On 02/04/2013 08:48 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
Is the following page still useful?
Would there be any objection to me removing it?
http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html
We are still working on complex and long double functions.
___
On 09/17/12 11:14, Lorenzo Cogotti wrote:
Il 17/09/2012 17:42, Poul-Henning Kamp ha scritto:
In message blu0-smtp510b16745b704c714268e2d5...@phx.gbl, Lorenzo Cogotti writ
es:
Hi,
I was wondering about the possibility of FreeBSD to provide an official
supported graphical environment.
We
Find some mailing lists that have nothing to do with FreeBSD, and
barrage them with spam promoting FreeBSD.
:-)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 01/18/2012 06:57 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
Andriy writes:
And dealing with PRs is not always exciting.
Neither is brushing your teeth or cleaning the kitchen, but most of us
manage to do them at least occasionally. Part of being a grown up.
Instead of looking for a stick to hold over
I also build my ports in a jail environment (only its not a really a
jail, just a chroot).
After I have built the ports I want, I create the packages using the
following little script. (My mail client will have mangled the script,
so take care when you copy and paste it, e.g. it needs to be
Victor Sudakov wrote:
But to hell with this. I started the topic because I think something
is wrong with SVN to CVS export, which upsets cvsup and causes
Checksum mismatch errors. Is anybody willing to look at it?
I second Victor's request.
___
Doug Barton wrote:
I was not going to reply on this thread at all, but the amount of
random speculation has now reached a pathological level.
The spurious new line at the end of a file has nothing to do with svn,
it is an artifact of how the file was originally transferred to the
cvsup mirror.
I would like to introduce a program into the base called
screw-the-whole-system. It would do something like this:
while true; do \
echo Please wait while your system is being destroyed...
sleep 10
done
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger alexan...@leidinger.net [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
jul...@elischer.org wrote:
The purists won out in that one
RW wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0400
Chuck Robey chu...@telenix.org wrote:
I just had to see if I could locate if there was a gnome project page
by looking at the FreeBSD web pages. Why don't you try that
yourself? I'll tell you, it's really FAR from being obvious. I'm
just saying,
Nate Eldredge wrote:
int bangbang(int x) { return !!x; }
int ternary(int x) { return x ? 1 : 0; }
Stylewise, I prefer
int notzero(int x) { return x!=0; }
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
I notice that if you use malloc from within a signal handler on
FreeBSD-6.x, that you can potentially trigger a recursive call error.
But this seems to have changed in FreeBSD-7.x.
Is it now permissible to call malloc from within a signal handler in
FreeBSD-7.x?
If so, should the man page
Jingshao Chen wrote:
Hi,
Since you have been unix admin for a few years, I guess you probably have
some experience with C programming. This book is more advanced, but it
is a really good one.
Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment: Paperback Edition (2nd Edition)
Lothar Braun wrote:
What about having two utilities for the installation process? Something
like a very small (non-gui/non-X) version of sysinstall that just
installs a base system and only has the functionality to
- partition/label a disk
- configure the network (if needed for installation)
I want to use getrusage to see how much time a program is using. But
this is a multithreaded program, and I just want the time taken by that
particular thread!
I know this info must be available somewhere, because top -H seems to
provide it. But getrusage seems to give the total rusage for
Sergey Babkin wrote:
I want to use getrusage to see how much time a program is using. But
this is a multithreaded program, and I just want the time taken by that
particular thread!
I know this info must be available somewhere, because top -H seems to
provide it. But getrusage seems to give
Rob Lytle wrote:
Hi Kevin,
The sysinstall dependency problem has existed for 10 years, so I doubt that
its unique to me. It has occurred in every installation I have ever done.
I use portupgrade for all ports.
i strongly disagree with using ports for huge packages. I don't have the
time to
Rob Lytle wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Lytle wrote:
Hi Kevin,
The sysinstall dependency problem has existed for 10 years, so I doubt
that
its unique to me. It has occurred in every installation I have ever done.
I use
On the whole, I rather like the installation process for FreeBSD.
Generally what I really like about FreeBSD is the ease of system
administration, and whenever I use Linux distributions I get rather
frustrated.
If, as the OP suggests, installation of packages from the FreeBSD CD's
requires
top doesn't get TIME right for threaded processes. How about this small
change:
--- usr.bin/top/machine.c-orig 2008-06-12 23:06:08.0 -0500
+++ usr.bin/top/machine.c 2008-06-12 23:06:51.0 -0500
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
prev_pp = pp;
}
Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering ... I have (I think) nvidia working on my box, or at least,
I am calling out the nvidia driver in the xorg.conf, but I was wondering if
there is any program that only works with the nvidia hardware, some way I
can
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by better
distributing workloads over CPU pools. This is important because the number
of
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Kip Macy wrote:
I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
Linux beat FreeBSD hands down -
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11
-0500):
I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me.
