/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204190
As well as this mailing list, you can find me on EFNet #bsdports and
Freenode #freebsd-ports.
Thank you very much.
-=david=-
--
I prefer encrypted and signed messages. KeyID: B20A22F9
Fingerprint: 110A F423 3647 54E2 880F ADAD 1C52 85BF B20A 22F9
"It i
ved
the offending file; I was then able to install devel/py-pyparsing without
issue.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/pu
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 08:51:35AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I suspect that there's something fairly fundamental that I'm missing,
> that I have something misconfigured (that hasn't shown up in the
> biweekly poudriere runs I've been doing since 19 July), or th
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 08:51:35AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> So: Is poudriere actually failing to build a package because an
> installed port on the package-building system doesn't meet the
> configuration requirements of the package to be built?
>
> That d
_READ=off: File is read directly from disk
EXTENSION=off: Allow loadable extensions
So: Is poudriere actually failing to build a package because an
installed port on the package-building system doesn't meet the
configuration requirements of the package to be built?
Th
:-}
(And the "poudriere bulk" run completed with an exit status of 0. :-})
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~da
for most of yesterday, and I'm presently 3 hours east of
my "home time zone" -- it's at least plausible that I've overlooked
a "heads up" or that I've failed to take appropriate evasive action
about something, so I thought I'd rather look a bit silly th
TING entry.
> I'll add portmaster to the list, as it seems it's getting confused too. (It
> did not in my testing.)
Ah, well -- you tried. :-}
Thanks for your help!
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who would m
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:39:00AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:27:12AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > The issue was not having default_versions set per the updating entry.
> >
>
> Oddly enough, "pkg updating" did not dis
" daily (after updating my ports working copy).
Between those activities, I invoke "pkg updating -d ...", specifying
"yesterday's" date, in an effort to ensure that I don't miss anything.)
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:39:10AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> I can't speak (write) for Larry, but something quite similar just
> happened to me during my daily "portmaster -ad" run after building &
> booting:
>
On closer examination, it
.0_4 as automatic
Installing perl5-5.22.0_4...
pkg-static: perl5-5.22.0_4 conflicts with perl5.22-5.22.0_4 (installs files
into the same place). Problematic file:
/usr/local/share/licenses/perl5-5.22.0_4/catalog.mk
*** Error code 70
Stop.
make[2]: stopped in /common/ports/lang/perl5.22
*** Er
ess point. I do not trust wireless access
to be secure, so that network is separate from my internal "trusted"
network. Access from the wireless (or "guest") network to the trusted
network is restricted to ssh, DNS, HTTP(S), rsync (to the build
machine only) and ping. [ssh authenti
name of the form 'perl5.XY' -- so
> in my repo, I have:
>
> % pkg search -x perl5
> perl5-5.22.0_2
> perl5.20-5.20.2_6
>
> ie 5.22 is the default version but I also have a (basically useless)
> perl5.20 package.
>
Huh; interesting: thanks. I may poke at tha
tems was their conversion from i386 to amd64 (and
the daunting prospect of rebuilding all of those ports -- and having
the machines' services disabled during that period. (I documented that
experience in
<http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/convert_i386_amd64.html>.)
I have since co
han trusting the value of PORTSDIR from
> /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk.
> ....
Thank you, Bryan! :-)
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisk
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:59:40AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> Further, I encountered a similar symptom (as described above re: the
> portmaster whine) on my build machine, running:
> ...
>
> And in this case, I was thinking of doing the Perl upgrade, so:
>
> S
net/howland/c/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg failed
===>>> Aborting update
Script done on Tue Sep 1 04:10:14 2015
In this case, /etc/make.conf is:
freebeast(10.2-S)[11] cat /etc/make.conf
SENDMAIL_MC=/etc/mail/client.mc
SENDMAIL_ADDITIONAL_MC= /etc/mail/bastion.mc /etc/mail/catwhisker
&& \
date && \
mv /usr/include{,.old} && \
date && \
rm -fr /usr/share/man && \
date && \
make installworld && \
date && \
mergemaster -F -U -u 0022 -i && \
date && \
make delete-old && \
date &&am
On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:18:59AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> Full typescript available in
> <http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/firefox/>.
>
> Summary: Daily installed-ports update (using portmaster) on laptop running:
> ...
> I have my build machine working
Full typescript available in
<http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/firefox/>.
