as a result of PT_TRACE_ME).
This is one time thing. It will be catched by the first wait()
call in the parent
issues.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my ongoing attempt to get my PR's closed, here's the list
again. They are listed roughly in the order of difficulty.
Please send this to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hiten Pandya [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any In-Kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD, like there is
kHTTPD for Linux?
God forbid! Lots of hack value, sure, but not something you'd
seriously consider for production use.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
Thomas Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't functions like FreeBSD's zero-copy sendfile() provide similar
performance benefits without the massive security issues?
sendfile() isn't zero-copy, it's just two-less-copies.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
well .. So let's turn the question upside-down, and ask Is there a web
server or -accelerator for FreeBSD with similar performance as with khttpd
or Tux?
Have you tried thttpd or boa?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sendfile() isn't zero-copy, it's just two-less-copies.
zero-copy means zero copy-operations within memory
To an MCSE, maybe.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
brags about
being an MCSE and MCNE to understand that)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
. Believing that it's worth more than the
paper it's printed on, however, and bragging about it in an
open-source forum, raises serious questions about one's intellectual
acumen.
Now, a CCNE, on the other hand...
DES (neither of the above)
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
.
4. Why is it that some linux utilities, run inside a jail, get the
hostname of the host machine, and not the hostname of the jail itself?
It's a bug. It was fixed recently (in the last few days) in -CURRENT.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
just fine.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
des des0 Apr 10 16:16 bar
In my humble opinion, Solaris (and every other *nix) is broken in this
respect, and *BSD is correct.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Bogdan TARU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 10 Apr 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
In my humble opinion, Solaris (and every other *nix) is broken in this
respect, and *BSD is correct.
Except for OpenBDS. No NetBDS machine available, maybe some of you could
try it on one as well?
I don't
Bogdan TARU [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you also try the NetBDS's 'rm'? If it does work like FreeBDS, than
I really don't know what to believe anymore.
It doesn't, actually, it removes the symlink rather than the directory
it points at.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It looks like the following delta (submitted by Tim J. Robbins) may
fix it:
It looks correct to me, please commit (unless John has any
objections?)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
John Kozubik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can solve this problem by removing the setrlimit() call in postfix,
with the following patch:
s/solve/work around/
The correct *solution* would be to fix setrlimit().
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-hackers is not the appropriate forum for code review. The patch is
incorrect and should be backed out.
Never mind, I did it myself.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The general rule is including includes from includes is bad.
Okay, it's time to point out that these are opinions, not rules, and
differing opinions exist.
POSIX disagrees with you.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Peter Haight [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I link with libc_r can I use gethostbyname2() at the same time in two
different threads?
Use getaddrinfo() instead.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
trying mmap, and this lets me get to about
2.5 GB of memory (again I ask for the memory in small increments). What
is it that causes these limitations?
man limits, and see MAX{DSIZ,SSIZ} in NOTES.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Charles Sprickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 28 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
ad_attach() is trying to dereference atadev-param, which is NULL.
Is there any other info I can provide? I'll drive, you steer. :)
No, this is Søren's cup of tea, which is why I Cc:ed him.
DES
--
Dag
:)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
swap space to fsck the 130 MB volume, and the
system has 64 MB RAM. This was is 2.2.8 (haven't upgraded it yet).
I *really* hope you meant 130 GB and not 130 MB :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd
in the correct address range from /dev/kmem)
- port GGI to FreeBSD.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Kelly Yancey kby...@alcnet.com writes:
On 14 May 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
No, actually it has 1536 more pixels :) Mode Q is so named because the
frame buffer is a cube of sorts (i.e. 256x256 pixels in 256 colors)
Yeah, I've seen the DOS port of snes9x use that. I don't think it has
kernel address space is large
enough. The default in -CURRENT and recent versions -STABLE is 1 GB,
which should be enough for most (if not all) uses. The default for
3.1-RELEASE and -STABLE up to mid-April is 256 MB.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail
experienced sustained transfer rates in excess of 1 MBps on
a 10Base2 network, with FreeBSD 3.1 using an SMC based Kingston EtherX
(ISA PnP NE2000 clone thingamabob) in one end and a nondescript Linux
box in the other end.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send
-remembering a quote about some other app.
As I remember it, the quote referred to a noddy program used as an
example in a paper or lecture. Knuth had proven the program to be
correct, but had never actually compiled it.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Daniel C. Sobral d...@newsguy.com writes:
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
[...] but the hardest
part of the job - finding loop and type invariants and post- and
pre-conditions which the prover can use as starting points - must
still be done
Stan Shkolny s...@osgroup.com writes:
[...] (BTW, I found it very-very-VERY helpful
that I did it first under NT, since NT has kernel-mode debugger :-).
Oh, and FreeBSD doesn't?
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail
, or put so much magic in your drawing
function that it will bog down to something like 3 fps. And you can't
just look at your video_info_t and see that mode X is interlaced; you
have to *know* that you're running in mode X and that mode X is
interlaced.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d
I want to convert these kernel options to sysctl variables. Where
should they be inserted into the tree? I was thinking of creating a
new 'cam' top-level category and put them there:
cam.sa.space_timeout
cam.sa.rewind_timeout
cam.sa.erase_timeout
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d
.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
, and some of it is a complete replacement for the fetch(1)
command. The code and documentation (yes, Nik, I wrote docs!) is
available at URL:http://www.freebsd.org/~des/software/.
As usual, comments and patches are welcome.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Sheldon Hearn sheld...@uunet.co.za writes:
On 28 May 1999 10:29:44 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
I brushed the dust off a bunch of patches I had for libfetch and the
fetch(1) command and made a patchkit of them [...]
Your mail has brought to mind a question I've never managed to sort out
;
int c;
f = fetchPutURL(argv[1], NULL);
while ((c = fgetc(stdin)) != EOF)
fputc(c, f);
return 0;
}
Needless to say, this works with file: URLs as well.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
driver shortly before 3.2 which should have ironed out whatever
problems remained.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
at objcopy(1).
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
, the problem you're facing is a very common one, and is usually
solved by switching to a Real Mail User Agent (tm) which breaks lines
at 80 columns or less.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
, society will collapse, and I can take over
the world while everyone's distracted!
Yes, Bill, we love you too :)
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
201 - 300 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
