On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 21:34, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>
> gitup walks the destination tree (ie /usr/ports), hashing every file
> it finds (by reading the complete file into memory). Whilst the
> default gitup configuration ignores /usr/ports/packages and
> /usr/ports/distfiles, it
On 10 Apr 2021, at 19:34, Peter Jeremy via freebsd-ports
wrote:
> On 2021-Apr-01 22:36:02 +1100, Trev wrote:
>
> One consequence is that gitup is unusable
> on small memory environments - in my case, I saw peak memory usage hit
> 5GB (though the largest file I have is 1.8GB, so I'm not sure
On 2021-Apr-01 22:36:02 +1100, Trev wrote:
>> I just tried gitup and was told tha I had no permissions for
>> /var/db/gitup.
"sudo chown $USER /var/db/gitup" fixes that.
>I just tried gitup and it was killed after apparently exhausting my
>swap space. I had no such problem with portsnap :-(
Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
Sat Apr 3 20:35:46 UTC 2021 :
> * Mark Millard via freebsd-ports [20210403
> 10:02]:
> > Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
> > > There was an announcement to deprecate it, but it's still built with
> > > releng/13 so far, and I'd be
* Mark Millard via freebsd-ports [20210403 10:02]:
> Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
> > There was an announcement to deprecate it, but it's still built with
> > releng/13 so far, and I'd be surprised if the snapshots for it wouldn't
> > be available any more. Deprecation of portsnap
On 03/04/21 18:10, LuMiWa via freebsd-ports wrote:
It is not good. The last was I did red was "portsnap" stay still for
awhile. I am portsnap and portmaster user for years. Where should I
find information what will happened with /usr/ports. Will gitup just
replace, update? I am using FreeBSD
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:10:33PM -0400, LuMiWa wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:51:29 -0600
> The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
> > freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > > On
Felix Palmen felix at palmen-it.de wrote on
Fri Apr 2 22:49:58 UTC 2021 :
> * Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports [20210403
> 00:35]:
> > On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > but I use pkg/portsnap .
> > >
> > > How does that affect us?
> >
> > AFAIK you can't use it
On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 05:51:29 -0600
The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
> freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > > On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at
On 03/04/21 13:50, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200,
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:00:29PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >>> On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >> On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 02/04/21
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 06:23:00AM +0200, Helge Oldach wrote:
> The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST):
> > Git is ready,
>
> Is it?
>
> # git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
> Cloning into 'ports'...
> fatal: repository
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 11:01:18PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-Apr-2, at 20:24, The Doctor wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> >> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
> >>
On 03/04/21 11:28, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
Please install gitup and read it's man page, it's straight forward.
--
Guido Falsi
Results:
On 03/04/21 06:23, Helge Oldach wrote:
The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 23:16:53 +0200 (CEST):
Git is ready,
Is it?
# git clone -o freebsd https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git
Cloning into 'ports'...
fatal: repository 'https://git.freebsd.org/ports.git/' not found
#
Check
On 03/04/21 02:24, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200,
On 2021-Apr-2, at 20:24, The Doctor wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
>> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
>> following command:
>>
>> sed -e '/github.com/d' -e 's/freebsd\/freebsd-//g'
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 07:45:56AM +0600, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
> Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
> following command:
>
> sed -e '/github.com/d' -e 's/freebsd\/freebsd-//g' /usr/local/etc/gitup.conf
>
> then do `gitup ports`
>
> Kind Regards,
>
On 2021-Apr-2, at 18:20, The Doctor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:54:48PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
>>> Sat Apr 3 00:27:42 UTC 2021 :
>>>
>>> Results:
Once it is publicly mentioned that the conversion is completed run the
following command:
sed -e '/github.com/d' -e 's/freebsd\/freebsd-//g' /usr/local/etc/gitup.conf
then do `gitup ports`
Kind Regards,
Moin
> On 3 Apr, 2021, at 07:20, The Doctor via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 05:54:48PM -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote:
>
>
> On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard wrote:
>
> > The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
> > Sat Apr 3 00:27:42 UTC 2021 :
> >
> > Results:
> >
> >> gitup -v 1 ports
> >> # Host: github.com
> >> #
On 2021-Apr-2, at 17:41, Mark Millard wrote:
> The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
> Sat Apr 3 00:27:42 UTC 2021 :
>
> Results:
>
>> gitup -v 1 ports
>> # Host: github.com
>> # Port: 443
>> # Repository: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git
>> # Target: /usr/ports
>> gitup:
The Doctor doctor at doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote on
Sat Apr 3 00:27:42 UTC 2021 :
Results:
> gitup -v 1 ports
> # Host: github.com
> # Port: 443
> # Repository: /freebsd/freebsd-ports.git
> # Target: /usr/ports
> gitup: get_commit_details: refs/heads/master doesn't exist in
>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 02:05:45AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> >> On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via
On 03/04/21 01:35, The Doctor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On
On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 12:35:57AM +0200, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports
> > wrote:
> >> On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at
* Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports [20210403 00:35]:
> On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > but I use pkg/portsnap .