Summary: Daily installed-ports update (using portmaster) on laptop running:
FreeBSD g1-245.catwhisker.org 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #113
r286399M/286408:1002500: Fri Aug 7 04:06:39 PDT 2015
rprints match.
Looks as if the relevant option (on the port) is:
ETCSYMLINK=off: Add symlink to /etc/ssl/cert.pem
Apparently I had that on at one point (perhaps it was a default), as:
g1-245(10.2-P)[7] ls -lT /etc/ssl/cert.pem
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 Feb 12 13:17:49 2015 /etc/ssl/cert.pem ->
/u
On Wednesday, 29 July 2015 09:06:40 Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 07:46:14AM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bart??omiej Rutkowski wrote:
> > > I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 22:05:54 Bartłomiej Rutkowski wrote:
> I've checked how linux does it and it seems they're (at least Debian)
doing
> static linking - that would fix the issue, whatever it is. Can you adjust
> the port to do the static instead of dynamic linking binary?
```
# cd /usr/loca
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 17:08:37 Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 7/28/15 11:46 AM, David Naylor wrote:
> > Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path
but not
> > when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
>
> What is the output for readelf?
&
.9 (0x806012000)
libncurses.so.8 => /lib/libncurses.so.8 (0x806224000)
```
Why would the shared library be found when using a relative path but not
when using an absolute path? Is this a bug in FreeBSD?
Regards
David
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
10 i386 -> stable/10 amd64 [gory
details at
<http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/FreeBSD/convert_i386_amd64.html>].
Based on my experiences doing those, I *think* that using that procedure
as a basis (and adapting in slightly) may serve you well. (Note that as
of this writing, that procedure
Hi all,
I *just* stumbled across this. Apparently a couple people have picked
up from Almy's work with tecoc and this is a live project again. The
new upstream is here:
https://github.com/blakemcbride/TECOC
I assume they're fixing bugs, which alas, *did* exist. ;-)
--
David Benfell
end to pay all that much attention to vbox.)
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpyS4ADTtGMA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ieved is
that for virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.3.20; perhaps you have a configuration
option selected that is no longer supported? In any case, reviewing
your selected options would seem reasonable; possibly jsut re-running
the port configuration and re-trying?
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgptMg85M9ATB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:36:05PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 2015/07/03 14:01, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> vuxml currently states that netpbm versions /less than/ 10.35.96 are
> vulnerable, and has done since about 48h ago.
H
> Given that the latest available ve
xistence of the vuxml
entry for this port under these circumstances. Rather, it was merely
annoying and disruptive, for no gain whatsoever. There wasn't even an
UPDATING entry to warn a person about what was going on.
So... what am I missing? How is a vuxml entry for ports/grap
olved.
Yes, redmine port is very fragile and breaks often. I also submitted
lots of PR for it. Is your Gemfile modified or is it the default?.
--
David Demelier
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
re, after removing 'CPUTYPE?=prescott' SOLVED a problem!
That's weird, but do you really need OSSv4 from ports? Your sound card
isn't supported by default FreeBSD drivers?
Regards,
David.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
the
port to 2.0 (or making them choose to stick with 2.1) is anything other than
retrograde.
With best wishes,
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &qu
rs that the test for the existence of the LICENSE file
is in error.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpo7U_zyGZD3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
sages and the
evidence that they were signed by their auhors.
Thanks in advance; I'm happy to summarize private responses.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Those who murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous cowards.
See http:/
uilt world (in this
case, stable/10 i386 @r283359), and assuming(!) that things look
OK, proceed with the "portmaster -ad" -- but that little whimper
about emulators/wine-compholio seems a bit ... inauspiciious.
So... am I supposed to be taking some sort of evasive action (e.g.
"
Yeah, this was 282802 ( so < 282808 ) … i’ve updated and its seems to be past
this point now.
Took awhile, because I was fighting some zpool corruption on the builder host.
Thanks.
-
David P. Discher
http://davidpdischer.com/
AIM: DavidDPD | Y!M: daviddpdz
> On May 14, 2015, at 5:57 P
ror code 1
Stop.
make: stopped in /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg
>> Cleaning up wrkdir
===> Cleaning for pkg-1.5.2
build of ports-mgmt/pkg ended at Fri May 15 00:31:57 UTC 2015
build time: 00:01:53
!!! build failure encountered !!!