After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then
made a bunch of other ports
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11
-0500):
I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me.
After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then
made a bunch of other ports
If you pkg_delete -f a package and then install the port again (but
after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that
require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently messes up
programs like portmanager. There is a sense in which one should never do
Robert Noland wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
If you pkg_delete -f a package and then install the port again (but
after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that
require the original port will be incorrect. This apparently
I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me.
After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then
made a bunch of other ports, if you go back to the original port and
then do make package, then +CONTENTS can be a bit messed up for the
package.
Jack L. wrote:
On 6/24/07, Martin Turgeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I recently installed AMD64 6.2 Release on 2 PowerEdge servers, both with
dual core Xeon (3070 and 5110). I noticed when I was updating the
sources that it was compiling as an Athlonxp by default. I was wondering
if I should
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS I'm looking at pkg_install and pkg_version mostly, but I'll be looking
into the other package utilities closely in the next couple weeks, evaluating
what approaches I should take in solving some bottlenecks with installing
packages and ports.
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-May-27 16:12:54 -0700, Bakul Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given the size and complexity of the port system I have long
felt that rather than do everything via more and more complex
Mk/*.mk what is is
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
Having done a great deal of rewriting of make some two years ago I can
tell you that even a small change to make is a tough job testing-wise:
run all the combinations of !-j and -j N on all architectures and run
the change through the port-building cluster. That's a
Ivan Voras wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for make
index and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls make -V PKGNAME for every installed package. Now
make -V PKGNAME should be a speedy
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for make
index and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls make -V PKGNAME for every installed
On Mon, 28 May 2007, David Naylor wrote:
On Monday 28 May 2007 03:43, you wrote:
Maybe I should look at the inner workings of cmake and gmake. Maybe
they have some good ideas. However having looked through the source
code of make, and also looking at the cvs logs, it does seem to be well
Roman Divacky wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for make
index and pkg_version
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for make
index and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls make -V PKGNAME for every installed package.
Now make -V PKGNAME should be a speedy operation, but the make has to
load in and analyze
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith said:
I suggest rewriting make so that variables are only evaluated on a
need to know basis.
or I have tried to do this.
Of course a lot of people have thinked about it, and quickly realized
that it was not going
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for make
index and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls make -V PKGNAME for every installed
I'm looking for something that will work with the existing framework.
But yes, I get the feeling that maybe using make to process the ports
might be the source of the problem. Make is a program primarily
designed for figuring out which was made first, the target or the
source, but in the
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
Hello all,
I am writing a mouse device driver for my Wacom tablet (Intuos 2 9x12).
The tablet comes with a mouse and I managed to get valid coordinate data
from the device. However, unlike usual mice, the
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
Hello all,
I am writing a mouse device driver for my Wacom tablet (Intuos 2 9x12).
The tablet comes with a mouse and I managed to get valid
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 30), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
An unprivileged user could waste all CPU time by setting a low delay
value in top (interactive or via -s).
Are you sure? In 6.2 at least, s0 in interactive mode results in a
1-second delay, and top -s0 prints
top:
Matthew Hudson wrote:
Mon Dec 11 09:08:37 PST 2006 c0re dumped wrote:
I wonder if is possible to read data from a
certain file without using a pipe.
Let me explain:
I have a process already writing messages to
a logfile. I want to read all written data
(without neither stop nor interfere
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M. L. Dodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On a computational chemistry list I subscribe to there is a
: current thread about multi-cpu systems needing to have the cpu
: frequencies synced (this is in a Linux context). This is
:
Clifton Royston wrote:
I'm soon to build myself a new AMD X2 workstation system on which I
plan to multiboot various operating systems including FreeBSD, a couple
Linux distros and probably Windows XP Pro, and probably also run
virtualization software (VMWare and/or Xen.) I'm hoping for it to
might
have hesitation over Vol 2, but only because it covers stuff that you
might not need.
He writes extremely well.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
John Baldwin wrote:
There is a problem in the kernel that causes with 3 or more processors
(including logical CPUs from HTT). Disabling HTT in the BIOS is probably
your best bet as it will get you down to 2 CPUs which should work much
better. HTT also isn't but so useful anyways for most
Simon Burke wrote:
Whener i try to install openoffice 1.1 from ports after several hours
of compiling etc, i get the following error message.
Is openoffice 1.1 port broken? or is it me?
Im running 5.3R and i've cvsuped ports to get gnome 2.8 running which went fine.
Any ideas?
I once had problems
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one to my computer, which came with a Maxtor 6Y080L0. My main
disk intensive operation
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one to my
the FreeBSD docs were better at explaining how it worked.)
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
is
not defined anywhere. It looks to me like netinet/ip.h is broken.
What is it that you need netinet/ip.h for? Maybe there are some other include
files that would work just as well.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
as well.
Sorry - it is I who is the complete idiot. Please totalyl ignore my last post.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
that this file is ready for
reading. In essence, calling select will always say that a file is ready for
reading, and calling select serves no purpose.