> >
> > How does that affect us?
>
> AFAIK you can't use it anymore. Use gitup. It's almost a drop-in
> replacement.
There was an announcement to deprecate
On 02/04/21 23:16, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
As a minor aside, has anyone stated
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:45:00PM +0200, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports wrote:
> On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>> As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base
>
Hi,
On 4/2/21 9:44 AM, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
Then the question is : Moving forward, how do we update
the ports?
There are a number of ways. You can use the prebuilt git package or one
of it's variants or substitutes. If you prefer to build git yourself,
you can use the
On 02/04/21 15:44, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
Hi!
As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base
or ports are moving to git?
Yes:
https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 08:55:00AM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base
> > or ports are moving to git?
>
> Yes:
>
> https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md
>
Then the question is : Moving
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:31:30 +0200 (CEST)
Ronald Klop wrote:
> I like pkg install git-tiny or git-lite so much more. If I
> install git I don't see why I need to install subversion as a
> dependency. And 50+ other direct or indirect dependencies.
Please note that packages are just build with
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:32:52PM +0200, Jimmy Renner wrote:
>
> Citerar Bob Eager :
>
> > On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:47:01 +1100
> > Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> >
> >> Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git
> >> commands that I need to function, in a manner similar to the way
On Fri, 2 Apr 2021 12:31:30 +0200 (CEST)
Ronald Klop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I like pkg install git-tiny or git-lite so much more. If I
> install git I don't see why I need to install subversion as a
> dependency. And 50+ other direct or indirect dependencies.
We might remove SVN from
Hi,
I like pkg install git-tiny or git-lite so much more. If I install git I
don't see why I need to install subversion as a dependency. And 50+ other
direct or indirect dependencies.
But gitup also helps for port users.
Regards,
Ronald.
Van: Mathieu Arnold
Datum: donderdag, 1 april
Hi!
> As a minor aside, has anyone stated the reason why the user-base of base
> or ports are moving to git?
Yes:
https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/git-why.md
--
p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372Now what ?
Mark Millard via freebsd-ports wrote on 2021/04/02 08:13:
>> On 4/1/21 6:04 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
>>> We have to learn by looking at such files. orz
>>> https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/File:Git-svn-cheatsheet.pdf
>>> [...]
>
> Be careful: Git-svn-cheatsheet.pdf is about how to use git
>
George Mitchell george+freebsd at m5p.com wrote on
Thu Apr 1 22:19:32 UTC 2021 :
> On 4/1/21 6:04 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
> > Dewayne Geraghty wrote on 2021/04/01 17:47:
> >> [...]
> >> Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git commands
> >> that I need to function, in a
On 4/1/21 6:04 PM, Tatsuki Makino wrote:
Dewayne Geraghty wrote on 2021/04/01 17:47:
[...]
Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git commands
that I need to function, in a manner similar to the way I use svnlite
use. Git equivalents for:
svnlite update /usr/ports
svnlite
Dewayne Geraghty wrote on 2021/04/01 17:47:
> On 1/04/2021 6:19 pm, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/git
>>
> Thanks Milan for bringing this to everyone's attention.