-
David P. Discher
http://davidpdischer.com/
A
Hi,
I was wondering when version 3.0.2 of MongoDB is going to be ready?
Thanks in advance.
- David S.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-
thing anyway (merges without
fast-forward, so you end up with a tangled history), so (after the initial
setup) the steps that I use for merging pull requests from GitHub projects are
very similar (locally pull the branch with fast-fordward, test, pus
buzz
===>>> Aborting update
===>>> Update for print/harfbuzz failed
===>>> Aborting update
Cutting out a fair bit of trial and erro, it turns out that
devel/glib20 needed to be (re-)built in order for print/harfbuzz
to build successfully.
To test this, when it c
led) and there I get
this:
$ pkg -v
1.4.99.13
In a jail on the same machine without the make.conf entry, I get the stable
version. This is how I've been testing pkg-devel for a while. Is there a
different recommended way?
David
___
freebs
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 06:33:38AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> FreeBSD g1-240.catwhisker.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #1452
> r277722M/277745:1001506: Mon Jan 26 05:37:52 PST 2015
> r...@g1-240.catwhisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY i386
>
&g
applicable any more; remove it." -- but it's not there to
remove:
g1-240(11.0-C)[14] ls files/
patch-partial-reservation pkg-message.in
g1-240(11.0-C)[15]
So I'm a bit perplexed.
(I only have emulators/wine-compholio as a dependency for
emulators/pipeli
It really needs to be well
> documented.
> ...
build(7) has it.
(I confess that I didn't recall this, nor it it just "magically occur"
to me. Rather, brute force works again:
grep -Zwr PORTS_MODULES /usr/share/man/man*
Ugly, perhaps, but effective. :-})
Peace,
david
--
Da
bove, I suspect that the fact that I have the line:
PORTS_MODULES=x11/nvidia-driver
in /etc/src.conf has a fair amount of (positive) influence on that.
(I track stable/10 & head -- on different slices -- daily on my laptop.)
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill d
debugging information to provide or what I
might be doing wrong.
Thanks !
-
David P. Discher
http://davidpdischer.com/
AIM: DavidDPD | Y!M: daviddpdz
Mobile: 408.368.3725
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
; to revert to
security/gnupg20.
* I re-tried using mutt to read the encrypted message; it still failed
for me in the same way.
* In ~/.gnupg, I moved aside the new *.gpg files and moved my old ones
into place.
* I re-tried using mutt to read the encrypted message; it still f
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 07:49:34AM -0600, Corey Halpin wrote:
> On 2014-11-20, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> > Then, a few minutes ago, I tried to retrieve a password from one of my
> > saved encrypted messages... only to be informed "Could not copy
> > message
n: Web audio support
WEBGL=on: Enable Web GL support
===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings
localhost(10.1-S)[11]
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwh
S)[2] echo $?
0
localhost(10.1-S)[3]
Thanks again... I'll update the PR.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgp5DIX9mgiLF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nging in a new port only if gpg2 isn't
> > already available?
> >
>
> Have you tried to do "make && make install" in the pipelight port directory?
> I think that the port system would consider the dependency resolved if it
> finds the file.
> ....
I
t the time of this
writing, I had flipped the laptop to boot from a different slice,
where I am performing my daily update of head.]
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpos53apNtj0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
just "svn revert -R /usr/ports/net" -- and didn't have further problems
for today's update.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgppqxVghpJ_y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ports/security
svn revert -R p5-IO-Socket-SSL
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpBzfvimvz4U.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ase-c6-6.6_1
Upgrade of linux-c6-devtools-6.6 to linux-c6-devtools-6.6_1
Script done on Wed Dec 3 05:26:58 2014
So it got emulators/linux_base-c6 done anyway... but using a different
sequence of operations than originally specified.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpeiVwuXM0GK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:02:45PM +0100, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> ...
> > > Any hint?
> > >
> >
> > Please read ports/UPDATING entry 20141127; its advice may well be
> > relevant.
>
> Thanks David for the hint, but I'm not sure that it app
sr/ports/cad/opencascade/work/stage/usr/local/OpenCAS/custom.sh):
> > No such file or directory
> > *** [fake-pkg] Error code 74
>
> Any hint?