Well I definitely learned something.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
choices?
I would say, use select(2).
Is there a reason this wouldn't work?
-- Josh
Either select(2) or poll(2) should work.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
.
- Remove ext2 support (GPL encumbered).
Remove ffs support also (BSD license encumbered).
- Add perl 5.8 *and* python 2.2 to base.
I agree - perl makes a perfect replacement for tar.
- Remove Sendmail and replace it with Postfix.
I prefer USPS.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
/query-pr.cgi?pr=20352
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
nanosleep won't work).
I looked at the man pages, but all I could find was runtime which seems
only to be accessible from the kernel.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
It looks like exactly what I want.
Thanks.
Sergey Lyubka wrote:
Would getrusage() help ?
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
How do I do the following:
1) Find out how much time a program has currently consumed in computer
time (something like what
, 0) != -1
boottime.tv_sec != 0) {
uptime = now - boottime.tv_sec;
+ uptime += 5;
if (uptime 60)
uptime += 30;
days = uptime / 86400;
(Sorry, couldn't resist it.)
--
Stephen Montgomery
takes place, but
I have no idea what to make of it.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
fprintf(stderr,Filling a[%d]\n,j);
for(i=0;isize;i++) a[j][i] = i;
fprintf(stderr,Done\n);
}
while(1){} /* so the program doesn't stop and stays at the top of top
*/
}
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: cc -o test test.c -pthread -D_THREAD_SAFE
:
: or am I misunderstanding something?
Ah, yes. -D_THREAD_SAFE is technically needed.
I am curious - what are the possible
, but that was changed to -pthread in 4.0.
Warner
According to the man page for gcc, you are supposed to write
cc -o test test.c -pthread -D_THREAD_SAFE
or am I misunderstanding something?
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
John Baldwin wrote:
On 07-Jan-02 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
You know, I have no idea. It is someone elses code. These are the
instructions. Can anyone tell me?
movl 32(%0),%1\n
adcl %1,32(%0)\n
Also, from
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2002 at 12:02:03PM -0600 I heard the voice of
Stephen Montgomery-Smith, and lo! it spake thus:
I want to create a Makefile for a C program that includes some Pentium
II specific inline assembler code. How do I tell the compiler whether
we
#ifdef i686
But arch doesn't exist on FreeBSD.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020104 12:02] wrote:
I want to create a Makefile for a C program that includes some Pentium
II specific inline assembler code. How do I tell the compiler whether
we are compiling on a i686?
For Linux, I can do
thread without suspending the whole process?
I can not use sleep or usleep can I?
TIA
Arjan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
particular problem, for example
pthread_cond_timedwait
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Thanks everyone for exellent answers - I learned something from every
single email I received in response.
Thanks, Stephen
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have written a server program that listens on port 3000. The program
works very well except for one feature. I am asking
(servaddr);
arg = malloc(sizeof(arg_pass_type));
arg-connfd = accept(listenfd,(struct sockaddr*)servaddr,slen);
arg-addr = servaddr.sin_addr;
arg-port = servaddr.sin_port;
pthread_create(tid,NULL,process_client,(void*) arg);
}
exit(0);
}
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL
the whole computer.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
PROTECTED]
fprintf(stderr,..) will print stuff when ncurses is running.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
in the body of the message
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Jim.Pirzyk Exp $
__o [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_'\,_ Senior Systems Engineer, Walt Disney Feature Animation
(*)/ (*)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL
in handling low order bits can be
significant.
You could check this out by trying the following
double x,y;
x = 53.278500;
y = exp(x);
for(i=0;isizeof(double);i++)
printf(%d ,((unsigned char*)y)[i]);
printf(\n);
or something like that.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
it is
supposed to handle? Looking at man math it says it should handle
numbers as large as 1.8e308 - we certainly are not in that range!!!
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers
, Mathematica, which is Linux binary running under emulation,
gets the answers correct.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
exp(54) = 160.331128 is way way wrong, by orders of magnitude.
Sorry - programming error - I forgot to change gamma back to exp.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Same for gamma(53.27850) = 157.464664.
Figured out this problem. gamma is returning the result of lgamma.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
won't compile in Red-Hat Linux.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Matt's performance manpage covers a lot of this, but is probably not as
easy to digest as an interactive script.
What do I type to read this man page?
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail
as to how this is proceeding on a day by day basis
should be distributed widely. But I do hope that when beta versions
are available that this info will also be widely distributed.
Also, maybe Munish could send his announcement to the comp.unix.bsd.freebsd
newsgroups.
--
Stephen Montgomery
before
any kernel message :/ Is there anything to check in order to know if I
can use a config instead of a config -r ? If using a config without the
-r option is dangerous, I think it shouldn't be the default. Is it the
case ?
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
Department of Mathematics
90 matches
Mail list logo