>
> Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git commands
> that I need to function, in a
On 01 Apr 2021, at 01:54, Milan Obuch wrote:
> This is unpleasant move for me. This means git or equivalent (and
> dependencies) must be installed on any box where tracking ports tree is
> planned/needed... and no tool like svnlite could be expected in base
> system for some time.
You only need
D'Arcy Cain wrote on 01/04/2021 22:08:
On 2021-04-01 4:55 a.m., Bob Eager wrote:
I got a partial answer. There is a port, net/gitup, that will do an
update of sorts. (Note: I was just told 'gitup' and there is an old
port, now renamed 'git-up', which is not the right one).
I just tried gitup
Citerar D'Arcy Cain :
On 2021-04-01 4:55 a.m., Bob Eager wrote:
I got a partial answer. There is a port, net/gitup, that will do an
update of sorts. (Note: I was just told 'gitup' and there is an old
port, now renamed 'git-up', which is not the right one).
I just tried gitup and was told
On 2021-04-01 4:55 a.m., Bob Eager wrote:
I got a partial answer. There is a port, net/gitup, that will do an
update of sorts. (Note: I was just told 'gitup' and there is an old
port, now renamed 'git-up', which is not the right one).
I just tried gitup and was told tha I had no permissions
Citerar Bob Eager :
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:47:01 +1100
Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git
commands that I need to function, in a manner similar to the way I
use svnlite use. Git equivalents for:
svnlite update /usr/ports
svnlite update
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 19:47:01 +1100
Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git
> commands that I need to function, in a manner similar to the way I
> use svnlite use. Git equivalents for:
>
> svnlite update /usr/ports
> svnlite update -r
On 1/04/2021 6:19 pm, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/git
>
Thanks Milan for bringing this to everyone's attention.
Would appreciate if anyone can provide insight as to the 4 git commands
that I need to function, in a manner similar to the way I use svnlite
use. Git
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:54:16AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:47:04 +0200, Mathieu Arnold
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > > Also, what about svn mirror, as is done for src repository, for 11
> > > and 12 branches at least? I
* Milan Obuch [20210401 09:54]:
> This is unpleasant move for me. This means git or equivalent (and
> dependencies) must be installed on any box where tracking ports tree is
> planned/needed... and no tool like svnlite could be expected in base
> system for some time.
If all you need is to keep
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:47:04 +0200, Mathieu Arnold
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > Also, what about svn mirror, as is done for src repository, for 11
> > and 12 branches at least? I did not tried it recently, but it used
> > to work. For some boxes,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 09:16:15AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Also, what about svn mirror, as is done for src repository, for 11 and
> 12 branches at least? I did not tried it recently, but it used to work.
> For some boxes, adding git to the mix would be big PITA.
There will be no Git to
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:35:11 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > The repo moved/is moving to git, so svn is no longer updated.
>
> > I did not catch any notice about the move. I know it was planned,
> > but not announcing actual move is... not that nice.
>
> The announcement was this
Hi!
> > The repo moved/is moving to git, so svn is no longer updated.
> I did not catch any notice about the move. I know it was planned, but
> not announcing actual move is... not that nice.
The announcement was this post, although it was maybe a bit terse
on the exact date:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 08:22:47AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> did somebody encountered this issue? I am using svn daily to update
> ports tree on some (maybe 15, exact number not important) boxes. No new
> updates today. I noticed it first actually yesterday afternoon or early
> evening,
On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:09:16 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > did somebody encountered this issue? I am using svn daily to update
> > ports tree on some (maybe 15, exact number not important) boxes. No
> > new updates today. I noticed it first actually yesterday afternoon
> > or early
On 1 Apr 2021, at 8:22, Milan Obuch wrote:
> did somebody encountered this issue? I am using svn daily to update
> ports tree on some (maybe 15, exact number not important) boxes. No new
> updates today. I noticed it first actually yesterday afternoon or early
> evening, but I did not consider
Hi!
> did somebody encountered this issue? I am using svn daily to update
> ports tree on some (maybe 15, exact number not important) boxes. No new
> updates today. I noticed it first actually yesterday afternoon or early
> evening, but I did not consider asking then.
The repo moved/is moving to
59 matches
Mail list logo