>
Please read ports/UPDATING entry 20141127; its advice may well be
relevant.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill
t; command
requires a path specification (e.g., the port that's causing trouble for
you).
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Actions have consequences ... as do inactions.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public
05:56:29 2014 libintl.a
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Nov 30 05:56:29 2014 libintl.so@ ->
libintl.so.8.1.2
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16 Nov 30 05:56:29 2014 libintl.so.8@ ->
libintl.so.8.1.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 45347 Nov 30 05:56:29 2014 libintl.so.8.1.2
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12
rly situated know.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Taliban: Evil cowards with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpQd4B2z5ReY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
The 2014Q4 ports tree has been doing very well with getting security
updates in a more timely fashion.
It seemed worthwhile to point out that that hard (and tedious) work is
being noticed and (much!) appreciated.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org ma
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 03:27:37PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I am not at all clear how to perform a migration of machines that
> run authoritative nameservers from FreeBSD 9.x -> 10.x, given the
> current setup of the dns/bind99 port. I'm hoping for some clues,
> if no
ot;
^
1 error generated.
*** Error code 1
...
(Yes, I'll plan on updating the PR, after I flip back to stable/9; I've
needed to run "service netif restart wlan0" way too many times while
trying to write email while running head on my laptop.)
Peace,
david
--
David
gt; make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 1213: UNAME_r (11.0-CURRENT) and
> OSVERSION (1000510) do not agree on major version number.
> ...
You could set the environment variable UNAME_r (e.g., to "10.0-STABLE")
prior to the "make" invocation.
Peace,
david
--
David
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:32:53PM +0300, Christos Chatzaras wrote:
> Will the pkg_* tools removed in a later FreeBSD release?
>
They have been (as of stable/10 somewhat prior to r271011, as well
as head, of course).
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill
Hi Tom,
On Monday, 1 September 2014 22:24:57 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I read something about two days on www.freshports.org about wine and
> i386-wine that alters my plans.
>
> I tried to build i386-wine from i386 with the idea of using it both from
> i386 and amd64, in the latter case mounting th
release. If you're able to upgrade ports,
then upgrading the pkg port should not be an issue.
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Le 01/09/2014 11:27, Baptiste Daroussin a écrit :
Hi all,
The ports tree is now fully staged (only 2% has been left unstaged, marked as
broken and will be removed from the ports tree if no PR to stage them are
pending in bugzilla).
I would like to thank every committer and maintainers for thei
Hello,
When the quarterly ports trees were introduced, they were described as
including security, build, and runtime fixes for 3 months.
This is a great idea, and with 2014Q2 it seemed to work pretty well.
However, it doesn't seem like 2014Q3 is getting security fixes.
For example, the openssl p
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 07:06:17AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 06:47:52AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 06:40:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > ...
> > > Back on the original topic, I was able to
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 06:47:52AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 06:40:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > ...
> > Back on the original topic, I was able to get pkg-1.3.1 installed and
> > ...
>
> OK; I was able to simplify the process on m
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 06:40:27AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> Back on the original topic, I was able to get pkg-1.3.1 installed and
> ...
OK; I was able to simplify the process on my 2nd system:
* Update /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf (to remove to eduplicate alias
definition
ld port of ports-mgmt/pkg
without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER"
in your environment or the "make install" command line.
*** [check-already-installed] Error code 1
* cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg && make reinstall
Which seems to have made
ould normally be upgraded to that point before I start
messing with ports on them).
I'll be happy to provide any information about this that I can.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Taliban: Evil cowards with guns afraid of truth from a 14
xpected to be a routine upgrade.
How can I get back to working environments on these 3 systems (and,
ideally, proceed with updates to the 2 "production" systems without
breaking their abaility to have updated ports)?
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@cat
2... wait
up; that should have been there already. Making me wait while that's
re-fetched is ... not good: I'm trying to get this laptop updated before
I go in to work this morning OK; I found a local copy on another
machine.)
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill
Great news!
I've been running the 1.3 prereleases for a while, and aside from one hiccup in
the early alphas, it's been a very pleasant experience.
Thanks to all involved,
David
On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:42, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very please to ann
ocbook as I did this and still get the same error.
Many thanks,
Gary
On 22/07/2014 14:01, Wesley Shields wrote:
This comes up from time to time. I think most people solve it by
rebuilding docbook.
-- WXS
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:06:40AM +0200, David wrote:
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /us
Path: .
Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports
URL: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports/head
Relative URL: ^/head
Repository Root: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/ports
Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5
Revision: 362166
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: thierry
L
Could someone commit patch from PR 191408?
Thanks in advance,
Pierre [maintainer of these ports]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr
I've received the following removal notice for 2 ports for which, as a
maintainer, I submitted 2 weeks ago a PR to support staging.
So far, I got no news about my PR, nor my patch, nor my reply.
What did I miss in my PR? What is needed to get some generous soul to
commit my patch?
Thanks in adva
Hi there,
Should this port install using pkgng?
[root@NAS ~]# pkg info observium
pkg: No package(s) matching observium
FreeBSD NAS 10.0-STABLE FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE #1 r264363: Sat Apr 12 13:37:38 CST
2014 dhunt@NAS:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Thanks
David
Hi,
This should correct the symlink creation error.
Regards,
David
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> Good catch on the WITH_APACHEPORT, thats old pre new options hang over,
> switched to a straight else, as one or the other must be selected.
>
> Looks like
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 03:12:40PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:01:06 -0700
> David Wolfskill wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 02:56:18PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > So *now* what do I do to get an updatable system a
g actions were performed:
Upgrade of gdbm-1.11 to gdbm-1.11_1
Upgrade of apr-1.5.1.1.5.3 to apr-1.5.1.1.5.3_1
Upgrade of serf-1.3.5_1 to serf-1.3.6
...
===>>> Re-installation of subversion-1.8.9 complete
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill d
ring installation for subversion-1.8.9
Installing subversion-1.8.9... done
===>>> Re-installation of subversion-1.8.9 complete
So *now* what do I do to get an updatable system again??!?
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Taliban: Evil cowards with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpgJayQ9f8Xl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
lping out with the PR queue is welcome to
> join us in #freebsd-bugbusters on EFnet
After many years of calls for help in this, people like Peter and Eitan
actually did the (massive amount of) work required to move us to a modern
bug-tracking system and *now* you choose to get inv
, if there is sufficient demand
for it.
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
FYI.
Hi all!
I succeeded in compile NDOUtils 2.0 in FreeBSD 10 in the following way:
I needed NDOUtils 2.0 in order to work with Nagios 4 and after to install
Centreon.
# uname -rsmp
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE-p1 amd64 amd64
# fetch
http://sourceforge.net/projects/nagios/files/ndoutils-2.x/ndoutil
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:07 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> Try
>
> CHECK_CHANGED_OPTIONS=verbose
>
> in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.conf ?
Great suggestion, thanks!
With just one Haskell port, hs-text, here's what happens:
>> Calculating ports order and dependencies
>> Sanity checking the r
Whenever I build a ports list with Haskell modules in it, poudriere
insists on rebuilding those Haskell modules every time, claiming the
options have changed. The options haven't changed; it will happily
report this even if run twice in a row on a system with no other
activity in between:
>>
uot;df -i /tmp" is
likely to be helpful in diagosing what is actually the problem.
Peace
david
--
David H. Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org
Taliban: Evil cowards with guns afraid of truth from a 14-year old girl.
See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
pgpa9zbN2paTu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:49:22PM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:03:41 -0700 David Wolfskill wrote:
> > This is running on stable/9:
> > ...
> > Per the earlier UPDATING entry "20140416", I started a
> >
> > portmaster -d -r
o make wee bits of progress by permuting the ssequence
in which the list of ports to update is presented to portmaster --
but I'm not convinced that this is necessarily a good thing.
How may I get myself out of this mess?
Thanks
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill
Hello Sergey,
Steven's patch already contains the symlink bugfix :-)
Regards,
David
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> kindly provide a patch.
>
> --
> ozz
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:23:56PM +0200, David Keller wrote:
IR}/${PORTNAME}
Or even:
${LN} -s ${GEM_NAME} ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}/${GEMS_DIR}/${PORTNAME}
David
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 03:09:04AM -0500, Scot Hetzel wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Steven Hartland
>> wrote:
>
Hi Baptiste,
this is awesome news. I think this is very good process.
I got a question. From which FreeBSD branch is the latest and quarterly
build?
Since it can be affected by such things as update to new xorg when
default in stable/10, etc.
Because if the base is stable/10 it should be clear
201 - 300 of 1584 matches
Mail list logo
